Certain conditions have an increased incidence of Wilms' tumor

Screening for Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndromes: a cost-effective model

BACKGROUND

We undertook a cost-benefit analysis of screening for Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), a known cancer predisposition syndrome. The purpose of this analysis was twofold: first, to assess whether screening in children with BWS has the potential to be cost-effective; second, if screening appears to be cost-effective, to determine which parameters would be most important to assess if a screening trial were initiated.

PROCEDURES

We used data from the BWS registry at the National Cancer Institute, the National Wilms Tumor Study (NWTS), and large published series to model events for two hypothetical cohorts of 1,000 infants born with BWS. One hypothetical cohort was screened for cancer until a predetermined age, representing the base case. The other cohort was unscreened. For our base case, we assumed: (a) sonography examinations three times yearly (triannually) from birth until 7 years of age; (b) screening would result in one stage shift downward at diagnosis for Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma; (c) 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting clinical stage I Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma; (d) a 3% discount rate; (e) a false positive result cost of $402. We estimated mortality rates based on published Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma stage specific survival.

RESULTS

Using the base case, screening a child with BWS from birth until 4 years of age results in a cost per life year saved of $9,642 while continuing until 7 years of age results in a cost per life-year saved of $14,740. When variables such as cost of screening examination, discount rate, and effectiveness of screening were varied based on high and low estimates, the incremental cost per life-year saved for screening up until age four remained comparable to acceptable population based cancer screening ranges (< $50,000 per life year saved).

CONCLUSIONS

Under our model's assumptions, abdominal sonography examinations in children with BWS represent a reasonable strategy for a cancer screening program. A cancer screening trial is warranted to determine if, when, and how often children with BWS should be screened and to determine cost-effectiveness in clinical practice.

Characteristics and outcome of children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and Wilms' tumor: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group

PURPOSE

Children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) are at increased risk for developing Wilms' tumor (WT). We reviewed the National Wilms Tumor Study Group (NWTSG) records to assess clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with WT and BWS.

METHODS

In the NWTSG, treating clinicians were asked to report, for each enrolled patient, whether the patient had BWS. Between 1980 and 1995, 4,669 patients were treated on two consecutive NWTSG protocols (NWTS 3 and NWTS 4). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of BWS patients compared with patients with WT without BWS.

RESULTS

Fifty-three children enrolled onto NWTS 3 and 4 were reported to have BWS. BWS patients were more likely to present with lower-stage tumors (P =.0001), with more than half (27 of 53) presenting with stage I disease. The overall treatment outcomes for the BWS patients were nearly identical to those without BWS, with overall survival at 4 years from diagnosis at 89% and 90%, respectively. Overall, 21% of the patients with BWS had bilateral disease, either at diagnosis (nine of 53) or as metachronous contralateral recurrence (two of 53). BWS patients enrolled onto NWTS 4 had smaller tumors than those enrolled onto NWTS 3 (P =.02), a trend not seen in the non-BWS patients.

CONCLUSION

Like children without BWS, children with BWS and WT have an excellent prognosis with modern treatment regimens. There is a high risk of bilateral disease, and increasingly smaller tumors are being detected. This suggests that a national trial assessing the role of ultrasound screening followed by nephron-sparing surgery for some patients may be appropriate.

Screening for Wilms tumor in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome or idiopathic hemihypertrophy

BACKGROUND

Children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and idiopathic hemihypertrophy (BWS/HH) are at increased risk for developing Wilms tumor and screening with abdominal sonography is frequently recommended. However, there is a paucity of published data supporting this strategy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether sonographic screening at intervals of 4 months or less reduced the proportion of late-stage Wilms Tumor (WT) in children with BWS/HH.

PROCEDURE

A case series analysis was employed to compare the proportion of late-stage (stage III or IV) Wilms tumor in patients with BWS/HH who were screened with sonography (n = 15) to the proportion of late-stage Wilms tumor in unscreened patients with BWS/HH (n = 59). Patients were identified from the BWS Registry and from previously published studies. Screened patients had sonograms at intervals of 4 months or less.

RESULTS

None of the 12 screened children with Wilms tumor had late-stage disease, whereas 25 of 59 (42%) of unscreened children had late-stage Wilms tumor, a difference that was statistically significant (P < 0.003). Three children had false positive screening studies. They were operated on for suspected Wilms tumor but the lesions proved to be complicated renal cysts (n = 2) or nephroblastomatosis (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that children with BWS/HH may benefit from screening sonograms at intervals of 4 months or less. However, false positive screening exams may result in unnecessary surgery. Given the rarity of BWS/HH, a larger, prospective international screening study is necessary to determine if the benefits of screening outweigh the risks.

Polymerase chain reaction-based risk assessment for Wilms tumor in sporadic aniridia

PURPOSE

Sporadic cases of aniridia have a 30% risk for the development of Wilms tumor. Current guidelines for sporadic aniridia recommend screening by renal ultrasonography for the presence of tumors every 6 months until age 5 years. Deletions of chromosome 11p13 that affect both PAX6 (aniridia) and WT1 (Wilms tumor) loci are the basis for the association of these two uncommon disorders. We sought to develop a rapid polymerase chain reaction-based test that could rule out a chromosome 11p13 deletion covering the PAX6-WT1 region in sporadic aniridia.

METHODS

Five patients with sporadic aniridia were recruited. Polymerase chain reaction-based genotyping was carried out for six highly informative marker loci across the PAX6-WT1 region to determine whether these patients had one or two haplotypes. The results were compared with those obtained from two cell lines with known deletions in the PAX6-WT1 region.

RESULTS

All five patients were heterozygous at least at one of the four marker loci in the PAX6-WT1 region, indicating that there were no cases of gross chromosomal deletion. The cell lines showed hemizygosity in the four marker loci within the PAX6-WT1 region and in one of the two flanking marker loci.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a rapid DNA test with an estimated sensitivity of 94.0% to 99.2%, using standard DNA diagnostic techniques and equipment, to rule out chromosomal deletion in sporadic aniridia. Patients in whom a chromosome 11p13 deletion has been ruled out do not require repeated renal imaging to screen for Wilms tumor.