Colonoscopic Findings in Patients With Incidental Colonic Focal FDG Uptake. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:W586-W591. [PMID: 25905966 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.12817]

Focal incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Should it be spotlighted?

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a cornerstone in cancer evaluation imaging, with a well-established history spanning several years. This imaging modality, encompassing the examination of the body from the base of the skull to the upper thighs, comprehensively covers the chest and abdominopelvic regions in a singular scan, allowing for a holistic assessment of nearly the entire body, including areas of marginal interest. The inherent advantage of this expansive scan range lies in its potential to unveil unexpected incidental abnormal hypermetabolic areas. The identification of incidental focal FDG uptake within colorectal regions during PET/CT scans is not an uncommon occurrence, albeit fraught with challenges associated with non-specific FDG uptake. The presence of benign colorectal lesions or physiological uptake poses a particular obstacle, as these may manifest with FDG uptake levels that mimic malignancy. Consequently, physicians are confronted with a diagnostic dilemma when encountering abnormal FDG uptake in unexpected colorectal areas. Existing studies have presented divergent results concerning these uptakes. Standardized uptake value and its derivatives have served as pivotal metrics in quantifying FDG uptake in PET images. In this article, we aim to succinctly explore the distinctive characteristics of FDG, delve into imaging findings, and elucidate the clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal uptake. This discussion aims to contribute valuable insights into the nuanced interpretation of such findings, fostering a comprehensive understanding.

Unexpected focal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in main organs; pass through or pass by?

Since the inception of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) utilizing F-18 FDG has become widely accepted as a valuable imaging modality in the field of oncology, with global prevalence in clinical practice. Given that a single Torso PET/CT scan encompasses the anatomical region from the skull base to the upper thigh, the detection of incidental abnormal focal hypermetabolism in areas of limited clinical interest is both feasible and not uncommon. Numerous investigations have been undertaken to delineate the distinctive features of these findings, yet the outcomes have proven inconclusive. The incongruent results of these studies present a challenge for physicians, leaving them uncertain about the appropriate course of action. This article provides a succinct overview of the characteristics of fluorodeoxyglucose, followed by a comprehensive discussion of the imaging findings and clinical significance associated with incidental focal abnormal F-18 FDG activity in several representative organs. In conclusion, while the prevalence of unrecognized malignancy varies across organs, malignancies account for a substantial proportion, ranging from approximately one-third to over half, of incidental focal uptake. In light of these rates, physicians are urged to exercise vigilance in not disregarding unexpected uptake, facilitating more assured clinical decisions, and advocating for further active evaluation.

Assessment of water enema PET/CT: an effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake

BACKGROUND

To validate the feasibility of water enema PET/CT (WE-PET/CT) in incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake and improve the accuracy of diagnosing colorectal neoplastic lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the electronic records of 338 patients undergoing common PET/CT and WE-PET/CT at our hospital. PET/CT results were correlated with colonoscopy pathology and follow-up results. The ROC contrast curve was plotted to evaluate the accuracy of SUVmax on common PET/CT and WE-PET/CT for detecting neoplastic lesions. SUVmax and the median retention indexes (RIs) of cancerous, precancerous, and benign lesions and physiologic uptake were compared.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosing neoplastic lesions with common PET/CT were 84.0%, 78.3% and 80.2%, respectively. The corresponding results with WE-PET/CT were 95.8%, 96.5% and 96.2%. The AUC of SUVmax on WE-PET/CT was significantly higher than that on common PET/CT (0.935 vs. 0.524, p < 0.001). The median SUVmax on WE-PET/CT was significantly higher than that on common PET/CT in cancerous and precancerous lesions, and significantly decreased in benign lesions and physiologic uptake (p < 0.001). The RI was significantly different between cancerous lesions and physiologic uptake, between precancerous lesions and physiologic uptake, between benign lesions and physiologic uptake, and between cancerous and benign lesions (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

WE-PET/CT is a noninvasive, well-tolerated and effective technique for diagnosing incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake. It is helpful for a timely colonoscopy and can effectively avoid an unnecessary colonoscopy for incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake.

Can physiologic colonic [18F]FDG uptake in PET/CT imaging predict response to immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma?

