Feasibility of Low-Dose and Low-Contrast Media Volume Approach in Computed Tomography Cardiovascular Imaging Reconstructed with Model-Based Algorithm

Aim: To evaluate the dose reduction and image quality of low-dose, low-contrast media volume in computed tomography (CT) examinations reconstructed with the model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithm in comparison with the hybrid iterative (HIR) one. Methods: We prospectively enrolled a total of 401 patients referred for cardiovascular CT, evaluated with a 256-MDCT scan with a low kVp (80 kVp) reconstructed with an MBIR (study group) or a standard HIR protocol (100 kVp-control group) after injection of a fixed dose of contrast medium volume. Vessel contrast enhancement and image noise were measured by placing the region of interest (ROI) in the left ventricle, ascending aorta; left, right and circumflex coronary arteries; main, right and left pulmonary arteries; aortic arch; and abdominal aorta. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were computed. Subjective image quality obtained by consensus was assessed by using a 4-point Likert scale. Radiation dose exposure was recorded. Results: HU values of the proximal tract of all coronary arteries; main, right and left pulmonary arteries; and of the aorta were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (p < 0.05), while the noise was significantly lower (p < 0.05). SNR and CNR values in all anatomic districts were significantly higher in the study group (p < 0.05). MBIR subjective image quality was significantly higher than HIR in CCTA and CTPA protocols (p < 0.05). Radiation dose was significantly lower in the study group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The MBIR algorithm combined with low-kVp can help reduce radiation dose exposure, reduce noise, and increase objective and subjective image quality.

Artificial intelligence-based opportunistic detection of coronary artery stenosis on aortic computed tomography angiography in emergency department patients with acute chest pain

Aims

To evaluate a deep-learning model (DLM) for detecting coronary stenoses in emergency room patients with acute chest pain (ACP) explored with electrocardiogram-gated aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) to rule out aortic dissection.

Methods and results

This retrospective study included 217 emergency room patients (41% female, mean age 67.2 years) presenting with ACP and evaluated by aortic CTA at our institution. Computed tomography angiography was assessed by two readers, who rated the coronary arteries as 1 (no stenosis), 2 (<50% stenosis), or 3 (≥50% stenosis). Computed tomography angiography was categorized as high quality (HQ), if all three main coronary arteries were analysable and low quality (LQ) otherwise. Curvilinear coronary images were rated by a DLM using the same system. Per-patient and per-vessel analyses were conducted. One hundred and twenty-one patients had HQ and 96 LQ CTA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the DLM in patients with high-quality image for detecting ≥50% stenoses were 100, 62, 59, 100, and 75% at the patient level and 98, 79, 57, 99, and 84% at the vessel level, respectively. Sensitivity was lower (79%) for detecting ≥50% stenoses at the vessel level in patients with low-quality image. Diagnostic accuracy was 84% in both groups. All 12 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stenoses by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were rated 3 by the DLM.

Conclusion

A DLM demonstrated high NPV for significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with ACP. All patients with ACS and stenoses by ICA were identified by the DLM.

Non-ECG-gated high-pitch CT angiography versus hybrid ECG-gated CT angiography for aorta using 512-slice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose

BACKGROUND

There have been few reports comparing image quality and radiation dose of aorta computed tomography angiography (CTA) between the high-pitch and the hybrid technique.

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality and radiation dose among non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated high-pitch CTA and hybrid ECG-gated CTA of the aorta using 512-slice CT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 110 patients who underwent non-ECG-gated high-pitch CTA (group 1) or hybrid ECG-gated CTA (group 2) of the entire aorta. Interpretability, image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the mean effective radiation dose were compared.

RESULTS

The mean image noise of the whole aorta was significantly lower (15.7 ± 1.8 HU vs. 16.5 ± 1.2 HU, P = 0.008) in group 1 than in group 2. The CNR (22.3 ± 4.7 vs. 20.0 ± 3.9, P < 0.001) and SNR (26.5 ± 4.9 vs. 23.2 ± 4.0, P < 0.001) were higher in group 2 compared with group 1. Neither group showed a significant difference in interpretability of the ascending aorta, cardiac chamber, aortic valve, right ostium, and left ostium (all P = 1). The mean effective radiation dose was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (3.5 ± 0.9 mSv vs. 4.3 ± 0.8 mSv, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The non-ECG-gated high-pitch technique shows significantly improved CNR and SNR due to reduced noise with lower radiation exposure. The interpretability of the cardiac structure, ascending aorta, aortic valve, and both ostia did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Clinical outcomes of a CT protocol for simultaneous examination of the aorta and coronary artery in patients with aortic aneurysm

Objectives

In patients with aortic aneurysm (AA), coronary artery disease (CAD) increases the risk of perioperative complications and even asymptomatic CAD is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare coronary-aorta CT (CACT) with thoracoabdominal CT angiography (Aorta CT) for CAD management and clinical outcomes in these patients.

Methods

We enrolled 479 patients undergoing CACT and 693 patients undergoing Aorta CT as an initial CT scan for AA. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 3 years after CT. The secondary outcomes were subsequent CAD management and invasive coronary angiography (CAG).

Results

After index CT scan, the CACT group had a significantly higher rate of coronary revascularization compared with the Aorta CT group (10.7% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001) but a lower probability of diagnostic CAG among total invasive CAG (32% vs. 55%, p < 0.001). At 3 months after the CT scan, the prescription rates of statins (65.8% vs. 44.6%, p < 0.001) and antiplatelet agents (57.6% vs. 43.9%, p < 0.001) were higher in the CACT group. During follow-up, the CACT group had a significantly lower incidence of the composite outcome of all-cause death or MI (adjusted HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.78, p = 0.027) than the Aorta CT group.

