Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists: part 2, revisions and complications

Acetabular Augments Used in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-year Follow-Up of Implant Survivorships, Functional Scores, and Radiographic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Acetabular bone loss is a major challenge in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Porous tantalum augments have emerged as a viable solution to acetabular bone loss in revision THA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship, clinical, and radiological outcomes of these implants.

METHODS

We identified 104 augment implants from our retrospective chart review of revision THA from June 2003 to July 2013. Of these patients, 75 (72.1%) were women, the mean age at surgery was 66 years (range, 27 to 87), and the mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range, 0.25 to 18.2). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, with failure defined as revision for aseptic loosening of the acetabular reconstruction.

RESULTS

There was significant improvement in the Harris Hip Score from 40.0 to 77.3 (P < 0.001) and the Oxford Hip Score from 14.9 to 36.3 (P < 0.001). Survivorship for failure due to aseptic loosening was 98.8% (95% CI [confidence interval] 96.4 to 100) at 24 months with 60 hips at risk, and 90.4% (95% CI 83.0 to 97.8) at 60 and 120 months with 38 and 18 hips at risk, respectively. The overall number of complications was 34 (32.7%). Of these complications, 21 (20.2%) required repeat revision surgery. The revision rate due to aseptic loosening of the augment, infection, dislocation, aseptic loosening of the femoral component, reconstruction failure, and heterotopic ossification was seven (6.7%), five (4.8%), four (3.8%), two (1.9%), two (1.9%), and one (0.96%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of acetabular defects during revision THA using porous tantalum augments provides acceptable implant survivorship and favorable clinical outcomes at mid-term (5 to 10 years) and long-term (> 10 years) follow-up.

Diagnostic and prognostic relevance of plain radiographs for periprosthetic joint infections of the hip: a literature review

Conventional radiography is regularly used to evaluate complications after total hip arthroplasty. In various recent consensus meetings, however, plain radiographs of a potentially infected hip joint have been judged as being only relevant to exclude diagnoses other than infection. Solid data on radiographic presentations of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are scarce. As a result, the prognostic value of radiological features in low-grade PJI remains uncertain. The present review article aims to present an overview of the available literature and to develop ideas on future perspectives to define the diagnostic possibilities of radiography in PJIs of the hip. The primary outcome of interest of this systematic review was the radiologic presentation of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip. As secondary outcome of interest served the sensitivity and specificity of the radiologic presentation of periprosthetic joint infections. Of the included articles, 26 were reviews, essays, or case reports and only 18 were clinical studies. Typical radiologic abnormalities of PJI were a periosteal reaction, a wide band of radiolucency at the cement-bone or metal-bone interface, patchy osteolysis, implant loosening, bone resorption around the implant, and transcortical sinus tracts. The frequency of their occurrence is still inadequately defined. A deeper understanding of the underlying causes and the relation between microorganisms to radiologic abnormalities can probably help clinicians in the future to diagnose a PJI. This is why further research shall focus on the radiographic features of PJI.

Mid-term results of titanium-titanium modular neck femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Modular neck femoral stems are advantageous because they can accurately restore the ideal hip geometry using various options in terms of offset, length, and version. However, there are concerns regarding junctional problems. Despite several reports on such issues, there is a lack of study on mid- to long-term results of these stems. The current study evaluated the mid-term results of patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty using a titanium-titanium (Ti-Ti) modular neck femoral stem.

METHODS

In total, data on 47 hips (42 patients) that could be followed-up for ≥ 5 years after primary total hip arthroplasty using the Ti-Ti modular neck femoral stem from 2011 to 2015 were reviewed. There were 22 male and 20 female patients, and their mean age was 56.3 (range: 31-76) years. The mean follow-up period was 8 (range: 5-12) years. Functional and radiological outcomes, complications, and reoperations were investigated. In addition, we conducted a comparative analysis of the outcomes between those who underwent surgery using the Ti-Ti modular neck femoral stem and 41 hips (35 patients, 19 males and 16 females) that underwent primary total hip arthroplasty using nonmodular femoral stems as a control.

