Expanding Role of Dual-Energy CT for Genitourinary Tract Assessment in the Emergency Department, From the AJR Special Series on Emergency Radiology

Among explored applications of dual-energy CT (DECT) in the abdomen and pelvis, the genitourinary (GU) tract represents an area where accumulated evidence has established the role of DECT to provide useful information that may change management. This review discusses established applications of DECT for GU tract assessment in the emergency department (ED) setting, including characterization of renal stones, evaluation of traumatic injuries and hemorrhage, and characterization of incidental renal and adrenal findings. Use of DECT for such applications can reduce the need for additional multiphase CT or MRI examinations and reduce follow-up imaging recommendations. Emerging applications are also highlighted, including use of low-energy virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) to improve image quality and potentially reduce contrast media doses and use of high-energy VMIs to mitigate renal mass pseudoenhancement. Finally, implementation of DECT into busy ED radiology practices is presented, weighing the trade-off of additional image acquisition, processing time, and interpretation time against potential additional useful clinical information. Automatic generation of DECT-derived images with direct PACS transfer can facilitate radiologists' adoption of DECT in busy ED environments and minimize impact on interpretation times. Using the described approaches, radiologists can apply DECT technology to improve the quality and efficiency of care in the ED.

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Integration Into Clinical Practice and Cost Considerations

Optimization of dual-energy CT (DECT) workflow is critical for successful integration of DECT into practice. Patient selection strategies differ by scanner type and may be based on patient size, exam indication, or both. All stakeholders involved in patient scheduling and scan acquisition should be involved in patient triage to DECT. Automation of DECT postprocessing frees up technologist and radiologist time, but care must be taken to avoid sending unnecessary reconstructions to PACS. DECT use in the Emergency Department aids in incidentaloma characterization and improves reader diagnostic confidence, and results in quantifiable cost savings by eliminating the need for follow-up exams.

Leveraging Dual-Energy Computed Tomography to Improve Emergency Radiology Practice

Dual-energy computed tomography affords emergency radiologists with important tools to aid in the detection and discrimination of commonly encountered ED pathologies. In doing so, it can increase the speed of diagnosis and diagnostic certainty while sparing patients potentially unnecessary downsteam workups and radiation exposure. This article demonstrates these clinical benefits through a case-based approach.

Dual Energy-Derived Metrics for Differentiating Adrenal Adenomas From Nonadenomas on Single-Phase Contrast-Enhanced CT

BACKGROUND. Adrenal masses are often indeterminate on single-phase postcontrast CT. Dual-energy CT (DECT) with three-material decomposition algorithms may aid characterization. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of metrics derived from portal venous phase DECT, including virtual noncontrast (VNC) attenuation, fat fraction, iodine density, and relative enhancement ratio, for characterizing adrenal masses. METHODS. This retrospective study included 128 patients (82 women, 46 men; mean age, 64.6 ± 12.7 [SD] years) who between January 2016 and December 2019 underwent portal venous phase abdominopelvic DECT that showed a total of 139 adrenal lesions with an available reference standard based on all imaging, clinical, and pathologic records (87 adenomas, 52 nonadenomas [48 metastases, two adrenal cortical carcinomas, one ganglioneuroma, one hematoma]). Two radiologists placed ROIs to determine the following characteristics of the masses: VNC attenuation, fat fraction, iodine density normalized to portal vein, and for masses with VNC greater than 10 HU, relative enhancement ratio (ratio of portal venous phase attenuation to VNC attenuation). Readers' mean measurements were used for ROC analyses, and clinically optimal thresholds were derived as thresholds yielding the highest sensitivity at 100% specificity. RESULTS. Adenomas and nonadenomas were significantly different (all p < .001) in VNC attenuation (mean ± SD, 18.5 ± 12.9 vs 34.1 ± 8.9 HU), fat fraction (mean ± SD, 24.3% ± 8.2% vs 14.2% ± 5.6%), normalized iodine density (mean ± SD, 0.34 ± 0.15 vs 0.17 ± 0.17), and relative enhancement ratio (mean ± SD, 186% ± 96% vs 58% ± 59%). AUCs for all metrics ranged from 0.81 through 0.91. The metric with highest sensitivity for adenoma at the clinically optimal threshold (i.e., 100% specificity) was fat fraction (threshold, ≥ 23.8%; sensitivity, 59% [95% CI, 48-69%]) followed by VNC attenuation (≤ 15.2 HU; sensitivity, 39% [95% CI, 29-50%]), relative enhancement ratio (≥ 214%; sensitivity, 37% [95% CI, 25-50%]), and normalized iodine density (≥ 0.90; sensitivity, 1% (95% CI, 0-60%]). VNC attenuation at the traditional true noncontrast attenuation threshold of 10 HU or lower had sensitivity of 28% (95% CI, 19-38%) and 100% specificity. Presence of fat fraction 23.8% or greater or relative enhancement ratio 214% or greater yielded sensitivity of 68% (95% CI, 57-77%) with 100% specificity. CONCLUSION. For adrenal lesions evaluated with single-phase DECT, fat fraction had higher sensitivity than VNC attenuation at both the clinically optimal threshold and the traditional threshold of 10 HU or lower. CLINICAL IMPACT. By helping to definitively diagnose adenomas, DECT-derived metrics can help avoid downstream imaging for incidental adrenal lesions.

