Differentiation of benign and malignant local tumor recurrence after lumpectomy

Time to development and imaging features of new calcifications in the treated breast after breast-conserving therapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to analyze the time to development, malignancy rate, location, and mammographic features of new calcifications in the treated breast after breast-conserving therapy (BCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this HIPAA-complaint, IRB-approved retrospective study, we reviewed the records of patients treated with BCT at our institution with breast-conserving surgery performed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010. A total of 735 breasts in 732 women were included in our study cohort. Factors analyzed included rate of development of new calcifications, malignancy rate of new calcifications, the time between completion of radiation therapy and development of new calcifications, imaging features of new calcifications, and location of the new calcifications in relation to the primary malignancy.

RESULTS

During follow-up, new calcifications developed in 155 of the 735 treated breasts (21.1%) and 155 of the 732 women (21.2%). After excluding two cases that were lost to follow-up, the malignancy rate of new calcifications was 5.2% (8/153; 95% CI: 2.3% to 10.0%). The median time to development of the benign calcifications was 27 months (range, 2 to 91 months) and of the malignant calcifications was 41 months (range, 11 to 57 months). Of the 20 (13.1%) cases of new calcifications categorized as BI-RADS 3 (probably benign), all were benign on follow-up (19 cases) or on biopsy (1 case). Of the 51 BI-RADS 4 (suspicious) cases, 8 (16%) were biopsy-proven malignant. The malignancy rate was the highest in fine pleomorphic 100% (1/1), followed by amorphous 17%, (5/29), coarse heterogeneous 8% (2/26) and typically benign 0 (0/97) calcifications (p < 0.0001). The malignancy rate was 1.5% (2/137) for new calcifications within the lumpectomy site vs. 37.5% (6/16) for new calcifications outside the lumpectomy site (p < 0.0001) and was 3.4% (5/147) for new calcifications at or within the same quadrant as the lumpectomy site vs. 50.0% (3/6) for new calcifications in a different quadrant from the lumpectomy site (p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Most new calcifications that developed in the treated breast after BCT were benign. Evaluation of morphology and distribution of those calcifications is imperative. New calcifications in the treated breast outside the lumpectomy site are more likely to be malignant and should be viewed with greater suspicion. Benign calcifications developed earlier than malignant calcifications, but the time courses overlapped.

Post-lumpectomy breast calcifications: Can original tumor features assist in determining need for biopsy?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to determine whether, in the digital era, imaging features of a primary breast tumor can be used to influence the decision to biopsy ipsilateral breast calcifications that occur following surgery in women treated with breast conservation surgery (BCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified women treated with BCS who subsequently developed suspicious calcifications in the treated breast (BI-RADS 4 or 5) from January 2012 - December 2018. Only cases with histopathological diagnosis by stereotactic or surgical biopsy were included. Pathology reports were reviewed, and biopsy results were considered malignant if invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was found. All other results were considered benign. Fisher's exact test was done comparing frequencies of malignancy between those patients whose original tumor had calcifications versus those whose original tumors were not calcified.

RESULTS

Of 90 women with suspicious calcifications on a post-BCS mammogram, 65 (72.2%) were biopsy proven benign and 25 (27.8%) were malignant. The original tumor presented without calcifications in 39 patients (43%), and 51 (57%) had calcifications with or without associated mass, focal asymmetry, or architectural distortion. New calcifications were less likely to be malignant if the original tumor presented without calcifications (5/39; 12.8%) as compared to original tumors with calcifications (20/51; 38.5%) [p-value < 0.05].

CONCLUSION

New calcifications after BCS are significantly less likely to be malignant if the original tumor presented without calcifications. However, with a PPV of 12.8%, even calcifications in a patient with a non-calcified primary tumor require biopsy.

Surveillance Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting the Second Breast Cancer in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting the secondary breast cancer among women with a personal history of the lesion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed breast MRI examinations performed between 2007 and 2011. A total of 798 women with a history of breast cancer were included in the study. Cancer detection rate, positive predictive value (PPV), recall rate, sensitivity, and specificity were assed. Cancer detection rate was stratified by interval after surgery of the primary breast cancer. Also, we derived 1 comparison group from the women for comparing the performance of x-ray mammography, ultrasound, and MRI in detecting the second breast cancer.

