1
|
Guo E, Xu L, Zhang D, Zhang J, Zhang X, Bai X, Chen L, Peng Q, Zhang G, Jin Z, Sun H. Diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:147. [PMID: 38886256 PMCID: PMC11183000 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01699-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 4-10 ng/mL. METHODS A computerized search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science was conducted from inception until October 31, 2023. We included articles on the use of MRI to detect csPCa or PCa at 4-10 ng/mL PSA. The primary and secondary outcomes were MRI performance in csPCa and PCa detection, respectively; the estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were pooled in a bivariate random-effects model. RESULTS Among the 19 studies (3879 patients), there were 10 (2205 patients) and 13 studies (2965 patients) that reported MRI for detecting csPCa or PCa, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for csPCa detection were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.88) and 0.76 (95%CI, 0.65-0.84), respectively, for PCa detection were 0.82 (95%CI, 0.75-0.87) and 0.74 (95%CI, 0.65-0.82), respectively. The pooled NPV for csPCa detection was 0.91 (0.87-0.93). Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging also showed a significantly higher sensitivity and specificity relative to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (both p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Prostate MRI enables the detection of csPCa and PCa with satisfactory performance in the PSA gray zone. The excellent NPV for csPCa detection indicates the possibility of biopsy decision-making in patients in the PSA gray zone, but substantial heterogeneity among the included studies should be taken into account. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Prostate MRI can be considered a reliable and satisfactory tool for detecting csPCa and PCa in patients with PSA in the "gray zone", allowing for reducing unnecessary biopsy and optimizing the overall examination process. KEY POINTS Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a common screening tool for prostate cancer but risks overdiagnosis. MRI demonstrated excellent negative predictive value for prostate cancer in the PSA gray zone. MRI can influence decision-making for these patients, and biparametric MRI should be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erjia Guo
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Lili Xu
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Daming Zhang
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Jiahui Zhang
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xin Bai
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Qianyu Peng
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Gumuyang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Zhengyu Jin
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
- National Center for Quality Control of Radiology, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Hao Sun
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
- National Center for Quality Control of Radiology, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wen J, Liu W, Shen X, Hu W. PI-RADS v2.1 and PSAD for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer among patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6570. [PMID: 38503972 PMCID: PMC10951302 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57337-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This study intended to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml. Between July 2018 and June 2022, a total of 453 patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml were retrospectively included, which were randomly assigned to the training group (323 patients) and validation group (130 patients). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with their 95% CI were calculated. The overall diagnostic performance was determined with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and an integrated nomogram combining PI-RADS score and PSAD was constructed and tested in a validation cohort. In the training group, the AUC for PI-RADS 2.1 and PSAD alone were 0.875 (95% CI 0.834-0.916) and 0.712 (95% CI 0.648-0.775). At the cutoff PI-RADS score ≥ 4, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.2% (95% CI 77.4-1.9%) and 84.7% (95% CI 79.6-88.8%), respectively. For PSAD, the sensitivity and specificity were 73.3% (95% CI 63.0-82.4%) and 62.1% (95% CI 55.8-68.5%) at the cutoff 0.162 ng/ml/ml. While combining PI-RADS with PSAD, the diagnostic performance was improved significantly, with AUC of 0.893 (95% CI 0.853-0.933). In the validation group, the nomogram yielded a AUC of 0.871 (95% CI 0.807-0.934), which is significantly higher than PI-RADS alone (0.829, 95% CI 0.759-0.899, P = 0.02). For patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml, PSAD demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy whereas PI-RADS showed high performance. By combination of PSAD and PI-RADS together, the diagnostic performance could be improved significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiology, Yancheng Tinghu District People's Hospital, Yancheng, China
| | - Xiaocui Shen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China
| | - Wei Hu
- Department of Radiology, Yixing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Yixing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hu B, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Jin Y. A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:82. [PMID: 37667393 PMCID: PMC10478308 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00606-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to develop and validate a model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve patients. METHOD This retrospective study included 324 patients who underwent bpMRI and MRI targeted fusion biopsy (MRGB) and/or systematic biopsy, of them 217 were randomly assigned to the training group and 107 were assigned to the validation group. We assessed the diagnostic performance of three bpMRI-based scorings in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Subsequently, 3 models (Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3) combining bpMRI scorings with clinical variables were constructed and compared with each other using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). The statistical significance of differences among these models was evaluated using DeLong's test. RESULTS In the training group, 68 of 217 patients had pathologically proven csPCa. The sensitivity and specificity for Scoring 1 were 64.7% (95% CI 52.2%-75.9%) and 80.5% (95% CI 73.3%-86.6%); for Scoring 2 were 86.8% (95% CI 76.4%-93.8%) and 73.2% (95% CI 65.3%-80.1%); and for Scoring 3 were 61.8% (95% CI 49.2%-73.3%) and 80.5% (95% CI 73.3%-86.6%), respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that scorings based on bpMRI, age, and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) were independent predictors of csPCa. The AUCs for the 3 models were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93), respectively. Model 2 showed significantly higher performance than Model 1 (P = 0.03) and Model 3 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION All three scorings had favorite diagnostic accuracy. While in conjunction with age and PSAD the prediction power was significantly improved, and the Model 2 that based on Scoring 2 yielded the highest performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beibei Hu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China.
| | - Huili Zhang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China
| | - Yueyue Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China
| | - Yongming Jin
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Yancheng Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University; Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Yancheng, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang YF, Lo CY, Chen LY, Chang CW, Huang YT, Huang YY, Huang YH. Comparing the Detection Performance Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:e321-e331. [PMID: 37145456 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been promoted as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) including 68 Ga-PSMA-11, 18 F-DCFPyL, and 18 F-PSMA-1007 applied PET/CT imaging was an emerging diagnostic tool in prostate cancer patients for staging or posttreatment follow-up, even early detecting. Many studies have used PSMA PET for comparison with mpMRI to test the diagnostic ability for early prostate cancer. Unfortunately, these studies have shown conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in diagnostic performance between PSMA PET and mpMRI for detecting and T staging localized prostatic tumors. METHODS This meta-analysis involved a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. The pooling sensitivity and specificity of PSMA and mpMRI verified by pathological analysis were calculated and used to compare the differences between the 2 imaging tools. RESULTS Overall, 39 studies were included (3630 patients in total) from 2016 to 2022 in the current meta-analysis and found that the pooling sensitivity values for localized prostatic tumors and T staging T3a and T3b of PSMA PET were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.86), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39-0.79), and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76), respectively, whereas those of mpMRI were found to be 0.84 (95% 0.78-0.89), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.80), and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73), respectively, without significant differences ( P > 0.05). However, in a subgroup analysis of radiotracer, the pooling sensitivity of 18 F-DCFPyL PET was higher than mpMRI (relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis found that whereas 18 F-DCFPyL PET was superior to mpMRI at detecting localized prostatic tumors, the detection performance of PSMA PET for localized prostatic tumors and T staging was comparable to that of mpMRI.
Collapse
|
5
|
Liang H, Wang X, Li F, Xie Y, Shen J, Wang X, Huang Y, Lin S, Chen J, Zhang L, Jiang B, Xing J, Zhu J. Label-free plasmonic metasensing of PSA and exosomes in serum for rapid high-sensitivity diagnosis of early prostate cancer. Biosens Bioelectron 2023; 235:115380. [PMID: 37207584 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2023.115380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test is widely used to diagnose early prostate cancer (PCa). Its low sensitivity, especially in the gray zone, usually incurs overtreatment or missed diagnosis. As an emerging tumor marker, exosomes have attracted great interest in non-invasive diagnosis of PCa. However, the quick direct detection of exosomes in serum is still a big challenge for convenient screening of early PCa due to their high-degree heterogeneity and complexity. Here we develop the label-free biosensors based on wafer-scale plasmonic metasurfaces, and establish a flexible spectral methodology of exosomes profiling, which facilitates their identification and quantification in serum. We combine the metasurfaces functionalized by anti-PSA and anti-CD63, respectively, and build a portable immunoassay system to detect serum PSA and exosomes simultaneously within 20 min. Our scheme can discriminate early PCa from benign prostatic hyperplasia with a diagnostic sensitivity of 92.3%, which is much higher that of 58.3% for conventional PSA tests. The receiver operating characteristic analysis in clinical trials demonstrates significant PCa distinguishing capability with an area under the curve up to 99.4%. Our work provides a rapid and powerful approach for precise diagnosis of early PCa, and will inspire more exosomes metasensing studies for other early cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haotian Liang
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
| | - Xuegang Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, China
| | - Fajun Li
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
| | - Yinong Xie
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
| | - Jiaqing Shen
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
| | - Xueqin Wang
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
| | - Yuqian Huang
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
| | - Shaowei Lin
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, China
| | - Junjie Chen
- Analysis and Measurement Center, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, China
| | - Lijian Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, China
| | - Bingliang Jiang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, China
| | - Jinchun Xing
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, China
| | - Jinfeng Zhu
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li X, Li C, Chen M. Patients With "Gray Zone" PSA Levels: Application of Prostate MRI and MRS in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:992-1010. [PMID: 36326563 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Improving the detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and avoiding unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels within the gray zone require urgent attention. In this context, rapid advances in MR technology in recent years may offer a promising possibility. A systematic review to evaluate the applications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in detecting PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in men with PSA levels within the gray zone. The study type is defined as systematic review. In July 2022, out of 229 studies identified by the database search and from other sources, 23 articles related to the selected topic of interest were included in this review. No field strength or sequence restrictions. The data including the study population, study characteristics, as well as basic MRI characteristics, from the final studies included in this review, were extracted independently by two reviewers. The major results of the original study were summarized and no additional statistical analysis was performed. Among the 23 studies included in this review, 17 focused on the applications of MRS and MRI for the prebiopsy diagnosis of PCa. Nine of these 17 articles used Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score to interpret MRI results, thereby confirming the practicality of the PI-RADS score in predicting PCa and csPCa. The remaining six articles evaluated the applications of MRI and MRS in guiding prostate biopsy. Although there was a variation in the biopsy modalities used in these studies, both MRI- and MRS-guided prostate biopsies were observed to improve the detection rates of PCa and csPCa in patients with PSA levels within the gray zone. MRS and MRI showed good performance in the detection of PCa and csPCa before biopsy. In addition, MRS- or MRI-guided prostate-targeted biopsies were able to improve the detection rates of PCa and csPCa. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Chunmei Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ziayee F, Schimmöller L, Blondin D, Boschheidgen M, Wilms LM, Vach M, Arsov C, Albers P, Antoch G, Ullrich T. Impact of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 1.5 T versus 3 T MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection. Eur J Radiol 2022; 156:110520. [PMID: 36116141 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study analyzes the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE) of the prostate on 1.5 T and 3 T examinations in patients within PI-RADS category 4. METHODS In this retrospective, bi-centric, cohort study all consecutive patients classified as PI-RADS 4 in mpMRI with 100 verified prostate cancers (PCa) in subsequent MRI/US-guided fusion biopsy were included for 1.5 T and 3 T, each. PCa detection in index lesions (IL) upgraded to PI-RADS 4 based on positive DCE findings was compared between 1.5 T and 3 T. Secondary objectives are subgroup analysis of PZ lesions and comparison of ISUP grade group distribution between 1.5 T and 3 T. RESULTS In total, 293 patients within PI-RADS category 4, including 152 (mean 66 ± 8y; median PSA 6.4 ng/ml;116 PZ IL) in the 1.5 T group and 141 (mean 65 ± 8y; median PSA 7.2 ng/ml;100 PZ IL) in the 3 T group were included. Overall amount of PCa (66 % vs 71 %; p = 0.346) and portion of upgraded IL (28 % vs 21 %; p = 0.126) did not differ significantly. At 1.5 T PCa detection was higher in upgraded PZ lesions compared to 3 T (23 % vs 14 %; p = 0.048). The amount of upgraded PZ lesions with ISUP grade group 2-5 PCa was significantly higher at 1.5 T versus 3 T (13.8 % vs 4.0 %; p = 0.007). 33 % (11/33; 1.5 T) and 32 % (10/31; 3 T) of the ISUP grade group 1 PCa of the PZ lesions were detected in upgraded lesions (10% of all PZ index lesions, respectively). CONCLUSION DCE enabled the detection of a substantial amount of additional clinically significant PCa in prostate mpMRI at 1.5 T. The effect was smaller at 3 T and was accompanied in relation to 1.5 T by higher risk of overdiagnosis due to detection of additional low-risk PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ziayee
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - L Schimmöller
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - D Blondin
- Community Hospital Moenchengladbach GmbH, Elisabeth-Hospital Rheydt, Department of Radiology, Vascular Radiology, and Nuclear Medicine, D-41239 Moenchengladbach, Germany.