Evaluation of thin-slice abdominal DECT using deep-learning image reconstruction in 74 keV virtual monoenergetic images: an image quality comparison

PURPOSE

To compare noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image quality using deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) vs. adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in 0.625 and 2.5 mm slice thickness gray scale 74 keV virtual monoenergetic (VM) abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT).

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and regional ethics committee. We analysed 30 portal-venous phase abdominal fast kV-switching DECT (80/140kVp) scans. Data were reconstructed to ASIR-V 60% and DLIR-High at 74 keV in 0.625 and 2.5 mm slice thickness. Quantitative HU and noise assessment were measured within liver, aorta, adipose tissue and muscle. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated image noise, sharpness, texture and overall quality based on a five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

DLIR significantly reduced image noise and increased CNR as well as SNR compared to ASIR-V, when slice thickness was maintained (p < 0.001). Slightly higher noise of 5.5-16.2% was measured (p < 0.01) in liver, aorta and muscle tissue at 0.625 mm DLIR compared to 2.5 mm ASIR-V, while noise in adipose tissue was 4.3% lower with 0.625 mm DLIR compared to 2.5 mm ASIR-V (p = 0.08). Qualitative assessments demonstrated significantly improved image quality for DLIR particularly in 0.625 mm images.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR significantly reduced image noise, increased CNR and SNR and improved image quality in 0.625 mm slice images, when compared to ASIR-V. DLIR may facilitate thinner image slice reconstructions for routine contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT.

Can radiomic analysis of a single-phase dual-energy CT improve the diagnostic accuracy of differentiating enhancing from non-enhancing small renal lesions?

BACKGROUND

The value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based radiomics in renal lesions is unknown.

PURPOSE

To develop DECT-based radiomic models and assess their incremental values in comparison to conventional measurements for differentiating enhancing from non-enhancing small renal lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 349 patients with 519 small renal lesions (390 non-enhancing, 129 enhancing) who underwent contrast-enhanced nephrographic phase DECT examinations between June 2013 and January 2020 on multiple DECT platforms were retrospectively recruited. Cohort A included all lesions, while cohort B included Bosniak II-IV and solid enhancing renal lesions. Radiomic models were built with features selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO). ROC analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy among conventional and radiomic models for predicting enhancing renal lesions.

RESULTS

The individual iodine concentration (IC), normalized IC, mean attenuation on 75-keV images, radiomic model of iodine images, 75-keV images and a combined model integrating all the above-mentioned features all demonstrated high AUCs for predicting renal lesion enhancement in cohort A (AUCs = 0.934-0.979) as well as in the test dataset (AUCs = 0.892-0.962) of cohort B (P values with Bonferroni correction >0.003). The AUC (0.864) of mean attenuation on 75-keV images was significantly lower than those of other models (all P values ≤0.001) except the radiomic model of 75-keV images (P = 0.038) in the training dataset of cohort B.

CONCLUSION

No incremental value was found by adding radiomic and machine learning analyses to iodine images for differentiating enhancing from non-enhancing renal lesions.

Spectral detector CT applications in advanced liver imaging

OBJECTIVE

Spectral detector CT (SDCT) has many applications in advanced liver imaging. If appropriately utilized, this technology has the potential to improve image quality, provide new diagnostic information, and allow for decreased radiation dose. The purpose of this review is to familiarize radiologists with the uses of SDCT in liver imaging.