AIM

The development of biomarkers that can reliably and early predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is crucial in melanoma. In recent years, the gut microbiome has emerged as an important regulator of immunotherapy response, which may, moreover, serve as a surrogate marker and prognosticator in oncological patients under immunotherapy. Aim of the present study is to investigate if physiologic colonic [18F]FDG uptake in PET/CT before start of ICIs correlates with clinical outcome of metastatic melanoma patients. The relation between [18F]FDG uptake in lymphoid cell-rich organs and long-term patient outcome is also assessed.

METHODOLOGY

One hundred nineteen stage IV melanoma patients scheduled for immunotherapy with ipilimumab, applied either as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab, underwent baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT. PET/CT data analysis consisted of standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) calculations in the colon as well as measurements of the colon-to-liver SUV ratios (CLRmean, CLRmax). Visual grading of colon uptake based on a four-point scale was also performed. Moreover, the spleen-to-liver SUV ratios (SLRmean, SLRmax) and the bone marrow-to-liver SUV ratios (BLRmean, BLRmax) were calculated. We also measured serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels as a marker for bacterial translocation and surrogate for mucosal defense homeostasis. The results were correlated with patients' best clinical response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as well as clinical signs of colitis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up [95%CI] from the beginning of immunotherapy was 64.6 months [61.0-68.6 months]. Best response to treatment was progressive disease (PD) for 60 patients, stable disease (SD) for 37 patients, partial response (PR) for 18 patients, and complete response (CR) for 4 patients. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a trend for longer PFS and OS in patients with lower colonic SUV and CLR values; however, no statistical significance for these parameters as prognostic factors was demonstrated. On the other hand, patients showing disease control as best response to treatment (SD, PR, CR) had significantly lower colonic MTV and TLG than those showing PD. With regard to lymphoid cell-rich organs, significantly lower baseline SLRmax and BLRmax were observed in patients responding with disease control than progression to treatment. Furthermore, patients with lower SLRmax and BLRmax values had a significantly longer OS when dichotomized at their median. In multivariate analysis, PET parameters that were found to significantly adversely correlate with patient survival were colonic MTV for PFS, colonic TLG for PFS, and BLRmax for PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Physiologic colonic [18F]FDG uptake in PET/CT, as assessed by means of SUV, before start of ipilimumab-based treatment does not seem to independently predict patient survival of metastatic melanoma. On the other hand, volumetric PET parameters, such as MTV and TLG, derived from the normal gut may identify patients showing disease control to immunotherapy and significantly correlate with PFS. Moreover, the investigation of glucose metabolism in the spleen and the bone marrow may offer prognostic information.

Evaluation of patients via colonoscopy who underwent positron emission tomography/computerized tomography due to colon involvement

OBJECTIVE

Fluorodeoxyglucose is not a tumor-specific agent and it can also be involved in benign conditions, which may cause diagnostic confusion. This research aims to elucidate the colonoscopic findings of patients who underwent colonoscopy due to colon involvement in positron emission tomography/computerized tomography.

METHODS

A total of 71 patients who underwent colonoscopy due to colonic involvement in positron emission tomography/computerized tomography at SBU Keçiören Training and Research Hospital Gastroenterology Clinic Endoscopy Unit have been analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics of the patients, areas of involvement in positron emission tomography/computerized tomography, and severity have been obtained from the hospital database.

RESULTS

The gastrointestinal involvement area of 22.5% (n=16) of the patients was ascending colon, 15.5% (n=11) was sigmoid, 15.5% (n=11) was rectum, 12.7% (n=9) was stomach, 11.3% (n=8) was transverse colon, 8.5% (n=6) was anal canal, 5.6% (n=4) was esophagus, and 5.6% (n=4) was descending colon. The endoscopic findings of 19.7% (n=14) patients were normal, whereas 29.6% (n=21) had polyps, 9.9% (n=7) had cancer, 2.8% (n=2) had an ulcer, 15.5% (n=11) had gastritis, 14.1% (n=10) had hemorrhoids, and 7% (n=5) had colitis.