| | - M Boschheidgen
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - L M Wilms
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - M Vach
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - C Arsov
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - P Albers
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - G Antoch
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - T Ullrich
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wen J, Ji Y, Han J, Shen X, Qiu Y. Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version v2.1 for detection of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1013941. [PMID: 36248983 PMCID: PMC9554626 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1013941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives We aimed to systematically assess the inter-reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version (PI-RADS) v2.1 for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods We included studies reporting inter-reader agreement of different radiologists that applied PI-RADS v2.1 for the detection of PCa. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed with the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies. The summary estimates of the inter-reader agreement were pooled with the random-effect model and categorized (from slight to almost perfect) according to the kappa (κ) value. Multiple subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore various clinical settings. Results A total of 12 studies comprising 2475 patients were included. The pooled inter-reader agreement for whole gland was κ=0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.73), and for transitional zone (TZ) lesions was κ=0.62 (95% CI 0.51-0.72). There was substantial heterogeneity presented throughout the studies (I 2= 95.6%), and meta-regression analyses revealed that only readers' experience (<5 years vs. ≥5 years) was the significant factor associated with heterogeneity (P<0.01). In studies providing head-to-head comparison, there was no significant difference in inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and v2.0 for both the whole gland (0.64 vs. 0.57, p=0.37), and TZ (0.61 vs. 0.59, p=0.81). Conclusions PI-RADS v2.1 demonstrated substantial inter-reader agreement among radiologists for whole gland and TZ lesions. However, the difference in agreement between PI-RADS v2.0 and v2.1 was not significant for the whole gland or the TZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China
| | - Yugang Ji
- The First People’s Hospital of Yancheng, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Yancheng, China
| | - Jing Han
- The Affiliated Suzhou Science & Technology Town Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiaocui Shen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China
| | - Yi Qiu
- The Affiliated Suzhou Science & Technology Town Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tamada T, Kido A, Ueda Y, Takeuchi M, Kanki A, Neelavalli J, Yamamoto A. Comparison of single-shot EPI and multi-shot EPI in prostate DWI at 3.0 T. Sci Rep 2022; 12:16070. [PMID: 36168032 PMCID: PMC9515065 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20518-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
In prostate MRI, single-shot EPI (ssEPI) DWI still suffers from distortion and blurring. Multi-shot EPI (msEPI) overcomes the drawbacks of ssEPI DWI. The aim of this article was to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) between ssEPI DWI and msEPI DWI. This retrospective study included 134 patients with suspected PC who underwent 3.0 T MRI and subsequent MRI-guided biopsy. Three radiologists independently assessed anatomical distortion, prostate edge clarity, and lesion conspicuity score for pathologically confirmed csPC. Lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and benign ADC were also calculated. In 17 PC patients who underwent prostatectomy, three radiologists independently assessed eight prostate regions by DWI score in PI-RADS v 2.1. Anatomical distortion and prostate edge clarity were significantly higher in msEPI DWI than in ssEPI DWI in the three readers. Lesion conspicuity score was significantly higher in msEPI DWI than in ssEPI DWI in reader 1 and reader 3. Regarding discrimination ability between PC with GS ≤ 3 + 4 and PC with GS ≥ 4 + 3 using lesion ADC, AUC was comparable between ssEPI DWI and msEPI DWI. For diagnostic performance of csPC using DWI score, AUC was comparable between msEPI DWI and ssEPI DWI in all readers. Compared with ssEPI DWI, msEPI DWI had improved image quality and similar or higher diagnostic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
| | - Ayumu Kido
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | | | | | - Akihiko Kanki
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | | | - Akira Yamamoto
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tamada T, Ueda Y, Kido A, Yoneyama M, Takeuchi M, Sanai H, Ono K, Yamamoto A, Sone T. Clinical application of single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging with compressed SENSE in prostate MRI at 3T: preliminary experience. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:549-556. [PMID: 35403993 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01010-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Image quality (IQ) of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in high b-value acquisitions. Compressed SENSE (C-SENSE), which combines SENSE with compressed sensing, enables SNR to be improved by reducing noise. The aim of this study was to compare IQ and prostate cancer (PC) detectability between DWI with ssEPI using SENSE (EPIS) and using C-SENSE (EPICS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five patients with pathologically proven PC underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. DW images acquired with EPIS and EPICS were assessed for the following: lesion conspicuity (LC), SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), mean and standard deviation (SD) of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of lesion (lADCm and lADCsd), coefficient of variation of lesion ADC (lADCcv), and mean ADC of benign prostate (bADCm). RESULTS LC were comparable between EPIS and EPICS (p > 0.050), and SNR and CNR were significantly higher in EPICS than EPIS (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001). In both EPIS and EPICS, lADCm was significantly lower than bADCm (p < 0.001). In addition, lADCcv was significantly lower in EPICS than in EPIS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Compared with EPIS, EPICS has improved IQ and comparable diagnostic performance in PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki-city, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
| | - Yu Ueda
- Philips Japan, Konan 2-13-37, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8507, Japan
| | - Ayumu Kido
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki-city, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Masami Yoneyama
- Philips Japan, Konan 2-13-37, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8507, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takeuchi
- Department of Radiology, Radiolonet Tokai, Asaoka-cho 3-86-2, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya-city , Aichi, 464-0811, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Sanai
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki-city, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ono
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki-city, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Akira Yamamoto
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki-city, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Teruki Sone
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki-city, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tamada T, Kido A, Ueda Y, Takeuchi M, Fukunaga T, Sone T, Yamamoto A. Clinical impact of ultra-high b-value (3000 s/mm 2) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer at 3T: comparison with b-value of 2000 s/mm 2. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210465. [PMID: 34558293 PMCID: PMC8978230 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (hDWI) with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 provides insufficient image contrast between benign and malignant tissues and an overlap of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between Gleason grades (GG) in prostate cancer (PC). We compared image quality, PC detectability, and discrimination ability for PC aggressiveness between ultra-high b-value DWI (uhDWI) of 3000 s/mm2 and hDWI. METHODS The subjects were 49 patients with PC who underwent 3T multiparametric MRI. Single-shot echo-planar DWI was acquired with b-values of 0, 2000, and 3000 s/mm2. Anatomical distortion of prostate (AD), signal intensity of benign prostate (PSI), and lesion conspicuity score (LCS) were assessed using a 4-point scale; and signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and mean ADC (×10-3 mm2/s) of lesion (lADC) and surrounding benign region (bADC) were measured. RESULTS PSI was significantly lower in uhDWI than in hDWI (p < 0.001). AD, LCS, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were comparable between uhDWI and hDWI (all p > 0.05). In contrast, lADC was significantly lower than bADC in both uhDWI and hDWI (both p < 0.001). In comparison of lADC between tumors of ≤GG2 and those of ≥GG3, both uhDWI and hDWI showed significant difference (p = 0.007 and p = 0.021, respectively). AUC for separating tumors of ≤GG2 from those of ≥GG3 was 0.731 in hDWI and 0.699 in uhDWI (p = 0.161). CONCLUSION uhDWI suppressed background signal better than hDWI, but did not contribute to increased diagnostic performance in PC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Compared with hDWI, uhDWI could not contribute to increased diagnostic performance in PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Ayumu Kido
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Yu Ueda
- Philips Japan, Konan 2-13-37, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Takeshi Fukunaga
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Teruki Sone
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Akira Yamamoto
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim J, Cho S, Park Y, Lee J, Park J. Evaluation of micro-RNA in extracellular vesicles from blood of patients with prostate cancer. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0262017. [PMID: 34972164 PMCID: PMC8719659 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) contain various types of molecules including micro-RNAs, so isolating EVs can be an effective way to analyze and diagnose diseases. A lot of micro-RNAs have been known in relation to prostate cancer (PCa), and we evaluate miR-21, miR-141, and miR-221 in EVs and compare them with prostate-specific antigen (PSA). EVs were isolated from plasma of 38 patients with prostate cancer and 8 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), using a method that showed the highest recovery of RNA. Isolation of EVs concentrated micro-RNAs, reducing the cycle threshold (Ct) value of RT-qPCR amplification of micro-RNA such as miR-16 by 5.12 and miR-191 by 4.65, compared to the values before EV isolation. Normalization of target micro-RNAs was done using miR-191. For miR-221, the mean expression level of patients with localized PCa was significantly higher than that of the control group, having 33.45 times higher expression than the control group (p < 0.01). Area under curve (AUC) between BPH and PCa for miR-221 was 0.98 (p < 0.0001), which was better than AUC for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in serum for the same patients. The levels of miR-21 and miR-141 in EVs did not show significant changes in patients with PCa compared to the control group in this study. This study suggests isolating EVs can be a helpful approach in analyzing micro-RNAs with regard to disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyoon Kim