RESULTS

Of the 798 patients, 47 of the 49 secondary breast carcinomas were detected by MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in detecting the secondary lesions were 95.9% and 96.3%, respectively. The recall rate was 9.5%, and the PPV was 61.8%. Cancer detection rate of MRI examinations performed at more than 36 months after initial surgery was significantly higher than that at 36 months or less after initial surgery (13.7% vs 3.6, P < 0.001). In comparison group, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI, mammography, and ultrasound were 96.7% and 96.1%, 48.4% and 93.9%, and 77.4% and 96.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance MRI for women with a personal history of breast cancer has high sensitivity in finding the secondary malignancies with a reasonable recall rate and PPV.

Analysis of stereotactic biopsies performed on suspicious calcifications identified within 24 months after completion of breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer: Can biopsy be obviated?

BACKGROUND

To determine the cancer yield of stereotactic biopsy of suspicious calcifications identified within 24 months after breast conservation therapy (BCT).

METHODS

Retrospective review of stereotactic biopsies performed during 2009-2013 for suspicious calcifications in the ipsilateral breast of patients who completed BCT.

RESULTS

94/2773 (3.4%) had stereotactic biopsies for suspicious calcifications in the ipsilateral breast; 7/94 (7.4%) had DCIS (6) or invasive (1) cancer; 5/7 occurred in the same breast quadrant as the primary. All 7 originally had negative surgical margins (≥2 mm); 6 received whole breast irradiation, and 2 received adjuvant chemotherapy + endocrine therapy. Median time to detection was 11 months (range, 6-20 months). There was a strong association between calcification morphology (particularly pleomorphic) and likelihood of malignancy (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic biopsy of calcifications identified within 24 months post-BCT has a 7% cancer yield. Tissue biopsy should be performed rather than imaging followup alone when breast calcifications have suspicious morphology.

The postconservation breast: part 2, Imaging findings of tumor recurrence and other long-term sequelae

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this article are to highlight the imaging findings of tumor recurrence and other long-term potential sequelae after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy, including increased risk of infection and radiation-induced malignancies. The role of MRI as a problem-solving tool in evaluating the conservatively treated breast will also be discussed.

CONCLUSION

Imaging the treated breast presents challenges because of its limited compressibility and overlapping features of benign posttreatment alterations and tumor recurrence. After lumpectomy and radiation therapy, mammographic findings such as breast edema, skin thickening, fluid collections, architectural distortion, and calcifications have characteristic sequences of evolution toward stability. Changes in the imaging appearance after stability has been achieved--including increasing asymmetry, an enlarging mass, increasing edema or skin thickening, and the development of pleomorphic calcifications within or near the operative bed--should alert the radiologist to possible tumor recurrence. When mammography or sonography is indeterminate, MRI may be useful in excluding recurrence or providing a means for biopsy of a suspicious finding.

Mammographic appearance of recurrent breast cancer after breast conservation therapy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the mammographic appearance of recurrent breast cancer to the primary tumor in patients treated with breast conservation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The charts of women with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I or II breast cancer who underwent breast conservation therapy between 1977 and 2001 at our institution were reviewed. A total of 132 patients were diagnosed with local recurrence.

RESULTS

The mammographic appearance of the local recurrence often varied from the appearance of the original breast cancer. This was especially true for women who had mammographically occult primary breast cancer. In these women, the recurrence was detected mammographically 76.9% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the variable appearance of the local recurrence after breast conservation therapy, any suspicious finding needs to be carefully evaluated regardless of the mammographic appearance of the original tumor.

Practice Guideline for the Breast Conservation Therapy in the Management of Invasive Breast Carcinoma

This is the second of two articles reprinted with permission from: Practice guideline for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. In: Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology;2006:443-468. In this reprinting "G" in Section IV is available in the Online version only. For Section VI please refer to the first publication of ductal carcinoma in-situ (J Am Coll Surg 2007:205:145-161). Parts of this article have been shortened for brevity. The full article is available through the American College of Radiology. The American College of Radiology, with more than 30,000 members, is the principal organization of radiologists, radiation oncologists, and clinical medical physicists in the United States. The College is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science of radiology, improve radiologic services to the patient, study the socioeconomic aspects of the practice of radiology, and encourage continuing education for radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and persons practicing in allied professional fields. The American College of Radiology will periodically define new practice guidelines and technical standards for radiologic practice to help advance the science of radiology and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing practice guidelines and technical standards will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each practice guideline and technical standard, representing a policy statement by the College, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, requiring the approval of the Commission on Quality and Safety as well as the ACR Board of Chancellors, the ACR Council Steering Committee, and the ACR Council. The practice guidelines and technical standards recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guideline and technical standard by those entities not providing these services is not authorized.

