Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Primer for the Radiologist

A review of Merkel cell carcinoma

ABSTRACT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive type of metastatic, nonmelanoma skin cancer derived from Merkel cells in the epidermis. MCC can be induced by sun exposure or via Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) gene expression. MCV is found in most patients with MCC and is associated with a lower recurrence rate of MCC. MCC has a wide range of clinical presentations that make diagnosis challenging. Histologic examination is performed using unique markers to differentiate it from other diagnoses. This article reviews the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, histopathology, differential diagnosis, and treatment of MCC.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: From Pathobiology to Clinical Management

Simple Summary

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an uncommon type of skin cancer that carries a poor prognosis. It is seen predominantly in old age in sun-exposed body parts. Racial and geographical differences are seen in its occurrence. Viral infection and radiation exposure are the two leading factors implicated in its causation. Small, firm to hard nodule (usually in sun-exposed areas), red with a history of a rapid increase in size is a common personation of the disease. Other body parts such as upper limbs, trunk, and even lower limbs may be also involved. The disease is diagnosed by taking a tissue sample (biopsy) for examination, and other radiological investigations are needed to reach a proper diagnosis with the staging of the disease. There are various treatment options including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Surgery is the primary treatment option though some patients may not be the candidates for operation where other treatment options come into play.

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an infrequent, rapidly growing skin neoplasm that carries a greater probability of regional lymph node involvement, and a grim prognosis in advanced cases. While it is seen predominantly in old age in sun-exposed body parts, the prevalence varies among different races and geographical regions. Merkel cell polyomavirus and UV radiation-induced mutations contribute to its etiopathogenesis. The clinical presentation of MCC lacks pathognomonic features and is rarely considered highly at the time of presentation. Histopathological examination frequently reveals hyperchromatic nuclei with high mitotic activity, but immunohistochemistry is required to confirm the diagnosis. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and imaging are advised for effective staging of the disease. Multimodal management including surgery, radiation therapy, and/or immunotherapy are deployed. Traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies may result in an initial response, but do not result in a significant survival benefit. Checkpoint inhibitors have dramatically improved the prognosis of patients with metastatic MCC, and are recommended first-line in advanced cases. There is a need for well-tolerated agents with good safety profiles in patients who have failed immunotherapies.

Abdominal metastases from Merkel cell carcinoma: Prevalence and presentation on CT examination in 111 patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence and imaging features of abdominal metastases from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) on computed tomography (CT) examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 111 patients with MCC from two institutions were initially identified. Of these, 27 patients (27/111; 24.3%) had abdominal metastases from MCC present on CT examination. There were 19 men and 8 women with a mean age of 75  ± 10.8 (SD) years (age range: 46-92 years). CT examinations were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists and analyzed quantitatively for the number and dimensions of abdominal metastases from MCC and qualitatively in terms of location, margins, contours, homogeneity, patterns of enhancement, vascular involvement and extension of metastases from MCC.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (15/27; 56%) had abdominal metastatic disease at initial diagnosis and twelve (12/27; 44%) developed abdominal metastases during the course of the disease. The mean number of locations of abdominal metastases was 2.1 ± 1.12 (SD) (range: 1-5). Abdominal metastases involved abdominal lymph nodes (16/27; 59%), adrenal glands/kidneys/retroperitoneum (14/27; 52%), mesentery/peritoneum (13/27; 48%), liver (7/27; 26%) and pancreas (7/27; 26%). Vascular involvement was found in association with peritoneal/mesenteric metastases in 6/13 (46%) patients with intraperitoneal metastases or in association with abdominal lymph nodes in 4/16 (25%) patients. Ureteral encasement and/or dilatation was found in 4/14 (28%) patients with retroperitoneal metastases and 3/16 (19%) patients with abdominal lymph nodes. Metastases to the liver, pancreas, peritoneum, retroperitoneum and adrenal glands displayed internal enhancement during the arterial phase in 1/2 (50%), 4/5 (80%), 4/7 (57%) and 5/8 (62%) patients for whom arterial phase was available, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Metastases from MCC have a prevalence of 24.3% on CT examination and may involve a variety of abdominal organs, mainly lymph nodes, peritoneal and retroperitoneal structures, but also the liver and pancreas. CT features of abdominal metastases from MCC include hypervascularity during the arterial phase of enhancement and eventually vascular and ureteral involvement.