RESULTS

In all Ti-Ti cases, the mean Harris Hip Scores were 50.6 (range: 6-59) preoperatively and 92.7 (range: 78-99) at the last follow-up (P < 0.001). Regarding the neck component's modularity, straight neck components were used in all Ti-Ti cases, and an anteverted or a retroverted neck was not used in any case. Stem revision was performed in one hip due to aseptic loosening. One hip underwent open reduction and internal fixation due to periprosthetic fracture without stem loosening. There were no cases of osteolysis and periprosthetic joint infection and clinically detectable junctional problems. The stem survival rate, with any stem revision as the endpoint, at 12 years was 96.6%. No significant difference was observed in the functional and radiological outcomes beween the Ti-Ti and nonmodular groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ti-Ti modular neck femoral stem had comparable results with broadly used nonmodular femoral stems; hence, it can be a reliable option in primary total hip arthroplasty. However, in terms of the modularity itself of the modular neck femoral stem, whether the modular neck femoral stem is useful in uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty is unclear.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Total Hip Arthroplasty

This article reviews evidence for performing various imaging studies in patients with total hip prostheses. Routine follow-up is generally performed with radiography. Radiographs are also usually the initial imaging modality for patients with symptoms related to the prosthesis. Following acute injury with pain, noncontrast CT may add information to radiographic examination regarding the presence and location of a fracture, component stability, and bone stock. Image-guided joint aspiration, noncontrast MRI, and white blood cell scan and sulfur colloid scan of the hip, are usually appropriate studies for patients suspected of having periprosthetic infection. For evaluation of component loosening, wear, and/or osteolysis, noncontrast CT or MRI are usually appropriate studies. Noncontrast MRI is usually appropriate for identifying adverse reaction to metal debris related to metal-on-metal articulations. For assessing patients after hip arthroplasty, who have trochanteric pain and nondiagnostic radiographs, ultrasound, or MRI are usually appropriate studies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Particularities on Anatomy and Normal Postsurgical Appearances of the Hip

Detailed knowledge of anatomy helps to understand pathologic processes. This article focuses on the anatomy and functionality of the hip, with emphasis on recently studied concepts and anatomic features that have an association with the development of symptoms. The most common anatomic variants posing a challenge for diagnosis and other common findings in asymptomatic patients are reviewed. Good understanding of the different surgical procedures helps in providing as much information as possible to guarantee a favorable outcome, improving prognosis. We review what are the commonly expected postsurgical appearances and the most common postsurgical complications.

Diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic infection after hip replacement (a review)

Introduction. The frequency of hip arthroplasty is steadily increasing throughout the world and, although this operation has become routine, the likelihood of postoperative complications reaches 4.3 % [1]. The most dangerous of them are infectious lesions in the area of the endoprosthesis and adjacent tissues. At the same time, in addition to the threat of generalization of the infectious process, there are functional disorders in the joint area and a general deterioration in the quality of life of the patient. Timely diagnosis and treatment of the infectious process and related disorders can minimize the adverse effects of infection.

Target. The purpose of this review is to analyze modern methods for diagnosing and treating periprosthetic infection resulting from hip replacement.

Materials and methods. The subject literature was searched using the PubMed and Google Sholar databases.

Results. The main methods for diagnosing periprosthetic infection include histological and bacteriological examination of the biopsy specimen, determination of sensitivity to antibiotics, blood, and synovial fluid analysis for the content of leukocytes, IL-6, CRP, PCR diagnostics of infectious agents. Treatment consists of re-intervention and/or antibiotic therapy.

Conclusion. The most optimal method for diagnosing periprosthetic infection is a bacteriological study of biopsy specimens taken intraoperatively. The preferred method of treatment is determined by the severity of the infection, the degree of involvement of tissues adjacent to the prosthesis, the comorbid background, the nature of the infectious agent, and includes repeated revision surgery.

Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management Part 2: Postoperative Diagnostic Imaging Strategy

Hip arthroplasty (HA) is a frequently used procedure with high success rates, but 7% to 27% of the patients complain of persistent postsurgical pain 1 to 4 years post-operation. HA complications depend on the post-operative delay, the type of material used, the patient’s characteristics, and the surgical approach. Radiographs are still the first imaging modality used for routine follow-up, in asymptomatic and painful cases. CT and MRI used to suffer from metallic artifacts but are nowadays central in HA complications diagnosis, both having their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging workup for HA complication diagnosis, which may have an impact on patient management. After a brief reminder about the different types of prostheses, this article reviews their normal and pathologic appearance, according to each imaging modality, keeping in mind that few abnormalities might be present, not anyone requiring treatment, depending on the clinical scenario. A diagnostic imaging workup is also discussed, to aid the therapist in his imaging studies prescription and the radiologist in their practical aspects.

Mechanic ileus due to retroperitoneal migration of total hip prosthesis; A case report

Intrapelvic migration of total hip prosthesis is a rare but severe complication of total hip arthroplasty that can cause severe outcomes for elderly patients. A 78-year-old female patient was referred to our hospital with the complaint of no gas-stool excretion for 3-4 days, abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting, and a preliminary diagnosis of ileus. Computed tomography showed the migration of the left total hip prosthesis to the pelvis, causing a hematoma around the prosthesis and mechanical ileus due to the compression of the hematoma. To our knowledge, this case report is the only reported mechanic ileus due to migration of total hip prosthesis. Although postop paralytic ileus is one of the complications of total hip arthroplasty, mechanical ileus has not been described before. This case report shows that mechanical ileus might be an unreported complication of total hip arthroplasty. It should be kept in mind that mechanical ileus complications may also occur after hip arthroplasty.

Prospective and longitudinal evolution of postoperative periprosthetic findings on metal artifact-reduced MR imaging in asymptomatic patients after uncemented total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively assess the evolution of postoperative MRI findings in asymptomatic patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA) over 24 months (mo).

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 9 asymptomatic patients (56.7 ± 15.0 years) after THA. Metal artifact-reduced 1.5-T MRI was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo after surgery. The femoral stem and acetabular cup were assessed by two readers for bone marrow edema (BME), periprosthetic bone resorption, and periosteal edema in addition to periarticular soft tissue edema and joint effusion.

RESULTS

BME was common around the femoral stem in all Gruen zones after 3 mo (range: 50-100%) and 6 mo (range: 33-100%) and in the acetabulum in DeLee and Charnley zone II after 3 mo (100%) and 6 mo (33%). BME decreased substantially after 12 mo (range: 0-78%) and 24 mo (range: 0-50%), may however persist in particular in Gruen zones 1 + 7. Periosteal edema along the stem was common 3 mo postoperatively (range: 63-75%) and rare after 24 mo: 13% only in Gruen zones 2 and 5. Twelve months and 24 mo postoperatively, periprosthetic bone resorption was occasionally present around the femoral stem (range: 11-33% and 13-38%, respectively). Soft tissue edema occurred exclusively along the surgical access route after 3 mo (100%) and 6 mo (89%) and never at 12 mo or 24 mo (0%).

CONCLUSION

Around the femoral stem, BME (33-100%) and periosteal edema (0-75%) are common until 6 mo after THA, decreasing substantially in the following period, may however persist up to 24 mo (BME: 0-50%; periosteal edema: 0-13%) in few non-adjoining Gruen zones. Soft tissue edema along the surgical access route should have disappeared 12 mo after surgery.

Performance of radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in painful total hip arthroplasty and impact on arthroplasty survival

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in painful hip arthroplasty regarding loosening and arthroplasty survival.

METHODS

Radiography and SPECT/CT reports of 249 painful hip arthroplasties of 191 patients were reviewed. Positive imaging was defined if loosening, infection, and polyethylene wear were found, indicating the need for arthroplasty exchange. Median time from radiograph to operation or last follow-up was 41.3 months (range 0.3-118.4 months). In 67 patients, the performance of radiographs and SPECT/CT regarding loosening was compared with an intraoperative reference standard. The time point of arthroplasty exchange was compared with imaging diagnosis and evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Exchange of cup, shaft, or both was performed in 76 of 249 arthroplasties. Main diagnoses on SPECT/CT were loosening (n = 94), infection (n = 5), and polyethylene wear (n = 15). In total, 104 patients were SPECT/CT positive compared to 84 patients on radiography. Five-year survival of arthroplasties for radiograph positive and negative arthroplasties was 41.5%/83.4% and 39.3%/90.7% for SPECT/CT, respectively. Prognostic impact regarding arthroplasty exchange was highest in radiograph and SPECT/CT concordant positive patients (hazard ratio 19.7 as compared to radiograph and SPECT/CT negative patients). Sensitivity and specificity in 67 operated patients regarding shaft loosening were 59.4%/80.0% with radiography, 90.6%/68.6% with SPECT/CT (P = 0.002 for sensitivity and P = 0.29 for specificity), and for cup loosening 47.4%/89.6% with radiography and 63.2%/85.4% with SPECT/CT (P = 0.51, respectively, P = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