Management of Microcalcifications Developing at the Lumpectomy Bed After Conservative Surgery and Radiation Therapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to determine whether the mammographic features (morphology and distribution) of new microcalcifications that develop in women treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy can allow differentiation of benign changes from recurrent neoplasm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of mammograms of 402 patients who were treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy between 1987 and 2005 revealed 68 cases of new calcifications (in 66 patients) with follow-up (n = 55) or biopsy (n = 13) results. Analysis included the time between completion of radiation therapy and the appearance of calcifications; location of calcifications relative to the site of the original lesion; the morphology and distribution of calcifications; and changes in number, density, morphology, and rate of change of calcifications.

RESULTS

The median rate of development after lumpectomy was 24 months (range, 6-84 months) for benign and 52 months (range, 20-90 months) for malignant calcifications. In 63 cases (93%), the new calcifications developed in the same quadrant as the primary tumor. None of the calcifications initially interpreted as BI-RADS category 2 (n = 40/68; 59%) and category 3 (n = 19/68; 28%) represented recurrent disease. Nine (13%) of 68 calcifications were initially classified as BI-RADS category 4 or 5; six (67%) of the nine were malignant and three (33%) were benign at biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Newly occurring calcifications in the treated breast are usually benign, and they can be managed conservatively in many cases by using morphology and pattern of distribution as a guide.

Membranous Fat Necrosis of the Breast: Diagnosis by Minimally Invasive Technique

Clinical and mammographic features of membranous fat necrosis (MFN) may simulate breast malignancy and tissue sampling is essential for accurate diagnosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and imaging findings in these patients. Retrospective review of the records of breast biopsies (n = 1200) during the 5-year period 1998 to 2002 revealed eight (0.67%) cases of histologically proven MFN. Seven of the eight patients had a history of breast trauma or surgery. Seven patients underwent mammography: normal in two, a mass with curvilinear calcifications in one, and heterogeneous calcifications in four. Four patients underwent surgical excision of a palpable mass, one patient had complete excision of calcifications with large core biopsy technique, and three patients had stereotactic vacuum-assisted mammotome biopsy (VAMB). MFN should be included in the differential diagnosis of lesions in a breast with previous trauma or surgery. A minimally invasive diagnostic procedure should be considered in order to avoid excessive excisional surgery.

Relation between the method of detection of initial breast carcinoma and the method of detection of subsequent ipsilateral local recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Mammography and physical examination are routine methods for the detection of ipsilateral local recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma in patients initially undergoing breast conservation treatment. The current study reports the relation between the method of detection of the initial breast carcinoma and the method of detection of subsequent ipsilateral local recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the records of female patients with initial American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I and II invasive breast carcinoma who developed ipsilateral local recurrence or contralateral breast carcinoma after breast conservation treatment. The method of detection of local recurrence in the ipsilateral breast and the method of detection of contralateral breast carcinoma were compared with the method of detection of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

