JOURNAL CLUB: Primary Anorectal Melanoma: MRI Findings and Clinicopathologic Correlations

Anal and Perianal Masses: The Common, the Uncommon, and the Rare

A variety of tumors involve the anal canal because the anal canal forms the transition between the digestive system and the skin, and this anatomical region is made of a variety of different cells and tissues. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice for diagnosis and local staging of the anal canal and perianal neoplasms. In this pictorial review, we demonstrate the MRI anatomy of the anal canal and perianal region and display the imaging spectrum of tumors in the region along with an overview of its management. Imaging appearances of many tumorlike lesions that can cause diagnostic dilemmas are also demonstrated with pointers to differentiate between them.

Organ preservation in anorectal melanoma: A tempting challenge-a case report

Melanoma arising from melanocytes is an uncommon neoplastic lesion, with rare occurrences in anorectal mucosa. While mucosal melanomas constitute a small portion of all melanomas, anorectal cases are even rarer and present with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Surgical management is central, with evolving debates regarding optimal approaches. We present a case of a 60-year-old woman with anorectal melanoma. She complained of rectal bleeding and weight loss. Clinical examination and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 3-cm budding lesion on the anterior rectal wall. Colonoscopy identified a pedunculated anorectal tumor of 3 cm, situated 4 cm from the anal margin. A biopsy led us to a malignant lesion: anorectal melanoma. Pelvic imaging displayed a localized tumor, prompting wide local excision with millimetric negative margins. These resection margins were estimated insufficient, even in front of R0 resection. Thus, and after multidisciplinary discussion, we opted for abdominoperineal resection after wide local excision. Lymph nodes were biopsied, confirming no residual tumor. Follow-up exhibited no recurrence at 1 year. Our case emphasizes the pivotal role of surgical strategy in managing anorectal melanoma, challenging the paradigm of organ preservation. Despite therapeutic progress, surgery remains integral, contributing to improved outcomes and addressing the metastatic potential inherent to this disease.

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in 47 patients with primary anorectal malignant melanoma in the immune therapy era

PURPOSE

Primary anorectal melanoma (ARM) accounts for approximately 1.2% of all melanomas and 16.5% of all mucosal melanomas. ARM is associated with the shortest interval to disease progression and the highest rate of metastasis; however, optimal therapeutic strategies for ARM remain controversial. This study aimed to assess the ideal surgical intervention for ARM and to determine the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

METHODS

We included 47 patients with ARM treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan from 2011 to 2020. We performed a survival analysis for each of these groups: (i) patients with ARM (n = 47); (ii) operable non-stage IV cases at initial presentation (n = 35); and (iii) stage IV cases (n = 32).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 53.6%, and the median OS was 78.7 months in patients with ARM. No statistically significant difference in 5-year OS was found between rectal and anal sites (50.9% vs. 56.7%). In the non-stage IV subgroup, the type of surgery (abdominoperineal resection or wide local excision) did not correlate with OS (HR 1.85; 95% CI 0.46-7.5; p = 0.39). In the stage IV subgroup, the 2-year OS of the ICI treatment group was 61.4%, whereas that of the dacarbazine regimen group was 0% (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Our ARM prognosis was better than that of previous studies. Our findings suggest that the availability of ICI therapy may improve survival in patients with advanced ARM. However, further research is warranted to identify both the clinical and molecular predictors of response to improve patient selection.

The different faces of metastatic melanoma in the gastrointestinal tract

Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer, with tendency to spread to any organ of the human body, including the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The diagnosis of metastases to the GIT can be difficult, as they may be clinically silent for somewhile and may occur years after the initial melanoma diagnosis. CT imaging remains the standard modality for staging and surveillance of melanoma patients, and in most cases, it will be the first imaging modality to identify GIT lesions. However, interpretation of CT studies in patients with melanoma can be challenging as lesions may be subtle and random in distribution, as well as sometimes mimicking other conditions. Even so, early diagnosis of GIT metastases is critical to avoid emergency hospitalisations, whilst surgical intervention can be curative in some cases. In this review, we illustrate the various imaging presentations of melanoma metastases within the GIT, discuss the clinical aspects and offer advice on investigation and management. We offer tips intended to aid radiologists in their diagnostic skills and interpretation of melanoma imaging scans.