In patients with painful hip arthroplasty, positive radiography, and SPECT/CT are associated with poorer arthroplasty survival. Performance regarding loosening is slightly better with SPECT/CT.

Value of multidetector computed tomography for the differentiation of delayed aseptic and septic complications after total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

The differentiation between delayed aseptic and septic complications of total hip arthroplasty is crucial to allow appropriate surgical planning and timely antimicrobial treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of multidetector computed tomography (CT) findings to diagnose aseptic mechanical loosening, granulomatous reaction, and periprosthetic joint infection in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty before revision surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-six consecutive patients with a clinical suspicion of periprosthetic complications underwent revision surgery over an 8-year period. All patients had been evaluated preoperatively using multidetector CT without contrast media. Two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed multidetector CT images, including periprosthetic soft-tissue accumulation, prosthetic acetabular malposition, periprosthetic osteolysis, enlarged iliac lymph nodes, and heterotopic ossification. Risk factors for aseptic and septic loosening were identified using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Multidetector CT-related variables independently associated with periprosthetic joint infection were high periprosthetic soft-tissue accumulation, periprosthetic osteolysis without expansile periosteal reaction and enlarged iliac lymph nodes. On the other hand, the absence of the following radiological signs: low or high periprosthetic soft-tissue accumulation, mild or severe periprosthetic osteolysis, and enlarged iliac lymph nodes, were predictors of aseptic mechanical loosening. Low periprosthetic soft-tissue accumulation, severe periprosthetic osteolysis with expansile periosteal reaction, and mild acetabular malposition were significant variables associated with granulomatosis.

CONCLUSION

Multidetector CT findings are useful to differentiate between aseptic and septic complications before revision surgery. The presence of osteolysis with expansile periosteal reaction appeared to be a time-dependent variable.

MRI with state-of-the-art metal artifact reduction after total hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the spectrum of periprosthetic MRI findings after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

This multi-center cohort study analyzed 31 asymptomatic patients (65.7 ± 12.7 years) and 27 symptomatic patients (62.3 ± 11.9 years) between 6 months and 2 years after THA. 1.5-T MRI was performed using Compressed Sensing SEMAC and high-bandwidth sequences. Femoral stem and acetabular cup were assessed for bone marrow edema, osteolysis, and periosteal reaction in Gruen zones and DeLee and Charnley zones. Student t test and Fisher's exact test were performed.

RESULTS

The asymptomatic and symptomatic groups showed different patterns of imaging findings. Bone marrow edema was seen in 19/31 (61.3%) asymptomatic and 22/27 (81.5%) symptomatic patients, most commonly in Gruen zones 1, 7, and 8 (p ≥ 0.18). Osteolysis occurred in 14/31 (45.2%) asymptomatic and 14/27 (51.9%) symptomatic patients and was significantly more common in Gruen zone 7 in the symptomatic group (8/27 (29.6%)) compared to the asymptomatic group (2/31 (6.5%)) (p = 0.03). Periosteal reaction was present in 4/31 asymptomatic (12.9%) and 9/27 symptomatic patients (33.3%) and more common in Gruen zones 5 and 6 in the symptomatic group (p = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively). In the acetabulum, bone marrow edema pattern was encountered in 3/27 (11.1%) symptomatic patients but not in asymptomatic patients (p ≥ 0.21). Patient management was altered in 8/27 (29.6%) patients based on MRI findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Periprosthetic bone marrow edema is common after THA both in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Osteolysis and periosteal reaction are more frequent in symptomatic patients. MRI findings led to altered patient management in 29.6% of patients.