There were 125 ipsilateral breast local recurrences and 71 contralateral breast carcinoma cases detected. Of the 125 recurrences in the ipsilateral breast, 38% (48 recurrences) were detected by mammography only, 37% (46 recurrences) were detected by physical examination only, and 25% (31 recurrences) were detected by both methods. Of the 71 contralateral breast carcinoma cases, 53% (38 cases) were detected by mammography only, 23% (16 cases) were detected by physical examination only, and 24% (17 cases) were detected by both methods. When the primary tumors were detected by mammography only, 21% of the local recurrences (3 of 14 local recurrences) and 19% of the contralateral breast carcinoma cases (4 of 21 cases) were detected by physical examination only. When the primary tumors were detected by physical examination only, 24% of the local recurrences (14 of 58 local recurrences) and 42% of the contralateral breast carcinoma cases (8 of 19 cases) were detected by mammography only. When stratified by the interval between diagnosis of the primary tumor and ipsilateral local recurrence or contralateral breast carcinoma (< or = 5 years vs. > 5 years) or age of the patient at the time of ipsilateral breast recurrence or contralateral breast carcinoma (age < or = 49 years vs. age > or = 50 years), both breast examination and mammography were found to be important in the detection of locally recurrent tumor and contralateral breast carcinoma in each subgroup of the patients, regardless of the method of presentation of the primary tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Both mammography and physical examination were found to be significant in the detection of locally recurrent tumor in the ipsilateral breast and in the detection of contralateral breast carcinoma, regardless of the method of detection of the primary tumor.

Breast imaging and the conservative treatment of breast cancer

Breast conservation, where appropriate, offers effective treatment for breast cancer while preserving the breast. The increased use of mammographic screening has led to increased detection of small, curable breast cancers that are amenable to breast-conserving surgery. Mammography and other imaging modalities, such as sonography and MRI, assist in the determination of the appropriateness of breast conservation and in the differentiation of recurrence from benign sequelae of treatment.

Comparison of rate of development and rate of change for benign and malignant breast calcifications at the lumpectomy bed

OBJECTIVE

The study purpose was to evaluate the rate of development and the rate of change for benign and malignant breast calcifications at the lumpectomy bed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review identified 53 new calcifications at the lumpectomy bed in patients with available mammograms and medical records. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories were retrospectively assigned on the basis of initial prospective recommendation for yearly follow-up (category 2), 6-month follow-up (category 3), or biopsy (category 4 or 5). Outcomes were defined as benign for no recurrence at the lumpectomy bed on biopsy or follow-up and malignant if biopsy-proven at the lumpectomy bed.

RESULTS

The median rate of development after lumpectomy was 23 months (range, 2-174 months) for benign and 39 months (range, 15-112 months) for malignant calcifications. Fifteen (28%) of 53 calcifications were classified as BI-RADS category 3. Twelve (80%) of 15 were downgraded to BI-RADS category 2 at a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range, 6-16 months); none represented recurrent disease. Three (20%) of 15 were upgraded to BI-RADS category 4 at the 6-month follow-up, one despite stability (benign) and two for increasing pleomorphism (malignant). Nine (17%) of 53 calcifications were classified as BI-RADS category 4 or 5; six (67%) of the nine were malignant and three (33%) were benign at biopsy. Twenty-nine (55%) of 53 calcifications were classified as BI-RADS category 2, none representing recurrent disease.

CONCLUSION

Benign calcifications at the lumpectomy bed usually develop earlier than malignant calcifications, but the rate of development overlaps. Most calcifications initially placed in the probably benign category evolve quickly to more benign or more malignant morphology. Most calcifications heralding recurrence appear suspicious on first presentation.

Origin of metallic particles resembling microcalcifications on mammograms after use of abrasive cautery-tip cleaning pads during breast surgery: experimental demonstration

PURPOSE

To determine if the act of cleaning a cautery tip with an abrasive pad dislodges radiopaque particles that can be transferred to breast tissue during surgery, thereby mimicking microcalcifications at mammography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mock breast surgery was performed by cauterizing bovine liver or fresh, normal, human breast tissue. The cautery tip was rubbed against a cleaning pad five to 20 times in the manner used intraoperatively and was touched on separate breast tissue specimens two to six times. Specimen radiography was then performed. Thirty-six breast specimens were used in three experiments, including 28 used for the experimental conditions and eight control specimens.

RESULTS

Particles collected from the cleaning pads resembled microcalcifications. After cauterization of liver, breast tissue, or both, in series, particles transferred from the cautery tip to breast tissue specimens could be identified on specimen radiographs. Transfer of particles after cautery of breast tissue occurred with increased numbers of rubs and specimen contacts.

CONCLUSION

Radiopaque aluminum oxide particles from abrasive cautery-tip cleaning pads can be dislodged and transferred to breast tissue during surgery. Scrutiny of high-detail, spot-compression, magnification mammograms will help identify these particles. Simple measures to mitigate particle transfer during breast surgery can prevent this problem and obviate a potential second procedure to remove particles mistaken for microcalcifications.