Can transrectal ultrasonography distinguish anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal adenocarcinoma? A retrospective paired study for ten years

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) and low rectal adenocarcinoma (LRAC) have some similarities in clinical behaviors, histopathological characteristics and ultrasonographic findings, diagnostic errors are common. By comparing the transrectally ultrasonographic features between the two tumors, we propose to provide more possibilities in differentiating them.

METHODS

The data of 9 ARMMs and 27 age- and gender-matched LRACs (the lower margin below the peritoneal reflection) in West China Hospital Sichuan University between April 2008 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The ultrasonic features between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) showed that the length of ARMM was shorter than that of LRAC (28.22 ± 12.29 mm vs. 40.22 ± 15.16 mm), and ARMM had a lower position than that of LRAC (the distance to anal verge was 50.78 ± 11.70 vs. 63.81 ± 18.73 mm). Unlike LRAC, the majority of ARMM in our study was confined to the intestinal mucosa/submucosa (66.67/25.93%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data of our study, several ultrasonographic findings (length, invasion depth, and position) of ARMM were significantly different from LRAC. Accordingly, more attention should be paid to masses at anorectal junction with lower position, shorter length, and shallower infiltration depth. Instead of the most common tumor, LRAC, ARMM should be taken into account to avoid a misdiagnosis, which will result in a poorer prognosis.

Difficulties in diagnosing anorectal melanoma: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Anorectal melanoma is a tumour that is difficult to identify due to its rarity and variability of presentation. Insufficient data published in the literature do not allow for diagnostic and treatment guidelines to be established. Anorectal melanoma has the worst prognosis among mucosal melanomas and is frequently misdiagnosed by standard identification methods.

CASE SUMMARY

A 66-year-old woman presented with intermittent anal bleeding, pain, and tenesmus in the past month, with no associated weight loss. Colonoscopy revealed a cauliflower-like tumour with a diameter of 1.5 cm, with exulcerated areas and an adherent clot but without obstruction. Biopsy results identified an inflammatory rectal polyp with nonspecific chronic rectitis. Tumour markers CA 19-9 and CEA were within the normal range. After 6 mo, due to the persistence of symptoms, a pelvic magnetic resonance imaging scan was performed. A lesion measuring 2.8 cm × 2.7 cm × 2.1 cm was identified at the anorectal junction, along with two adjacent lymphadenopathies. No distant metastases were detected. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the second set of biopsies, and a diagnosis of anorectal melanoma was established. Surgical treatment by abdominoperineal resection was performed. Evolution was marked by the appearance of lung metastases at 1 mo postoperatively, detected on a positron emission tomography-computer tomography scan, and perineal recurrence after 5 mo. After molecular testing, the patient was included in an immunotherapy trial.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the difficulty of establishing a definitive early diagnosis of anorectal melanoma, the importance of performing histological analysis on a well-represented biopsy specimen, and the poor prognosis, even with radical surgery.

Multimodality Imaging and Genetics of Primary Mucosal Melanomas and Response to Treatment

Mucosal melanomas (MMs) are rare and aggressive tumors that arise from melanocytes in the mucosal tissues that line the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urogenital tracts. Most MMs occur during the 6th and 7th decades of life. MMs may be asymptomatic but may also cause bleeding, pain, and itching, depending on the site of origin. Because of their asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic nature and the difficulty of visualizing them in some cases, they are often advanced tumors at patient presentation. MM staging varies depending on the site of the primary tumor. A simplified staging system allows classification of clinically localized disease as stage I, regional nodal involvement as stage II, and distant metastasis as stage III. MM differs genetically from its cutaneous counterparts. Common drivers in cutaneous melanoma such as B-raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) have a lower mutation rate in MM, whereas mutations of other genes including the KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and splicing factor 3b subunit 1 gene (SF3B1) are more common in MM. Complete resection is the best curative option. However, surgical intervention with wide local excision and negative margins may be difficult to attain because of the local anatomy and the extent of disease. In addition, despite aggressive surgical resection, most patients develop local recurrence and metastatic disease. Recent advances in the treatment of melanoma include immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Unfortunately, MMs have a relatively poor prognosis, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 25%. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

A Rare Case of Primary Anorectal Malignant Melanoma

Malignant melanoma affecting the anorectum is very rare. We present a 63-year-old female who presented with features of bleeding per rectum and painful defecation. On examination, the patient had a palpable mass on the right side of the anorectum, with predominant exophytic growth and intraluminal extension. Biopsy and imaging studies were diagnostic of malignant melanoma. The patient was discussed on the tumor board and planned for abdominoperineal resection. Postoperatively, the patient was started on chemotherapy. The patient was followed up for two years, and there was no evidence of any recurrence.

