Understanding Early Hemophilic Arthropathy in Children and Adolescents Through MRI T2 Mapping

BACKGROUND

Persons with hemophilia experience hemarthrosis, which can lead to cartilage degeneration, causing physical impairment. MRI T₂ mapping has the potential to be used as a tool to evaluate early arthropathic changes and cartilage degeneration in patients with hemophilia.

PURPOSE

To assess the value of MRI-T₂ mapping as a tool for investigating the cartilage status of children and adolescents with hemophilic arthropathy.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective, cross-sectional.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-eight boys with hemophilia (aged 5-17 years) and 23 healthy boys (aged 7-17 years).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES

A multiecho spin-echo T₂ -weighted gradient echo sequence was used on a 3.0T magnet.

ASSESSMENT

MRI-T₂ maps of ankle (tibia-talus) (n = 19) or knee (femur-tibia) (n = 9) cartilage were assessed in hemophilia and healthy groups. An anatomically-based MRI score was also assigned to each ankle/knee.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), linear regression, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.

RESULTS

Negative associations between age and ankle/knee cartilage T₂ relaxation times were found in hemophilia (r = -0.72 [P = 0.03] to -0.55 [P = 0.01]) and healthy (r = -0.84 [P < 0.001] to -0.55 [P = 0.20]) groups. There were nonsignificant associations between ankle cartilage T₂ relaxation times and MRI scores (r = -0.15 [P = 0.54] to 0.31 [P = 0.19]).

DATA CONCLUSION

Results of this clinical investigation emphasize the potential importance of MRI-T₂ maps as a tool to understand the functional status of cartilage in children and adolescents with hemophilic arthropathy, while holding promise for the detection of early cartilage degeneration prior to macroscopic characterization by conventional MRI. MRI-T₂ mapping may provide novel information that is not reflected in the anatomically-based MRI scoring system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

T2 mapping of articular cartilage of the glenohumeral joint at 3.0 T in healthy volunteers: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the T2 values of the glenohumeral joint cartilage in healthy asymptomatic individuals at 3.0 T and to analyze the T2 profile of the humeral cartilage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was approved by our institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained. Thirteen subjects (mean age, 28.6 years; age range, 24-33 years) were included and underwent multiecho spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging and T2 mapping was acquired. Regions of interest were placed on the humeral cartilage and glenoid cartilage on oblique coronal images. T2 profiles of humeral cartilage were measured from the bone-cartilage interface to the articular surface. Intra-observer agreement was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

All 13 joints showed normal appearance on conventional T2-weighted images. The mean T2 values of humeral and glenoid cartilage were 50.5 ± 12.1 and 49.0 ± 9.9 ms, respectively. Intra-observer agreement was good, as determined by ICC (0.736). Longer T2 values were observed at the articular surface with a tendency to decrease toward the bone-cartilage interface. The mean cartilage T2 value was 69.03 ± 21.2 ms at the articular surface and 46.99 ± 19.6 ms at the bone-cartilage interface.

CONCLUSION

T2 values of the glenohumeral joint cartilage were similar to reported values of cartilage in the knee. The T2 profile of normal humeral cartilage showed a spatial variation with an increase in T2 values from the subchondral bone to the articular surface.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and the temporomandibular joint: A comprehensive review

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common inflammatory rheumatic disease of childhood and represents a series of chronic inflammatory arthritides of unknown cause. Involvement of the temporomandibular joint has been reported in up to 87% of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis when based on magnetic tomography imaging; it can be asymptomatic and may lead to severe long term complications. In this review a summary of the contemporary literature of imaging of the temporomandibular joint in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis will be provided, including ultrasound which is a valuable method for guided joint injections, but does not necessarily allow detection of acute inflammation, cone beam computed tomography, which has emerged as a feasible and accurate low-dose alternative as compared to conventional computed tomography to detect destructive change, and magnetic resonance imaging which is considered the method of choice for assessing acute, inflammatory change, although the lack of normative standards remains a challenge in children.

Imaging of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a multimodality approach

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by synovial inflammation and is the most common rheumatic complaint in children. To facilitate research and treatment, JIA has been further classified on the basis of the number of joints involved, additional symptoms, family history, and serologic findings. Imaging in patients with JIA has historically relied on radiography, which allows the accurate assessment of chronic changes of JIA, including growth disturbances, periostitis, and joint malalignment. However, radiographic findings of active inflammation are nonspecific, and, in the past, clinical evaluation has taken precedence over imaging of acute disease. Recent advances in disease-modifying therapeutic agents that can help prevent long-term disability in patients with JIA have led to greater emphasis on the detection of early joint-centered inflammation that cannot be accurately assessed radiographically and may not be evident clinically. Both contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and Doppler ultrasonography (US) are well suited for this application and are playing an increasingly important role in diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment monitoring, and problem solving. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the most sensitive technique for the detection of synovitis and is the only modality that can help detect bone marrow edema, both of which indicate active inflammation. US is more sensitive than radiography for the detection of synovial proliferation and effusions and is particularly useful in the evaluation of small peripheral joints. The complexity of the temporomandibular and sacroiliac joints limits the usefulness of radiographic or US evaluation, and contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the preferred modality for evaluation of these structures.