Characteristic Imaging Features of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare primary cutaneous tumor. The standardized imaging guidelines for the diagnosis of MCC have not been established. We report the multimodality imaging features of MCC, including CT, MRI, and ultrasound with grayscale and color Doppler mode as well as the elastography and even a histopathologic confirmation.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 76-year old male patient with MCC on the elbow that was treated by excision. On MRI, prominent T2 low signal voiding was noted with branching or chaotic pattern and marked, branching, or chaotic vascularity was also seen on color doppler ultrasound. Those findings corresponded to histology that showed increased vascularity in stromal tissues of the tumor and in between the tumor cells.

CONCLUSION

A mass in the dermal and subcutaneous layer with marked and branching or chaotic vascularity may be the unique characteristic that may contribute to early diagnosis of MCC.

Clinical Impact of FDG PET/CT of the Lower Extremities in Patients With Merkel Cell Carcinoma With Primary Disease Site Outside of the Lower Extremities

OBJECTIVE. Whole-body imaging extending from the vertex of the head to the toes is considered the standard ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT protocol for Merkel cell carcinoma, though the evidence establishing this standard is scant. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of PET/CT of the lower extremities in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma, a rare aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 101 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (mean age, 70.9 years) who underwent whole-body PET/CT were included. PET/CT findings in the lower extremities were evaluated on a per-patient basis, and the results were compared between patients with the primary lesion in the lower extremities (lower extremity primary) and those with the primary lesion located between the head and inguinal regions (body primary). Subsequent clinical evaluation and follow-up imaging were used as the reference standard. RESULTS. In the lower extremity (n = 22) and body (n = 79) primary groups, five and eight patients had true metastases in the lower extremities (p = .15). In the body primary group, all metastases in the lower extremities were part of widespread metastases in the body. In contrast, three of five patients (60%) in the lower extremity primary group had isolated metastases in the lower extremities, which differed significantly from the rate in the body primary group (p = .04). Subgroup analysis that included 48 patients who underwent initial staging examinations showed no metastases in the lower extremities regardless of primary location. CONCLUSION. PET/CT of the lower extremities for patients with body primary lesions of Merkel cell carcinoma should be considered of limited clinical utility.

Imaging of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: What Imaging Experts Should Know

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine tumor with a higher mortality rate than melanoma. Approximately 40% of MCC patients have nodal or distant metastasis at initial presentation, and one-third of patients will develop distant metastatic disease over their clinical course. Although MCC is rare, its incidence has been steadily increasing. Furthermore, the immunogenicity of MCC and its diagnostic and therapeutic application have made MCC one of the most rapidly developing topics in dermatology and oncology. Owing to the aggressive and complex nature of MCC, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for management of this tumor, including dermatologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis, planning for surgery or radiation therapy, and assessment of treatment response and surveillance. However, MCC is still not well recognized among radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians, likely owing to its rarity. The purpose of this review is to raise awareness of MCC among imaging experts by describing the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features of MCC and current clinical management with a focus on the role of imaging. The authors highlight imaging findings characteristic of MCC, as well as the clinical significance of CT, MRI, sentinel lymph node mapping, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, and other nuclear medicine studies such as bone scintigraphy and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. ^©RSNA, 2019.

