Novel, portable, cassette-sized, and wireless flat-panel digital radiography system: initial workflow results versus computed radiography

Clinical feasibility and effectiveness of bedside peripherally inserted central catheter using portable digital radiography for patients in an intensive care unit: A single-center experience

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of bedside peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) using portable digital radiography (DR) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Sixty-five ICU patients who underwent PICC were enrolled in this study between May 2016 and May 2017. Of these 65 patients, 45 (69.2%) underwent the procedures bedside in ICU using portable DR, and 20 (30.8%) underwent the procedures at the intervention clinic, both performed by a single interventional radiologist. We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records for clinical presentation, total procedural time, total radiation dose, total patient transfer time, and clinical outcomes. We performed an independent t test to compare the clinical effectiveness between the 2 groups.The technical and clinical success rates were 100% in both groups, and there were no procedure-related complications. The total radiation dose of bedside PICC at ICU was significantly lower than that of conventional PICC at the intervention clinic (557.9 mGy*cm ± 209.2 vs 985.2 mGy*cm ± 547.6, P < .001). The total procedure time was significantly different between the bedside and conventional PICC groups (26.8 minutes ± 3.9 vs 24.1 minutes ± 5.55, P = .028). The average patient transfer time to the intervention clinic was 26.6 minutes ± 9.8.Bedside PICC using portable DR is a safe and effective procedure option to manage ICU patients in daily clinical practice.

Bedside Chest Radiographs in the Intensive care Setting: Wireless Direct Radiography Compared to Computed Radiography

OBJECTIVES

To compare image quality, visibility of anatomic landmarks, tubes and lines, and other clinically significant findings on portable (bedside) chest radiographs acquired with wireless direct radiography (DRw) and computed radiography (CR).

METHODS

In a prospective IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant study, portable DRw (DRX-1C mobile retrofit portable wireless direct radiography, CareStream Inc., Rochester, NY) and portable CR (AGFA CR (DXG) version; NIM2103, AGFA Healthcare, Ridgefield Park, NJ) images of the chest were acquired within 24-hours in 80 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Image pairs of 75 patients (37% female) with a mean age of 60.7±16 years were independently compared side-by-side by 7 experienced thoracic radiologists using a five-point scale. When tubes and lines were present, the radiologist also compared an edge-enhanced copy of the DRw image to the CR image.

RESULTS

Most radiologists found significantly fewer artifacts on DRw images compared to CR images and all readers agreed that when present, these artifacts did not significantly preclude the ability to evaluate anatomic landmarks, tubes and lines, or clinically significant findings. None of the radiologists (0/7) reported superior visibility of anatomic structures on CR images compared to DRw images and some radiologists (3/7) found DRw images significantly better for visibility of anatomic landmarks such as the carina (p=0.01-0.001). Most radiologists (6/7) found DRw images to be better or clearly better than CR images for position of tubes and lines, and edge-enhanced DRw images to be especially helpful for evaluation of central venous catheters and esophageal tubes (p=0.027-0.001). None of the radiologists deemed CR images superior for visibility of clinically significant findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical care chest radiography with a portable DRw system can provide similar or superior information compared to a CR system regarding clinically significant findings and position of tubes and lines.

Development of Portable Digital Radiography System with a Device for Monitoring X-ray Source-Detector Angle and Its Application in Chest Imaging

This study developed a device measuring the X-ray source-detector angle (SDA) and evaluated the imaging performance for diagnosing chest images. The SDA device consisted of Arduino, an accelerometer and gyro sensor, and a Bluetooth module. The SDA values were compared with the values of a digital angle meter. The performance of the portable digital radiography (PDR) was evaluated using the signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), spatial resolution, distortion and entrance surface dose (ESD). According to different angle degrees, five anatomical landmarks were assessed using a five-point scale. The mean SNR and CNR were 182.47 and 141.43. The spatial resolution and ESD were 3.17 lp/mm (157 μm) and 0.266 mGy. The angle values of the SDA device were not significantly difference as compared to those of the digital angle meter. In chest imaging, the SNR and CNR values were not significantly different according to the different angle degrees. The visibility scores of the border of the heart, the fifth rib and the scapula showed significant differences according to different angles (p < 0.05), whereas the scores of the clavicle and first rib were not significant. It is noticeable that the increase in the SDA degree was consistent with the increases of the distortion and visibility score. The proposed PDR with a SDA device would be useful for application in the clinical radiography setting according to the standard radiography guidelines.

Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality using a mini mobile digital imaging system in a neonatal intensive care unit

This study was aimed to assess the radiation dose and image quality of a mini-mobile digital imaging (mini-DI) system for neonatal chest radiography and compared to conventional digital radiography (DR). A total of 64 neonates were examined and anatomical landmarks were assessed. The entrance surface dose of mini DI and conventional DR was 26.64±0.15 μGy and 49.11±1.46 μGy, respectively (p<0.001). The mean SNR values for mini-DI and DR were 233.2±5.1 and 31.6±1.2, and 10% MTF values were 131 and 161μm. A newly developed mini-DI is capable of preserving the diagnostic information with dose reduction in neonates under intensive care.