CONCLUSION

SDCT has a variety of post-processing techniques, which can be used in advanced liver imaging and can significantly add value in clinical practice.

Photon Counting CT: Clinical Applications and Future Developments

The use of a photon counting detector in CT (PCD CT) is currently the subject of intense investigation and development. In this review article, we will describe potential clinical applications of this technology with a particular focus on the experience of our own institution with a prototype PCD CT scanner. PCDs have three primary advantages over conventional, energy integrating detectors (EIDs): they provide spectral information without need for a dedicated dual energy protocol; they are immune to electronic noise; and they can be made very high resolution without significant compromises to quantum efficiency. These advantages translate into several clinical applications. Metal artifacts, beam hardening artifacts, and noise streaks from photon starvation can be better mitigated using PCD CT. Certain incidental findings can be better characterized using the spectral information from PCD CT. High-contrast, high-resolution structures such as the temporal bone can be better visualized using PCD CT and at greatly reduced dose. We also discuss new possibilities on the horizon, including new contrast agents, and how anticipated improvements in PCD CT will translate to performance in these applications.

Dual energy imaging in cardiothoracic pathologies: A primer for radiologists and clinicians

Recent advances in dual-energy imaging techniques, dual-energy subtraction radiography (DESR) and dual-energy CT (DECT), offer new and useful additional information to conventional imaging, thus improving assessment of cardiothoracic abnormalities. DESR facilitates detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules. Other advantages of DESR include better depiction of pleural, lung parenchymal, airway and chest wall abnormalities, detection of foreign bodies and indwelling devices, improved visualization of cardiac and coronary artery calcifications helping in risk stratification of coronary artery disease, and diagnosing conditions like constrictive pericarditis and valvular stenosis. Commercially available DECT approaches are classified into emission based (dual rotation/spin, dual source, rapid kilovoltage switching and split beam) and detector-based (dual layer) systems. DECT provide several specialized image reconstructions. Virtual non-contrast images (VNC) allow for radiation dose reduction by obviating need for true non contrast images, low energy virtual mono-energetic images (VMI) boost contrast enhancement and help in salvaging otherwise non-diagnostic vascular studies, high energy VMI reduce beam hardening artifacts from metallic hardware or dense contrast material, and iodine density images allow quantitative and qualitative assessment of enhancement/iodine distribution. The large amount of data generated by DECT can affect interpreting physician efficiency but also limit clinical adoption of the technology. Optimization of the existing workflow and streamlining the integration between post-processing software and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) is therefore warranted.

Recommendations for the Management of Incidental Hepatobiliary Findings in Adults: Endorsement and Adaptation of the 2017 and 2013 ACR Incidental Findings Committee White Papers by the Canadian Association of Radiologists Incidental Findings Working Group

The Canadian Association of Radiologists Incidental Findings Working Group consists of both academic subspecialty and general radiologists and is tasked with adapting and expanding upon the American College of Radiology incidental findings white papers to more closely apply to Canadian practice patterns, particularly more comprehensively dealing with the role of ultrasound and pursuing more cost-effective approaches to the workup of incidental findings without compromising patient care. Presented here are the 2020 Canadian guidelines for the management of hepatobiliary incidental findings. Topics covered include initial assessment of hepatic steatosis and cirrhosis, the workup of incidental liver masses identified on ultrasound and computed tomography (with algorithms presented), incidental gallbladder findings (wall thickening, calcification, and polyps), and management of incidental biliary dilatation.

Dual energy CT in clinical routine: how it works and how it adds value

Dual energy computed tomography (DECT), also known as spectral CT, refers to advanced CT technology that separately acquires high and low energy X-ray data to enable material characterization applications for substances that exhibit different energy-dependent x-ray absorption behavior. DECT supports a variety of post-processing applications that add value in routine clinical CT imaging, including material selective and virtual non-contrast images using two- and three-material decomposition algorithms, virtual monoenergetic imaging, and other material characterization techniques. Following a review of acquisition and post-processing techniques, we present a case-based approach to highlight the added value of DECT in common clinical scenarios. These scenarios include improved lesion detection, improved lesion characterization, improved ease of interpretation, improved prognostication, inherently more robust imaging protocols to account for unexpected pathology or suboptimal contrast opacification, length of stay reduction, reduced utilization by avoiding unnecessary follow-up examinations, and radiation dose reduction. A brief discussion of post-processing workflow approaches, challenges, and solutions is also included.