Conclusion

Among patients with AA, CACT was associated with a higher rate of subsequent CAD management and a lower risk of all-cause death or MI compared to Aorta CT. When evaluating with AA using CT, simultaneous coronary and aortic evaluation using CACT would be recommended over Aorta CT.

The clinical performance of ultra-low-dose shoulder CT scans: The assessment on image and physical 3D printing models

Objectives

Evaluation of the clinical performance of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (CT) images of the shoulder joint on image-based diagnosis and three-dimensional (3D) printing surgical planning.

Materials and methods

A total of 93 patients with displaced shoulder fractures were randomly divided into standard-dose, low-dose, and ultra-low-dose groups. Three-dimensional printing models of all patients’ shoulder joints were fabricated. The subjective image quality and 3D-printing model were evaluated by two senior orthopedic surgeons who were blinded to any scanning setting. A 3-point scale system was used to quantitatively assess the image quality and 3D printing model, where more than 2 points meant adequate level for clinical application.

Results

Compared with the standard dose protocol, ultra-low-dose technique reduced the radiation dose by 99.29% without loss of key image quality of fracture pattern. Regarding the subjective image quality, the assessment scores for groups of standard, low, and ultra-low doses were 3.00, 2.76, 2.00 points on scapula and humerus, and 3.00, 2.73, 2.44 points on clavicle. Scores of the three groups for the assessment of 3D printing models were 3.00, 2.80, 1.34 on scapula and humerus, and 3.00, 2.90, 2.06 on clavicle. In the ultra-low-dose group, 24 out of 33 (72.7%) 3D printing models of scapula and humerus received lower than 2 points of the evaluation score, while nearly 94% of the clavicle models reached the adequate level.

Conclusion

An ultra-low-dose protocol is adequate for the diagnosis of either displaced or non-displaced fractures of the shoulder joint even though minor flaws of images are present. Three-dimensional printing models of shoulder joints created from ultra-low-dose CT scans can be used for surgical planning at specific bone like the clavicle but perform insufficiently in the overall surgical planning for shoulder injuries due to the significant geometric flaws.

Update for the Performance of CT Coronary Angiography

BACKGROUND

 Coronary CT angiography (cCTA) is a class 1 recommendation in the current guidelines by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for excluding significant coronary artery stenosis. To achieve optimal image quality at a low radiation dose, the imaging physician may choose different acquisition modes. Therefore, the consensus guidelines by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) provide helpful guidance for this procedure.

METHOD

 The article provides practical recommendations for the application and acquisition of cCTA based on the current literature and our own experience.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 According to current ESC guidelines, cCTA is recommended in symptomatic patients with a low or intermediate clinical likelihood for coronary artery disease. We recommend premedication with beta blockers and nitrates prior to CT acquisition under certain conditions even with the latest CT scanner generations. The most current CT scanners offer three possible scan modes for cCTA acquisition. Heart rate is the main factor for selecting the scan mode. Other factors may be coronary calcifications and body mass index (BMI).

KEY POINTS

  · CCTA is a valid method to exclude coronary artery disease in patients with a low to intermediate clinical likelihood.. · Even with the latest generation CT scanners, premedication with beta blockers and nitrates can improve image quality at low radiation exposure.. · Current CT scanners usually provide retrospective ECG gating and prospective ECG triggering. Dual-source scanners additionally provide a "high pitch" scan mode to scan the whole heart during one heartbeat, which may also be achieved using single-source scanners with broad detectors in some cases.. · Besides the available scanner technology, the choice of scan mode primarily depends on heart rate and heart rate variability (e. g., arrhythmia)..

CITATION FORMAT

· Soschynski M, Hagar MT, Taron J et al. Update for the Performance of CT Coronary Angiography. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1747-3554.

Double rule-out technique for evaluation of acute chest pain using 128-row multidetector CT

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility and image quality of the double rule-out (DRO) technique using 128-row multidetector computed tomography (CT) for simultaneous evaluation of the aorta and coronary arteries in patients with acute non-specific chest pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-eight patients underwent electrocardiography (ECG)-gated coronary CT followed by non-ECG-gated abdominal CT. The contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio between the vessels and adjacent perivascular fat tissue were calculated for both the aorta and coronary arteries. Dose-length products were recorded. Two blinded readers graded the image quality of the aorta and coronary arteries on a two-point and a four-point scale, respectively. In addition, the severity of coronary stenosis was independently analysed for each coronary vessel.

RESULTS

The average attenuation was more than 350 HU for the aorta and >330 HU for the coronary arteries. The average (±standard deviation) volume of contrast media was 69.5 ± 12.5 ml. Interobserver agreement on the image quality of aortic and coronary data sets was perfect and substantial, respectively. There was almost perfect interobserver agreement for the all observations of the severity of coronary stenosis.

CONCLUSION

The DRO technique with a standard volume (approximately 70 ml) of contrast media is useful for acute chest pain evaluation in patients suspected of having acute aortic syndrome or acute coronary syndrome. It is also accurate and safe while maintaining the average CT attenuation of the aorta and coronary arteries >330 HU.

Stenotic lesions of aorta: Imaging evaluation using multidetector computed tomography angiography

Aortic involvement can be secondary to various pathologic disease processes. These may result in stenotic or aneurysmal aortic lesions with a varied spectrum of imaging findings including intra-luminal, mural, and periaortic changes along with associated loco-regional or distal changes, depending on the etiology. Multidetector computer tomography with its recent advances has become the frontline imaging modality for the evaluation of aortic pathologies. Comprehensive evaluation of the aortic pathology with simultaneous evaluation of lungs, bones, and visceral organs is possible with a single multidetector computer tomography acquisition. It allows accurate primary diagnosis, identifies important anatomic landmarks and relationships, and identifies associated cardiovascular anomalies. Moreover, it serves as an adjunct in diagnosis of various complications, helps in treatment planning and detection of disease progression during follow-up.