Patterns of distant metastases in 215 Merkel cell carcinoma patients: Implications for prognosis and surveillance

Approximately one‐third of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) patients eventually develop distant metastatic disease. Little is known about whether the location of the primary lesion is predictive of initial distant metastatic site, or if survival likelihood differs depending on the metastatic site. Such data could inform imaging/surveillance practices and improve prognostic accuracy. Multivariate and competing‐risk analyses were performed on a cohort of 215 MCC patients with distant metastases, 31% of whom had two or more initial sites of distant metastasis. At time of initial distant metastasis in the 215 patients, metastatic sites (n = 305) included non‐regional lymph nodes (present in 41% of patients), skin/body wall (25%), liver (23%), bone (21%), pancreas (8%), lung (7%), and brain (5%). Among the 194 patients who presented with MCC limited to local or regional sites (stage I‐III) but who ultimately developed distant metastases, distant progression occurred in 49% by 1 year and in 80% by 2 years following initial diagnosis. Primary MCC locations differed in how likely they were to metastasize to specific organs/sites (P < .001). For example, liver metastases were far more likely from a head/neck primary (43% of 58 patients) versus a lower limb primary (5% of 39 patients; P < .0001). Skin‐only distant metastasis was associated with lower MCC‐specific mortality as compared to metastases in multiple organs/sites (HR 2.7; P = .003), in the liver (HR 2.1; P = .05), or in distant lymph nodes (HR 2.0; P = .045). These data reflect outcomes before PD1‐pathway inhibitor availability, which may positively impact survival. In conclusion, primary MCC location is associated with a pattern of distant spread, which may assist in optimizing surveillance. Because it is linked to survival, the site of initial distant metastasis should be considered when assessing prognosis.

Updated WHO nomenclature of head and neck lesions and associated imaging findings

This article reviews the imaging features of head and neck lesions with updated 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) nomenclature. The major WHO changes include refined terminology of existing entities, descriptions of new tumor types, elimination of defunct categories, and updated biological characterization of various tumor types. In particular, the updates pertaining to the following conditions will be reviewed: tumors of the oral cavity and oropharynx, including HPV-positive or HPV-negative squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma; tumors of the hypopharynx, larynx, trachea, and parapharyngeal space, including nomenclature revisions for laryngeal neuroendocrine tumors; tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses including newly added entities such as NUT carcinoma and biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma; odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors, including the reversal of terminology for certain cystic lesions; tumors of the salivary glands, including updated terminology related to high-grade transformation and polymorphous adenocarcinomas tumors; temporal bone lesions including modifications of the nomenclature and classification criteria; tumor-like lesions of the neck and lymph nodes, with a discussion encompassing developmental cysts, metastases of unknown primary, and heterotopia-associated neoplasia; and mucosal melanoma. Familiarity with the proper WHO terminology for conditions that might be mentioned in differential diagnoses and a general understanding of the behavior of head and neck lesions can help optimize imaging assessment and reporting.

The utility of positron emission tomography with and without computed tomography in patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer

Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans are widely used in the staging and monitoring of most malignancies. The differential for PET-positive cutaneous lesions includes primary skin cancers, infections, cutaneous metastases from distant malignancies, and benign neoplasms. In dermatology, PET/CT scans have been most widely studied in patients with melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma. The role of PET/CT scans in the management of other cutaneous malignancies is less clear, but it has shown great promise in the management of patients with squamous cell carcinoma and cutaneous lymphoma. This review seeks to address the usefulness of PET/CT scans in nonmelanoma skin cancer and to provide guidance regarding the management of patients with incidental PET-positive nodules. Currently, there is limited experience with PET/CT scans for staging and monitoring of non-head and neck metastatic basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, and results show limited sensitivity and specificity. We also address the evidence for management of an incidental PET-positive cutaneous nodule and recommend obtaining a biopsy specimen in patients with a known noncutaneous malignancy, a history of primary skin cancer, or a high risk of either cutaneous or noncutaneous malignancy.

