In search of venous thromboembolism: the first 2913 years

Biomarkers Profile in Provoked Versus Unprovoked Deep Venous Thrombosis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), represents a substantial healthcare challenge. Provoked and unprovoked DVT cases carry distinct risks and treatment considerations. Recognizing the limitations of this classification, molecular markers may enhance diagnostic precision and guide anticoagulation therapy duration relying on patient history and risk factors. This preliminary, open-label, prospective cohort study was conducted including 15 patients (10 provoked DVT and 5 unprovoked DVT) and a control group of healthy plasmatic subjects. Plasma levels of 9 biomarkers were measured at diagnosis (baseline, day 0, and D0) and after 30 days (day 30-D30). Patient demographics, clinical data, and biomarker concentrations were analyzed. Serum concentrations of D-dimer, von Willebrand factor, C-reactive protein, and Anti-Xa were elevated in DVT groups at D0 compared to controls. No significant differences were observed between the provoked and unprovoked groups on the day of diagnosis and 30 days later. Over 30 days, the provoked group exhibited significant biomarker changes related to temporal assessment. No significant differences were noted in the biomarker profile between provoked and unprovoked DVT groups. This study is indicative of the concept of individualized thrombosis assessment and subsequent treatment for VTE. Larger cohorts are warranted to validate these findings and further define the most appropriate use of the molecular markers.

Historical Evolution of Imaging Techniques for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism

As we celebrate the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), it seems fitting to look back at the major accomplishments of the radiology community in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Few diseases have so consistently captured the attention of the medical community. Since the first description of pulmonary embolism by Virchow in the 1850s, clinicians have struggled to reach a timely diagnosis of this common condition because of its nonspecific and often confusing clinical picture. As imaging tests started to gain importance in the 1900s, the approach to diagnosing pulmonary embolism also began to change. Rapid improvements in angiography, ventilation-perfusion imaging, and cross-sectional imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging have constantly forced health care professionals to rethink how they diagnose pulmonary embolism. Needless to say, the way pulmonary embolism is diagnosed today is distinctly different from how it was diagnosed in Virchow's era; and imaging, particularly CT, now forms the cornerstone of diagnostic evaluation. Currently, radiology offers a variety of tests that are fast and accurate and can provide anatomic and functional information, thus allowing early diagnosis and triage of cases. This review provides a historical journey into the evolution of these imaging tests and highlights some of the major breakthroughs achieved by the radiology community and RSNA in this process. Also highlighted are areas of ongoing research and development in this field of imaging as radiologists seek to combat some of the newer challenges faced by modern medicine, such as rising health care costs and radiation dose hazards.