Updates in Vascular Computed Tomography

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become a mainstay for the imaging of vascular diseases, because of high accuracy, availability, and rapid turnaround time. High-quality CTA images can now be routinely obtained with high isotropic spatial resolution and temporal resolution. Advances in CTA have focused on improving the image quality, increasing the acquisition speed, eliminating artifacts, and reducing the doses of radiation and iodinated contrast media. Dual-energy computed tomography provides material composition capabilities that can be used for characterizing lesions, optimizing contrast, decreasing artifact, and reducing radiation dose. Deep learning techniques can be used for classification, segmentation, quantification, and image enhancement.

Computed Tomography Angiography Combined With Knowledge-Based Iterative Algorithm for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Planning: Image Quality and Radiation Dose Exposure With Low-kV and Low-Contrast-Medium Protocol

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate image quality and radiation dose exposure of low-kV setting and low-volume contrast medium (CM) computed tomography angiography (CTA) protocol for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) planning in comparison with standard CTA protocol.

METHODS

Sixty-patients were examined with 256-row MDCT for TAVI planning: 32 patients (study group) were evaluated using 80-kV electrocardiogram-gated protocol with 60 mL of CM and IMR reconstruction; 28 patients underwent a standard electrocardiogram-gated CTA study (100 kV; 80 mL of CM; iDose4 reconstruction). Subjective and objective image quality was evaluated in each patient at different aortic levels. Finally, we collected radiation dose exposure data (CT dose index and dose-length product) of both groups.

RESULTS

In study protocol, significant higher mean attenuation values were achieved in all measurements compared with the standard protocol. There were no significant differences in the subjective image quality evaluation in both groups. Mean dose-length product of study group was 56% lower than in the control one (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Low-kV and low-CM volume CTA, combined with IMR, allows to correctly performing TAVI planning with high-quality images and significant radiation dose reduction compared with standard CTA protocol.

Low Iodine Contrast Injection for CT Acquisition Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Aorta Assessment and Screening for Coronary Artery Disease

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess both the complete aorta and coronary artery disease (CAD) using low iodine contrast computed-tomography angiography before transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

84 patients underwent computed-tomography angiography before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: 42 with standard iodine injection protocol (P1:120 mL); 42 with a low dose iodine injection protocol (P2:60 mL). Mean attenuation and subjective image quality were rated at different levels of the aorta, iliac and coronary arteries. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values for depiction of CAD were calculated according to the coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Mean attenuation was significantly higher in P1 for the ascending aorta (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed regarding image quality of the aortic valve (p = 0.876), the ascending aorta (p = 0.306), or the abdominal aorta (p = 1.0). Diagnostic image quality of coronary arteries was excellent for P1 and P2 (94.6% vs 96.5%, p = 0.08). Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and accuracy for depiction of CAD were excellent for P1 and P2 (100% vs 100%; 79% vs 86%, 70% vs 87%, 100% vs 100% and 86% vs 93%) without significant differences (p = 0.93; p = 0.58; p = 0.90; p = 1.0; p = 0.74), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite a difference in aortic mean attenuation, a reduced iodine injection protocol showed similar image quality and detection of CAD in comparison with a standard injection protocol.

Ultra-low dose one-step CT angiography for coronary, carotid and cerebral arteries using 128-slice dual-source CT: A feasibility study

Atherosclerotic diseases are systemic and patient outcomes depend on comprehensive imaging evaluation. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a powerful tool used to assess atherosclerosis. However, the scanning protocol is designed for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular imaging, which require considerations into the radiation dose, contrast agent and image quality. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate ultra-low dose one-step CTA for coronary, carotid and cerebral arteries with a low concentration contrast agent. A total of 78 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: Group A (n=38) and B (n=40). High-pitch CTA for coronary, carotid and cerebral arteries with a tube voltage of 70 or 80 kVp and 40 ml contrast agent (270 mgI/ml) was performed by a 128-slice dual-source CT scanner for group A. Standard high-pitch CTA with a tube voltage of 100 kVp and 60 ml contrast agent (370 mgI/ml) was conducted for group B. The image quality, radiation dose and amount of contrast agent in group A were evaluated and compared with group B. The dose length product for groups A and B was 62.95±21.54 vs. 160.15±15.13 mGy cm, respectively (t=−23.157, P<0.001). The mean total iodine content was 10.8±0 mg for group A and 22.2±0 mg for group B. In total, 99.4% of the arterial segments could be assessed for the two groups (χ²=0.267, P=0.606). The results revealed that ultra-low dose one-step high-pitch CTA can provide assessable image quality, and minimize the radiation dose and contrast agent.

High-pitch dual-source paranasal sinus CT in agitated patients with maxillofacial trauma: analysis of image quality, motion artifacts, and dose aspects

Background Image quality benefits from high-pitch scanning in agitated patients by reducing acquisition time. Purpose To compare image quality and exposure parameters in patients with maxillofacial trauma on second- and third-generation dual-source computed tomography (DSCT). Material and Methods Four groups were compared. Group 1 was examined on second-generation DSCT (120 kV/50 mAs, pitch 3.0). The other three groups were examined on third-generation DSCT. Group 2 was scanned with 120 kV/50 mAs, pitch 2.2. Automated exposure control (AEC) was used in group 3 and group 4 with pitch factors of 2.2 and 3.0, respectively. Images of third-generation DSCT were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR), of second-generation DSCT with filtered back-projection. CTDIvol, acquisition time, and image quality were compared. Results Thirty patients were included in each group. Average CTDIvol (2.76 ± 0.00 mGy, 2.66 ± 0.00 mGy, 0.74 ± 0.23 mGy, and 0.75 ± 0.17 mGy) was significantly lower on third-generation DSCT with AEC ( P < 0.001). Subjective image quality was rated worst in group 4 due to strong high-pitch artifacts, while in the remaining three groups it was rated good or very good with good inter-observer agreement (k > 0.64). Average acquisition time was significantly shorter with third-generation DSCT (0.47 s, 0.36 s, 0.38 s, 0.30 s; P < 0.001). Conclusion Third-generation DSCT yields faster acquisition times and substantial dose reduction with AEC. A pitch of 2.2 should be preferred, as it results in fewer artifacts. If AEC is used, latest IR ensures that diagnostic image quality is guaranteed.

