Epidermolysis Bullosa: Pediatric Perspectives

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare congenital genetic conditions that result in painful blistering of the skin and mucous membranes, which occur with minor trauma or friction. There are many types and subtypes of EB that need to be distinguished, as the management and prognosis of each can vary significantly. We aim to perform an up-to-date literature review on congenital EB for healthcare providers in pediatrics. We performed a review of existing literature in the English language on EB via PubMed Clinical Queries, using key words such as "epidermolysis bullosa", "congenital" and "children". We reviewed EB based on the following subheadings: epidemiology, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and clinical prediction guidelines. EB is due to mutation in a number of genes, some types are autosomal dominant while others are autosomal recessive. The underlying mechanism is a defect in attachment between or within the epidermis and dermis of the skin. There are four main types: epidermolysis bullosa simplex, dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, junctional epidermolysis bullosa, and Kindler syndrome. The diagnosis is suspected based on symptoms and confirmed by skin biopsy and definitive genetic testing. The severity of EB can range from mild to fatal. Severe complications may arise in some EB types and subtypes within the eye, ear, nose, upper airway, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts. There is no cure for the condition to date. Optimal management must be multidisciplinary, and involves wound care, pain control, controlling infections, nutritional support, and prevention and treatment of complications. EB presents in different forms. Treatment is supportive. The prognosis of milder forms is good. Children severely affected with EB and their families live a misery life with impaired quality of life. Health care workers must be aware of the suffering in these families and proactively support them.

Inpatient management of children with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A review

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is a disorder marked by skin and mucosal blistering after minimal trauma. Even the most routine procedures in the hospital, if done incorrectly, can precipitate extensive skin loss, pain, and scarring. Most providers have little experience working with patients with this degree of skin fragility. When a person with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is admitted to the hospital, there are multiple considerations to keep in mind while strategizing an effective care plan: avoidance of new blisters with a "hands-off" approach; careful consideration of all indwelling devices; symptomatic management of pain, itch, and anxiety; coordination of dressing changes; aggressive treatment of skin infections; environmental and staffing considerations; and awareness of other chronic complications that affect care, such as anemia, malnutrition, and chronic pain. To minimize discomfort for patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa during the hospital stay, inpatient care teams should understand these considerations and modify the care plan accordingly. Prior preparation by the hospital facility and inpatient care team will facilitate the delivery of safe and effective care and greatly improve the overall patient experience.

Multicentre consensus recommendations for skin care in inherited epidermolysis bullosa

Background

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises a highly heterogeneous group of rare diseases characterized by fragility and blistering of skin and mucous membranes. Clinical features combined with immunofluorescence antigen mapping and/or electron microscopy examination of a skin biopsy allow to define the EB type and subtype. Molecular diagnosis is nowadays feasible in all EB subtypes and required for prenatal diagnosis. The extent of skin and mucosal lesions varies greatly depending on EB subtype and patient age. In the more severe EB subtypes lifelong generalized blistering, chronic ulcerations and scarring sequelae lead to multiorgan involvement, major morbidity and life-threatening complications. In the absence of a cure, patient management remains based on preventive measures, together with symptomatic treatment of cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations and complications. The rarity and complexity of EB challenge its appropriate care. Thus, the aim of the present study has been to generate multicentre, multidisciplinary recommendations on global skin care addressed to physicians, nurses and other health professionals dealing with EB, both in centres of expertise and primary care setting.

Methods

Almost no controlled trials for EB treatment have been performed to date. For this reason, recommendations were prepared by a multidisciplinary team of experts from different European EB centres based on available literature and expert opinion. They have been subsequently revised by a panel of external experts, using an online-modified Delphi method to generate consensus.

Results

Recommendations are reported according to the age of the patients. The major topics treated comprise the multidisciplinary approach to EB patients, global skin care including wound care, management of itching and pain, and early diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. Aspects of therapeutic patient education, care of disease burden and continuity of care are also developed.

Conclusion

The recommendations are expected to be useful for daily global care of EB patients, in particular in the community setting. An optimal management of patients is also a prerequisite to allow them to benefit from the specific molecular and cell-based treatments currently under development.

Fluoroscopically guided dilation of esophageal strictures in patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: long-term results

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate and long-term outcomes after fluoroscopically guided balloon dilation of esophageal strictures in a series of patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2011, the medical records of all patients with DEB treated with fluoroscopically guided balloon dilation of esophageal strictures were included in the study and retrospectively analyzed. The indication for treatment was dysphagia attributed to at least one radiologically verified esophageal stricture. The primary endpoints of the study included procedural technical success, clinical improvement assessed with a 0-4 dysphagia score, and major complication rate. Secondary endpoints were patient survival and reintervention rates.

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutively registered patients with DEB (age range, 10-51 years; mean, 30 ± 12.2 years) and dysphagia due to esophageal strictures were treated with fluoroscopically guided balloon dilation. In total, 90 procedures and 121 dilations were performed to manage 28 lesions. Balloon diameter ranged from 8 to 18 mm. The mean follow-up time was 47.51 ± 16.64 months (range, 17-73 months). The technical success rate was 96.7% (87/90). There were no major complications. The mean reintervention rate was 1.19 dilations per patient per year, and the postprocedural dysphagia score (0.72 [95% CI, 0.56-0.87]) was significantly lower than baseline (2.50 [95% CI 2.35-2.65]) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Repeated fluoroscopically guided balloon dilation is safe and effective for the management of dysphagia caused by esophageal strictures in DEB. Use of this technique was associated with marked clinical improvement in dysphagia and satisfactory long-term reintervention rates with no major complications.