- School of Interdisciplinary Bioscience and Bioengineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeong-buk, Republic of Korea
| | - Siwoo Cho
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeong-buk, Republic of Korea
| | - Yonghyun Park
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jiyoul Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaesung Park
- School of Interdisciplinary Bioscience and Bioengineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeong-buk, Republic of Korea
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeong-buk, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moss B, Amin S, Muthukumara W, Khoory C, Minshull-Beech H, Nambirajan T. Diagnostic accuracy of bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in suspected prostate cancer: Correlation of scan results with biopsy findings in a series of 266 patients. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415820970399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer (PCa), and to assess the suitability of a new diagnostic pathway using bpMRI and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) to determine the need for biopsy. Methods: A total of 386 patients referred to one UK cancer centre with suspected PCa across 12 months from 2017 to 2018 underwent bpMRI, with a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score assigned. Of these, 266 (69%) were biopsied, with 150 CS-PCa (a Gleason score of 7 or a Gleason score of 3 with core length ⩾5 mm) detected: a 57% diagnostic yield. Imaging, PSAd and biopsy results were collated, and a confusion matrix was calculated. Results: Twenty-three men with PIRADS 1 were biopsied, with two CS-PCa detected: PSAd M=0.19 ( SD=0.07). Twenty-one men with PIRADS 2 lesions were biopsied, with one CS-PCa detected: PSAd was 0.28. Seventy-five men with PIRADS 3 were biopsied, with 25 CS-PCa detected: PSAd M=0.26 ( SD=0.16). Fifty-seven men with PIRADS 4 were biopsied, with 46 CS-PCa detected: PSAd M=0.26 ( SD=0.16). Ninety men with PIRADS 5 were biopsied, with 83 CS-PCa detected: PSAd M=0.55 ( SD=0.63). Among the 266 biopsied patients, a pathway offering biopsy if PIRADS is ⩾3 or PSAd ⩾0.1 spares 11 (4.2%) biopsies compared to baseline practice, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 10.1%, for biopsy-detected CS-PCa. The diagnostic yield is 61.8%. Conclusion: BpMRI is comparable to multi-parametric MRI for assessing need for biopsy in suspected PCa, albeit with lower specificity. A diagnostic pathway using bpMRI and PSAd can be safely used to avoid biopsy in men at low risk, increasing diagnostic yield of biopsy while reducing overdiagnosis and avoiding the risks and costs associated with gadolinium contrast. Level of evidence: Level 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suzanne Amin
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for assessment of tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 83:152-159. [PMID: 34454006 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) for characterization of prostate cancer (PC). METHODS 104 PC patients who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI at 3T including DWI and DCE-MRI before MRI-guided biopsy or radical prostatectomy. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with histogram analysis (mean, 0-25th percentile, skewness, and kurtosis), intravoxel incoherent motion model including D and f; stretched exponential model including distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and a; and permeability parameters including Ktrans, Kep, and Ve were obtained from a region of interest placed on the dominant tumor of each patient. RESULTS ADCmean, ADC0-25, D, DDC, and Ve were significantly lower and Kep was significantly higher in GS ≥ 3 + 4 tumors (n = 89) than in GS = 3 + 3 tumors (n = 15), and also in GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors (n = 57) than in GS ≤ 3 + 4 tumors (n = 47) (P < 0.001 to P = 0.040). f was significantly lower in GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors than in GS ≤ 3 + 4 tumors (P = 0.022), but there was no significant difference between GS = 3 + 3 tumors and GS ≥ 3 + 4 tumors, or between the remaining metrics in both comparisons. In metrics with area under the curve (AUC) >0.80, there was a significant difference in AUC between ADC0-25 and D, and DDC for separating GS ≤ 3 + 4 tumors from GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors (P = 0.040 and P = 0.022, respectively). There were no significant differences between metrics with AUC > 0.80 for separating GS = 3 + 3 tumors from GS ≥ 3 + 4 tumors. ADC0-25 had the highest correlation with Gleason grade (ρ = -0.625, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS DWI and DCE-MRI showed no apparent clinical superiority of non-Gaussian models or permeability MRI over the mono-exponential model for assessment of tumor aggressiveness in PC.
Collapse
|
15
|
Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Biparametric versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer in 431 Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11071223. [PMID: 34359307 PMCID: PMC8306749 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: the study of dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) has a limited role in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa), and there is a growing interest in performing unenhanced biparametric prostate-MRI (bpMRI) instead of the conventional multiparametric-MRI (mpMRI). In this study, we aimed to retrospectively compare the performance of the mpMRI, which includes DCE study, and the unenhanced bpMRI, composed of only T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), in PCa detection in men with elevated prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) levels. (2) Methods: a 1.5 T MRI, with an endorectal-coil, was performed on 431 men (aged 61.5 ± 8.3 years) with a PSA ≥4.0 ng/mL. The bpMRI and mpMRI tests were independently assessed in separate sessions by two readers with 5 (R1) and 3 (R2) years of experience. The histopathology or ≥2 years follow-up served as a reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated with their 95% CI, and McNemar’s and Cohen’s κ statistics were used. (3) Results: in 195/431 (45%) of histopathologically proven PCa cases, 62/195 (32%) were high-grade PCa (GS ≥ 7b) and 133/195 (68%) were low-grade PCa (GS ≤ 7a). The PCa could be excluded by histopathology in 58/431 (14%) and by follow-up in 178/431 (41%) of patients. For bpMRI, the sensitivity was 164/195 (84%, 95% CI: 79–89%) for R1 and 156/195 (80%, 95% CI: 74–86%) for R2; while specificity was 182/236 (77%, 95% CI: 72–82%) for R1 and 175/236 (74%, 95% CI: 68–80%) for R2. For mpMRI, sensitivity was 168/195 (86%, 95% CI: 81–91%) for R1 and 160/195 (82%, 95% CI: 77–87%) for R2; while specificity was 184/236 (78%, 95% CI: 73–83%) for R1 and 177/236 (75%, 95% CI: 69–81%) for R2. Interobserver agreement was substantial for both bpMRI (κ = 0.802) and mpMRI (κ = 0.787). (4) Conclusions: the diagnostic performance of bpMRI and mpMRI were similar, and no high-grade PCa was missed with bpMRI.
Collapse
|
16
|
Stavrinides V, Syer T, Hu Y, Giganti F, Freeman A, Karapanagiotis S, Bott SRJ, Brown LC, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge TJ, Bosaily AES, Frangou E, Ghei M, Henderson A, Hindley RG, Kaplan RS, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Persad R, Rosario DJ, Shergill IS, Echeverria LMC, Norris JM, Winkler M, Barratt D, Kirkham A, Punwani S, Whitaker HC, Ahmed HU, Emberton M. False Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phenotypes in the Biopsy-naïve Prostate: Are They Distinct from Significant Cancer-associated Lesions? Lessons from PROMIS. Eur Urol 2021; 79:20-29. [PMID: 33051065 PMCID: PMC7772750 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND False positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) phenotypes prompt unnecessary biopsies. The Prostate MRI Imaging Study (PROMIS) provides a unique opportunity to explore such phenotypes in biopsy-naïve men with raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and suspected cancer. OBJECTIVE To compare mpMRI lesions in men with/without significant cancer on transperineal mapping biopsy (TPM). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS PROMIS participants (n=235) underwent mpMRI followed by a combined biopsy procedure at University College London Hospital, including 5-mm TPM as the reference standard. Patients were divided into four mutually exclusive groups according to TPM findings: (1) no cancer, (2) insignificant cancer, (3) definition 2 significant cancer (Gleason ≥3+4 of any length and/or maximum cancer core length ≥4mm of any grade), and (4) definition 1 significant cancer (Gleason ≥4+3 of any length and/or maximum cancer core length ≥6mm of any grade). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Index and/or additional lesions present in 178 participants were compared between TPM groups in terms of number, conspicuity, volume, location, and radiological characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Most lesions were located in the peripheral zone. More men with significant cancer had two or more lesions than those without significant disease (67% vs 37%; p< 0.001). In the former group, index lesions were larger (mean volume 0.68 vs 0.50 ml; p< 0.001, Wilcoxon test), more conspicuous (Likert 4-5: 79% vs 22%; p< 0.001), and diffusion restricted (mean apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]: 0.73 vs 0.86; p< 0.001, Wilcoxon test). In men with Likert 3 index lesions, log2PSA density and index lesion ADC were significant predictors of definition 1/2 disease in a logistic regression model (mean cross-validated area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve: 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.87]). CONCLUSIONS Significant cancer-associated MRI lesions in biopsy-naïve men have clinical-radiological differences, with lesions seen in prostates without significant disease. MRI-calculated PSA density and ADC could predict significant cancer in those with indeterminate MRI phenotypes. PATIENT SUMMARY Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions that mimic prostate cancer but are, in fact, benign prompt unnecessary biopsies in thousands of men with raised prostate-specific antigen. In this study we found that, on closer look, such false positive lesions have different features from cancerous ones. This means that doctors could potentially develop better tools to identify cancer on MRI and spare some patients from unnecessary biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilis Stavrinides
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Tom Syer
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Yipeng Hu
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK; Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Science (WEISS), University College London, London, UK; Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Francesco Giganti
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Solon Karapanagiotis
- The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK; Medical Research Council (MRC) Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon R J Bott
- Department of Urology, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Louise C Brown
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Burns-Cox
- Department of Urology, Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Timothy J Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Elena Frangou
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maneesh Ghei
- Department of Urology, Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alastair Henderson
- Department of Urology, Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Tunbridge Wells, UK
| | - Richard G Hindley
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
| | - Richard S Kaplan
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Chris Parker
- Department of Academic Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Derek J Rosario
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Iqbal S Shergill