Noninvasive aortic imaging

Non-invasive imaging of the aorta has undergone considerable advancements in recent times; largely driven by the technological advances in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This review article highlights these recent advancements and discusses the current role of different imaging tools in the management of aortic diseases.

Hybrid ECG-gated versus non-gated 512-slice CT angiography of the aorta and coronary artery: image quality and effect of a motion correction algorithm

Background Using the hybrid electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) technique, assessment of entire aorta, coronary arteries, and aortic valve can be possible using single-bolus contrast administration within a single acquisition. Purpose To compare the image quality of hybrid ECG-gated and non-gated CT angiography of the aorta and evaluate the effect of a motion correction algorithm (MCA) on coronary artery image quality in a hybrid ECG-gated aorta CT group. Material and Methods In total, 104 patients (76 men; mean age = 65.8 years) prospectively randomized into two groups (Group 1 = hybrid ECG-gated CT; Group 2 = non-gated CT) underwent wide-detector array aorta CT. Image quality, assessed using a four-point scale, was compared between the groups. Coronary artery image quality was compared between the conventional reconstruction and motion correction reconstruction subgroups in Group 1. Results Group 1 showed significant advantages over Group 2 in aortic wall, cardiac chamber, aortic valve, coronary ostia, and main coronary arteries image quality (all P < 0.001). All Group 1 patients had diagnostic image quality of the aortic wall and left ostium. The MCA significantly improved the image quality of the three main coronary arteries ( P < 0.05). Moreover, per-vessel interpretability improved from 92.3% to 97.1% with the MCA ( P = 0.013). Conclusion Hybrid ECG-gated CT significantly improved the heart and aortic wall image quality and the MCA can further improve the image quality and interpretability of coronary arteries.

Computed Tomography Diagnosis of Nonspecific Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: From Typical Acute Coronary Syndrome to Various Unusual Mimics

It is a challenging task for emergency department physicians to establish a precise and rapid diagnosis based only on clinical and laboratory findings in patients who present with nonspecific acute chest pain. In this circumstance, CT angiography can provide important clues to the diagnosis. To provide a rapid diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and its various mimics, the physician should enumerate each possible cause of acute chest pain on the basis of an objective assessment of pretest probability. On the basis of clinical suspicion, the appropriate CT protocol should then be performed. Moreover, radiologists should be familiar with typical CT findings of ACS and its various mimics to assist the emergency department physician in diagnosing patients with nonspecific acute chest pain. This review article presents an overview on choosing an appropriate CT protocol in patients with nonspecific acute chest pain and provides specific CT findings of ACS and various mimics of ACS.

Low contrast medium-volume third-generation dual-source computed tomography angiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning

PURPOSE

To investigate feasibility, image quality and safety of low-tube-voltage, low-contrast-volume comprehensive cardiac and aortoiliac CT angiography (CTA) for planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty consecutive TAVR candidates prospectively underwent combined CTA of the aortic root and vascular access route (270 mgI/ml iodixanol). Patients were assigned to group A (second-generation dual-source CT [DSCT], 100 kV, 60 ml contrast, 4.0 ml/s flow rate) or group B (third-generation DSCT, 70 kV, 40 ml contrast, 2.5 ml/s flow rate). Vascular attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were compared. Subjective image quality was assessed by two observers. Estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) at CTA and follow-up were measured.

RESULTS

Besides a higher body-mass-index in group B (24.8±3.8 kg/m² vs. 28.1±5.4 kg/m², P=0.0339), patient characteristics between groups were similar (P≥0.0922). Aortoiliac SNR (P=0.0003) was higher in group B. Cardiac SNR (P=0.0003) and CNR (P=0.0181) were higher in group A. Subjective image quality was similar (P≥0.213) except for aortoiliac image noise (4.42 vs. 4.12, P=0.0374). TAVR-planning measurements were successfully obtained in all patients. There were no significant changes in eGFR among and between groups during follow-up (P≥0.302).

CONCLUSION

TAVR candidates can be safely and effectively evaluated by a comprehensive CTA protocol with low contrast volume using low-tube-voltage acquisition.

KEY POINTS

• Third-generation dual-source CT facilitates low-tube-voltage acquisition. • TAVR planning can be performed with reduced contrast volume and radiation dose. • TAVR-planning CT did not result in changes in creatinine levels at follow-up. • TAVR candidates can be safely evaluated by comprehensive low-tube-voltage CT angiography.