Management of incidental adrenal masses: an update

OBJECTIVE

To review the current evidence and guidelines for diagnosis and management of incidental adrenal masses with a focus on the recent changes made by the American College of Radiology (ACR) Incidental Findings Committee.

CONCLUSION

Incidentally detected adrenal nodules are a commonly encountered finding estimated to occur in 5-7% of the adult population. By following current recommendations, radiologists can improve patient care by efficiently determining which masses require further diagnostic testing and which masses can be considered benign and not require further follow-up.

Dual-Energy CT: A Paradigm Shift in Acute Traumatic Abdomen

Abdominal trauma, one of the leading causes of death under the age of 45, can be broadly classified into blunt and penetrating trauma, based on the mechanism of injury. Blunt abdominal trauma usually results from motor vehicle collisions, fall from heights, assaults, and sports and is more common than penetrating abdominal trauma, which is usually seen in firearm injuries and stab wounds. In both blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma, an optimized imaging approach is mandatory to exclude life-threatening injuries. Easy availability of the portable ultrasound in the emergency department and trauma bay makes it one of the most commonly used screening imaging modalities in the abdominal trauma, especially to exclude hemoperitoneum. Evaluation of the visceral and vascular injuries in a hemodynamically stable patient, however, warrants intravenous contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography scan. Dual-energy computed tomography with its postprocessing applications such as iodine selective imaging and virtual monoenergetic imaging can reliably depict the conspicuity of traumatic solid and hollow visceral and vascular injuries.

Follow-up Recommendation Rates Associated With Spectral Detector Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis: A Retrospective Comparison to Single-Energy CT

BACKGROUND

Dual-energy CT image sets have many applications in abdominopelvic imaging but no demonstrated clinical effect.

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of dual-energy CT iodine maps on abdominopelvic imaging follow-up recommendation rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of abdominopelvic CTs acquired from April 2017 through June 2018. CT reports were analyzed for radiologic follow-up recommendation and follow-up recommendation reason. Follow-up MRI reports were analyzed for benign or nonbenign diagnosis. CT scans with iodine maps (CTIMs) and conventional CT scans (CCTs) subgroups were compared using χ² testing.

RESULTS

In all, 3,221 abdominopelvic CT scans of 2,401 patients (1,326 men, 1,075 women, mean age 54.1 years) were analyzed; 1,423 were CTIMs and 1,798 were CCTs. Follow-up recommendation rates were not significantly different for CTIMs and CCTs (19.5% and 21.4%, respectively, P = .19). Follow-up recommendations because of incomplete diagnosis were significantly lower in CTIMs (9.1%) than in CCTs (11.9%, P = .01). Follow-up recommendations for MRI and PET/CT were significantly lower in CTIMs (9.6%) than CCTs (13.0%, P = .003). Follow-up MRI outcomes (n = 111) were not different between CTIMs (61.2% benign) and CCTs (59.6%, P = .87).

CONCLUSION

Dual-energy CT iodine maps are associated with decreased follow-up examinations because of incomplete diagnosis and decreased recommendations for follow-up MRI, suggesting that abdominopelvic iodine maps may benefit patient care and decrease institutional cost.

Dual-energy CT for routine imaging of the abdomen and pelvis: radiation dose and image quality

PURPOSE

To assess the radiation dose and image quality of routine dual energy CT (DECT) of the abdomen and pelvis performed in the emergency department setting, compared with single energy CT (SECT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive routine contrast-enhanced SECT scans of the abdomen and pelvis meeting inclusion criteria were compared with 75 routine contrast-enhanced DECT scans matched by size and patient weight (within 10 lbs), performed on the same dual-source DECT scanner. Cohorts were compared in terms of radiation dose metrics of CT dose index (CTDI_vol) and dose length product (DLP), objective measurements of image quality (signal, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio of a variety of anatomical landmarks), and subjective measurements of image quality scored by two emergency radiologists.