Patterns of mammographically detected calcifications after breast-conserving therapy associated with tumor recurrence

BACKGROUND

Some authors have suggested that mammographically evident calcifications that would be considered benign in other situations can be due to carcinoma in women who have undergone breast conservation. This study was undertaken to determine if the pattern of calcifications associated with recurrent tumors detected mammographically differs from that observed in carcinomas developing de novo.

METHODS

Mammograms of 22 cases of local tumor recurrence were retrospectively reviewed, and calcifications associated with recurrence were characterized according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification.

RESULTS

Tumors were usually associated with > or = 10 calcifications (77%; 17 of 22 cases). Recurrences commonly contained very suspicious patterns of calcifications with linear forms present in 15 cases (68%) and pleomorphic calcifications present in 17 cases (77%). The distribution of calcifications was usually clustered (73%; 16 of 22 cases) or segmental (18%; 4 of 22 cases). Recurrences were usually obviously malignant (BI-RADS Category 5), and were characterized as such in 77% of cases. The remainder were indeterminate, requiring biopsy (BI-RADS Category 4). Recurrent tumors containing calcifications always contained some suspicious forms. Less worrisome types of calcifications were sometimes observed, including punctate calcifications in 36% and coarse calcifications in 14% of cases, but were always associated with more malignant patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Local tumor recurrences, when associated with mammographically evident calcifications, usually have a pattern highly suspicious for malignancy, although indeterminate forms can be the only calcifications present. Characteristically benign patterns of calcifications are not observed in recurrent tumors unless they are associated with more suspicious calcifications. Therefore, women without more worrisome patterns need not undergo biopsy because of the presence of these nonworrisome calcifications.

Assessment of response to therapy of primary breast cancer by mammography and physical examination

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of response to treatment is necessary to treat appropriately primary breast cancers that are not surgically removed. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of physical examination (PE) and mammography to assess response of primary breast cancer to medical therapy in women who were ineligible for initial surgical treatment.

METHODS

Thirteen women with 14 breast carcinomas were evaluated for interval changes. Except for 1 patient who had two follow-up studies, the other 12 each had a single follow-up study including PE and mammography; changes therefore were assessed in 15 instances. Response to treatment also was judged by mastectomy results in two instances, changes in metastatic disease by other imaging procedures in five, and changes in primary tumor by computed tomography in two breasts.

RESULTS

In 11 of 15 assessments of posttherapy changes, PE and mammography results were similar concerning treatment response. Of four discordant follow-ups, the tumors were found to be stable by PE, whereas they were found to be increasing by mammography in two. In both of these cases, progression of disease outside the breast was identified by other imaging studies, consistent with the mammographic findings. In another case, disease appeared to regress by PE but was unchanged by mammography; disease extent in mastectomy specimens was consistent with that found mammographically and more extensive than that suggested by physical examination. In the fourth case, superficial healing of a fungating tumor was obvious by clinical examination but could not be appreciated by mammography. The detectability of changes was not related to type of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical examination and mammography are both useful in the serial evaluation of breast cancers. Although usually complimentary, disease progression, when it occurs, may be detected by only one of these methods.

Salvage surgery for recurrence after breast conservation

Breast conservation surgery and radiation therapy are chosen with increasing frequency in breast cancer management. In addition to the risk of developing a contralateral malignancy, these women are at risk for local recurrence or a new primary lesion in the conserved breast. Most of these ipsilateral recurrences can be treated successfully with salvage mastectomy. The prognosis with salvage mastectomy depends on several factors, including the method of diagnosis of the recurrent tumor, the size of the recurrence, the extent of breast involvement at recurrence, the time interval from initial surgery to recurrence, the involvement of axillary nodes at the initial diagnosis and at the time of recurrence, and the histopathology of the recurrent tumor.