Low-Voltage, High-Pitch Computerized Tomography Angiography of the Infrarenal Aorta and Lower Extremity Vessels: Assessment of Radiation Dose, Image Quality With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction, and Efficacy of Test Injection Using a Monitoring Scan at Knee Level

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to assess image quality and radiation dose of low-voltage high-pitch computed tomography angiography of the infrarenal aorta and lower extremities and evaluate the efficacy of test injection technique using a monitoring scan at knee level.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients with suspected peripheral arterial disease were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (30 patients, 80 kVp, high pitch [3.2], and hybrid iterative reconstruction [sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction]) and group 2 (30 patients, 120 kVp, low pitch [1.0], and filtered back projection reconstruction). The test injection technique at knee level was used to determine the scan delay time in group 1. The image quality and radiation exposure were compared.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the 2 groups in mean (SD) arterial attenuation (80 vs 120 kVp: 507.78 [103.01] vs 317.54 [62.03] Hounsfield units, P < 0.001), mean (SD) signal-to-noise ratio (51.04 [20.29] vs 34.66 [9.94], P < 0.001), and contrast-to-noise ratio (44.83 [17.93] vs 28.26 [9.60], P < 0.001). No difference in subjective image quality was found between the 2 groups (all P > 0.05). The imaging time was significantly shorter in group 1 (2.70 [0.11] vs 14.65 [0.90s], P < 0.001). The mean (SD) effective dose was significantly lower in the 80 kVp group (0.76 [0.06] vs 4.29 [0.63] mSv, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 80-kVp high-pitch computed tomography angiography of the lower limbs using sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction yields reduction of radiation exposure as well as obtains acceptable image quality if acquisition protocols are used in conjunction with the test injection technique using monitoring scan at knee level to determine the delay time.

ECG-gated Versus Non-ECG-gated High-pitch Dual-source CT for Whole Body CT Angiography (CTA)

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate motion artifacts, image quality, and practical differences in electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated versus non-ECG-gated high-pitch dual-source computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the whole aorta.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two groups, each including 40 patients, underwent either ECG-gated or non-ECG-gated high-pitch dual-source CTA of the whole aorta. The aortic annulus, aortic valve, coronary ostia, and the presence of motion artifacts of the thoracic aorta as well as vascular contrast down to the femoral arteries were independently assessed by two readers. Additional objective parameters including image noise and signal-to-noise ratio were analyzed.

RESULTS

Subjective and objective scoring revealed no presence of motional artifacts regardless of whether the ECG-gated or the non-ECG-gated protocol was used (P > 0.1). Image acquisition parameters (examination length, examination duration, radiation dose) were comparable between the two groups without significant differences. The aortic annulus, aortic valve, and coronary ostia were reliably evaluable in all patients. Vascular contrast was rated excellent in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

High-pitch dual-source CTA of the whole aorta is a robust and dose-efficient examination strategy for the evaluation of aortic pathologies whether or not ECG gating is used.

Low-volume contrast medium protocol for comprehensive cardiac and aortoiliac CT assessment in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic performance of a comprehensive computed tomography (CT) protocol for both cardiac and aortoiliac evaluation of patients considered for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a single, low-volume contrast medium (CM) injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-four TAVR candidates were retrospectively analyzed. All underwent retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated cardiac CT followed by high-pitch CT angiography of the aortoiliac vasculature using one of two single injection protocols of 320 mgI/mL iodine CM: group A (n = 22), iodine delivery rate-based (1.28 gI/s), 60-mL CM volume, 4.0 mL/s flow rate; group B (n = 22), clinical routine protocol, 100-mL CM volume, 4.0 mL/s flow rate. Mean arterial attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Subjective image quality was assessed.

RESULTS

Aortic root and iliofemoral dimensions could be analyzed in all cases. Patient characteristics showed no significant differences. Mean attenuation at the levels of the aortic root (285.8 ± 83.0 HU vs 327.5 ± 70.8 HU, P = .080) and the iliofemoral access route (256.8 ± 88.5 HU vs 307.5 ± 93.2 HU, P = .071), as well as SNR and CNR were nonsignificantly lower in group A compared to group B. Subjective image quality was equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

In multimorbid TAVR patients, the performance of a combined CT protocol using a single low-volume CM bolus is feasible with maintained image quality compared to a standard protocol.

Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom

Objectives:

The aim of our study was to find out how much energy is applicable in second-generation dual source high-pitch computed tomography (CT) in imaging of the abdomen.

Materials and Methods:

We examined an upper abdominal phantom using a Somatom Definition Flash CT-Scanner (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). The study protocol consisted of a scan-series at 100 kV and 120 kV. In each scan series we started with a pitch of 3.2 and reduced it in steps of 0.2, until a pitch of 1.6 was reached. The current was adjusted to the maximum the scanner could achieve. Energy values, image noise, image quality, and radiation exposure were evaluated.

Results:

For a pitch of 3.2 the maximum applicable current was 142 mAs at 120 kV and in 100 kV the maximum applicable current was 114 mAs. For conventional abdominal imaging, current levels of 200 to 260 mAs are generally used. To achieve similar current levels, we had to decrease the pitch to 1.8 at 100 kV — at this pitch we could perform our imaging at 204 mAs. At a pitch of 2.2 in 120 kV we could apply a current of 206 mAs.

Conclusion:

We conclude our study by stating that if there is a need for a higher current, we have to reduce the pitch. In a high-pitch dual source CT, we always have to remember where our main focus is, so we can adjust the pitch to the energy we need in the area of the body that has to be imaged, to find answers to the clinical question being raised.

High-pitch, low-voltage and low-iodine-concentration CT angiography of aorta: assessment of image quality and radiation dose with iterative reconstruction

Objective

To assess the image quality of aorta obtained by dual-source computed tomography angiography (DSCTA), performed with high pitch, low tube voltage, and low iodine concentration contrast medium (CM) with images reconstructed using iterative reconstruction (IR).