KEY POINTS

• Bone marrow edema pattern was frequent in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients after THA, particularly around the proximal femoral stem in Gruen zones 1, 7, and 8. • Osteolysis was significantly more frequent in symptomatic patients in Gruen zone 7. • Periosteal reaction occurred more frequently in symptomatic patients in Gruen zones 5 and 6.

Three-Dimensional Morphological Analysis of Sex, Age, and Symmetry of Proximal Femurs from Computed Tomography: Application to Total Hip Arthroplasty

The success of a total hip arthroplasty is directly related to the ability of the implant to match original femoral morphology. Given this critical relationship, we characterized normal proximal femoral morphology as it relates to sex, age, and symmetry. Sixty abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scans (30 male and 30 female, ages 20-85 years old) from patients without any osseous pathology or implants were utilized. Three-dimensional models were constructed from the CT scans using Mimics v19 (Materialize). Thirteen landmarks were placed on each femur model and yielded eight morphological measurements for each femur. Medullary cavity measurements were taken superior to, at the center of, and inferior to the lesser trochanter. Morphological measurements were analyzed by sex, age group, and left versus right. A significant difference was identified between males and females for femoral head height, inferior neck length, minimum neck diameter, neck shaft angle, mediolateral medullary cavity measurement superior to the lesser trochanter and the anteroposterior at the lesser trochanter (P < 0.05). Age was found to correlate with medullary cavity measurements. As previously identified in the literature, differences with respect to the right and left femur were not of practical significance. The results show that sex is critical in determining prosthesis fit with the examined morphological measurements of the proximal femur while age is more important with respect to the medullary cavity. It is also evident that the current practice of using one femur to approximate the opposite is a viable clinical assumption. Clin. Anat., 33:731-738, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Component Loosening in THA?

BACKGROUND

Implant loosening is a common cause of reoperation after THA. Plain radiographs have been the default modality to evaluate loosening, although radiographs provide a relatively insensitive assessment of integration; cross-sectional modalities may provide a more detailed evaluation but traditionally have suffered from metal-related artifacts. We sought to determine whether MRI is capable of reliably detecting operatively confirmed component loosening in patients after hip arthroplasty.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is assessing implant integration using MRI (with multiacquisition variable resonance image combination, [MAVRIC]) repeatable between readers? (2) What is the sensitivity and specificity of MRI with MAVRIC to evaluate component loosening, using intraoperative assessment as a gold standard? (3) How does the sensitivity and specificity of MRI with MAVRIC for surgically confirmed component loosening compare with those of radiographs?

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2017, 2582 THAs underwent revision at one institution. Of those, 219 had a preoperative MRI with MAVRIC. During that period, the most common indication for obtaining an MRI was evaluation of potential adverse local tissue reaction. The surgeons' decision to proceed with revision was based on their overall assessment of clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings, with MRI findings cited as contributing to the decision to revise commonly occurring in the setting of recalled implants. Of the THAs that underwent MRI, 212 were included in this study, while seven were excluded due to equivocal operative notes (5) and excessively poor quality MRI (2). MRI was performed at 1.5T using a standardized arthroplasty imaging protocol, including MARS (metal artifact reduction sequencing) and MAVRIC techniques. Two independent musculoskeletal fellowship-trained readers (one with 26 and one with 5 years of experience) blinded to operative findings scored a subset of 57 hips for implant integration based on Gruen zone and component loosening (defined as complete circumferential loss of integration around a component) to evaluate interobserver reliability. A third investigator blinded to imaging findings reviewed operative notes for details on the surgeon's assessment of intraoperative loosening.