Evaluation of a palpable breast mass

A palpable mass in a woman's breast represents a potentially serious lesion and requires evaluation by history taking, physical examination, and mammography. The initial objective is to distinguish simple cysts from solid lesions, which can be accomplished with needle aspiration (Fig. 2). A solid lesion requires a firm diagnosis, and this usually calls for removing the lesion for histologic examination. A positive result on cytologic examination after aspiration is sufficiently accurate to justify one-stage diagnosis and treatment, with confirmation by examination of a frozen section obtained during the procedure. A negative or suspicious finding on cytologic evaluation is inconclusive, and outpatient biopsy is indicated. Perfection in diagnosis will require the removal of every solid mass. This can be expected to result in the biopsy of many benign lesions, but removal of many of them is desirable on other grounds. Although in some instances the probability of cancer may be exceedingly small, it is never zero. If biopsy is not recommended, the probability of cancer should be estimated so that the patient can decide whether the level of risk is acceptable to her.

Detection of local recurrence after conservative therapy for breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Early detection of local recurrence after conservative therapy for breast cancer is associated with improved survival. This review was undertaken to determine the ability to detect recurrence and identify patterns of recurrence.

METHODS

Records of women with local tumor recurrence were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

In 42 women with 43 local recurrences, tumors were detected by mammography alone in 18 instances (42%), physical examination alone in 14 (33%), and by both in 11 (25%). Of 29 recurrences mammographically detected, 19 were diagnosed by microcalcifications, 9 by a mass, and 1 by a mass with microcalcifications. Twenty of 25 tumors detected by physical examination were felt as a mass. Recurrences detected by mammography were more often in situ (72% or 13 of 18) than those detected by physical examination alone (7% or 1 of 14). Treatment failure at the site of the original tumor seemed to occur earlier than failures elsewhere in the breast and was more common in women younger than 43 years of age or with disease that was originally axillary node-positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Mammography often detects more in situ recurrences than physical examination, but both are complimentary. Recurrence at the site of the original tumor is usually earlier and in younger women and may be associated with tumors that were originally node-positive.

The value of mammography after limited breast surgery and before definitive radiation therapy

One hundred twenty consecutive patients who had breast-conserving surgery for cancer and were referred for definitive radiation therapy (RT) had a mammogram performed before starting RT. This was done to determine the presence of residual neoplasm or other abnormalities that may alter or delay the planned RT and are undetected by other means. It also was performed to provide a baseline for the diagnosis of postoperative changes and recurrence of disease on follow-up studies. In six (5%) patients, calcifications or masses were found that proved to be residual tumors. This led to reexcision in two, mastectomies in two, and a higher radiation booster dose to the tumor bed in two. Eight (6.6%) patients had postoperative hematomas larger than 4 cm in diameter, which delayed the start of RT by 2 to 3 weeks. In 39 (32%) patients, the pre-RT mammogram provided information considered to be helpful for the interpretation of post-RT mammograms. Such information may lead to a decrease in the number of diagnostic biopsies based on indeterminate mammographic findings. Therefore, a routine mammogram is recommended before RT is started.

Salvage mastectomy

Local-regional relapse after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy is operable and not associated with concurrent distant metastases in most cases. Salvage mastectomy results in local-regional control for most patients. The extent of the surgery relates to the extent of the local-regional recurrence and does not carry an increased complication rate. The outcome of salvage mastectomy depends on the disease-free interval from initial breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy to local-regional recurrence. Additional factors, such as the extent and histologic type of the recurrence, as well as the axillary lymph node status, either at the time of initial breast conservation or at salvage mastectomy, may influence outcome and require further study. Prospective trials are required to determine the safety of further breast-conserving surgery after local-regional relapse and the role of systemic therapy in improving postsalvage survival.

Mammographic detection of breast cancer and preoperative needle localization

Since its early clinical use during the 1960s, mammography has become a widely accepted screening method for breast cancer. Its utilization may be capable of diminishing mortality by 40%. Screening programs have been instituted, and their cost effectiveness depends on the locale and age of the population screened. Mass screening has resulted in large numbers of nonpalpable lesions being biopsied. Needle localization techniques allow for these to be performed with a minimal chance of missing the lesion, while removing only a small volume of breast tissue. Although most lesions biopsied will be benign, 20-30% of those excised at any institution should be malignant. Consultation with experienced mammographers may be desirable when recommending mammography-based biopsy. The rate of detection of malignancy is higher in women who have a prior history of ipsilateral or contralateral breast cancer.