Methods

One hundred patients randomly allocated to receive one of two types of CM underwent DSCTA with the electrocardiogram-triggered Flash protocol. In the low-iodine group, 50 patients received CM containing 270 mg I/mL and were scanned at low tube voltage (100 kVp). In the high-iodine CM group, 50 patients received CM containing 370 mg I/mL and were scanned at the tube voltage (120 kVp). The filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm was used for reconstruction in both groups. In addition, the IR algorithm was used in the low-iodine group. Image quality of the aorta was analyzed subjectively by a 3-point grading scale and objectively by measuring the CT attenuation in terms of the signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR, respectively). Radiation and CM doses were compared.

Results

The CT attenuation, subjective image quality assessment, SNR, and CNR of various aortic regions of interest did not differ significantly between two groups. In the low-iodine group, images reconstructed by FBP and IR demonstrated significant differences in image noise, SNR, and CNR (p<0.05). The low-iodine group resulted in 34.3% less radiation (4.4 ± 0.5 mSv) than the high-iodine group (6.7 ± 0.6 mSv), and 27.3% less iodine weight (20.36 ± 2.65 g) than the high-iodine group (28 ± 1.98 g). Observers exhibited excellent agreement on the aortic image quality scores (κ = 0.904).

Conclusions

CT images of aorta could be obtained within 2 s by using a DSCT Flash protocol with low tube voltage, IR, and low-iodine-concentration CM. Appropriate contrast enhancement was achieved while maintaining good image quality and decreasing the radiation and iodine doses.

Application of prospective ECG-gated high-pitch 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in the diagnosis of congenital extracardiac vascular anomalies in infants and children

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of prospective ECG-gated high-pitch 128-slice dual-source CT (DSCT) angiography in the diagnosis of congenital extracardiac vascular anomalies in infants and children in comparison with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).

METHODS

Eighty consecutive infants or children clinically diagnosed of congenital heart disease and suspected with extracardiac vascular anomaly were enrolled, and 75 patients were finally included in this prospective study. All patients underwent prospective ECG-gated high-pitch DSCT angiography after TTE with an interval of 1-7 days. The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of high-pitch DSCT angiography and TTE were compared according to the surgical/CCA findings. The image quality of DSCT was assessed using a five-point scale. The effective radiation dose (ED) was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 17 congenital heart diseases and 162 separate extracardiac vascular anomalies were confirmed by surgical/CCA findings in 75 patients. The diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch DSCT angiography and TTE was 99.67% and 97.89%, respectively. The sensitivity of high-pitch DSCT angiography and TTE was 97.53% and 79.62%, respectively. There was significant difference regarding to the diagnostic accuracy and the sensitivity between high-pitch DSCT angiography and TTE (χ2 = 23.561 and 28.013, P<0.05). The agreement on the image quality scoring of DSCT between the two observers was excellent (κ = 0.81), and the mean score of image quality was 4.1±0.7. The mean ED of DSCT was 0.29±0.08 mSv.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective ECG-gated high-pitch 128-slice DSCT angiography with low radiation dose and high diagnostic accuracy has higher sensitivity compared to TTE in the detection of congenital extracardiac vascular anomalies in infants and children.

Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality at cardiovascular CT angiography by automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection: intra-individual comparison

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of automated tube voltage selection on radiation dose and image quality at cardiovascular CT angiography (CTA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed paired studies in 72 patients (41 male, 60.5 ± 16.5 years), who had undergone CTA acquisitions of the heart or aorta both before and after the implementation of an automated x-ray tube voltage selection algorithm (ATVS). All other parameters were kept identical between the two acquisitions. Subjective image quality (IQ) was rated and objective IQ was measured by image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and figure of merit (FOM). Image quality parameters and effective dose were compared between acquisitions.

RESULTS

Overall subjective image quality improved with the percentage of cases scored as adequate or higher increasing from 79 % to 92 % after implementation of ATVS (P = 0.03). SNR (14.1 ± 5.9, 15.7 ± 6.1, P = 0.009), CNR (11.6 ± 5.3, 13.2 ± 5.6, P = 0.011), and FOM (19.9 ± 23.3, 43.8 ± 51.1, P < 0.001) were significantly higher after implementation of ATVS. Mean image noise (24.1 ± 8.4 HU, 22.7 ± 7.1 HU, P = 0.048) and mean effective dose (10.6 ± 5.9 mSv, 8.8 ± 5.0 mSv, P = 0.003) were significantly lower after implementation of ATVS.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated tube voltage selection can operator-independently optimize cardiovascular CTA image acquisition parameters with improved image quality at reduced dose.

KEY POINTS

• Automatic tube voltage selection optimizes tube voltage for each individual patient. • In this population, overall radiation dose decreased while image quality improved. • This tool may become valuable for improving dose/quality ratio.

High-pitch coronary CT angiography with third generation dual-source CT: limits of heart rate

To determine the average heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) required for diagnostic imaging of the coronary arteries in patients undergoing high-pitch CT-angiography (CTA) with third-generation dual-source CT. Fifty consecutive patients underwent CTA of the thoracic (n = 8) and thoracoabdominal (n = 42) aorta with third-generation dual-source 192-slice CT with prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gating at a pitch of 3.2. No β-blockers were administered. Motion artifacts of coronary arteries were graded on a 4-point scale. Average HR and HRV were noted. The average HR was 66 ± 11 beats per minute (bpm) (range 45-96 bpm); the HRV was 7.3 ± 4.4 bpm (range 3-20 bpm). Interobserver agreement on grade of image quality for the 642 coronary segments evaluated by both observers was good (κ = 0.71). Diagnostic image quality was found for 608 of the 642 segments (95%) in 43 of 50 patients (86%). In 14% of the patients, image quality was nondiagnostic for at least one segment. HR (p = 0.001) was significantly higher in patients with at least one non-diagnostic segment compared to those without. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in HRV between patients with nondiagnostic segments and those with diagnostic images of all segments. All patients with a HR < 70 bpm had diagnostic image quality in all coronary segments. The effective radiation dose and scan time for the heart were 0.4 ± 0.1 mSv and 0.17 ± 0.02 s, respectively. Third-generation dual-source 192-slice CT allows for coronary angiography in the prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch mode with diagnostic image quality at HR up to 70 bpm. HRV is not significantly related to image quality of coronary CTA.