RESULTS

Gwet's agreement coefficients (AC) were used to describe interobserver agreement; these are similar to Cohen's kappa but are more resistant to certain paradoxes, such as unexpectedly low values in the setting of very high or low trait prevalence, or good agreement between readers on marginal counts. Almost perfect interobserver agreement (AC2 = 0.81-1.0) was demonstrated for all acetabular zones and all femoral Gruen zones on MRI, while perfect (AC1 = 1.0) agreement was demonstrated for the overall assessment of acetabular component loosening and near perfect agreement was shown for the assessment of femoral component loosening (AC1 = 0.98). MRI demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 83% (95% CI, 65-96) and 98% (95% CI, 97-100), respectively, for acetabular component loosening and 75% (95% CI, 55-94) and 100% (95% CI, 100-100), respectively, for femoral component loosening. Radiographs demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 26% (95% CI, 12-47) and 100% (95% CI, 96-100), respectively, for acetabular component loosening and 20% (95% CI, 9-47) and 100% (95% CI, 100-100), respectively, for femoral component loosening.

CONCLUSION

MRI may provide a repeatable assessment of implant integration and demonstrated greater sensitivity than radiographs for surgically confirmed implant loosening in patients undergoing revision THA at a single institution. Additional multi-institutional studies may provide more insight into the generalizability of these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Radiological Imaging Evaluation of the Failing Total Hip Replacement

Total hip replacements (THR) have been performed in the UK from the 1960s and since then we have seen surgical techniques, the design of implants, and imaging modalities rapidly develop. This paper will aim to review the different complications and imaging appearance which help to evaluate each problem. As for all investigations for bone and joints, a radiograph is the first imaging to be performed for any patient with a THR and can detect a majority of complications. CT is relatively low-cost, simple to perform and easily available making it an excellent tool to supplement radiographs when trying to evaluate a hip prosthesis. Single photon emission computed tomography with CT (SPECT-CT) is an emerging modality which has shown to combine the sensitivity that bone scintigraphy offers with the high specificity of CT. SPECT imaging also has the advantage of showing the bone's metabolic activity and is less prone to metal artifact than Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI has evolved to become an important diagnostic tool for the evaluation of THR in the post-operative period. Optimized pulse sequences and metal artifact reduction techniques have made MRI a useful tool in diagnosis of soft tissue abnormalities and is particularly useful in identifying adverse local tissue reactions in metal on metal implants. CT and MRI are accurate in identifying the diagnosis of most causes of THR complications except infection. Research confirms that leukocyte-marrow scintigraphy is the modality of choice for accurately diagnosing prosthetic joint infection and reassures us of its superiority over other nuclear medicine imaging. However, due to the limited availability and increased costs when performing leukocyte-marrow scintigraphy, CT and SPECT-CT would be a more preferred option when suspecting prosthesis infection. Ultrasound (US) has a limited role in the assessment of most THR complications but can be useful to identify peri-prosthetic fluid collections and the presence of soft tissue sinus tracts. Being aware of the imaging modalities that are available to orthopedic surgeons, and discussing these challenging cases with specialist radiologists will enable optimal management of THR complications.

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Charcot Arthropathy is Associated With High Complications but Improved Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic (Charcot) arthropathy of the hip is rare but can lead to joint destruction, bone loss, and dysfunction. While total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be considered a treatment option, only very limited data in the form of case reports are available on the results of THA. The goal of this study was to analyze the outcomes of primary THA for Charcot arthropathy with emphasis on implant survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Eleven patients undergoing 12 primary THAs for Charcot arthropathy from 2007 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had a severe underlying neuropathy and clear radiographic evidence of Charcot arthropathy. Mean age was 54 years with 4 patients being female. Mean follow-up was 5 years.

RESULTS

Survivorship free of any revision was 75% at both 2 and 5 years. Three THAs (3/12) were revised: 2 for recurrent instability and 1 for femoral component loosening. Survivorship free of any reoperation was 67% at both 2 and 5 years. One additional THA underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a Vancouver B₁ periprosthetic fracture. The overall complication rate (including revisions and reoperations) was high at 58% with 3 recurrent dislocations, 2 periprosthetic fractures, 1 femoral component loosening, and 1 delayed wound healing. Harris Hip Scores improved from a mean of 43 preoperatively to 81 postoperatively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the largest to date, we found that patients undergoing primary THA for Charcot arthropathy have a significant improvement in clinical outcomes but that there was a high risk of early complications and revisions, mostly related to recurrent instability. Specific precautions to avoid early complications, namely utilization of components that provide robust fixation and strategies that provide enhanced hip stability, should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

LncRNA DANCR involved osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty by regulating FOXO1 expression to inhibit osteoblast differentiation

Background

Aseptic loosening of artificial hip joint is a major complication affecting the long-term use of the artificial hip joint, and is the main cause of joint replacement failure. However, the mechanism of aseptic loosening of THR has not yet cleared. The aim of this study was to investigate the underlying mechanism of DANCR in osteoblast differentiation (OD).