- Department of Urology, Wrexham Maelor Hospital NHS Trust, Wrexham, UK
| | | | - Joseph M Norris
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Dean Barratt
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK; Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Science (WEISS), University College London, London, UK; Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Palumbo P, Manetta R, Izzo A, Bruno F, Arrigoni F, De Filippo M, Splendiani A, Di Cesare E, Masciocchi C, Barile A. Biparametric (bp) and multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach to prostate cancer disease: a narrative review of current debate on dynamic contrast enhancement. Gland Surg 2020; 9:2235-2247. [PMID: 33447576 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in male population. Over the last few years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proved to be a robust clinical tool for identification and staging of clinically significant prostate cancer. Though suggestions by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology to use complete multiparametric (mp) T2-weighted/diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)/dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) acquisition for all prostate MRI examinations, the real advantage of functional DCE remains a matter of debate. Recent studies demonstrate that biparametric (bp) and mp approaches have similar accuracy, but controversial evidences remain, and the specific potential benefits of contrast medium administration are still poorly discussed in literature. The bp approach is in fact sufficient in most cases to adequately identify a negative test, or to accurately define the degree of aggressiveness of a lesion, especially if larger or with major characteristics of malignancy. This feature would give the DCE a secondary role, probably limited to a second evaluation of the lesion location, for detecting small cancer or in case of controversy. However, DCE has proved to increase the sensitivity of prostate MRI, though a less specificity. Therefore, an appropriate decision algorithm is needed to standardize the MRI approach. Aim of this review study was to provide a schematic description of bpMRI and mpMRI approaches in the study of prostatic anatomy, focusing on comparative validity and current DCE application. Additional theoretical considerations on prostate MRI are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Rosa Manetta
- Radiology Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Izzo
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Arrigoni
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Massimo De Filippo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMec), Section of Radiology, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Alessandra Splendiani
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ernesto Di Cesare
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Carlo Masciocchi
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tamada T, Kido A, Yamamoto A, Takeuchi M, Miyaji Y, Moriya T, Sone T. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 53:283-291. [PMID: 32614123 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biparametric MRI (bpMRI) without dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) results in an elimination of adverse events, shortened examination time, and reduced costs, compared to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). The ability of bpMRI to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) with the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) compared to standard mpMRI has not been studied extensively. PURPOSE To compare the interobserver reliability and diagnostic performance for detecting csPC of bpMRI and mpMRI using PI-RADS v2.1. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION In all, 103 patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels who underwent mpMRI and subsequent MRI-ultrasonography fusion-guided prostate-targeted biopsy (MRGB) with or without prostatectomy. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES T2 -weighted imaging (T2 WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and DCE-MRI at 3T. ASSESSMENT Three readers independently assessed each suspected PC lesion, assigning a score of 1-5 for T2 WI, a score of 1-5 for DWI, and positive and negative for DCE-MRI according to PI-RADS v2.1 and determined the overall PI-RADS assessment category of bpMRI (T2 WI and DWI) and mpMRI (T2 WI, DWI, and DCE-MRI). The reference standard was MRGB or prostatectomy-derived histopathology. STATISTICAL TESTING Statistical analysis was performed using the kappa statistic and McNemar and Delong tests. RESULTS Of the 165 suspected PC lesions in 103 patients, 81 were diagnosed with csPC and 84 with benign conditions. Interobserver variability of PI-RADS assessment category showed good agreement for bpMRI (kappa value = 0.642) and mpMRI (kappa value = 0.644). For three readers, the diagnostic sensitivity was significantly higher for mpMRI than for bpMRI (P < 0.001 to P = 0.016, respectively), whereas diagnostic specificity was significantly higher for bpMRI than for mpMRI (P < 0.001 each). For three readers, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was higher for bpMRI than for mpMRI; however, the difference was significant only for Reader 1 and Reader 3 (Reader 1: 0.823 vs. 0.785, P = 0.035; Reader 2: 0.852 vs. 0.829, P = 0.099; and Reader 3: 0.828 vs. 0.773, P = 0.002). DATA CONCLUSION For detecting csPC using PI-RADS v2.1, the interobserver reliability and diagnostic performance of bpMRI was comparable with those of mpMRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Ayumu Kido
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Akira Yamamoto
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | | | - Yoshiyuki Miyaji
- Department of Urology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Teruki Sone
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Multiparametric MRI has a changing role in prostate cancer diagnosis. Internationally recognized consensus documents such as prostate imaging reporting and data system version have been developed and adapted to standardize the acquisition and reporting of prostate MRI. The improvement in scanning techniques and development of highly sensitive functional sequences have improved the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer as well as treatment planning and follow up. This has led to a recent NICE recommendation to use prostate MRI as the initial investigation in men with clinically suspected localized disease. The results of several recent international MRI prostate trials are influencing the way imaging is used to stratify which patients require a prostate biopsy as well as how MRI guidance is used to target biopsies.
Collapse
|
20
|
Yoo S, Suh J, Park J, Cho MC, Son H, Jeong H. Can we improve the detection rate of prostate cancer using standard 12-core TRUS-guided prostate biopsy? Focused on the location of prostate biopsy. Cancer Med 2020; 9:3758-3764. [PMID: 32281264 PMCID: PMC7286467 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed the effect of biopsy location on the prostate cancer detection and clinically significant prostate cancer. Methods A total of 2774 patients with 12‐core prostate transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate biopsy were included for per core analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of the location of biopsy on the prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer detection. Results Prostate cancer was found in 775 patients (27.9%) and 576 prostate cancer patients (20.8%) were found to be clinically significant. The core length (P = .043), tumor length (P < .001), and % tumor length (P < .001) were significantly different according to the biopsy location. The detection rates for prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer differed significantly according to the location of biopsy. Multivariate analysis revealed that the apical core was significantly related with increased detection of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. The lateral core, in addition to apical core, was found to be significantly related with increased detection rates of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer in men with prostate‐specific antigen <10 ng/mL. Conclusions More in‐depth discussions on the location of standard 12‐core prostate biopsy are considered necessary. Apical core and lateral core biopsies may be helpful, especially in patients with prostate‐specific antigen ˂10 ng/mL if additional biopsies are planned following findings of no target lesions on imaging studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangjun Yoo
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jungyo Suh
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Juhyun Park
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Chul Cho
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwancheol Son
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.,Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.,Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gündoğdu E, Emekli E, Kebapçı M. Evaluation of relationships between the final Gleason score, PI-RADS v2 score, ADC value, PSA level, and tumor diameter in patients that underwent radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer. Radiol Med 2020; 125:827-837. [PMID: 32266690 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01183-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the serum PSA level, Gleason score (GS), PI-RADS v2 score, tumor ADCmin value, and the largest tumor diameter in patients that underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) due to prostate cancer (PCa) and to comparatively evaluate the variables of these parameters in clinically significant and insignificant PCa groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS The mpMRI examinations of the patients who underwent RP due to PCa were retrospectively evaluated. According to the final GS, the lesions were divided into two groups as clinically significant (GS ≥ 7) and insignificant (GS ≤ 6). The PSA value, tumor ADCmin value, tumor diameter, and PI-RADS score were compared between the clinically significant and nonsignificant PCa groups using Student's t-test. The correlations between the serum PSA level, GS, PI-RADS v2 score, tumor ADCmin value, and tumor diameter were evaluated separately (Pearson's correlation analysis was used for peripheral gland tumors, and Spearman's correlation analysis for central gland tumors). A ROC analysis was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of the tumor ADCmin, diameter and PSA values in differentiating clinically significant and nonsignificant tumors. RESULTS In both central and peripheral gland tumors, there was a correlation between the PSA level, tumor diameter, PI-RADS score, ADCmin value, and GS at various levels (poor, moderate, and high). In central gland tumors, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the PSA value and PI-RADS scores (p > 0.05), but the ADCmin value and diameter of the tumor significantly differed (p < 0.05). For peripheral gland tumors, significant differences were observed in all parameters (p < 0.05). The cut-off values for the peripheral and central gland tumors are as follows: lesion diameter, 13.5 mm and 19 mm; tumor ADCmin, 0.709 × 10-3 mm2/s and 0.874 × 10-3 mm2/s; and PSA level, 8.47 ng/ml and 11.10 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION The current PI-RADS v2 scoring system can be inadequate in distinguishing clinically significant and insignificant groups in central gland tumors. A separate cut-off value of the tumor diameter should be determined for central and peripheral gland tumors. Tumor ADCmin values can be used as a predictive parameter. The PSA cut-off value should be kept lower in peripheral gland tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elif Gündoğdu
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Meşelik Yerleşkesi, 26480, Eskişehir, Turkey.