Assessment of vascular contrast and wall motion of the aortic root and ascending aorta on MDCT angiography: dual-source high-pitch vs non-gated single-source acquisition schemes

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study assessed whether dual-source high-pitch computed tomographic angiography (CTA) offered advantages over single-source standard-pitch techniques in the evaluation of the ascending aorta.

METHODS

Twenty patients who received both thoracic dual-source high-pitch and single-source standard-pitch CTAs within 1 year were assessed. Dual-source CTAs were performed; standard-pitch imaging used dose-modulated 120 kVp/150 mAs and 0.8 pitch compared with high-pitch protocols employing dose-modulated 120 kVp/250 mAs and 2.4 target pitch. Radiation dose was documented. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) at sinuses of the Valsalva (CNRValsalva) and ascending aorta (CNRAorta) were calculated. Dose/CNR for each technique was compared with paired t-tests. Motion at aortic valve, aortic root and ascending aorta were assessed with four-point scales and Mann-Whitney U tests; longitudinal extension of motion was compared with paired t-tests.

RESULTS

Significantly lower motion scores for high-pitch, compared with standard-pitch acquisitions for aortic annulus, 0 vs. 2, aortic root, 0 vs. 3, and ascending aorta, 0 vs. 2, were achieved. Significantly reduced longitudinal extension of motion at aortic root, 4.9 mm vs 15.7 mm, and ascending aorta, 4.9 mm vs 21.6 mm, was observed. Contrast was not impacted: CNRValsalva, 45.6 vs 46.3, and CNRAorta, 45.3 vs 47.1. CTDIvol was significantly decreased for high-pitch acquisitions, 13.9 mGy vs 15.8 mGy.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual-source high-pitch CTAs significantly decreased motion artefact without negatively impacting vascular contrast and radiation dose.

KEY POINTS

• Dual-source high-pitch CTA significantly decreased motion artefact of the ascending aorta. • Dual-source high-pitch CTA did not negatively impact on vascular contrast. • Dual-source high-pitch CTA significantly decreased radiation dose compared with single-source standard-pitch acquisitions.

Abdominal aortic intimal flap motion characterization in acute aortic dissection: assessed with retrospective ECG-gated thoracoabdominal aorta dual-source CT angiography

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility of dose-modulated retrospective ECG-gated thoracoabdominal aorta CT angiography (CTA) assessing abdominal aortic intimal flap motion and investigate the motion characteristics of intimal flap in acute aortic dissection (AAD).

Materials and Methods

49 patients who had thoracoabdominal aorta retrospective ECG-gated CTA scan were enrolled. 20 datasets were reconstructed in 5% steps between 0 and 95% of the R-R interval in each case. The aortic intimal flap motion was assessed by measuring the short axis diameters of the true lumen and false lumen 2 cm above of celiac trunk ostium in different R-R intervals. Intimal flap motion and configuration was assessed by two independent observers.

Results

In these 49 patients, 37 had AAD, 7 had intramural hematoma, and 5 had negative result for acute aortic disorder. 620 datasets of 31 patients who showed double lumens in abdominal aorta were enrolled in evaluating intimal flap motion. The maximum and minimum true lumen diameter were 12.2±4.1 mm (range 2.6∼17.4) and 6.7±4.1 mm (range 0∼15.3) respectively. The range of intimal flap motion in all patients was 5.5±2.6 mm (range 1.8∼10.2). The extent of maximum true lumen diameter decreased during a cardiac cycle was 49.5%±23.5% (range 12%∼100%). The maximum motion phase of true lumen diameter was in systolic phase (5%∼40% of R-R interval). Maximum and minimum intimal flap motion was at 15% and 75% of the R-R interval respectively. Intimal flap configuration had correlation with the phase of cardiac cycle.

Conclusions

Abdominal intimal flap position and configuration varied greatly during a cardiac cycle. Retrospective ECG-gated thoracoabdominal aorta CTA can reflect the actual status of the true lumen and provide more information about true lumen collapse. This information may be helpful to diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dynamic abstraction.

High-pitch ECG-synchronized pulmonary CT angiography versus standard CT pulmonary angiography: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare high-pitch ECG-synchronized pulmonary CT angiography (CTA) with standard pulmonary CTA with regard to radiation dose and image quality in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and participants provided informed consent. Patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (60% women; mean age, 57 ± 14 years) were randomized to undergo high-pitch ECG-synchronized pulmonary CTA (n = 26) or standard pulmonary CTA (n = 21). Two independent readers assessed subjective image quality of pulmonary arteries, cardiovascular structures, and pulmonary parenchyma. Signal intensity (SI) was measured in one segmental and three central pulmonary arteries.

RESULTS

High-pitch ECG-synchronized pulmonary CTA showed higher SI (p < 0.001) for pulmonary arteries. Image quality scores indicated improvement in assessment of cardio-vascular structures (p < 0.001), minimization of motion of central (p < 0.001) pulmonary arteries, and an increase in pulmonary arterial enhancement (p = 0.01) with high-pitch ECG-synchronized pulmonary CTA. Image quality scores for lung assessment were higher for standard pulmonary CTA (p < 0.001). The amount of contrast agent administered was similar between techniques (p = 0.86). Radiation dose was lower for high-pitch ECG-synchronized pulmonary CTA (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High-pitch ECG-synchronized pulmonary CTA provides higher pulmonary arterial SI, decreased motion of central pulmonary arteries, and improved assessment of cardiovascular structures with similar contrast dose and lower radiation compared with standard pulmonary CTA.