Development of a mini-mobile digital radiography system by using wireless smart devices

The current technologies that trend in digital radiology (DR) are toward systems using portable smart mobile as patient-centered care. We aimed to develop a mini-mobile DR system by using smart devices for wireless connection into medical information systems. We developed a mini-mobile DR system consisting of an X-ray source and a Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) sensor based on a flat panel detector for small-field diagnostics in patients. It is used instead of the systems that are difficult to perform with a fixed traditional device. We also designed a method for embedded systems in the development of portable DR systems. The external interface used the fast and stable IEEE 802.11n wireless protocol, and we adapted the device for connections with Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) and smart devices. The smart device could display images on an external monitor other than the monitor in the DR system. The communication modules, main control board, and external interface supporting smart devices were implemented. Further, a smart viewer based on the external interface was developed to display image files on various smart devices. In addition, the advantage of operators is to reduce radiation dose when using remote smart devices. It is integrated with smart devices that can provide X-ray imaging services anywhere. With this technology, it can permit image observation on a smart device from a remote location by connecting to the external interface. We evaluated the response time of the mini-mobile DR system to compare to mobile PACS. The experimental results show that our system outperforms conventional mobile PACS in this regard.

Key Performance Indicators for Comparing the Performance of Portable Radiography: Direct Digital Radiography versus Conventional Machine Computed Radiography-A Study in a Nonacute Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Portable radiography traditionally has been performed with a conventional portable x-ray unit with computed radiography (CR) system (conventional-CR combo), and off-site processing of the exposed CR cassettes was time-consuming. The direct digital radiography (DDR) portable x-ray system, with the digital image immediately available for review and wireless transmission as the key merits, is newly installed for portable radiography. Thus, the work flow of portable radiography is changed. This study was performed to quantitatively investigate the performance of portable radiography using the DDR portable x-ray system and conventional-CR combo in terms of efficiency and work flow enhancement.

METHODS

One hundred ninety portable x-ray examinations were timed for each procedural step using conventional-CR combo (n=97) and the DDR portable x-ray system. The following key performance indicators were designed for measuring the performance of portable radiography quantitatively: "examination duration," "time for image becoming available in PACS," "postacquisition processing time," and "manpower deployment time."

RESULTS

Productivity was raised by 96% using the DDR portable x-ray system. "Examination duration" using the DDR portable system was significantly faster (P < .0001), with a mean calculated time of 13.4 ± 7.6 minutes for the DDR portable system and 25.2 ± 10.9 minutes for conventional-CR combo. The "time for image becoming available in PACS" was significantly shorter than that of conventional-CR combo (P < .0001), with a mean time of 6.8 ± 2.6 minutes for the DDR portable system and 19.2 ± 9.7 minutes for conventional-CR combo. The "postacquisition processing time" was measured with slight differences, with a mean time of 2.2 ± 1.1 minutes for the DDR portable system and 1.9 ± 1.0 minutes for conventional-CR combo (P = .1064). Because more portable x-ray examinations could be performed when using the DDR portable x-ray system in each round of service, the mean "manpower deployment time" when using the DDR portable x-ray system was longer (ie, 82.6 ± 46.8 minutes for the DDR portable system and 24.5 ± 11.9 minutes for conventional-CR combo).

CONCLUSIONS

By using the new DDR portable x-ray system with work flow changes, the performance of portable radiography was improved in efficiency and work flow was enhanced. Furthermore, the four defined key performance indicators in this study may help provide a framework for measuring the performance of portable radiography in other institutions.

The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To assess evidence of the impact of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) on clinicians' work practices in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

We searched Medline, Pre-Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and the SPIE Digital Library databases for English-language publications between 1980 and September 2010 using Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords.

RESULTS

Eleven studies from the USA and UK were included. All studies measured aspects of time associated with the introduction of PACS, namely the availability of images, the time a physician took to review an image, and changes in viewing patterns. Seven studies examined the impact on clinical decision-making, with the majority measuring the time to image-based clinical action. The effect of PACS on communication modes was reported in five studies.

DISCUSSION

PACS can impact on clinician work practices in three main areas. Most of the evidence suggests an improvement in the efficiency of work practices. Quick image availability can impact on work associated with clinical decision-making, although the results were inconsistent. PACS can change communication practices, particularly between the ICU and radiology; however, the evidence base is insufficient to draw firm conclusions in this area.

CONCLUSION

The potential for PACS to impact positively on clinician work practices in the ICU and improve patient care is great. However, the evidence base is limited and does not reflect aspects of contemporary PACS technology. Performance measures developed in previous studies remain relevant, with much left to investigate to understand how PACS can support new and improved ways of delivering care in the intensive care setting.