Methods

We detected the expressions of DANCR and FOXO1 in clinical samples and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) by qRT-PCR and western blotting. The effects of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) on OD of MSCs were examined by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining. The expressions of OD markers were measured by qRT-PCR and western blotting. The mechanism of DANCR in OD was detected by RNA pull-down, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay and ubiquitination assays.

Results

Compared with the surrounding normal tissues, DANCR expression was up-regulated and FOXO1 expression was down-regulated in periprosthetic tissues. PMMA suppressed ALP activity, increased DANCR expression, and decreased the expressions of FOXO1, Runx2, Osterix (Ostx) and osteocalcin (OCN). ARS staining showed that PMMA inhibited the OD of MSCs. Knockdown of DANCR attenuated the inhibitory effect of PMMA on OD. Knockdown of FOXO1 could reverse the effect of si-DANC. RNA pull-down and RIP assay implicated that DANCR bound to FOXO1. Ubiquitination assay indicated that si-DANCR could repress Skp2-mediated ubiquitination of FOXO1.

Conclusion

LncRNA DANCR could inhibit OD by regulating FOXO1 expression.

Acetabular Component Position and the Risk of Dislocation Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, the importance of acetabular component positioning in the Lewinnek "safe zone" in preventing prosthetic dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of acetabular components within the Lewinnek safe zone between primary and revision THAs that have sustained a dislocation vs matched controls without a dislocation event.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved investigation of THAs performed at our institution or referred to our institution between 1997 and 2013. Ninety-six primary THAs and 60 revision THAs that sustained a dislocation were included and matched 1:1 based on age, gender, and body mass index with nondislocated controls. Acetabular component inclination and anteversion were performed using Martell Hip Analysis Suite and compared between the 2 cohorts for both primary and revision THAs.

RESULTS

The proportion of acetabular components within the safe zone for both inclination and anteversion was 23 of 96 (24%) in primary THA dislocators vs 48 of 96 (50%, P < .001) in controls. The proportion of acetabular components within the safe zone for both inclination and anteversion was 28 of 60 (47%) in revision THA dislocators vs 40 of 60 (66%, P = .03) in controls.

CONCLUSION

Patients sustaining a dislocation following a primary or revision THA had acetabular components less frequently positioned within the safe zone compared to control patients. This study suggests acetabular component positioning remains an important variable in decreasing the risk of dislocation following primary and revision THA.

Developments in imaging methods used in hip arthroplasty: A diagnostic algorithm

BACKGROUND

Several imaging modalities can be used to diagnose complications of hip prosthesis placement. Despite progress in these imaging techniques, there are, as yet, no guidelines as to their respective indications.

METHODS

We formed a panel of experts in fields related to prosthesis imaging (radiology, nuclear medicine, orthopedic surgery) and conducted a review of the literature to determine the value of each modality for diagnosing complications following hip replacement.

RESULTS

Few recent studies have investigated the benefits related to the use of the latest technical developments, and studies comparing different methods are extremely rare.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a diagnostic tree based on the characteristics of each imaging technique and recommend its use. Computed topography was found to be the most versatile and cost-effective imaging solution and therefore a key tool for diagnosing the complications of hip replacement surgery.

Imaging of the Painful Hip Arthroplasty

The incidence of complications following total hip arthroplasty is low, but due to the frequency of the procedure, they are quite commonly encountered and require appropriate investigation. Complications include aseptic loosening, infection, foreign body granulomatosis (osteolysis), adverse reactions to metal debris, periprosthetic fracture, heterotopic ossification, hardware failure, and a range of soft tissue complications, all of which may result in pain. Relevant imaging findings are illustrated and the role of various imaging modalities is reviewed. A suggested approach for the radiological investigation of each potential complication is outlined, based on our experience at a specialist referral unit.