| | - Emre Emekli
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Meşelik Yerleşkesi, 26480, Eskişehir, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Kebapçı
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Meşelik Yerleşkesi, 26480, Eskişehir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liang Z, Hu R, Yang Y, An N, Duo X, Liu Z, Shi S, Liu X. Is dynamic contrast enhancement still necessary in multiparametric magnetic resonance for diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:553-573. [PMID: 32420161 PMCID: PMC7215029 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.02.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literatures assessing the value of dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) in the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods We searched Embase, PubMed and Web of science until January 2019 to extract articles exploring the possibilities whether the pre-biopsy biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) can replace the position of mpMRI in the diagnosis of PCa. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI were all included. The study quality was assessed by QUADAS-2. Bivariate random effects meta-analyses and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic plot were performed for further study through Revman 5 and Stata12. Results After searching, we acquired 752 articles among which 45 studies with 5,217 participants were eligible for inclusion. The positive likelihood ratio for the detection of PCa was 2.40 (95% CI: 1.50–3.80) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18–0.53). The sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73–0.81) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.85) respectively. Based on our result, pooled specificity demonstrated little difference between bpMRI and mpMRI [bpMRI, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76–0.85); mpMRI, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72–0.88); P=0.169]. The sensitivity, however, indicated a significant difference between these two groups [bpMRI, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73–0.81); mpMRI, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78–0.89); P=0.001]. Conclusions bpMRI with high b-value is a sensitive tool for diagnosing PCa. Consistent results were found in multiple subgroup analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Liang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Rui Hu
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Yongjiao Yang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Neng An
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Xiaoxin Duo
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Shangheng Shi
- Department of Transplantation, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Liu
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wu Q, Chen Y, Chen S, Wu X, Nong W. Correlation between adiponectin, chemerin, vascular endothelial growth factor and epicardial fat volume in patients with coronary artery disease. Exp Ther Med 2019; 19:1095-1102. [PMID: 32010275 PMCID: PMC6966190 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Epicardial fat, a local visceral fat depot surrounded by visceral pericardial sac, surrounds the coronary arteries for most of their course and may contribute to the development of coronary atherosclerosis by local production of inflammatory cytokines. Some studies on non-invasive measurement of epicardial fat mass have shown that epicardial fat mass is associated with the increased incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD), onset and progression of coronary plaque, mainly including major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial ischemia, and atrial fibrillation. In the present study the correlation of adiponectin, chemerin, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with the epicardial fat volume in patients with coronary artery disease was explored, and the risk factors for vascular remodeling of CAD patients were analyzed. A total of 50 CAD patients, treated in Chongzuo People's Hospital from August 2017 to September 2018, were enrolled as the observation group, and further 50 healthy individuals, who underwent physical examinations in the hospital at the same period, were enrolled as the control group. RT-qPCR was adopted to detect the expression levels of adiponectin, chemerin and VEGF in the two groups, a 64-slice dual-source CT to detect epicardial fat volume, and Pearson's correlation to analyze adiponectin, chemerin, VEGF and epicardial fat volume. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors for vascular remodeling in CAD patients, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to analyze the value of indexes with multifactorial significance in vascular remodeling. The observation group showed obviously larger epicardial fat volume than the control group (P<0.001), lower adiponectin expression than the control group (P<0.001), and higher chemerin and VEGF expression than the control group (P<0.001). In the observation group, adiponectin expression decreased with the increase of epicardial fat volume (P<0.001), while the expression of chemerin and VEGF increased with the increase of epicardial fat volume (P<0.001). Remodeling occurred in 27 of the 50 patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under the curves of adiponectin, chemerin, VEGF and epicardial fat volume were 0.697, 0.652, 0.696 and 0.689, respectively. Epicardial fat volume, adiponectin, chemerin and VEGF are independent risk factors for vascular remodeling and the expression of adiponectin, chemerin and VEGF can reflect epicardial fat volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qixin Wu
- Department of Radiology, Chongzuo People's Hospital, Chongzuo, Guangxi 532200, P.R. China
| | - Yuxiang Chen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chongzuo People's Hospital, Chongzuo, Guangxi 532200, P.R. China
| | - Song Chen
- Department of Radiology, The People's Hospital of Qinzhou, Qinzhou, Guangxi 535000, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoqiu Wu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chongzuo People's Hospital, Chongzuo, Guangxi 532200, P.R. China
| | - Weixia Nong
- Department of Physiology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tamada T, Kido A, Takeuchi M, Yamamoto A, Miyaji Y, Kanomata N, Sone T. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 2019; 121:108704. [PMID: 31669798 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 for detecting transition zone prostate cancer (TZPC) on multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). METHOD Fifty-eight patients with elevated PSA levels underwent mpMRI at 3 T including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and subsequent MRI-transrectal ultrasonography fusion-guided prostate-targeted biopsy (MRGB). The standard of reference was MRGB-derived histopathology. Two readers independently assessed each TZ lesion, assigning a score of 1-5 for T2WI, a score of 1-5 for DWI, and the overall PI-RADS assessment category according to PI-RADS v2 and v2.1. The diagnostic performance of the two methods was compared in terms of inter-reader agreement, diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS Of the 58 patients, 26 were diagnosed with PC (GS = 3 + 3, n = 9; GS = 3 + 4, n = 9; GS = 3 + 5, n = 1; GS = 4 + 3, n = 4; GS = 4 + 4, n = 3) and 32 with benign lesions. Regarding inter-reader agreement of overall PI-RADS assessment category, the kappa value was 0.580 for v2 and 0.645 for v2.1. For both readers, there was no difference in diagnostic sensitivity between the versions (p ≥ 0.500). For reader 1, the diagnostic specificity was higher for v2.1 (p = 0.002), and was similar for reader 2 (p = 1.000). For both readers, AUC tended to be higher for v2.1 than for v2, but the difference was not significant (0.786 vs. 0.847 for reader 1, p = 0.052; and 0.808 vs. 0.858 for reader 2, p = 0.197). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that compared with PI-RADS v2, PI-RADS v2.1 could be preferable for evaluating TZ lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
| | - Ayumu Kido
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | | | - Akira Yamamoto
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Miyaji
- Department of Urology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Naoki Kanomata
- Department of pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Teruki Sone
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tamada T, Miyaji Y, Kanomata N, Kido A, Yamamoto A, Sone T. Early Experience with MRI-ultrasound Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy in Japanese Men with Elevated PSA Levels. Magn Reson Med Sci 2019; 18:301-303. [PMID: 30745546 PMCID: PMC6883085 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.bc.2018-0154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ayumu Kido
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School
| | | | - Teruki Sone
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Upgraded Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 3 Peripheral Zone Observations Stratified by a Size Threshold of 15 mm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:836-843. [PMID: 31120786 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.21005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI (DCE-MRI)-upgraded Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) peripheral zone (PZ) observations stratified by a size threshold of 15 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two blinded radiologists independently assessed 301 patients with 326 clinically significant tumors (Gleason score [GS] ≥ 7) using multiparametric MRI performed before radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2012 and 2017 and then assigned PI-RADSv2 scores for the tumors. PI-RADSv2 category 3 PZ observations upgraded on the basis of abnormal DCE-MRI findings were tabulated, agreement was calculated, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The rate of detection of clinically significant cancer among upgraded observations was calculated. Size was measured at consensus review and was compared with pathologic outcomes on the basis of the PI-RADSv2 size threshold of 15 mm or more, with the use of chi-square tests. RESULTS. Reader 1 identified 5.2% (17/326) of DCE-MRI-upgraded PZ observations, and reader 2 identified 8.3% (27/326) of such observations. Interobserver agreement for PI-RADSv2 scoring was moderate (κ = 0.42) overall, but it was fair (κ = 0.23) when only DCE-MRI-upgraded observations were considered. Of the upgraded observations, which had a mean (± SD) size of 14 ± 6 mm (range, 6-29 mm), 10.4% (34/326) were agreed on after consensus review. Size smaller than 15 mm was noted for 61.8% (21/34) of observations. Among DCE-MRI-upgraded PZ observations, true- and false-positive detection rates for significant cancer were 91.2% (31/34) and 8.8% (3/34), respectively. Observations 15 mm or larger had no false-positive diagnoses and higher rates of extraprostatic extension (84.6% [11/13] vs 38.1% [8/21]; p = 0.016); however, there was no difference in GS (p = 0.354) compared with observations less than 15 mm in size. CONCLUSION. PZ observations upgraded on the basis of abnormal DCE-MRI findings have a high likelihood of being clinically significant cancer; however, agreement between readers was low. DCE-MRI-upgraded tumors of 15 mm or larger had no false-positive diagnoses and higher rates of extraprostatic extension, suggesting that they could be assigned to PI-RADSv2 assessment category 5.