Imaging of cardiac valves by computed tomography

This paper describes "how to" examine cardiac valves with computed tomography, the normal, diseased valves, and prosthetic valves. A review of current scientific literature is provided. Firstly, technical basics, "how to" perform and optimize a multislice CT scan and "how to" interpret valves on CT images are outlined. Then, diagnostic imaging of the entire spectrum of specific valvular disease by CT, including prosthetic heart valves, is highlighted. The last part gives a guide "how to" use CT for planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), an emerging effective treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis. A special focus is placed on clinical applications of cardiac CT in the context of valvular disease.

The ascending aortic image quality and the whole aortic radiation dose of high-pitch dual-source CT angiography

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection is a lift-threatening medical emergency associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The incidence rate of aortic dissection is estimated at 5 to 30 per 1 million people per year. The prompt and correct diagnosis of aortic dissection is critical. This study was to compare the ascending aortic image quality and the whole aortic radiation dose of high-pitch dual-source CT angiography and conventional dual-source CT angiography.

METHODS

A total of 110 consecutive patients with suspected aortic dissection and other aortic disorders were randomly divided into two groups. Group A underwent traditional scan mode and Group B underwent high-pitch dual-source CT scan mode. The image quality and radiation dose of two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Close interobserver agreement was found for image quality scores (κ = 0.87). The image quality of ascending aorta was significantly better in the high-pitch group than in the conventional group (2.78 ± 0.46 vs 1.57 ± 0.43, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference of the CT attenuation values, the aortic image noise and SNR between two groups. The mean radiation dose of high-pitch group was also significantly lower than that of conventional group (2.7 ± 0.6 mSv vs. 3.9 ± 0.9 mSv, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the whole aorta can provide motion-artifact-free imaging of the ascending aorta at a low radiation dose compared to conventional protocol.

Radiation dose optimization and thoracic computed tomography

In the past 3 decades, radiation dose from computed tomography (CT) has contributed to an increase in overall radiation exposure to the population. This increase has caused concerns over harmful effects of radiation dose associated with CT in scientific publications as well as in the lay press. To address these concerns, and reduce radiation dose, several strategies to optimize radiation dose have been developed and assessed, including manual or automatic adjustment of scan parameters. This article describes conventional and contemporary techniques to reduce radiation dose associated with chest CT.

Radiation dose and image quality at high-pitch CT angiography of the aorta: intraindividual and interindividual comparisons with conventional CT angiography

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to evaluate radiation dose and quantitative image quality parameters at high-pitch CT angiography (CTA) of the aorta compared with conventional CTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied the examinations of 110 patients (65 men and 45 women; mean age ± SD, 64 ± 15 years) who had undergone CTA of the entire aorta on a second-generation dual-source CT system; 50 examinations were performed in high-pitch mode. The mean arterial attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM) were calculated for the high-pitch CTA and conventional CTA groups. Radiation exposures were compared.

RESULTS

All studies were considered of diagnostic quality. At high-pitch CTA, the mean tube voltage and tube current-exposure time product were 118 ± 7 kV (SD) and 197 ± 78 mAs compared with 120 ± 1 kV and 258 ± 78 mAs, respectively, at conventional CTA (p < 0.05). The mean volume CT dose index, dose-length product, and effective dose were 8.1 ± 2.4 mGy, 561.1 ± 178.6 mGy × cm, and 9.6 ± 3.0 mSv at high-pitch CTA and 18.3 ± 7.7 mGy, 1162.6 ± 480.1 mGy × cm, and 19.8 ± 8.2 mSv at conventional CTA (p < 0.001). Attenuation was similar for both protocols, whereas significantly less contrast medium was injected for high-pitch CTA than for standard-pitch CTA (87.3 ± 16 mL vs 97.9 ± 16 mL, respectively; p < 0.01). The SNR and CNR were significantly lower in the high-pitch CTA examinations (p < 0.01), whereas the FOM was nonsignificantly higher. Twenty patients underwent both high-pitch CTA and conventional CTA, with a 45% reduction in radiation dose (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High-pitch CTA of the aorta yields 45-50% reduction of radiation exposure as well as contrast medium savings with maintained vessel attenuation.

Iterative reconstruction improves evaluation of native aortic and mitral valves by retrospectively ECG-gated thoracoabdominal CTA

OBJECTIVES

To compare native aortic (AV) and mitral valve (MV) image quality on limited-dose retrospectively ECG-gated CTA of the thoracoabdominal aorta reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP).

METHODS

Fifty patients underwent routine care retrospectively ECG-gated thoracoabdominal limited-dose 256-slice CTA. At 30 % (systole) and 75 % (diastole) of the R-R interval AV and MV were reconstructed using FBP and IR. Objective image quality [density and noise (SD of density measurement)] was measured. Two independent observers scored subjective valve image quality using four-point Likert scales.

RESULTS

IR significantly decreased image noise, but did not alter the aorta and interventricular septum density. Interobserver variability was moderate to good. Valve image quality was scored at least moderate in most cases. IR scored one or two Likert scale points higher than FBP in 10 (first observer) and 27 (second observer) scores. Conversely, IR scored one Likert scale point lower than FBP in 1 (first observer) and 4 (second observer) scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited-dose retrospectively ECG-gated thoracoabdominal CTA enables moderate to excellent evaluation of AV and MV in most patients, in addition to the primary diagnostic question. Image quality is further improved by IR.