Multidisciplinary management of sexual and gender minorities with bladder cancer

Bladder cancer, a common urologic malignancy, has poor morbidity and mortality in sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals, stemming from higher risk, poor access to care and lack of quality cancer care. To begin addressing this disparity, this review offers key considerations for evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of SGM individuals with bladder cancer. In addition to thorough medical and surgical history, initial evaluation should include discussion of patient goals for sexual function and organ preservation, as well as an evaluation of sexual function. Prior gender affirming surgery and patient specific sexual function goals will impact diagnosis and treatment approaches, including surgical and radiation therapy. Throughout care for SGM individuals with bladder cancer, it is critical to acknowledge the systemic discrimination that may be experienced by these individuals and approach conversations with sensitivity and humility and incorporate mental and social support as appropriate.

Patient-Centered Radiology Communications: Engaging Patients as Partners

Patient-centered care is a model in which, by bringing the patient's perspective to the design and delivery of health care, we can better meet patients' needs, enhancing the quality of care. Patient-centered care requires finding ways to communicate effectively with a diverse patient population that has various levels of health literacy, cultural backgrounds, and unique needs and preferences. Moreover, multimedia resources have the potential to inform and educate patients promoting greater independence. In this review, we discuss the fundamentals of communication with the different modes used in radiology and the key elements of effective communication. Then, we highlight five opportunities along the continuum of care in the radiology practice in which we can improve communications to empower our patients and families and strengthen this partnership. Lastly, we discuss the importance on communication training of the workforce, optimizing and seamlessly integrating technology solutions into our workflows, and the need for patient feedback in the design and delivery of care.

Educating Radiology Stakeholders on Relevant Health Issues and Terminology Regarding LGBTQIA+ Patients in 2023

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Over 20% of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Queer or Questioning, Intersex, Asexual or Ally, and more (LGBTQIA+) community reports experiencing discrimination upon accessing health care, causing many to defer access to care and resulting in poorer outcomes. While members of this community routinely undergo imaging studies, little formal education exists within the field of radiology to review the unique health care needs of this population and the specific relevance to imaging, in addition to actionable methods to promote inclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 1-hour educational conference was held for a cohort of radiology resident physicians at our institution, in which topics including LGBTQIA+ health care disparities, clinical nuances relevant to the field of radiology, and actionable suggestions that both academic and private-practice centers can adopt to foster inclusion were presented. All attendees were required to complete a 12-question, multiple-choice preconference and postconference examination.

RESULTS

Median prelecture and postlecture quiz scores for four first-year radiology residents were 29% and 75%, for two second-year radiology residents were 29% and 63%, for two third-year radiology residents were 17% and 71%, and for three fourth-year radiology residents were 42% and 80%.

CONCLUSION

Multiple areas of opportunity to foster LGBTQIA+ inclusion at the provider and administration levels currently exist throughout the field of radiology. A radiology-focused education module regarding clinical nuances, health care inequities, and ways to foster an inclusive environment with the LGBTQIA+ community is an effective way to promote learner knowledge.

An assessment of radiation safety practices for transgender and gender non-binary patients in Irish radiology departments

INTRODUCTION

Studies indicate there may be inadequate care given to transgender and non-binary (TGNB) patients in healthcare environments, with radiology departments not being equipped to cater for this group. There is currently a deficit in research concerning the use of radiation safety measures for TGNB patients. The purpose of this research was to examine opinions of Irish Radiation Safety Experts (RSE) on current status of radiation safety protocols and techniques in place for TGNB patients and consider any changes necessary.

METHODOLOGY

Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with RSEs from eight Irish hospitals, including five radiation protection officers (RPO) and five medical physicists. Question included: current radiation safety protocols for TGNB patients, potential issues and challenges with current practice, and recommendations of new measures. Coding was used to facilitate content analysis for interpretation of findings.

RESULTS

No reference to TGNB patients in local policies or guidelines was evident. Interviews established key radiation safety risks including inadvertent exposure of the foetus and insensitive patient care. Prominent categories identified included additional education, gender identification at patient registration and consideration of current policies and guidelines. The extent to which RSEs promoted the implementation of further measures to radiology departments varied.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear lack of guidance and instruction for radiation safety for TGNB patients is evident. Whilst there are few TGNB patients in Irish hospitals, participants believed that inclusive changes should be made concurrent with Ireland's evolving culture and in the interest of equality of patient safety.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Inclusive changes should be made to radiology departments concurrent with Ireland's evolving culture. However, barriers to implementing such measures include a lack of available resources, investment, and instruction from authoritative bodies.