Collapse
|
27
|
Gatti M, Faletti R, Calleris G, Giglio J, Berzovini C, Gentile F, Marra G, Misischi F, Molinaro L, Bergamasco L, Gontero P, Papotti M, Fonio P. Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI). Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:1883-1893. [PMID: 30788558 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01934-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) by readers with different experience, comparing performance with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bmMRI) and with the reference multiparametric (mpMRI). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 68 patients with mpMRI of the prostate at 1.5 Tesla using a 32 phased-array coil. Forty-five patients (cases) underwent radical prostatectomy, whereas 23 (controls) had a negative prostate biopsy and ≥ 2.5 years of negative follow-up. Six observers (two with 1000 cases interpreted, two with 300, two with 100) performed the analysis first with bpMRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and T2-weighted (T2W) imaging in three planes and, after 1 month, with mpMRI, adding dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE). The performance was quantified by sensitivity (SNS), specificity (SPC) and area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) procedure. RESULTS Concordance within observers of equivalent experience was good (weighted Cohen's k ≈ 0.7). The two expert readers performed as well in bpMRI as in mpMRI (SNS = 0.91-0.96, AUC = 0.86-0.93; p ≥ 0.10); readers with 300 cases performed well in mpMRI, but significantly worse in bpMR: SNS = 0.58 versus 0.91 (p < 0.0001) and AUC = 0.73 versus 0.86 (p = 0.01); the limited experience of readers with 100 cases showed in mpMRI (SNS = 0.71; AUC = 0.77) and even more in bpMRI (SNS = 0.50; AUC = 0.68). CONCLUSION The study revealed the impact of the readers' experience when using bpMRI. The bpMRI without contrast media was a valid alternative for expert readers, whereas less experienced ones needed DCE to significantly boost SNS and AUC. Results indicate 700-800 cases as threshold for reliable interpretation with bpMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Gatti
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Faletti
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Jacopo Giglio
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Claudio Berzovini
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Gentile
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Misischi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Laura Bergamasco
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Papotti
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Fonio
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Li W, Xin C, Zhang L, Dong A, Xu H, Wu Y. Comparison of diagnostic performance between two prostate imaging reporting and data system versions: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2019; 114:111-119. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
29
|
Multidimensional analysis of clinicopathological characteristics of false-negative clinically significant prostate cancers on multiparametric MRI of the prostate in Japanese men. Jpn J Radiol 2019; 37:154-164. [DOI: 10.1007/s11604-018-0801-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
30
|
Steinkohl F, Pichler R, Junker D. Short review of biparametric prostate MRI. MEMO-MAGAZINE OF EUROPEAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY 2018; 11:309-312. [PMID: 30595756 PMCID: PMC6280777 DOI: 10.1007/s12254-018-0458-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate has become the gold standard for visualization of prostate cancer. Prostate MRI is usually performed as multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Since mpMRI has several drawbacks, a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) of the prostate has been proposed. Many studies have been published on mpMRI and bpMRI in recent years. This short review offers an overview of the latest developments in this rapidly evolving field of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Steinkohl
- 1Department für Radiologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Renate Pichler
- 2Universitätsklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, Innsbruck, 6020 Austria
| | - Daniel Junker
- Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Landeskrankenhaus Hall in Tirol, Milser Str. 10, Hall in Tirol, 6060 Austria
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Head-to-Head Comparison Between Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211:W226-W241. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.19880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
32
|
Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy. Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 53:28-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
33
|
Deike-Hofmann K, Koenig F, Paech D, Dreher C, Delorme S, Schlemmer HP, Bickelhaupt S. Abbreviated MRI Protocols in Breast Cancer Diagnostics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 49:647-658. [PMID: 30328180 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncologic imaging focused on the detection of breast cancer is of increasing importance, with over 1.7 million new cases detected each year worldwide. MRI of the breast has been described to be one of the most sensitive imaging modalities in breast cancer detection; however, clinical use is limited due to high costs. In the past, the objective and clinical routine of oncologic imaging was to provide one extended imaging protocol covering all potential needs and clinical implications regardless of the specific clinical indication or question. Future protocols might be more focused according to a "keep it short and simple" approach, with a reduction of patient magnet time and a limited number of images to review. Rather than replacing conventional full-diagnostic breast MRI protocols, these approaches aim at introducing a new thinking in oncologic imaging using a diversification of available imaging approaches targeted to the dedicated clinical needs of the individual patient. Here we review current approaches on using abbreviated protocols that aim to increase the clinical availability and use of breast MRI for improved early detection of breast cancer. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:647-658.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Franziska Koenig
- German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Department of Radiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Paech
- German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Department of Radiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantin Dreher
- German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Department of Radiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Delorme
- German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Department of Radiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lovegrove CE, Matanhelia M, Randeva J, Eldred-Evans D, Tam H, Miah S, Winkler M, Ahmed HU, Shah TT. Prostate imaging features that indicate benign or malignant pathology on biopsy. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:S420-S435. [PMID: 30363462 PMCID: PMC6178322 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.07.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer is essential in identifying patients who should be offered treatment with curative intent. Modifications to the Gleason grading system in recent years show that accurate grading and reporting at needle biopsy can improve identification of clinically significant prostate cancers. Extracapsular extension of prostate cancer has been demonstrated to be an adverse prognostic factor with greater risk of metastatic spread than organ-confined disease. Tumor volume may be an independent prognostic factor and should be considered in conjunction with other factors. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) has become an increasingly important tool in the diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer. MP-MRI allows T2-weighted (T2W) anatomical imaging to be combined with functional and physiological assessment. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has shown greater sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value compared to prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing and T2W imaging alone and has a more positive correlation with Gleason score and tumour volume. Dynamic gadolinium contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging can exhibit difficulties in distinguishing prostatitis from malignancy in the peripheral zone, and between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and malignancies in the transition zone (TZ). Computer aided diagnosis utilizes software to aid radiologists in detecting and diagnosing abnormalities from diagnostic imaging. New techniques of quantitative MRI, such as VERDICT MRI use tissue-specific factors to delineate different cellular and microstructural phenotypes, characterizing tissue properties with greater detail. Proton MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) is a more technically challenging imaging modality than DCE and DWI MRI. Over the last decade, choline and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) have developed as better tools for staging than conventional imaging. While hyperpolarized MRI shows promise in improving the imaging and differentiation of benign and malignant lesions there is further work required. Accurate reading and interpretation of diagnostic investigations is key to accurate identification of abnormal areas requiring biopsy, sparing those in whom benign or indolent disease can be managed by non-invasive means. Embracing and advancing existing technologies is essential in furthering this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Elizabeth Lovegrove
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mudit Matanhelia
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jagpal Randeva
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - David Eldred-Evans
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Henry Tam
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Saiful Miah
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Diagnostic Performance of Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211:369-378. [PMID: 29894216 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) for detection of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS Two independent reviewers performed a systematic review of the literature published from January 2000 to July 2017 by using predefined search terms. The standard of pathologic reference was established at prostatectomy or prostate biopsy. The numbers of true- and false-positive and true- and false-negative results were extracted. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to assess the quality of the selected studies. Statistical analysis included pooling of diagnostic accuracy, meta-regression, subgroup analysis, head-to-head comparison, and identification of publication bias. RESULTS Thirty-three studies were used for general data pooling. The overall sensitivity was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85), and overall specificity was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.69-0.84). As for clinically relevant PCa, bpMRI maintained high diagnostic value (AUC, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.88). There was no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.67). From head-to-head comparison for detection of PCa, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) had significantly higher pooled sensitivity (0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93) than did bpMRI (0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90) (p = 0.01). However, the pooled specificity values were not significantly different (mpMRI, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.58-0.95]; bpMRI, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.64-0.96]; p = 0.82). CONCLUSION The results of this meta-analysis suggest that bpMRI has high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of PCa and maintains a high detection rate for clinically relevant PCa. However, owing to high heterogeneity among the included studies, caution is needed in applying the results of the meta-analysis.
Collapse
|
36
|
Hara T, Ogata T, Wada H, Yabuki T, Kanazawa S. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric MRI: A Comparison of 1 M-Concentration Gadobutrol with 0.5 M-Concentration Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. Curr Urol 2018; 11:201-205. [PMID: 29997463 PMCID: PMC6036578 DOI: 10.1159/000447219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gadobutrol (Gd-DO3A-butrol) (Gadovist®) is a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) formulated at 1.0 mmol Gd/ml. Gadobutrol's higher concentration compared to other contrast agents (0.5 mmol Gd/ml) is associated with higher T1 relaxivity. We examined whether gadobutrol increases the accuracy of prostate cancer detection using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multiparametric MRI was performed in 379 patients: 94 patients received 1 M gadobutrol while 285 randomly received equivalent doses of 0.5 M gadoterate meglumine or gadopentetate dimeglumine. MRI images were retrospectively and blindly assessed for the presence of cancer by comparing them with prostate biopsy findings. RESULTS The specificity and accuracy were significantly higher with 1 M gadobutrol than 0.5 M of the other contrast agents. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity, or positive and negative predictive values. CONCLUSION Multiparametric MRI using 1 M gadobutrol may improve the accuracy of prostate cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Hara
- Department of Radiology, NHO Iwakuni Clinical Center, Yamaguchi
| | - Takeshi Ogata
- Department of Radiology, NHO Iwakuni Clinical Center, Yamaguchi
| | - Hiroko Wada
- Department of Radiology, NHO Iwakuni Clinical Center, Yamaguchi
| | - Takayuki Yabuki
- Department of Radiology, NHO Iwakuni Clinical Center, Yamaguchi
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience. Eur J Radiol 2018; 101:17-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Revised: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
38
|
Mazaheri Y, Akin O, Hricak H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: A review of current methods and applications. World J Radiol 2017; 9:416-425. [PMID: 29354207 PMCID: PMC5746645 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i12.416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In many areas of oncology, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has proven to be a clinically useful, non-invasive functional imaging technique to quantify tumor vasculature and tumor perfusion characteristics. Tumor angiogenesis is an essential process for tumor growth, proliferation, and metastasis. Malignant lesions demonstrate rapid extravasation of contrast from the intravascular space to the capillary bed due to leaky capillaries associated with tumor neovascularity. DCE-MRI has the potential to provide information regarding blood flow, areas of hypoperfusion, and variations in endothelial permeability and microvessel density to aid treatment selection, enable frequent monitoring during treatment and assess response to targeted therapy following treatment. This review will discuss the current status of DCE-MRI in cancer imaging, with a focus on its use in imaging prostate malignancies as well as weaknesses that limit its widespread clinical use. The latest techniques for quantification of DCE-MRI parameters will be reviewed and compared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousef Mazaheri
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Oguz Akin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fusco R, Sansone M, Granata V, Setola SV, Petrillo A. A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection. Infect Agent Cancer 2017; 12:57. [PMID: 29093748 PMCID: PMC5663098 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-017-0168-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Literature data suggest that multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), including morphologic T2-weigthed images (T2-MRI) and functional approaches such as Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI), Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI), give an added value in the prostate cancer localization and local staging. METHODS We performed a systematic review of literature about the role and the potentiality of morphological and functional MRI in prostate cancer, also in a multimodal / multiparametric approach, and we reported the diagnostic accuracy results for different imaging modalities and for different MR coil settings: endorectal coil (ERC) and phased array coil (PAC). Forest plots and receiver operating characteristic curves were performed. Risk of bias and the applicability at study level were calculated. RESULTS Thirty three papers were identified for the systematic review. Sensitivity and specificity values were, respectively, for T2-MRI of 75% and of 60%, for DCE-MRI of 80% and of 72%, for MRSI of 89% and of 69%, for combined T2-MRI and DCE-MRI of 87% and of 46%, for combined T2-MRI and MRSI of 79% and of 57%, for combined T2-MRI, DWI and DCE-MRI of 81% and of 84%, and for combined MRSI and DCE-MRI of 83% and of 83%. For MRI studies performed with ERC we obtained a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 81% and of 66% while the pooled values for MRI studies performed with PAC were of 78% and of 64%, respectively (p>0.05 at McNemar test). No studies were excluded from the analysis based on the quality assessment. CONCLUSIONS ERC use yielded no additional benefit in terms of prostate cancer detection accuracy compared to multi-channel PAC use (71% versus 68%) while the use of additional functional imaging techniques (DCE-MRI, DWI and MRSI) in a multiparametric MRI protocol improves the accuracy of prostate cancer detection allowing both the early cure and the guidance of biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Fusco
