Comparison of Mannitol, Water, and Iodine-Based Oral Contrast in the Evaluation of the Bowel by Multi-Detector Computed Tomography

Background and objectives

To perform contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen with water, mannitol, or iodinated positive contrast as an oral contrast agent, and compare the distension and enhancement pattern of the bowel.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study conducted on 90 patients over a period of 12 months who were referred for CECT abdomen. Patients were randomly divided into three groups (30 each) and were given water, mannitol, or positive oral contrast before the CECT study. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the bowel for distension, mural fold pattern, and enhancement was analyzed at various anatomical levels. A qualitative examination of bowel loops was done in the three groups by using a continuous 4-point scale.

Results

The mean distension at the duodenum was 1.89 ± 0.33 cm (mean ± SD) with water, 2.28 ± 0.36 cm with mannitol, and 2.01 ± 0.33 cm with positive oral contrast. Overall, maximum luminal distension was seen at the level of the duodenum, followed by the jejunum across all the groups. Bowel characteristics were far superior in the mannitol group compared to water and positive oral contrast at all anatomical levels.

Conclusion

Small bowel distension was excellent with mannitol, followed by positive oral contrast, and least with water. Mural characteristics and enhancement patterns were better with mannitol as compared with water and with positive oral contrast.

Multi-detector computed tomography in traumatic abdominal lesions: value and radiation control

Background, The context

A prospective study was conducted involving 81 patients (mean age, 20.79 years) with abdominal trauma who underwent ultrasonography and post-contrast CT on MDCT scanner. The total DLP for each patient was reviewed, and the effective dose was calculated. Purpose of the study to: explore the role of MDCT in assessing traumatic abdominal lesions, demonstrate radiation dose delivered by MDCT, and describe specific CT technical features to minimize radiation.

Results

The spleen was the most commonly injured organ (49.4%) followed by liver (39.5%) and kidney (24.7%). Pancreatic injury occurred in seven patients, whereas only two patients had intestinal injuries. One patient had adrenal injury. Minimal, mild and moderate free intra-peritoneal fluid collection was detected in 21 (25.9%), 47 (58%) and 10 (12.3%) patients, respectively. Only three (3.7%) patients had no collection. One patient had active uncontrolled bleeding and died. Radiation dose was below the detrimental level (calculated effective dose), with optimal image quality.

Conclusions

MDCT is sensitive to all types of traumatic abdominal lesions. Not only in determining the injury, but also in its grading. MDCT has affected the treatment directions, spotting a focus on conservative treatment by raising the diagnostic confidence. FAST cannot be the sole imaging modality. The individual radiation risk is small but real. Advancements in medical imaging reduce radiation risk.

The pediatric stomach - masses and mass-like pathology

Diagnostic imaging of pediatric gastric masses often provides a challenge for the practicing radiologist. Radiologists should be aware of this relatively unusual pathology, particularly in cross-sectional imaging findings. We will review pediatric gastric masses and mass-like lesions, focusing on neoplastic and inflammatory etiologies.