RESULTS

Demographics and patient size were not statistically different between DECT and SECT cohorts. Both average scans CTDI_vol and DLP were significantly lower with DECT than with SECT. Average scan CTDI_vol for SECT was 14.7 mGy (± 6.6) and for DECT was 10.9 mGy (± 3.8) (p < 0.0001). Average scan DLP for SECT was 681.5 mGy cm (± 339.3) and for DECT was 534.8 mGy cm (± 201.9) (p < 0.0001). For objective image quality metrics, for all structures measured, noise was significantly lower and SNR was significantly higher with DECT compared with SECT. For subjective image quality, for both readers, there was no significant difference between SECT and DECT in subjective image quality for soft tissues and vascular structures, or for subjective image noise.

CONCLUSIONS

DECT was performed with decreased radiation dose when compared with SECT, demonstrated improved objective measurements of image quality, and equivalent subjective image quality.

Correlation Between Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Single Scan and Computed Tomography Perfusion for Pancreatic Cancer Patients: Initial Experience

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the role and limit of iodine maps by dual-energy computed tomography (CT) single scan for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Thirty patients with suspected solitary pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this study and underwent CT perfusion and iodine maps. The parameters of pancreatic cancer and normal pancreatic tissue were calculated. Pearson correlation and paired t test were used for evaluating 2 techniques.

RESULTS

Iodine concentration had a moderate positive correlation with blood flow or blood volume (P < 0.05 for both). All values of iodine concentration and blood flow, iodine concentration, and blood volume had significant positive correlations (P < 0.001 for both). The mean effective dose for CT perfusion and iodine maps had significant difference (8.61 ± 0.00 mSv vs 1.13 ± 0.14 mSv, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine maps had the potential to replace routine CT perfusion for pancreatic cancer with low radiation dose.

Clinical and Payer-Based Analysis of Value of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Workup of Incidental Abdominal Findings

OBJECTIVE

To perform a clinical and payer-based analysis of the value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for workup of incidental abdominal findings.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospectively designed, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study approved by our institutional review board. Sixty-nine examinations in 69 patients (45 men, 24 women; mean age, 57.7 years) who underwent single-phase postcontrast abdominal DECT studies between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017, were included. Two radiologists, blinded to study objective and design, reviewed all cases and identified incidental abdominal findings needing further imaging. All incidental findings were reviewed by 2 other investigators, who determined whether an imaging-based diagnosis could be made using DECT virtual noncontrast images and iodine maps. Additional studies and associated payer-reimbursement amounts avoided by use of DECT were estimated. All imaging costs were estimated based on the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reimbursement amounts.

RESULTS

Thirty-four incidental findings (renal mass, n = 20; adrenal nodule, n = 8; pancreatic cystic lesions, n = 3; others, n = 3) were identified in 19 (27.5%) of 69 patients. Dual-energy computed tomography characterized 27 incidental findings in 15 patients and accounted for cost savings of 15 additional imaging examinations (abdominal magnetic resonance imaging, n = 11; abdominal computed tomography, n = 4). Based on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reimbursement amounts, we estimated that, by abolishing the need for additional imaging use, DECT saved US $84.95 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual-energy computed tomography can provide an imaging-based diagnosis of incidental abdominal findings, otherwise incompletely characterized on routine abdominal computed tomography, in approximately 21% of patients. In select patients, the monetary savings from abolishing additional imaging may reduce payer costs associated with use of DECT.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Investigating the Diagnostic Yield of Dual-Energy CT for Renal Mass Assessment

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT (DECT) for renal mass evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In March 2018, we searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Analytic methods were based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated for DECT-based virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) and iodine quantification techniques as well as for conventional attenuation measurements from renal mass CT protocols. I² was used to evaluate heterogeneity. The methodologic quality of the included studies and potential bias were assessed using items from the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). RESULTS. Of the 1043 articles initially identified, 13 were selected for inclusion (969 patients, 1193 renal masses). Cumulative data of sensitivity, specificity, and summary diagnostic odds ratio for VMI were 87% (95% CI, 80-92%; I², 92.0%), 93% (95% CI, 90-96%; I², 18.0%), and 183.4 (95% CI, 30.7-1093.4; I², 61.6%), respectively. Cumulative data of sensitivity, specificity, and summary diagnostic odds ratio for iodine quantification were 99% (95% CI, 97-100%; I², 17.6%), 91% (95% CI, 89-94%; I², 84.2%), and 511.5 (95% CI, 217-1201; I², 0%). No significant differences in AUCs were found when comparing iodine quantification to conventional attenuation measurements (p = 0.79). CONCLUSION. DECT yields high accuracy for renal mass evaluation. Determination of iodine content with the iodine quantification technique shows diagnostic accuracy similar to conventional attenuation measurements from renal mass CT protocols. The iodine quantification technique may be used to characterize incidental renal masses when a dedicated renal mass protocol is not available.