CONCLUSION

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography can detect unexpected distant metastases with high sensitivity because it allows whole-body imaging. Curative resection significantly contributes to the choice of treatment modality in the pre-operative period of colorectal cancer patients with planned surgery.

Significance of incidental focal fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate: With a brief literature review

BACKGROUND

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT), a functional imaging method, is usually performed on the entire torso, and regions of unexpected suspicious focal hypermetabolism are not infrequently observed. Among the regions, colon, thyroid, and prostate were found to be the common organs in a recent umbrella review. Some studies reported that a high rate of malignancy was shown in incidentally identified focal hypermetabolic regions and suggested that further examinations should not be ignored.

AIM

To investigate the malignancy rate of incidental focal FDG uptake, useful PET parameters and their cutoffs in discrimination between malignant and benign lesions.

METHODS

Retrospectively, the final reports of 16510 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans performed at our hospital between January 2016 and March 2022 were reviewed to identify incidentally observed FDG uptake in the colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate. The scans of patients with current or prior malignancies at each corresponding location, without the final reports of histopathology or colonoscopy (for colon and rectum) for the corresponding hypermetabolic regions, or with diffuse (not focal) hypermetabolism were excluded. Finally, 88 regions of focal colorectal hypermetabolism in 85 patients (48 men and 37 women with mean age 67.0 ± 13.4 years and 63.4 ± 15.8 years, respectively), 48 focal thyroid uptakes in 48 patients (12 men and 36 women with mean age 62.2 ± 13.1 years and 60.8 ± 12.4 years, respectively), and 39 focal prostate uptakes in 39 patients (mean age 71.8 ± 7.5 years) were eligible for this study. For those unexpected focal hypermetabolic regions, rates of malignancy were calculated, PET parameters, such as standardized uptake value (SUV), capable of distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions were investigated, and the cutoffs of those PET parameters were determined by plotting receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

In the colon and rectum, 29.5% (26/88) were malignant and 33.0% (29/88) were premalignant lesions. Both SUVmax and SUVpeak differentiated malignant/premalignant from benign lesions, however, no parameters could distinguish malignant from premalignant lesions. Higher area under the curve was shown with SUVmax (0.752, 95%CI: 0.649-0.856, P < 0.001) and the cutoff was 7.6. In the thyroid, 60.4% (29/48) were malignant. The majority were well-differentiated thyroid cancers (89.7%, 26/29). The results of BRAF mutation tests were available for 20 of the 26 well-differentiated thyroid cancers and all 20 had the mutation. Solely SUVmax differentiated malignant from benign lesions and the cutoff was 6.9. In the prostate, 56.4% (22/39) were malignant. Only SUVmax differentiated malignant from benign lesions and the cutoff was 3.8. Overall, among the 175 focal hypermetabolic regions, 60.6% (106/175) were proven to be malignant and premalignant (in colon and rectum) lesions.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 60% of the incidentally observed focal F-18 FDG uptake in the colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate were found to be malignant. Of the several PET parameters, SUVmax was superior to others in distinguishing between malignant/premalignant and benign lesions. Based on these findings, incidental focal hypermetabolism should not be ignored and lead physicians to conduct further investigations with greater confidence.

Correlation between incidental focal colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT and colonoscopic and histopathological results

OBJECTIVE AND AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between incidental focal colorectal foci on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) with colonoscopic and histopathological results. The secondary aim was to determine to what extent these findings led to a change in patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed among 5850 patients who had an FDG-PT/CT scan from July 2015 to July 2018. Among these patients, we identified patients with a PET/CT description of incidental colorectal FDG uptake, and a colonoscopy within 90 days from the PET/CT scan. PET/CT findings were compared with colonoscopy-detected lesions and eventually histopathology on a per-lesion analysis and a per-person analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included in the study. A total of 180 foci of colorectal FDG uptake were detected on FDG-PET/CT. Of these, 86 foci corresponded to advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN), positive predictive value (PPV) 47.8%; 95% CI: 40.5-55.1%). On a per-patient analysis 81 patients had a least one ACRN at colonoscopy (PPV 55.9%; 95% CI: 47.6-63.8), this group included 20 patients (13.8%) diagnosed with cancer. There was a small positive correlation between focal FDG-uptake and the finding of ACRN at the same colonic segment at colonoscopy, which was statistically significant, rho = 0.2565, p = .002. The findings changed patient management in 67 (46.2%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental focal colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT is associated with a high risk of ACRN and is affecting subsequent patient management. Further evaluation with colonoscopy is recommended when the patient is considered suitable for further treatment.

