An in vitro Assessment of the Haemodynamic Features Occurring Within the True and False Lumens Separated by a Dissection Flap for a Patient-Specific Type B Aortic Dissection

One of the highest mortality rates of cardiovascular diseases is aortic dissections with challenging treatment options. Currently, less study has been conducted in developing in vitro patient-specific Type B aortic dissection models, which mimic physiological flow conditions along the true and false lumens separated by a dissection flap with multiple entry and exit tears. A patient-specific Stanford Type B aortic dissection scan was replicated by an in-house manufactured automatic injection moulding system and a novel modelling technique for creating the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta incorporating arterial branching, the true/false lumens, and dissection flap with entry and exit intimal tears. The physiological flowrates and pressure values were monitored, which identified jet stream fluid flows entering and exiting the dissection tears. Pressure in the aorta’s true lumen region was controlled at 125/85 mmHg for systolic and diastolic values. Pressure values were obtained in eight sections along the false lumen using a pressure transducer. The true lumen systolic pressure varied from 122 to 128 mmHg along the length. Flow patterns were monitored by ultrasound along 12 sections. Detailed images obtained from the ultrasound transducer probe showed varied flow patterns with one or multiple jet steam vortices along the aorta model. The dissection flap movement was assessed at four sections of the patient-specific aorta model. The displacement values of the flap varied from 0.5 to 3 mm along the model. This model provides a unique insight into aortic dissection flow patterns and pressure distributions. This dissection phantom model can be used to assess various treatment options based on the surgical, endovascular, or hybrid techniques.

Computed Tomography Angiography Assessment of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Classification, Differentiating Imaging Features, and Imaging Interpretation Pitfalls

An acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is an important life-threatening condition that requires early detection and management. Acute intramural hematoma (IMH), aortic dissection (AD) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) are included in AAS. ADs can be classified using the well-known Stanford or DeBakey classification systems. However, these classification systems omit description of arch dissections, anatomic variants, and morphologic features that impact outcome. The Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS-STS) have recently introduced a classification system that classifies ADs according to the location of the entry tear (primary intimomedial tear, PIT) and the proximal and distal extent of involvement, but does not include description of all morphologic features that may have diagnostic and prognostic significance. This review describes these classification systems for ADs and other AAS entities as well as their limitations. Typical computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging appearance and differentiating features of ADs, limited intimal tears (LITs), IMHs, intramural blood pools (IBPs), ulcer-like projections (ULPs), and PAUs will be discussed. Furthermore, this review highlights common imaging interpretation pitfalls, what should be included in a comprehensive CTA report, and provides a brief overview of current management options.

The added value of CT virtual angioscopy to MDCT angiography in the evaluation of aortic diseases

PURPOSE

Incorporation of virtual angioscopy (VA) in the diagnostic work-up of aortic diseases could improve the clinical value and efficiency of multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA). We aim to evaluate the clinical usefulness of virtual aortic navigation by CT angiography in various aortic diseases as a complement to standard MDCTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively selected 211 patients who performed MDCTA for suspected or operated aortic diseases. VA endoluminal images of the aorta were obtained by a fly-through technique. Two senior vascular radiologists independently evaluated all MDCTA images. After 1 month, the same two radiologists independently reviewed the MDCTA images combined with CTVA images. The respective accuracy of CTVA in delineating aortic abnormalities was compared to that of MDCTA using Fisher's exact test. The Fleiss kappa (κ) statistic was used to assess the inter-reader agreement (IRA).

RESULTS

We detected 229 abnormalities in 203 patients on MDCTA and 231 abnormalities in 205 patients on CTVA. CTVA provided significant additional findings in 63.8% (146/229) of all abnormalities diagnosed by MDCTA (p < 0.001, odd ratio [OR] = 42). Although CTVA diagnosed two abnormalities overlooked by MDCTA, the value was statistically insignificant (p = 0.787, OR = 1.3). Regarding postoperative abnormalities, the CTVA added significant additional findings over MDCTA (p = 0.006, OR = 87.4). The overall IRA for the performance of CTVA was good (κ = 0.699).