Merkel cell carcinoma: An algorithm for multidisciplinary management and decision-making

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin. Therapeutic approach is often unclear, and considerable controversy exists regarding MCC pathogenesis and optimal management. Due to its rising incidence and poor prognosis, it is imperative to establish the optimal therapy for both the tumor and the lymph node basin, and for treatment to include sentinel node biopsy. Sentinel node biopsy is currently the most consistent predictor of survival for MCC patients, although there are conflicting views and a lack of awareness regarding node management. Tumor and node management involve different specialists, and their respective decisions and interventions are interrelated. No effective systemic treatment has been made available to date, and therefore patients continue to experience distant failure, often without local failure. This review aims to improve multidisciplinary decision-making by presenting scientific evidence of the contributions of each team member implicated in MCC management. Following this review of previously published research, the authors conclude that multidisciplinary team management is beneficial for care, and propose a multidisciplinary decision algorithm for managing this tumor.

A systematic review of clinical outcomes for patients diagnosed with skin cancer spinal metastases

OBJECT Surgical procedures and/or adjuvant therapies are effective modalities for the treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases. However, clinical results specific to the skin cancer spinal metastasis cohort are generally lacking. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature for treatments, clinical outcomes, and survival following the diagnosis of a skin cancer spinal metastasis and evaluate prognostic factors in the context of spinal skin cancer metastases stratified by tumor subtype. METHODS The authors performed a literature review using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science to identify articles since 1950 that reported survival, clinical outcomes, and/or prognostic factors for the skin cancer patient population with spinal metastases. The methodological quality of reviews was assessed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) tool. RESULTS Sixty-five studies met the preset criteria and were included in the analysis. Of these studies, a total of 25, 40, 25, and 12 studies included patients who underwent some form of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or observation alone, respectively. Sixty-three of the 65 included studies were retrospective in nature (Class of Evidence [CoE] IV), and the 2 prospective studies were CoE II. Based on the studies analyzed, the median overall survival for a patient with a spinal metastasis from a primary skin malignancy is 4.0 months; survival by tumor subtype is 12.5 months for patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 4.0 months for those with melanoma, 4.0 months for those with squamous cell carcinoma, 3.0 months for those with pilomatrix carcinoma, and 1.5 months for those with Merkel cell carcinoma (p < 0.0001). The overall percentage of known continued disease progression after spine metastasis diagnosis was 40.1% (n = 244/608, range 25.0%-88.9%), the rate of known recurrence of the primary skin cancer lesion was 3.5% (n = 21/608, range 0.2%-100.0%), and the rate of known spine metastasis recurrence despite treatment for all skin malignancies was 2.8% (n = 17/608, range 0.0%-33.3%). Age greater than 65 years, sacral spinal involvement, presence of a neurological deficit, and nonambulatory status were associated with decreased survival in patients diagnosed with a primary skin cancer spinal metastasis. All other clinical or prognostic parameters were of low or insufficient strength. CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed with a primary skin cancer metastasis to the spine have poor overall survival with the exception of those with BCC. The median duration of survival for patients who received surgical intervention alone, medical management (chemotherapy and/or radiation) alone, or the combination of therapies was similar across interventions. Age, spinal region, and neurological status may be associated with poor survival following surgery.

Hormonal therapy in oncology: a primer for the radiologist

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive imaging review of the common hormonal therapies used in oncology and the side effects associated with them.

CONCLUSION

Commonly used hormones in oncology include corticosteroids, somatostatin analogues, progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists, antiandrogens, aromatase inhibitors, and selective estrogen receptor modulators. Familiarity with these hormones and their side effects can help radiologists to be vigilant for the side effects and complications of these agents.

Focus on Merkel cell carcinoma: diagnosis and staging

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare lymphophilic skin tumor of neuroendocrine origin with the potential for rapid progression. Small, localized lesions are diagnosed and treated clinically, but advanced tumors often undergo imaging evaluation. Due to its rarity, radiologists are unaware of evocative imaging features and usually do not consider Merkel cell carcinoma in the differential diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Appropriate staging is important to determine appropriate treatment and has an impact on patient prognosis. Multimodality imaging is usually needed, and there is no consensus on the optimal imaging strategy. The purpose of this article is to review various aspects of Merkel cell carcinoma imaging and look in detail at how optimal multimodality staging should be carried out.