Dual energy CT for evaluation of polycystic kidneys: a multi reader study of interpretation time and diagnostic confidence

PURPOSE

To compare dual-energy CT (DECT) iodine overlay images with renal mass protocol CT in the evaluation of polycystic kidneys with respect to reading time, diagnostic confidence, and detection of renal lesions that are not definitively benign.

METHODS

Following IRB approval, portal venous phase dual-source DECT scans performed between September 2013 and February 2016 from 55 patients (mean age 67 ± 15 years, 31 male, 24 female) with polycystic kidneys (4 or more cysts) were included. For each patient, two image sets were created: (1) DECT post-processed iodine overlay images and (2) simulated renal mass protocol CT images (virtual noncontrast and mixed images). Two radiologists independently retrospectively reviewed both sets at separate time points, evaluating for the presence of lesions that were not definitively benign (enhancing lesions or Bosniak IIF cysts), as well as reading times and Likert scale diagnostic confidence ratings (scaled 1-5) for the presence of non-benign lesions. Reading times were compared with a t test, diagnostic confidence with a McNemar test, and lesion number detection with Cohen's kappa test.

RESULTS

Iodine overlay images were read faster (mean 55 ± 26 s) than renal mass protocol (mean 105 ± 51 s) (p < 0.001). Readers assigned the highest diagnostic confidence rating in 64% using iodine overlay series, compared to 17% using renal mass protocol (p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with recorded lesions was not significantly different between methods (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

DECT improves lesion assessment in polycystic kidneys by decreasing reading times and increasing diagnostic confidence, without affecting lesion detection rates.

Energy-Specific Optimization of Attenuation Thresholds for Low-Energy Virtual Monoenergetic Images in Renal Lesion Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine in vitro and in vivo the optimal threshold for renal lesion vascularity at low-energy (40-60 keV) virtual monoenergetic imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A rod simulating unenhanced renal parenchymal attenuation (35 HU) was fitted with a syringe containing water. Three iodinated solutions (0.38, 0.57, and 0.76 mg I/mL) were inserted into another rod that simulated enhanced renal parenchyma (180 HU). Rods were inserted into cylindric phantoms of three different body sizes and scanned with single- and dual-energy MDCT. In addition, 102 patients (32 men, 70 women; mean age, 66.8 ± 12.9 [SD] years) with 112 renal lesions (67 nonvascular, 45 vascular) measuring 1.1-8.9 cm underwent single-energy unenhanced and contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT. Optimal threshold attenuation values that differentiated vascular from nonvascular lesions at 40-60 keV were determined.

RESULTS

Mean optimal threshold values were 30.2 ± 3.6 (standard error), 20.9 ± 1.3, and 16.1 ± 1.0 HU in the phantom, and 35.9 ± 3.6, 25.4 ± 1.8, and 17.8 ± 1.8 HU in the patients at 40, 50, and 60 keV. Sensitivity and specificity for the thresholds did not change significantly between low-energy and 70-keV virtual monoenergetic imaging (sensitivity, 87-98%; specificity, 90-91%). The AUC from 40 to 70 keV was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99) to 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00).

CONCLUSION

Low-energy virtual monoenergetic imaging at energy-specific optimized attenuation thresholds can be used for reliable characterization of renal lesions.

Dual energy CT applications in pancreatic pathologies

Dual energy CT (DECT) is a technology that is gaining widespread acceptance, particularly for its abdominopelvic applications. Pancreatic pathologies are an ideal application for the many advantages offered by dual energy post-processing. This article reviews the current literature on dual energy CT pancreatic imaging, specifically in the evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, other solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms, and pancreatitis. The advantages in characterization and quantification of enhancement, detection of subtle lesions, and potential reduction of imaging phases and contrast usage are reviewed. We also discuss directions for future research, and the ideal use of dual energy CT in routine clinical practice.