CONCLUSIONS

CTVA yields extra findings and improves diagnostic efficiency of MDCTA, especially in postoperative patients.

MDCT evaluation of acute aortic syndrome (AAS)

Non-traumatic acute thoracic aortic syndromes (AAS) describe a spectrum of life-threatening aortic pathologies with significant implications on diagnosis, therapy and management. There is a common pathway for the various manifestations of AAS that eventually leads to a breakdown of the aortic intima and media. Improvements in biology and health policy and diffusion of technology into the community resulted in an associated decrease in mortality and morbidity related to aortic therapeutic interventions. Hybrid procedures, branched and fenestrated endografts, and percutaneous aortic valves have emerged as potent and viable alternatives to traditional surgeries. In this context, current state-of-the art multidetector CT (MDCT) is actually the gold standard in the emergency setting because of its intrinsic diagnostic value. Management of acute aortic disease has changed with the increasing realization that endovascular therapies may offer distinct advantages in these situations. This article provides a summary of AAS, focusing especially on the MDCT technique, typical and atypical findings and common pitfalls of AAS, as well as recent concepts regarding the subtypes of AAS, consisting of aortic dissection, intramural haematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer and unstable aortic aneurysm or contained aortic rupture. MDCT findings will be related to pathophysiology, timing and management options to achieve a definite and timely diagnostic and therapeutic definition. In the present article, we review the aetiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, outcomes and therapeutic approaches to acute aortic syndromes.

Confirmation of Intimal Tear in Thrombosed-Type Acute Aortic Dissection by Virtual Angioscopy

Introduction

Therapeutic strategies for intramural hematoma (IMH) involving the ascending aorta remain controversial.

Report

The patient was a 72 year old woman with a history of chest pain. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) showed an IMH involving the ascending aorta. Because virtual angioscopy revealed a punctate intimal tear in the ascending aorta, acute aortic dissection with an intimal tear and not IMH was diagnosed, and emergency surgery was performed. The post-operative course was uneventful.

Discussion

Virtual angioscopy allows the vascular lumen to be examined minimally invasively on the basis of images reconstructed from MDCT data. Even if MDCT does not clearly show an intimal tear associated with aortic dissection in a general view, virtual angioscopy can show the exact location and size of the tear before surgery. Virtual angioscopy is very useful for distinguishing thrombosed-type acute aortic dissection without clear ulcer like projections from an IMH, which may facilitate therapeutic planning.

Influence of radiologically evident residual intimal tear on expansion of descending aorta following surgery for acute type I aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Although a residual intimal tear may contribute to the dilatation of the descending aorta following surgical repair of acute type I aortic dissection (AD), its causal relationship has not been elucidated by clinical data due to the limited resolution of imaging modalities.

METHODS

This study enrolled 41 patients (age, 55.2±11.9 years) who were evaluated with dual-source computed tomography (CT) imaging of the whole aorta in the setting of the surgical repair of acute type I AD. Logistic regression models were used to determine the predictors of a composite of the aortic aneurysm formation (diameter >55 mm) and rapid aortic expansion (>5 mm/yr).

RESULTS

On initial CT, a distal re-entry tear was identified in 9 patients. Two patients failed to achieve proximal tear exclusion by the surgery. Serial follow-up CT evaluations (median, 24.6 months; range, 6.0 to 67.2 months) revealed that 14 patients showed rapid expansion of the descending aorta or aortic aneurysm formation. A multivariate analysis revealed that the residual intimal tear (odds ratio [OR], 4.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 19.31) and the patent false lumen in the early postoperative setting (OR, 4.64; 95% CI, 0.99 to 43.61) were predictive of the composite endpoint.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a residual intimal tear following surgery for acute type I AD adversely influenced the expansion of the descending aorta.