Appearance and Frequency of Gas Interface Artifacts Involving Small Bowel on Rapid-Voltage-Switching Dual-Energy CT Iodine-Density Images

Role of Dual Energy Computed Tomography in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), which allows material-based differential X-ray absorption behavior from near simultaneously acquired low- and high-kilovolt datasets is finding increasing applications in the evaluation of bowel diseases. In patients with inflammatory bowel disease, DECT techniques permit both qualitative and quantitative assessment. Particularly in patients with Crohn's disease, monoenergetic and iodine specific images have been explored. This article focuses on the principles and applications of DECT in inflammatory bowel disease along with review of its limitations and challenges.

Dual-energy CT of acute bowel ischemia

Acute bowel ischemia is a condition with high mortality and requires rapid intervention to avoid catastrophic outcomes. Swift and accurate imaging diagnosis is essential because clinical findings are commonly nonspecific. Conventional contrast enhanced CT of the abdomen has been the imaging modality of choice to evaluate suspected acute bowel ischemia. However, subtlety of image findings and lack of non-contrast or arterial phase images can make correct diagnosis challenging. Dual-energy CT provides valuable information toward assessing bowel ischemia. Dual-energy CT exploits the differential X-ray attenuation at two different photon energy levels to characterize the composition of tissues and reveal the presence or absence of faint intravenous iodinated contrast to improve reader confidence in detecting subtle bowel wall enhancement. With the same underlying technique, virtual non-contrast images can help to show non-enhancing hyperdense hemorrhage of the bowel wall in intravenous contrast-enhanced scans without the need to acquire actual non-contrast scans. Dual-energy CT derived low photon energy (keV) virtual monoenergetic images emphasize iodine contrast and provide CT angiography-like images from portal venous phase scans to better evaluate abdominal arterial patency. In Summary, dual-energy CT aids diagnosing acute bowel ischemia in multiple ways, including improving visualization of the bowel wall and mesenteric vasculature, revealing intramural hemorrhage in contrast enhanced scans, or possibly reducing intravenous contrast dose.

Quantitative assessment of liver steatosis using ultrasound: dual-energy CT

Reflecting the growing interest in early diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in recent years, the development of noninvasive and reliable fat quantification methods is needed. Dual-energy computed tomography (DE-CT) is a quantitative diagnostic imaging method that estimates the composition of the imaging target using a material decomposition technique based on the X-ray absorption characteristics peculiar to substances from DE-CT scanning using X-rays generated with different energies (tube voltage). In this review article, we first explain the basic principles and technical aspects of DE-CT. Then, we will present the current diagnostic ability of DE-CT and the factors influencing the quantitative evaluation of liver steatosis using DE-CT as compared to multi-modal methods including ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging-based methods. In brief, DE-CT may have comparable diagnostic performance to the modern US-based liver fat measurement methods. However, the current material decomposition technique using DE-CT does not seem to have added value to the simple quantitative assessment of liver steatosis, because DE-CT measurement does not improve the accuracy of fat quantification over conventional single-energy computed tomography (SE-CT) attenuation. The most significant influencing factor for the quantitative assessment of liver steatosis using DE-CT can be hepatic iron deposition. An iron-specific multi-material decomposition algorithm correcting for the influences of iron in the liver has been under development. The current material decomposition algorithm can still have added value in a specific situation such as the quantitative assessment of liver steatosis using contrast-enhanced DE-CT. However, there is a lack of evidence for the influence of liver fibrosis in the quantitative assessment of liver steatosis using DE-CT.

Dual-Energy CT Images: Pearls and Pitfalls

Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a tremendous innovation in CT technology that allows creation of numerous imaging datasets by enabling discrete acquisitions at more than one energy level. The wide range of images generated from a single DECT acquisition provides several benefits such as improved lesion detection and characterization, superior determination of material composition, reduction in the dose of iodine, and more robust quantification. Technological advances and the proliferation of various processing methods have led to the availability of diverse vendor-based DECT approaches, each with a different acquisition and image reconstruction process. The images generated from various DECT scanners differ from those from conventional single-energy CT because of differences in their acquisition techniques, material decomposition methods, image reconstruction algorithms, and postprocessing methods. DECT images such as virtual monochromatic images, material density images, and virtual unenhanced images have different imaging appearances, texture features, and quantitative capabilities. This heterogeneity creates challenges in their routine interpretation and has certain associated pitfalls. Some artifacts such as residual iodine on virtual unenhanced images and an appearance of pseudopneumatosis in a gas-distended bowel loop on material-density iodine images are specific to DECT, while others such as pseudoenhancement seen on virtual monochromatic images are also observed at single-energy CT. Recognizing the potential pitfalls associated with DECT is necessary for appropriate and accurate interpretation of the results of this increasingly important imaging tool. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