Incidental anal 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Should we further examine the patient?

BACKGROUND

There are no studies on incidental anal ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸FDG) uptake.

AIM

To assess the rate and aetiologies of incidental anal ¹⁸FDG uptake and to evaluate the correlation between ¹⁸FDG positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters and the diagnosis of an anorectal disease.

METHODS

The data from patients with incidental anal ¹⁸FDG uptake were retrospectively analysed. Patients who underwent anorectal examinations were identified and compared to those who did not undergo examinations. Patients who were offered treatment were then identified and compared to those who did not receive treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 43020 ¹⁸FDG PET/CT scans performed, 197 ¹⁸FDG PET/CT scans of 146 patients (0.45%) reported incidental anal uptake. Among the 134 patients included, 48 (35.8%) patients underwent anorectal examinations, and anorectal diseases were diagnosed in 33 (69.0%) of these patients and treated in 18/48 (37.5%) patients. Among the examined patients, those with a pathology requiring treatment had significantly smaller metabolic volumes (MV) 30 and MV41 values and higher maximal and mean standardized uptake value measurements than those who did not require treatment.

CONCLUSION

Incidental anal ¹⁸FDG uptake is rare, but a reliable anorectal diagnosis is commonly obtained when an anorectal examination is performed. The diagnosis of an anorectal disease induces treatment in more than one-third of the patients. These data should encourage practitioners to explore incidental anal ¹⁸FDG uptake systematically.

Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the colon: value of contrast-enhanced CT correlation with colonoscopic findings

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of morphological information derived from contrast-enhanced CT in the characterization of incidental focal colonic uptake in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations.

METHODS

A total of 125 patients (female: n = 53, male: n = 72) that underwent colonoscopy secondary to contrast-enhanced, full-dose PET/CT without special bowel preparation were included in this retrospective study. PET/CT examinations were assessed for focal colonic tracer uptake in comparison with the background. Focal tracer uptake was correlated with morphological changes of the colonic wall in the contrast-enhanced CT images. Colonoscopy reports were evaluated for benign, inflammatory, polypoid, precancerous, and cancerous lesions verified by histopathology, serving as a reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for detection of therapeutic relevant findings were calculated for (a) sole focal tracer uptake and (b) focal tracer uptake with correlating CT findings in contrast-enhanced CT.

RESULTS

In 38.4% (48/125) of the patients, a focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was observed within 67 lesions. Malignant lesions were endoscopically and histopathologically diagnosed in eleven patients, and nine of these were detected by focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. A total of 34 lesions with impact on short- or long-term patient management (either being pre- or malignant) were detected. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for sole ¹⁸F-FDG uptake for this combined group were 54%, 69%, 29%, 85%, and 65%. Corresponding results for focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake with correlating CT findings were 38%, 90%, 50%, 86%, and 80%. This resulted in a statistically significant difference for diagnostic accuracy (p = 0.0001) CONCLUSION: By analyzing additional morphological changes in contrast-enhanced CT imaging, the specificity of focal colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake for precancerous and cancerous lesions can be increased but leads to a considerate loss of sensitivity. Therefore, every focal colonic uptake should be followed up by colonoscopy.

Incidental colorectal focal 18 F-FDG uptake: a novel indication for colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 The relevance of incidental colorectal focal ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT uptake is debatable. All patients who were referred for colonoscopy because of incidental colonic focal FDG uptake were included in this retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 PET/CT imaging characteristics were reviewed by a nuclear physician who was blinded to endoscopic and histopathological findings to determine the location of FDG uptake sites and to measure the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and metabolic volume (MV). Endoscopic findings were categorized as malignant lesions (ML), high-risk polyps (HRP), low-risk polyps (LRP) or other non-neoplastic lesions (NNL).

