Diffuse finely nodular lesions of the esophagus

Oesophageal hyperkeratosis: clinicopathological associations

AIMS

Oesophageal hyperkeratosis is rarely described. In contrast to hyperkeratosis of orolaryngeal mucosa, where its risk factors and association with squamous neoplasia are well-studied, the prevalence and clinicopathological features of oesophageal hyperkeratosis are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed prospectively 1845 oesophageal biopsies and found hyperkeratosis in 37 (2.0%). Among 98 patients studied, hyperkeratosis occurred in two distinct settings: group 1 [within Barrett's oesophagus (BO)/adenocarcinoma, n = 61, 62%] and group 2 (outside BO/adenocarcinoma, n = 37, 38%). In contrast to group 1, hyperkeratosis in group 2 was more often multifocal (>3 foci in 51% versus 16%, P = 0.0001), involved mid-oesophagus (51% versus 2%, P < 0.0001), showed endoscopic leucoplakia (24% versus 3%, P = 0.003) and involved current/former alcohol users (51% versus 19%, P = 0.0012). Importantly, invasive squamous carcinoma and squamous dysplasia were seen only in group 2 (47% and 19% versus 0%, P < 0.0001). Further, 42% of group 2, but none of group 1, had benign or malignant squamous lesions of the oral cavity/larynx (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Hyperkeratosis involves ~2% of oesophageal biopsies and can be divided into cases occurring within BO/adenocarcinoma and those occurring outside BO/adenocarcinoma. The former lack clinical significance, whereas the latter are associated frequently with oesophageal squamous neoplasia and squamous pathology of the head and neck region.

Superficial Esophageal Cancer: Esophagographic Findings Correlated with Histopathologic Findings

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine and evaluate the findings of superficial esophageal cancer at esophagography and to correlate the esophagographic findings with the depth of tumor invasion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review boards required neither their approval nor informed patient consent for this retrospective study. One hundred thirteen patients with superficial esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy at three institutions were included in this study. Double-contrast esophagograms were reviewed independently by two reviewers. For assessment of histopathologic findings, pathology reports were reviewed. Findings at esophagography, including morphologic type of the lesion, lesion extent, presence or absence of elevated or depressed component, margin and extent of elevated or depressed component, presence or absence of nodularity, extent of nodularity, esophageal luminal narrowing, and esophageal wall rigidity, were compared between mucosal and submucosal cancers by using chi2, Fisher exact, and independent-sample t tests.

RESULTS

Of 122 histopathologically proved superficial esophageal cancers in 113 patients, 100 (82%) were detected at esophagography. The most common morphologic type was the plaquelike form; 50 (50%) such lesions were depicted at esophagography. Morphologic types were significantly different between the mucosal and submucosal cancers (P < .001). Protruded and plaquelike lesions were more frequent among submucosal cancers, whereas most flat lesions were mucosal cancers. An elevated component (P < .001), a rigid esophageal wall (P < .001), and a lobulated or irregular margin of the elevated component (P = .023) were significantly more frequent among submucosal cancers. Also, total extent of the lesion (P < .001), size of the largest nodule (P < .001), and extent of nodularity (P = .036) were significantly larger in the submucosal cancers.

CONCLUSION

In the evaluation of patients with superficial esophageal cancer, esophagography appears to be helpful for diagnosing the tumor and differentiating mucosal from submucosal cancers.

Significance of diffuse granularity and nodularity of the esophageal mucosa at double-contrast radiography

Out of 5000 consecutive double-contrast examinations of the esophagus, 50 cases presented a diffuse finely granular or nodular appearance of the mucosa. Endoscopy was subsequently performed in 38 cases and biopsy in the majority of these. In 23 of the 38 verified cases the diagnosis was reflux esophagitis. In the other 15 cases the diagnoses were: candidal esophagitis (4), leukoplakia (2), glycogenic acanthosis (1), and diffuse leiomyomatosis (1). A normal mucosa was demonstrated in 7 cases. Our study indicates that a radiologically granular or nodular appearance of the esophageal mucosa often indicates reflux esophagitis and less commonly identifies diffuse lesions of variable origin.