Dual-energy CT in diffuse liver disease: is there a role?

Dual-energy CT (DECT) can be defined as the use of two different energy levels to identify and quantify material composition. Since its inception, DECT has benefited from remarkable improvements in hardware and clinical applications. DECT enables accurate identification and quantification of multiple materials, including fat, iron, and iodine. As a consequence, multiple studies have investigated the potential role of DECT in the assessment of diffuse liver diseases. While this role is evolving, this article aims to review the most relevant literature on use of DECT for assessment of diffuse liver diseases. Moreover, the basic concepts on DECT techniques, types of image reconstruction, and DECT-dedicated software will be described, focusing on the areas that are most relevant for the evaluation of diffuse liver diseases. Also, we will review the evidence of added value of DECT in detection and assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma which is a known risk in patients with diffuse liver disease.

Low-keV and Low-kVp CT for Positive Oral Contrast Media in Patients with Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background Substantial gain in the attenuation of iodine on low-kVp and dual-energy CT processed low-keV virtual monochromatic images provides an opportunity for customization of positive oral contrast media administration. Purpose To perform an intrapatient comparison of bowel labeling, opacification, and taste preference with iodinated oral contrast medium (ICM) in standard (sICM) and 25%-reduced (rICM) concentrations at low tube voltage (100 kVp) or on low-energy (50-70 keV) virtual monochromatic images compared with barium-based oral contrast medium (BCM) at 120 kVp. Materials and Methods In this prospective clinical trial, 200 adults (97 men, 103 women; mean age, 63 years ± 13 [standard deviation]) who weighed less than 113 kg and who were undergoing oncologic surveillance (from April 2017 to July 2018) and who had previously undergone 120-kVp abdominopelvic CT with BCM randomly received sICM (7.2 g iodine) or rICM (5.4 g iodine) and underwent 100-kVp CT or dual-energy CT (80/140 kVp) scans to be in one of four groups (n = 50 each): sICM/100 kVp, rICM/100 kVp, sICM/dual-energy CT, and rICM/dual-energy CT. Qualitative analysis was performed for image quality (with a five-point scale), extent of bowel labeling, and homogeneity of opacification (with a four-point scale). Intraluminal attenuation of opacified small bowel was measured. A post-CT patient survey was performed to indicate contrast medium preference, taste of ICM (with a five-point scale), and adverse effects. Data were analyzed with analogs of analysis of variance. Results All CT studies were of diagnostic image quality (3.4 ± 0.3), with no difference in the degree of bowel opacification between sICM and rICM (P > .05). Compared with BCM/120 kVp (282 HU ± 73), mean attenuation was 78% higher with sICM/100 kVp (459 HU ± 282) and 26%-121% higher at sICM/50-65 keV (50 keV = 626 HU ± 285; 65 keV = 356 HU ± 171). With rICM, attenuation was 46% higher for 100 kVp (385 HU ± 215) and 19%-108% higher for 50-65 keV (50 keV = 567 HU ± 270; 65 keV = 325 HU ± 156) compared with BCM (P < .05). A total of 171 of 200 study participants preferred ICM to BCM, with no taste differences between sICM and rICM (3.9 ± 0.6). Fifteen participants had diarrhea with BCM, but none had diarrhea with ICM. Conclusion A 25%-reduced concentration of iodinated oral contrast medium resulted in acceptable bowel labeling while yielding substantially higher luminal attenuation at low-kVp and low-keV CT examinations with improved preference in patients undergoing treatment for cancer. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Laghi in this issue.

