Role of high-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography in the evaluation of peripheral nerves in the upper extremity

Upper extremity entrapment neuropathies are common conditions in which peripheral nerves are prone to injury at specific anatomical locations, particularly superficial regions or within fibro-osseous tunnels, resulting in pain and potential disability. Although neuropathy is primarily diagnosed clinically by physical examination and electrophysiology, imaging evaluation with ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography are valuable complementary non-invasive and accurate tools for evaluation and can help define the site and cause of nerve dysfunction which ultimately leads to precise and timely treatment. Ultrasound, which has higher spatial resolution, can quickly and comfortably characterize the peripheral nerves in real time and can evaluate for denervation related muscle atrophy. Magnetic resonance imaging on the other hand provides excellent contrast resolution between the nerves and adjacent tissues, also between pathologic and normal segments of peripheral nerves. It can also assess the degree of muscle denervation and atrophy. As a prerequisite for nerve imaging, radiologists and sonographers should have a thorough knowledge of anatomy of the peripheral nerves and their superficial and deep branches, including variant anatomy, and the motor and sensory territories innervated by each nerve. The purpose of this illustrative article is to review the common neuropathy and nerve entrapment syndromes in the upper extremities focusing on ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography imaging.

Intravenous contrast does not improve detection of nerve lesions or active muscle denervation changes in MR neurography of the common peroneal nerve

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) contrast on sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) neurography of the knee with attention to the common peroneal nerve (CPN) in identifying nerve lesions and active muscle denervation changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective search for contrast-enhanced MR neurography cases evaluating the CPN at the knee was performed. Patients with electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) within 3 months of imaging were included and those with relevant prior surgery were excluded. Two radiologists independently reviewed non-contrast sequences and then 4 weeks later evaluated non-contrast and contrast sequences. McNemar's tests were performed to detect a difference between non-contrast only and combined non-contrast and contrast sequences in identifying nerve lesions and active muscle denervation changes using EDX as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Forty-four exams in 42 patients (2 bilateral) were included. Twenty-eight cases had common peroneal neuropathy and 29, 21, and 9 cases had active denervation changes in the anterior, lateral, and posterior compartment/proximal muscles respectively on EDX. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of non-contrast versus combined non-contrast and contrast sequences for common peroneal neuropathy were 50.0%, 56.2%, and 52.3% versus 50.0%, 56.2%, and 52.3% for reader 1 and 57.1%, 50.0%, and 54.5% versus 64.3%, 56.2%, and 61.4% for reader 2. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of non-contrast and combined non-contrast and contrast sequences in identifying active denervation changes for anterior, lateral, and posterior compartment muscles were not significantly different. McNemar's tests were all negative.

CONCLUSION

IV contrast does not improve the ability of MR neurography to detect CPN lesions or active muscle denervation changes.

Imaging Review of Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Patients with COVID-19

With surging numbers of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) throughout the world, neuromuscular complications and rehabilitation concerns are becoming more apparent. Peripheral nerve injury can occur in patients with COVID-19 secondary to postinfectious inflammatory neuropathy, prone positioning-related stretch and/or compression injury, systemic neuropathy, or nerve entrapment from hematoma. Imaging of peripheral nerves in patients with COVID-19 may help to characterize nerve abnormality, to identify site and severity of nerve damage, and to potentially elucidate mechanisms of injury, thereby aiding the medical diagnosis and decision-making process. This review article aims to provide a first comprehensive summary of the current knowledge of COVID-19 and peripheral nerve imaging.

Post-Contrast 3D Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Neurography for Evaluation of Branch Nerves of the Brachial Plexus

PURPOSE

To compare 3.0 Tesla brachial plexus three-dimensional (3D) T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery fast spin echo (STIR-FSE) MRI sequences before (pre-contrast STIR) and after (post-contrast STIR) administration of gadolinium intravenous contrast.

METHOD

Eighteen patients were included. Each patient was imaged before and after intravenous contrast administration during the same session. 3D STIR-FSE sequences were obtained at 3.0 Tesla using two 16-channel flexible coils positioned over the lower neck and chest wall region. Three musculoskeletal radiologists qualitatively assessed degree of vascular signal suppression, visualization of the axillary, musculocutaneous, and suprascapular nerves, diagnostic confidence in nerve evaluation, and lesion conspicuity. Marginal ordinal logistic regression models were used to compare subjective ratings between sequences. Pre- and post-STIR lesion conspicuity was compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were assessed using Gwet's agreement coefficient.