- Radiology Unit, “Dipartimento di supporto ai percorsi oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale”, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Sansone
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University “Federico II” of Naples, Via Claudio, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Unit, “Dipartimento di supporto ai percorsi oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale”, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Unit, “Dipartimento di supporto ai percorsi oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale”, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Unit, “Dipartimento di supporto ai percorsi oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale”, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chen Z, Zheng Y, Ji G, Liu X, Li P, Cai L, Guo Y, Yang J. Accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 8:77975-77989. [PMID: 29100440 PMCID: PMC5652829 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The goals of this meta-analysis were to assess the effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa) and to explore the risk profiles with the highest benefit. Systematic electronic searched were conducted in database. We used patient-based and biopsy-based pooled weighted estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for assessing the diagnostic performance of DCE. We performed direct and indirect comparisons of DCE and other methods of imaging. A total of 26 articles met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. DCE-MRI pooled sensitivity was 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.67), with a specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92) on whole gland. The peripheral zone pooled sensitivity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.86), with a specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.94). Compared with T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), DCE was statistically superior to T2. In conclusion, DCE had relatively high specificity in detecting PCa but relatively low sensitivity as a complementary functional method. DCE-MRI might help clinicians exclude cases of normal tissue and serve as an adjunct to conventional imaging when seeking to identify tumor foci in patients with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqiang Chen
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China
- Radiology Department of The General Hospital, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, China
| | - Yi Zheng
- Radiology Department of The General Hospital, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, China
| | - Guanghai Ji
- Radiology Department of The General Hospital, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, China
| | - Xinxin Liu
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Honghui Hospital, Health Science Center of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 750004, Shaanxi, China
| | - Peng Li
- Radiology Department of The General Hospital, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, China
| | - Lei Cai
- Radiology Department of The General Hospital, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, China
| | - Yulin Guo
- Radiology Department of The General Hospital, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dwivedi DK, Kumar R, Dwivedi AK, Bora GS, Thulkar S, Sharma S, Gupta SD, Jagannathan NR. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI-based risk score for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 47:1227-1236. [PMID: 28872226 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk calculators have traditionally utilized serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values in addition to clinical variables to predict the likelihood of prostate cancer (PCa). PURPOSE To develop a prebiopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-based risk score (RS) and a statistical equation for predicting the risk of PCa in biopsy-naive men with serum PSA between 4-10 ng/mL that may help reduce unnecessary biopsies. STUDY TYPE Prospective cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS In all, 137 consecutive men with PSA between 4-10 ng/mL underwent prebiopsy mpMRI (diffusion-weighted [DW]-MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging [MRSI]) during 2009-2015 were recruited for this study. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1.5T (Avanto, Siemens Health Care, Erlangen, Germany); T1 -weighted, T2 -weighted, DW-MRI, and MRSI sequences were used. ASSESSMENT All eligible patients underwent mpMRI-directed, cognitive-fusion transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies. STATISTICAL TESTS An equation model and an RS were developed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and a multivariable logistic regression approach. A 10-fold crossvalidation and simulation analyses were performed to assess diagnostic performance of various combinations of mpMRI parameters. RESULTS Of 137 patients, 32 were diagnosed with PCa on biopsy. Multivariable analysis, adjusted with positive pathology, showed apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), metabolite ratio, and PSA as significant predictors of PCa (P < 0.05). A statistical equation was derived using these predictors. A simple 6-point mpMRI-based RS was derived for calculating the risk of PCa and it showed that it is highly predictive for PCa (odds ratio = 3.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.24-6.27, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87). Both models (equation and RS) yielded high predictive performance (AUC ≥0.85) on validation analysis. DATA CONCLUSION A statistical equation and a simple 6-point mpMRI-based RS can be used as a point-of-care tool to potentially help limit the number of negative biopsies in men with PSA between 4 and 10 ng/mL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1227-1236.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Department of NMR & MRI Facility, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajeev Kumar
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Alok Kumar Dwivedi
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Girdhar S Bora
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay Thulkar
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay Sharma
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pahwa S, Schiltz NK, Ponsky LE, Lu Z, Griswold MA, Gulani V. Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men. Radiology 2017; 285:157-166. [PMID: 28514203 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multiparametric diagnostic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination followed by MR imaging-guided biopsy strategies in the detection of prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men presenting with clinical suspicion of cancer for the first time. Materials and Methods A decision-analysis model was created for biopsy-naive men who had been recommended for prostate biopsy on the basis of abnormal digital rectal examination results or elevated prostate-specific antigen levels (age groups: 41-50 years, 51-60 years, and 61-70 years). The following three major strategies were evaluated: (a) standard transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided biopsy; (b) diagnostic MR imaging followed by MR imaging-targeted biopsy, with no biopsy performed if MR imaging findings were negative; and (c) diagnostic MR imaging followed by MR imaging-targeted biopsy, with a standard biopsy performed when MR imaging findings were negative. The following three MR imaging-guided biopsy strategies were further evaluated in each MR imaging category: (a) biopsy with cognitive guidance, (b) biopsy with MR imaging/US fusion guidance, and (c) in-gantry MR imaging-guided biopsy. Model parameters were derived from the literature. The primary outcome measure was net health benefit (NHB), which was measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained or lost by investing resources in a new strategy compared with a standard strategy at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50 000 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed by using Monte Carlo simulations. Results Noncontrast MR imaging followed by cognitively guided MR biopsy (no standard biopsy if MR imaging findings were negative) was the most cost-effective approach, yielding an additional NHB of 0.198 QALY compared with the standard biopsy approach. Noncontrast MR imaging followed by in-gantry MR imaging-guided biopsy (no standard biopsy if MR imaging findings were negative) led to the highest NHB gain of 0.251 additional QALY compared with the standard biopsy strategy. All MR imaging strategies were cost-effective in 94.05% of Monte Carlo simulations. Analysis by age groups yielded similar results. Conclusion MR imaging-guided strategies for the detection of prostate cancer were cost-effective compared with the standard biopsy strategy in a decision-analysis model. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Pahwa
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.P., M.A.G., V.G.) and Urology (L.E.P.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Bolwell B120, Cleveland, OH 44106-0500; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (N.K.S.) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.A.G., V.G.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (Z.L.)
| | - Nicholas K Schiltz
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.P., M.A.G., V.G.) and Urology (L.E.P.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Bolwell B120, Cleveland, OH 44106-0500; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (N.K.S.) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.A.G., V.G.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (Z.L.)
| | - Lee E Ponsky
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.P., M.A.G., V.G.) and Urology (L.E.P.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Bolwell B120, Cleveland, OH 44106-0500; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (N.K.S.) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.A.G., V.G.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (Z.L.)
| | - Ziang Lu
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.P., M.A.G., V.G.) and Urology (L.E.P.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Bolwell B120, Cleveland, OH 44106-0500; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (N.K.S.) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.A.G., V.G.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (Z.L.)
| | - Mark A Griswold
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.P., M.A.G., V.G.) and Urology (L.E.P.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Bolwell B120, Cleveland, OH 44106-0500; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (N.K.S.) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.A.G., V.G.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (Z.L.)
| | - Vikas Gulani
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.P., M.A.G., V.G.) and Urology (L.E.P.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Bolwell B120, Cleveland, OH 44106-0500; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (N.K.S.) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.A.G., V.G.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (Z.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Barth BK, De Visschere PJL, Cornelius A, Nicolau C, Vargas HA, Eberli D, Donati OF. Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Short Dual-Pulse Sequence versus Standard Multiparametric MR Imaging-A Multireader Study. Radiology 2017; 284:725-736. [PMID: 28346073 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of a short dual-pulse sequence magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol versus a standard six-pulse sequence multiparametric MR imaging protocol for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the regional ethics committee. Between July 2013 and March 2015, 63 patients from a prospectively accrued study population who underwent MR imaging of the prostate including transverse T1-weighted; transverse, coronal, and sagittal T2-weighted; diffusion-weighted; and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging with a 3-T imager at a single institution were included in this retrospective study. The short MR imaging protocol image set consisted of transverse T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images only. The standard MR imaging protocol image set contained images from all six pulse sequences. Three expert readers from different institutions assessed the likelihood of prostate cancer on a five-point scale. Diagnostic performance on a quadrant basis was assessed by using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, and differences were evaluated by using 83.8% confidence intervals. Intra- and interreader agreement was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Transperineal template saturation biopsy served as the standard of reference. Results At histopathologic evaluation, 84 of 252 (33%) quadrants were positive for cancer in 38 of 63 (60%) men. There was no significant difference in detection of tumors larger than or equal to 0.5 mL for any of the readers of the short MR imaging protocol, with areas under the curve in the range of 0.74-0.81 (83.8% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64, 0.89), and for readers of the standard MR imaging protocol, areas under the curve were 0.71-0.77 (83.8% CI: 0.62, 0.86). Ranges for sensitivity were 0.76-0.95 (95% CI: 0.53, 0.99) and 0.76-0.86 (95% CI: 0.53, 0.97) and those for specificity were 0.84-0.90 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.94) and 0.82-0.90 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.94) for the short and standard MR protocols, respectively. Ranges for interreader agreement were 0.48-0.60 (83.8% CI: 0.41, 0.66) and 0.49-0.63 (83.8% CI: 0.42, 0.68) for the short and standard MR imaging protocols. Conclusion For the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, no difference was found in the diagnostic performance of the short MR imaging protocol consisting of only transverse T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging pulse sequences compared with that of a standard multiparametric MR imaging protocol. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borna K Barth
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (B.K.B., O.F.D.) and Department of Urology (D.E.), University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (P.J.L.D.V.); Department for Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland (A.C.); Department of Radiology, CDIC, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (C.N.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (H.A.V.)
| | - Pieter J L De Visschere
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (B.K.B., O.F.D.) and Department of Urology (D.E.), University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (P.J.L.D.V.); Department for Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland (A.C.); Department of Radiology, CDIC, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (C.N.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (H.A.V.)
| | - Alexander Cornelius
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (B.K.B., O.F.D.) and Department of Urology (D.E.), University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (P.J.L.D.V.); Department for Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland (A.C.); Department of Radiology, CDIC, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (C.N.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (H.A.V.)
| | - Carlos Nicolau
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (B.K.B., O.F.D.) and Department of Urology (D.E.), University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (P.J.L.D.V.); Department for Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland (A.C.); Department of Radiology, CDIC, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (C.N.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (H.A.V.)
| | - Hebert Alberto Vargas
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (B.K.B., O.F.D.) and Department of Urology (D.E.), University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (P.J.L.D.V.); Department for Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland (A.C.); Department of Radiology, CDIC, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (C.N.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (H.A.V.)
| | - Daniel Eberli
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (B.K.B., O.F.D.) and Department of Urology (D.E.), University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (P.J.L.D.V.); Department for Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland (A.C.); Department of Radiology, CDIC, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (C.N.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (H.A.V.)