Combining quantitative and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging features to differentiate anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer

Background

Distinguishing anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer remains challenging because of the overlap of clinical symptoms and imaging findings. We aim to investigate whether combining quantitative and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features could differentiate anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer.

Methods

Thirty-seven anorectal malignant melanoma and 98 low rectal cancer patients who underwent pre-operative rectal MRI from three hospitals were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were divided into the primary cohort (N = 84) and validation cohort (N = 51). Quantitative image analysis was performed on T1-weighted (T1WI), T2-weighted (T2WI), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI). The subjective qualitative MRI findings were evaluated by two radiologists in consensus. Multivariable analysis was performed using stepwise logistic regression. The discrimination performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

The skewness derived from T2WI (T2WI-skewness) showed the best discrimination performance among the entire quantitative image features for differentiating anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer (primary cohort: AUC = 0.852, 95% CI 0.788-0.916; validation cohort: 0.730, 0.645-0.815). Multivariable analysis indicated that T2WI-skewness and the signal intensity of T1WI were independent factors, and incorporating both factors achieved good discrimination performance in two cohorts (primary cohort: AUC = 0.913, 95% CI 0.868-0.958; validation cohort: 0.902, 0.844-0.960).

Conclusions

Incorporating T2WI-skewness and the signal intensity of T1WI achieved good performance for differentiating anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer. The quantitative image analysis helps improve diagnostic accuracy.

Clinical evidence, diagnostic approach and challenging therapeutic modalities for malignant melanoma of the anorectum

Primary anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is a rare, aggressive tumour that accounts for approximately 1.2% of all melanomas. This rare entity represents less than 5% of anorectal malignant tumours and 0.05-1% of all malignant colorectal neoplasms. The incidence increases with age while there is a higher prevalence in Caucasians. ARMM is often asymptomatic or presents with no disease-specific evidence so that it can mimic other rectal disorders, malignant or benign. Colonoscopy is obligatory as a diagnosing mean for ARMM. Furthermore, endoscopic ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can be utilized for the evaluation of tumour infiltration and lymph node metastases. Moreover, diagnostic establishment of ARMM requires an undeniable demonstration of essential melanocytic features in histology and immunohistochemistry. Even though the standard of treatment remains surgical resection, the choice between wide local excision and abdomino-perineal resection is still controversial. Recently, there have been recommendations regarding new techniques which could be utilized for the surgical treatment of ARMM. Newer treatments that have been proposed such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies need further validation. A multicenter study would allow clarification of the most appropriate therapeutic strategy for this uncommon nosological entity.

Primary Malignant Melanoma of Anorectum CT Findings: a Single Tertiary Center's Experience

Anorectal melanoma is a rare malignancy with very aggressive course. This case series emphasize the role of imaging, contrast-enhanced computed tomography in evaluating such cases before surgery. CT scan of four patients with pathologically proven primary anorectal malignant melanoma was included. CT findings were analyzed from the picture archiving and communication system for the site of involvement, morphological shape, presence of perirectal and anal infiltration, lymphadenopathy, liver metastasis, and occurrence of bowel obstruction for all the four patients. All the four patients presented as polypoidal mass that caused focal expansion and obscuration of rectal lumen without causing colonic obstruction. Perirectal infiltration was seen in 2/4 patients and involvement of anal canal was seen in 3 patients. Distant metastasis was seen in the liver in three out of four patients. In conclusion, primary anorectal malignant melanoma is a rare, highly aggressive tumor and should be considered in patients with a bulky intraluminal polypoid mass that does not cause colonic obstruction in the anorectal region with large-sized lymphadenopathy.