RESULTS

Vascular signal suppression significantly improved following contrast administration (odds ratio, OR = 209.9, 95% confidence interval, CI: 21.0-2094.6, p < .001). The post-contrast STIR technique significantly improved nerve visualization (OR = 8.4, 95% CI: 3.6-19.9, p < .001) and diagnostic confidence in evaluation (OR = 13.2, 95% CI: 4.8-36.0, p < .001) across all nerve segments. Post-contrast STIR improved lesion conspicuity by 1 point, but statistical significance was not reached (Reader 1: p = 0.5, Reader 2: p = 0.063). Post-contrast STIR imaging demonstrated substantial to near-perfect inter- and intra-rater agreement coefficients for both nerve visualization (inter-rater: 0.74-1.0, intra-rater: 0.94-1.0) and diagnostic confidence (inter-rater: 0.79-1.0, intra-rater: 0.94-1.0). Quantitatively, post-contrast STIR demonstrated a 24% increase in mean C6 nerve-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-contrast STIR improved nerve-to-muscle contrast ratio, allowing for enhanced visualization and diagnostic confidence in evaluation of branch nerves of the brachial plexus.

Consensus recommendations of three-dimensional visualization for diagnosis and management of liver diseases

Three-dimensional (3D) visualization involves feature extraction and 3D reconstruction of CT images using a computer processing technology. It is a tool for displaying, describing, and interpreting 3D anatomy and morphological features of organs, thus providing intuitive, stereoscopic, and accurate methods for clinical decision-making. It has played an increasingly significant role in the diagnosis and management of liver diseases. Over the last decade, it has been proven safe and effective to use 3D simulation software for pre-hepatectomy assessment, virtual hepatectomy, and measurement of liver volumes in blood flow areas of the portal vein; meanwhile, the use of 3D models in combination with hydrodynamic analysis has become a novel non-invasive method for diagnosis and detection of portal hypertension. We herein describe the progress of research on 3D visualization, its workflow, current situation, challenges, opportunities, and its capacity to improve clinical decision-making, emphasizing its utility for patients with liver diseases. Current advances in modern imaging technologies have promised a further increase in diagnostic efficacy of liver diseases. For example, complex internal anatomy of the liver and detailed morphological features of liver lesions can be reflected from CT-based 3D models. A meta-analysis reported that the application of 3D visualization technology in the diagnosis and management of primary hepatocellular carcinoma has significant or extremely significant differences over the control group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, recovery of postoperative liver function, operation time, hospitalization time, and tumor recurrence on short-term follow-up. However, the acquisition of high-quality CT images and the use of these images for 3D visualization processing lack a unified standard, quality control system, and homogeneity, which might hinder the evaluation of application efficacy in different clinical centers, causing enormous inconvenience to clinical practice and scientific research. Therefore, rigorous operating guidelines and quality control systems need to be established for 3D visualization of liver to develop it to become a mature technology. Herein, we provide recommendations for the research on diagnosis and management of 3D visualization in liver diseases to meet this urgent need in this research field.

MRN findings of lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve impingement in a collegiate athlete

Dynamic compression of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) occurs with forearm pronation when the LABCN becomes compressed by the lateral margin of the biceps tendon. LABCN compression is a rare occurrence and is often overlooked as an etiology for forearm pain. While this entity has been described in several case reports in the orthopedic literature, it has not yet been described in radiology literature. We present a case of LABCN compression by the biceps tendon which was suggested by high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography in combination with the clinical findings and was subsequently confirmed and corrected surgically.

With or without? A retrospective analysis of intravenous contrast utility in magnetic resonance neurography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of intravenous contrast in magnetic resonance neurography (MRN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of our PACS for MRN studies performed in 2015 yielded 74 MRN exams, 57 of which included pre- and post-contrast images. All studies were independently reviewed by 3 musculoskeletal radiologists with peripheral nerve imaging experience for presence/absence of nerve pathology, presence/absence of muscle denervation, and contrast utility score based on a 4-point Likert scale. The medical record was reviewed for demographic and clinical data.

RESULTS

The mean contrast utility score across all readers and all cases was 1.65, where a score of 1 indicated no additional information and a score of 2 indicated mild additional information/supports interpretation. The mean contrast utility score was slightly higher in cases with a clinical indication of amputation/stump neuroma or mass (2.3 and 2.1 respectively) and lower in cases with a clinical indication of trauma (1.5). The mean contrast utility score was lowest in patients undergoing MRN for pain, numbness, and/or weakness (1.2).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous contrast provides mild to no additional information for the majority of MRN exams. Given the invasive nature of contrast and recent concerns regarding previously unrecognized risks of repetitive contrast exposure, assessment of the necessity of intravenous contrast in MRN is important. Consensus evidence-based practice guidelines regarding intravenous contrast use in MRN are necessary.