RESULTS

 Seventy patients with 84 foci of FDG uptake were included. The proportions of true-positive (lesions found at colonoscopy at the same location) and false-positive (no lesion at colonoscopy) PET/CT findings were 65.5 % (n = 55) and 34.5 % (n = 29). Median SUVmax values did not differ between true-positive and false-positive findings ( P  = 0.27). Median MV30 values differed significantly between true-positive (5.5 cm ³ , [3.3 - 10.9 cm ³ ]) and false-positive (9.7 cm ³ , [5.2 - 40.8 cm ³ ]) findings ( P  = 0.015). Among the 55 true-positive FDG uptake sites, there were 14 (25.5 %) malignant lesions, 30 (54.5 %) HRP, 4 (7.3 %) LRP, and 7 (12.7 %) NNL. Median MV30 values differed significantly between advanced neoplasia (5.0 cm ³ , [2.9 - 9.7 cm ³ ]) and other endoscopic findings (9.4 cm ³ , [5.2 - 39.8 cm ³ ]) ( P  = 0.001); the AUROC was 0.71. By per-colonic segment analysis, the distribution of true-positive, false-negative, false-positive, and true-negative FDG PET/CT findings was as follows: 21.5 %, 14.2 %, 11.5 %, and 52.8 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

 Our study demonstrates that follow-up complete colonoscopy is mandatory in all patients with incidental colorectal focal ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT uptake.

Incidental colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT scan and lesions observed during subsequent colonoscopy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake can be observed during a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan. For clinical and/or histological assessment of the cause, a colonoscopy is then performed. A systematic review was conducted to investigate the relationship between incidental colorectal FDG uptake and lesions observed during a subsequent colonoscopy.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science with the keywords concerning PET/CT scan and colonoscopy. The studies were selected using inclusion criteria defined a priori and were described individually to examine the correlation between incidental colorectal FDG uptake and the lesions found at colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Twenty-six of 1606 studies found were included. In total, 108,578 patients underwent an FDG-PET/CT scan as part of a diagnostic work-up or cancer staging. In total, 2546 incidental colorectal FDG uptakes were described in 2121 patients (mean age 62.7 years SD ± 5.1), of which 2045 uptakes in 1635 patients were examined by colonoscopy, within a mean of 37 days (SD ± 28). The colonoscopic lesions included neoplasms (n = 1097; 322 cancers), benign lesions (n = 273), and inflammatory lesions (n = 71). Colonoscopies were normal in 604 patients. In total, 82% of lesions were located in the same location as the FDG uptakes. The positive predictive value was 70% (95% CI [68-72]).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental colorectal FDG uptake, as evaluated by subsequent colonoscopy, often reveals neoplastic lesions. Predominantly, lesions were located at the same location as FDG uptake. Further investigation is warranted before recommending that incidental colorectal FDG uptake should always result in referral to diagnostic colonoscopy.

Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting

BACKGROUND

Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT may be associated with a malignancy and can be quantified. This provides the basis for an automatic trigger threshold above which cases are flagged for colonoscopic evaluation and below which for individual assessment.

PURPOSE

To determine the lowest maximum standard uptake (SUVmax) in colorectal cancer that could be used as a threshold to trigger endoscopic evaluation and to evaluate whether the SUVmax needs to be further normalised to a priori known extrinsic factors.

METHODS

The SUVmax was measured in 54 colorectal carcinomas and correlated with gender, age, blood glucose level, injected activity, body mass index and time to scan using t test or correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman, according to distribution).

RESULTS

There was no correlation between SUVmax and any of the extrinsic factors mentioned above. The lowest SUVmax value was 5 [mean ± SD (range): 11.1 ± 4.8 (5.0-24.6)].

CONCLUSION

In contrast to most other screening techniques, semi-automation in colorectal screening seems possible with PET/CT. This opens the door for further study into the feasibility of automated screening. Independent from extrinsic factors, an SUVmax ≥5.0 in a focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT should automatically trigger for endoscopic evaluation, if not contraindicated. Cases with SUVmax <5 should be assessed individually before referral for endoscopy. Thus, more interpretation time could be spent on those cases with a lower uptake and more ambiguous diagnosis.