What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position

BACKGROUND

Numerous factors influence total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability including surgical approach and soft tissue tension, patient compliance, and component position. One long-held tenet regarding component position is that cup inclination and anteversion of 40° ± 10° and 15° ± 10°, respectively, represent a "safe zone" as defined by Lewinnek that minimizes dislocation after primary THA; however, it is clear that components positioned in this zone can and do dislocate.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to determine if these classic radiographic targets for cup inclination and anteversion accurately predicted a safe zone limiting dislocation in a contemporary THA practice.

METHODS

From a cohort of 9784 primary THAs performed between 2003 and 2012 at one institution, we retrospectively identified 206 THAs (2%) that subsequently dislocated. Radiographic parameters including inclination, anteversion, center of rotation, and limb length discrepancy were analyzed. Mean followup was 27 months (range, 0-133 months).

RESULTS

The majority (58% [120 of 206]) of dislocated THAs had a socket within the Lewinnek safe zone. Mean cup inclination was 44° ± 8° with 84% within the safe zone for inclination. Mean anteversion was 15° ± 9° with 69% within the safe zone for anteversion. Sixty-five percent of dislocated THAs that were performed through a posterior approach had an acetabular component within the combined acetabular safe zones, whereas this was true for only 33% performed through an anterolateral approach. An acetabular component performed through a posterior approach was three times as likely to be within the combined acetabular safe zones (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.6) than after an anterolateral approach (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7; p < 0.0001). In contrast, acetabular components performed through a posterior approach (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9) had an increased risk of dislocation compared with those performed through an anterolateral approach (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The historical target values for cup inclination and anteversion may be useful but should not be considered a safe zone given that the majority of these contemporary THAs that dislocated were within those target values. Stability is likely multifactorial; the ideal cup position for some patients may lie outside the Lewinnek safe zone and more advanced analysis is required to identify the right target in that subgroup.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Postoperative radiograph of the hip arthroplasty: what the radiologist should know

This pictorial review aims to provide the radiologist with simple and systematic guidelines for the radiographic evaluation of a hip prosthesis. Currently, there is a plethora of commercially available arthroplasties, making postoperative analysis not always straightforward. Knowledge of the different types of hip arthroplasty and fixating techniques is a prerequisite for correct imaging interpretation. After identification of the type of arthroplasty, meticulous and systematic analysis of the following parameters on an anteroposterior standing pelvic radiograph should be undertaken: leg length, vertical and horizontal centre of rotation, lateral acetabular inclination, and femoral stem positioning. Additional orthogonal views may be useful to evaluate acetabular anteversion. Complications can be classified in three major groups: periprosthetic lucencies, sclerosis or bone proliferation, and component failure or fracture.

Teaching Points

• To give an overview of the different types of currently used hip arthroplasties.

• To provide a simple framework for a systematic approach to postoperative radiographs.

• To discuss radiographic findings of the most common complications.

The utility of digital linear tomosynthesis imaging of total hip joint arthroplasty with suspicion of loosening: a prospective study in 40 patients

Aim. The clinical utility of digital linear tomosynthesis in musculoskeletal applications has been validated in only a few reports. Technical performance and utility in hip prosthesis imaging have been discussed in technical reports, but no clinical evaluation has been reported. The purpose of the current study was to assess the added clinical utility of digital linear tomosynthesis compared to radiography in loosening of total hip joint arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. In a prospective study, radiography and digital tomosynthesis were performed in 40 consecutive patients with total hip arthroplasty referred for suspect prosthesis loosening. Tomosynthesis images were compared to anterior-posterior (AP) and cross-table lateral radiographs regarding demarcation and extent of demineralization and osteolysis. Further noted were skeletal fractures, cement fractures, fragmentation, and artifacts interfering with the diagnosis. Results. Tomosynthesis was superior to radiography with sharper delineation of demineralization and osteolysis in the AP projection. A limitation was the inability to generate lateral tomosynthesis images, with inferior assessment of the area anterior and posterior to the acetabular cup compared to cross-table radiographs. Artifacts interfering with diagnosis were found in one hip. Conclusion. Tomosynthesis improved evaluation of total hip arthroplasty in the AP projection but was limited by the lack of lateral projections.