Can imaging be the new yardstick for diagnosing peripheral neuropathy?-a comparison between high resolution ultrasound and MR neurography with an approach to diagnosis

PURPOSE

Peripheral neuropathies are a group of disorders which affect the peripheral nervous system which have been conventionally diagnosed using electrodiagnostic studies. This study was carried out to assess the role of imaging in diagnosing peripheral mononeuropathy as exact anatomical localisation of the pathology is possible using high-resolution ultrasound and MR neurography, the modalities assessed in this study.

METHOD

A hospital-based prospective analytical study was carried out in a resource-limited setting on 180 peripheral nerves in 131 patients with symptoms of peripheral mononeuropathy after taking IRB approval. Each patient underwent high-resolution ultrasound examination and MR neurography, findings of which were then compared and statistically analysed assuming electrodiagnostic findings as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Overall, the diagnostic accuracy was highest for the proton density fat-saturated MR sequence (93.89%) followed by high-resolution ultrasound (80%). The sensitivity was highest for proton density fat-saturated sequence while the T1 MR sequence had the highest specificity. Combined diagnostic accuracy of both modalities was calculated to be 93.33% with a negative predictive value of 80%. High-resolution ultrasound and MRI equally detected the cases with nerve discontinuity, while neuromas were better identified on MRI.

CONCLUSION

With the advent of higher frequency probes and improved MR field strength, imaging of peripheral nerves is possible with better accuracy. Imaging assessment of nerves allows anatomical delineation with identification of exact site of involvement. This comparative study demonstrates the role of imaging in diagnosing peripheral nerve pathologies with the accuracy of MRI as high as 93.89% which may serve as an imaging gold standard. High-resolution ultrasound, being quicker, cost effective and a comparable accuracy of 80% can serve as a reliable screening tool. This study incorporates a larger study group and compares HRUS with MRI, taking NCV as gold standard, which has not been done in the preceding studies. With this study, we conclude that these two imaging modalities are not mutually exclusive. Rather, they complement each other and can be used in conjunction as an imaging yardstick for diagnosing peripheral neuropathies.

Magnetic Resonance Neurography in Chronic Lumbosacral and Pelvic Pain: Diagnostic and Management Impact-Institutional Audit

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Low back and pelvic pain are among the most prevalent conditions worldwide, with major social and economic costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) of lumbosacral plexus in the management and outcomes of these patients with chronic pain.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with chronic lumbosacral and pelvic pain referred for MRN over a year were included. Preimaging and postimaging clinical diagnosis and treatment, pain levels, and location were recorded. Pain-free survival was compared between treatments using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients with mean age 53.7 ± 14.8 years and a male/female ratio of 1:1.53 were included. Of these patients, 115 presented with radiculopathy (57%), 56 with pelvic pain (28%), and 31 with groin pain (15%). Mean initial pain level was 6.9 ± 1.9. Mean symptom duration was 4.21 ± 5.86 years. Of these patients, 143 (71%) had a change in management because of MRN. After MRN, reduction in pain levels was observed in 21 of 32 patients receiving conservative treatment (66%), 42 of 67 receiving injections (63%), and 27 of 33 receiving surgery (82%). Follow-ups were available in 131 patients. Median pain-free survival was 12 months. Patients treated with surgery had significantly lower pain recurrence than patients receiving other treatments in the same time frame (hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-9.2; P = 0.0061).

CONCLUSIONS

MRN use in chronic lumbosacral and pelvic pain led to a meaningful change in diagnosis and treatment. After MRN, conservative treatment and injections provided pain relief; however, patients benefited more from surgery than from any other treatment.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Digital Nerves of the Hand: Anatomy and Spectrum of Pathology

Digital nerves are intrinsic to the sensory and motor function of the hand. These nerves represent the terminal ramifications of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves and are located distal to the carpal tunnel and Guyon canal. With magnetic resonance imaging, traumatic and nontraumatic abnormalities of the digital nerves can be shown with high contrast as well as high spatial resolution. Digital nerve abnormalities are most commonly posttraumatic in nature; however, infection, inflammatory, vascular malformations, and neoplasms can rarely occur. Magnetic resonance imaging is playing an increasing role in the assessment of peripheral nerve injury throughout the body, and in the hand, which can accurately identify the extent and character of digital nerve abnormalities before operative intervention.