| | - Olivio F Donati
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (B.K.B., O.F.D.) and Department of Urology (D.E.), University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (P.J.L.D.V.); Department for Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland (A.C.); Department of Radiology, CDIC, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (C.N.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (H.A.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, van der Kwast TH, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, De Santis M, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Yuan CY, Cornford P, Mottet N, Lam TB, Rouvière O. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2017; 72:250-266. [PMID: 28336078 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 270] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT It remains unclear whether patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can safely obviate prostate biopsy. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the literature assessing the negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI in patients with a suspicion of PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched up to February 2016. Studies reporting prebiopsy mpMRI results using transrectal or transperineal biopsy as a reference standard were included. We further selected for meta-analysis studies with at least 10-core biopsies as the reference standard, mpMRI comprising at least T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging, positive mpMRI defined as a Prostate Imaging Reporting Data System/Likert score of ≥3/5 or ≥4/5, and results reported at patient level for the detection of overall PCa or clinically significant PCa (csPCa) defined as Gleason ≥7 cancer. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 48 studies (9613 patients) were eligible for inclusion. At patient level, the median prevalence was 50.4% (interquartile range [IQR], 36.4-57.7%) for overall cancer and 32.9% (IQR, 28.1-37.2%) for csPCa. The median mpMRI NPV was 82.4% (IQR, 69.0-92.4%) for overall cancer and 88.1% (IQR, 85.7-92.3) for csPCa. NPV significantly decreased when cancer prevalence increased, for overall cancer (r=-0.64, p<0.0001) and csPCa (r=-0.75, p=0.032). Eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Seven reported results for overall PCa. When the overall PCa prevalence increased from 30% to 60%, the combined NPV estimates decreased from 88% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 77-99%) to 67% (95% CI, 56-79%) for a cut-off score of 3/5. Only one study selected for meta-analysis reported results for Gleason ≥7 cancers, with a positive biopsy rate of 29.3%. The corresponding NPV for a cut-off score of ≥3/5 was 87.9%. CONCLUSIONS The NPV of mpMRI varied greatly depending on study design, cancer prevalence, and definitions of positive mpMRI and csPCa. As cancer prevalence was highly variable among series, risk stratification of patients should be the initial step before considering prebiopsy mpMRI and defining those in whom biopsy may be omitted when the mpMRI is negative. PATIENT SUMMARY This systematic review examined if multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan can be used to reliably predict the absence of prostate cancer in patients suspected of having prostate cancer, thereby avoiding a prostate biopsy. The results suggest that whilst it is a promising tool, it is not accurate enough to replace prostate biopsy in such patients, mainly because its accuracy is variable and influenced by the prostate cancer risk. However, its performance can be enhanced if there were more accurate ways of determining the risk of having prostate cancer. When such tools are available, it should be possible to use an MRI scan to avoid biopsy in patients at a low risk of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Moldovan
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Van den Broeck
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Richard Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Marconi
- Department of Urology, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Michel Bolla
- Department of Radiation Therapy, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Tobias Gross
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Cathy Yuhong Yuan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Cochrane UGPD Group, Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Philip Cornford
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| | - Thomas B Lam
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1, faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Feng Z, Min X, Margolis DJA, Duan C, Chen Y, Sah VK, Chaudhary N, Li B, Ke Z, Zhang P, Wang L. Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm2. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0172127. [PMID: 28199367 PMCID: PMC5310778 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0-4500 s/mm2) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0-1000, 0-2000, 0-3200, and 0-4500 s/mm2, grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, <D>, D*, f, DDC, α, Dapp, and Kapp were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and Kapp in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than Kapp (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm2) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoyan Feng
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiangde Min
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Daniel J. A. Margolis
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Caohui Duan
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yuping Chen
- Centers for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Vivek Kumar Sah
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Nabin Chaudhary
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Basen Li
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zan Ke
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Peipei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Popita C, Popita AR, Sitar-Taut A, Petrut B, Fetica B, Coman I. 1.5-Tesla Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 90:40-48. [PMID: 28246496 PMCID: PMC5305086 DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) is the main imaging modality used for prostate cancer detection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of mp-MRI at 1.5-Tesla (1.5-T) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. METHODS In this ethical board approved prospective study, 39 patients with suspected prostate cancer were included. Patients with a history of positive prostate biopsy and patients treated for prostate cancer were excluded. All patients were examined at 1.5-T MRI, before standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. RESULTS The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for mp-MRI were 100%, 73.68%, 80% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our results showed that 1.5 T mp-MRI has a high sensitivity for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and high negative predictive value in order to rule out significant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Popita
- Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Anca Raluca Popita
- Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Adela Sitar-Taut
- Internal Medicine Department, New Blue Life Medical Center, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Bogdan Petrut
- Department of Urology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute , Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Department of Urology , Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Bogdan Fetica
- Department of Pathology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ioan Coman
- Department of Urology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute , Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Department of Urology , Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kido A, Tamada T, Sone T, Kanomata N, Miyaji Y, Yamamoto A, Ito K. Incremental value of high b value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3-T for prediction of extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer: preliminary experience. Radiol Med 2016; 122:228-238. [PMID: 27943099 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-016-0712-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether high b value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) contributes to the improvement of diagnostic ability of extracapsular extension (ECE) in prostate cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-three patients with PC underwent multiparametric MRI including DWI (b values: 0, 2000 s/mm2) at 3-T. Two radiologists assessed the presence of ECE and the diagnostic certainty degree using conventional diagnostic method by consensus. Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, ×10-3 mm2/s) was also measured. Independent predictors of ECE were identified among PSA, tumor ADC, Gleason score, and conventional MRI. ECE in patients with low diagnostic certainty by conventional MRI was further reevaluated using ADC cutoff value, and the results were combined with those of patients with high diagnostic certainty by conventional MRI (MRI + ADC method). RESULTS Tumor ADC was an independent predictor of ECE, and the ADC cutoff value was 0.72. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional MRI and MRI + ADC method in the diagnosis of ECE were 44, 92, and 72%, and 78, 96, and 88%, respectively. Among MRI findings leading to the judgement of low diagnostic certainty, broad tumor contact was most common (72% of the patients). CONCLUSIONS The addition of ADC obtained with high b value DWI at 3-T to conventional MRI improved the diagnostic ability of ECE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayumu Kido
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki City, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
| | - Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki City, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Teruki Sone
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki City, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Naoki Kanomata
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki City, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Miyaji
- Department of Urology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki City, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Akira Yamamoto
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki City, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Katsuyoshi Ito
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki City, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Harvey H, deSouza NM. The role of imaging in the diagnosis of primary prostate cancer. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2016; 9:11-17. [PMID: 28344811 PMCID: PMC5356180 DOI: 10.1177/2051415816656120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are key imaging modalities in prostate cancer diagnosis. MRI offers a range of intrinsic contrast mechanisms (T2, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS)) and extrinsic contrast-generating options based on tumour vascular state following injection of weakly paramagnetic agents such as gadolinium. Together these parameters are referred to as multiparametric (mp)MRI and are used for detecting and guiding biopsy and staging prostate cancer. Although sensitivity of mpMRI is <75% for disease detection, specificity is >90% and a standardised reporting system together with MR-guided targeted biopsy is the optimal diagnostic pathway. Shear wave ultrasound elastography is a new technique which also holds promise for future studies. This article describes the developments in imaging the primary site of prostate cancer and reviews their current and future utility for screening, diagnosis and T-staging the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh Harvey
- Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gupta RT, Spilseth B, Patel N, Brown AF, Yu J. Multiparametric prostate MRI: focus on T2-weighted imaging and role in staging of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:831-43. [PMID: 27193786 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0579-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) represents a growing modality for the non-invasive evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa) and is increasingly being used for patients with persistently elevated PSA and prior negative biopsies, for monitoring patients in active surveillance protocols, for preoperative characterization of cancer for surgical planning, and in planning for MRI-targeted biopsy. The focus of this work is twofold. First, we review the key role of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) in mpMRI, specifically outlining how it is used for anatomic evaluation of the prostate, detection of clinically significant PCa, assessment of extraprostatic extension (EPE), and mimics of PCa on this sequence. We will also discuss optimal technical acquisition parameters for this sequence and recent technical advancements in T2WI. Second, we will delineate the role that mpMRI plays in the staging of PCa and describe the implications of the information that mpMRI can provide in determining the most appropriate management plan for the patient with PCa.
Collapse
|
50
|
Dwivedi DK, Kumar R, Bora GS, Thulkar S, Sharma S, Gupta SD, Jagannathan NR. Stratification of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2016; 29:232-238. [PMID: 26730884 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2014] [Revised: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/03/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Risk stratification, based on the Gleason score (GS) of a prostate biopsy, is an important decision-making tool in prostate cancer management. As low-grade disease may not need active intervention, the ability to identify aggressive cancers on imaging could limit the need for prostate biopsies. We assessed the ability of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in pre-biopsy risk stratification of men with prostate cancer. One hundred and twenty men suspected to have prostate cancer underwent mpMRI (diffusion MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging) prior to biopsy. Twenty-six had cancer and were stratified into three groups based on GS: low grade (GS ≤ 6), intermediate grade (GS = 7) and high grade (GS ≥ 8). A total of 910 regions of interest (ROIs) from the peripheral zone (PZ, range 25-45) were analyzed from these 26 patients. The metabolite ratio [citrate/(choline + creatine)] and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of voxels were calculated for the PZ regions corresponding to the biopsy cores and compared with histology. The median metabolite ratios for low-grade, intermediate-grade and high-grade cancer were 0.29 (range: 0.16, 0.61), 0.17 (range: 0.13, 0.32) and 0.13 (range: 0.05, 0.23), respectively (p = 0.004). The corresponding mean ADCs (×10(-3) mm(2) /s) for low-grade, intermediate-grade and high-grade cancer were 0.99 ± 0.08, 0.86 ± 0.11 and 0.69 ± 0.12, respectively (p < 0.0001). The combined ADC and metabolite ratio model showed strong discriminatory ability to differentiate subjects with GS ≤ 6 from subjects with GS ≥ 7 with an area under the curve of 94%. These data indicate that pre-biopsy mpMRI may stratify PCa aggressiveness noninvasively. As the recent literature data suggest that men with GS ≤ 6 cancer may not need radical therapy, our data may help limit the need for biopsy and allow informed decision making for clinical intervention. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Department of NMR & MRI Facility, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajeev Kumar
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Girdhar S Bora
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay Thulkar
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay Sharma
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|