Dual Energy Computed Tomography Scans of the Bowel: Benefits, Pitfalls, and Future Directions

Current computed tomography bowel imaging is challenging given the variable distension, content, and location of the bowel, the different appearance of tumors within and adjacent to bowel, and peristaltic artifacts. Published data remain sparse. Derangements in enhancement may be highlighted, image artifacts reduced, and radiation dose from multiphase scans minimized. This modality is suited for imaging bowel tumor detection and characterization, gastrointestinal bleeding, and bowel inflammation, and ischemia. Experimental results on computed tomography colonography and novel bowel contrast material offer hope for major improvements in bowel interrogation. It is likely to become increasingly valuable for bowel-related disease diagnosis and monitoring.

Quantification of Iodine Concentration Using Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in a Calf Liver

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of single-source dual-energy computed tomography (ssDECT) in iodine quantification using various segmentation methods in an ex vivo model.

METHODS

Ten sausages, injected with variable quantities of iodinated contrast, were inserted into 2 livers and scanned with ssDECT. Material density iodine images were reconstructed. Three radiologists segmented each sausage. Iodine concentration, volume, and absolute quantity were measured. Agreement between the measured and injected iodine was assessed with the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Intrareader agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Air bubbles were observed in sausage (IX). Sausage (X) was within the same view as hyper-attenuating markers used for localization. With IX and X excluded, CCC and ICC were greater than 0.98 and greater than 0.88. When included, CCC and ICC were greater than 0.94 and greater than 0.79.

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine quantification was reproducible and precise. However, accuracy reduced in sausages consisting of air filled cavities and within the same view as hyperattenuating markers.

Rapid switching kVp dual energy CT: Value of reconstructed dual energy CT images and organ dose assessment in multiphasic liver CT exams

PURPOSE

Clinical applications of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) have been widely reported; however, the importance of the different image reconstructions and radiation organ dose remains a relevant area of investigation, particularly considering the different commercially available DECT equipment. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the image reliability and compare the information content between several image reconstructions in a rapid-switching DECT (rsDECT), and assess radiation organ dose between rsDECT and conventional single-energy computed tomography (SECT) exams.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 98 consecutive patients who had a history of liver cancer and underwent multiphasic liver CT exams with rsDECT applied during the late arterial phase between June 2015 and December 2015. Virtual monochromatic 70 keV, material density images (MDI) iodine (-water) and virtual unenhanced (VUE) images were generated. Radiation dose analysis was performed in a subset of 44 patients who had also undergone a multiphasic SECT examination within 6 months of the rsDECT. Four board-certified abdominal radiologists reviewed 24-25 patients each, and a fifth radiologist re-evaluated all the scans to reach a consensus. The following imaging aspects were assessed by the radiologists: (a) attenuation measurements were made in the liver and spleen in VUE and true unenhanced (TUE) images; (b) subjective evaluation for lesion detection and conspicuity on MDI iodine (-water)/VUE images compared with the virtual monochromatic images/TUE images; and (c) overall image quality using a five-point Likert scale. The radiation dose analyses were evaluated in the subset of 44 patients regarding the following parameters: CTDIvol, dose length product, patient's effective diameter and organ dose using a Monte Carlo-based software, VirtualDose™ (Virtual Phantoms, Inc.) to 21 organs.

RESULTS

On average, image noise on the TUE images was 49% higher within the liver (p < 0.0001) and 48% higher within the spleen (p < 0.0001). CT numbers for the spleen were significantly higher on VUE images (p < 0.0001). Twenty-eight lesions in 24/98 (24.5%) patients were not observed on the VUE images. The conspicuity of vascular anatomy was considered better on MDI iodine (-water) Images 26.5% of patients. Using the Likert scale, the rsDECT image quality was considered to be satisfactory. Considering the subset of 44 patients with recent SECT, the organ dose was, on average, 37.4% less with rsDECT. As the patient's effective diameter decreased, the differences in dose between the rsDECT and SECT increased, with the total average organ dose being less by 65.1% when rsDECT was used.

CONCLUSION

VUE images in the population had lower image noise than TUE images; however, a few small and hyperdense findings were not characterized on VUE images. Delineation of vascular anatomy was considered better in around a quarter of patients on MDI iodine (-water) images. Finally, radiation dose, particularly organ dose, was found to be lower with rsDECT, especially in smaller patients.