Making the invisible visible: improving conspicuity of noncalcified gallstones using dual-energy CT

PURPOSE

To determine whether virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) increases detectability of noncalcified gallstones on dual-energy CT (DECT) compared with conventional CT imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study included consecutive patients who underwent DECT of the abdomen in the Emergency Department during a 30-month period (July 1, 2013-December 31, 2015), with a comparison US or MR within 1-year. 51 patients (36F, 15M; mean age 52 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All DECT were acquired on a dual-source 128 × 2 slice scanner using either 80/Sn140 or 100/Sn140 kVp pairs. Source images at high and low kVp were used for DE post-processing with VMI. Within 3 mm reconstructed images, regions of interest of 0.5 cm² were placed on noncalcified gallstones and bile to record hounsfield units (HU) at VMI energy levels ranging between 40 and 190 keV.

RESULTS

Noncalcified gallstones uniformly demonstrated lowest HU at 40 keV and increase at higher keV; the HU of bile varied at higher keV. Few of the noncalcified stones are visible at 70 keV (simulating a conventional 120 kVp scan), with measured contrast (bile-stone HU difference) <10 HU in 78%, 10-20 HU in 20%, and >20 HU in 2%. Contrast was maximal at 40 keV, where 100% demonstrated >20 HU difference from surrounding bile, 75% >44 HU difference, and 50% >60 HU difference. A paired t test demonstrated a significant difference (p < 0.0001) between this stone-bile contrast at 40 vs. 70 keV and 70 vs. 190 keV.

CONCLUSION

Low keV virtual monochromatic imaging increased conspicuity of noncalcified gallstones, improving their detectability.

Multi-energy spectral CT: adding value in emergency body imaging

Most vendors offer scanners capable of dual- or multi-energy computed tomography (CT) imaging. Advantages of multi-energy CT scanning include superior tissue characterization, detection of subtle iodine uptake differences, and opportunities to reduce contrast dose. However, utilization of this technology in the emergency department (ED) remains low. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to illustrate the value of multi-energy CT scanning in emergency body imaging.

Comparison of true unenhanced and virtual unenhanced (VUE) attenuation values in abdominopelvic single-source rapid kilovoltage-switching spectral CT

OBJECTIVE

To assess the agreement between the true non-contrast (TNC) attenuation values of intra-abdominal structures and attenuation values obtained on virtual-unenhanced (VUE) images based on rapid kVp-switching dual-energy CT. The effects of contrast phase and patient characteristics (e.g., BMI, hematocrit, hemoglobin content) on VUE values were also investigated.

METHODS

Ninety four patients who underwent triphasic abdominal CT (liver mass protocol, n = 47; pancreas mass protocol, n = 47) between August 2014 and May 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Unenhanced series was performed using conventional single-energy mode at 120 kVp. Late arterial and venous phase post-contrast series were obtained utilizing rapid kVp-switching dual-energy CT technique. VUE images were processed off of arterial (VUE-art) and venous (VUE-ven) phase series. Attenuation values of liver, pancreas, kidneys, adrenal glands, muscle, subcutaneous fat, aorta, IVC, and main portal vein were recorded on TNC and VUE sets of images. Attenuation values were compared using univariate linear regression and Student two-tailed paired t test.

RESULTS

There was excellent correlation between TNC, VUE-art, and VUE-ven attenuation values across all organs (p < 0.0001). Paired Student t test, however, showed significant difference between TNC and VUE-art attenuation of kidneys, right adrenal gland, paraspinal muscle, and aorta. There was also significant difference between TNC and VUE-ven attenuation of left kidney. Percentage of cases which had >10 HU difference between VUE and TNC for an individual was calculated which ranged between 13% (right kidney) and 42% (right adrenal gland).

CONCLUSION

Although the correlation between VUE and TNC attenuation values was excellent and mean difference between TNC and VUE attenuation values was negligible (ranging between -5.94 HU for paraspinal muscles to 6.2 HU in aorta), intra-patient analysis showed a considerable number of cases which had >10 HU difference between VUE and TNC. VUE-ven generally offered a better approximation of TNC values. Further optimization of post-processing algorithms might be necessary before complete replacement of TNC with VUE images.