Glycogenic acanthosis of the esophagus: radiographic and pathologic features

Diagnostic features of glycogenic acanthosis of the esophagus on air-contrast radiography, endoscopy, and histopathologic studies in 10 selected cases are presented. Glycogenic acanthosis of the esophagus is a common benign entity, characterized by multifocal plaques of hyperplastic squamous epithelium with abundant intracellular glycogen deposits. At esophagoscopy or on autopsy specimens these lesions appear as slightly raised grey-white plaques which are usually 2-10 mm in diameter and may be confluent. They cause a finely nodular or cobblestone mucosal pattern demonstrable on double-contrast views of the well-distended esophagus. The findings are not associated with mucosal ulcerations, luminal narrowing, or mobility disturbance, although some patients may have coexistent hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux.

Sensitivity of single-contrast radiology in esophageal disease: a study of 240 patients with endoscopically verified abnormality

Single-contrast radiology of the esophagus was correlated with endoscopy in 240 patients with the following endoscopically verified abnormalities: esophagitis 170, rings 28, malignancies 19, varices 9, miscellaneous 14. For all the abnormalities except mild esophagitis, the overall sensitivity of the radiology in these 240 patients was 92%. All 19 cancers were diagnosed radiologically, whereas 90% of moderate and severe esophagitis was detected. The single-contrast examination thus reliably identified clinically significant disease of the esophagus. Comparison of these results to recent reports employing double-contrast technique suggests that claims of superiority for the double-contrast esophagram over the single-contrast study are not supported.

Esophageal cancer

The important concepts of carcinoma of the esophagus are reviewed in this article. Pathology of malignant esophageal tumors is described and tumor behavior of squamous cell carcinoma is discussed and illustrated. Various classifications and staging methods are reviewed with emphasis placed on the TNM system. The role of current imaging techniques in patients with esophageal carcinoma is presented. Computed tomography is discussed and illustrated in detail. The relative cost effectiveness of these procedures is presented and an imaging approach emphasizing TNM staging is described for patients with known carcinoma of the esophagus. This imaging approach is integrated with the basic aspects of treatment and both curative and palliative pathways are presented. The final section of the article deals with these same concepts in patients with carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. The important differences between adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction and esophageal carcinoma are described.

Double-contrast examination of the oesophagus: the radiological changes of peptic oesophagitis

A simple method for obtaining double-contrast views of the oesophagus as part of the routine double contrast examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract using high-density low-viscosity barium is described. The typical radiological changes of early peptic oesophagitis (confirmed by endoscopy) which can be readily demonstrated with this technique are illustrated as an example of its practical value. These consist of 'smudged' or 'cobble-stone' mucosa with thickened and distorted longitudinal folds. Superficial erosions and deep ulcers may also be seen. It is suggested that endoscopic confirmation of these characteristic radiological signs of peptic oesophagitis is unnecessary.

Double-contrast artifacts

With the increasing use of double-contrast technique in radiological evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract, certain artifacts peculiar to this mode of examination need to be identified. These artifacts arise because of: (a) the characteristics of the barium suspensions used for double-contrast studies; (b) the see-through effect obtained on double-contrast studies whereby opacities lying in front of or behind the organ being examined may simulate pathologic lesions; (c) infolding of the mucosa which may simulate pathology; (d) extraneous or foreign material which is frequently detected and must be differentiated from intrinsic disease; (e) certain anatomical structures such as the cardia, pylorus, and retrogastric structures which are seen with unusual clarity and detail and which, in some cases, may simulate pathology. In general, these artifacts may simulate diffuse superficial ulceration, discrete ulceration, or polypoid lesions. Familiarity with the double-contrast technique and an understanding of these artifacts will help to avoid diagnostic errors.