Discussion and Optimization of the Male Breast Cancer Patient Experience

Breast cancer in men is rare and often overlooked as there is a misconception that it is a gendered disease that affects women only. The feminization, or "pinkification," of the disease has been socially constructed to raise awareness, improve screening, and empower women but has not addressed the occurrence of the illness in men. Men may therefore experience unique psychosocial difficulties when faced with a disease that predominantly affects women, including feelings of disbelief and embarrassment that impact their sense of self and challenge their masculinity. The lack of mammographic screening in men, lack of public awareness, and the shame that develops during the time of diagnosis can result in treatment avoidant behaviors, a delayed presentation, and worse prognosis in men. Although male breast cancer (MBC) is uncommon, the incidence is increasing; therefore, efforts should be made to enhance education for health care professionals and the general public in order to lessen the stigma, with the goal of improving outcomes. Furthermore, special attention to the unique medical needs and hurdles encountered by transgender males can break down health care barriers in this marginalized patient population. This article offers male perceptions on breast cancer, the psychosocial implications of being diagnosed with a gendered disease, and suggestions on how to improve the MBC experience.

Practical Approaches to Advancing Health Equity in Radiology, From the AJR Special Series on DEI

Despite significant advances in healthcare, many patients from medically underserved populations are impacted by existing healthcare disparities. Radiologists are uniquely positioned to decrease health disparities and advance health equity efforts in their practices. However, literature on practical tools for advancing radiology health equity efforts applicable to a wide variety of patient populations and care settings is lacking. Therefore, this article seeks to equip radiologists with an evidence-based and practical knowledge toolkit of health equity strategies, presented in terms of four pillars of research, clinical care, education, and innovation. For each pillar, equity efforts across diverse patient populations and radiology practice settings are examined through the lens of existing barriers, current best practices, and future directions, incorporating practical examples relevant to a spectrum of patient populations. Health equity efforts provide an opportune window to transform radiology through personalized care delivery that is responsive to diverse patient needs. Guided by compassion and empathy as core principles of health equity, leveraging the four pillars provides a helpful framework to advance health equity efforts as a step towards social justice in health.

Promoting Progress and Learning from Mistakes: Results of a Radiology Department LGBTQ Inclusion Audit

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

As radiology programs seek to recruit and retain diverse and competitive applicants, it is important to critically review existing department policies to ensure they meet the needs of their residents. To evaluate a radiology program's inclusivity measures, an interdepartmental committee developed an "LGBTQ inclusion index" and performed an LGBTQ inclusion audit to identify gaps in policy and to craft proposals for administrative review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An LGBTQ inclusion index was compiled through the collaboration of an interdisciplinary committee of residents, faculty, institutional and community representatives. Five inclusion milestones were identified relating to department policy, department facilities, institutional culture, department culture, and community engagement. Milestones were scored as 0, for milestone not at all met, 1, for milestone partially met, and 2, for milestone completely met, with a total score of 10. Program scores were calculated for the 2018-2021 academic years.

RESULTS

The radiology program LGBTQ inclusion index score increased over the course of the study period. The program LGBTQ inclusion index score was 4 of 10 in 2018 and 2019, but after formation of an LGBTQ inclusion task force by the diversity and inclusion committee, increased to 7 of 10 in 2020. The LGBTQ inclusion audit identified several areas that required improvement and the committee drafted proposals to address these gaps. By 2021, the program scored 9 of 10 on the inclusion index.

CONCLUSION

Promoting an inclusive and affirming radiology department is an important step to providing culturally competent healthcare and mitigating health disparities. An LGBTQ inclusion audit and a robust department diversity committee can help to identify and address gaps in policy, facilities, and culture.

Proposed Multilevel measures to Support Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Efforts in Radiology

Integrating diversity into healthcare systems has its challenges and advantages. Academic medicine strives to expand the diversity of the healthcare workforce. The Association of University Radiologists (AUR) put together a task force to review the concept of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) as it pertains to Radiology and to propose strategies for better integrating DEI in Radiology. We present several measures aimed at the trainee, leadership, management and professional society levels to empower DEI in Radiology.

Gender Affirmative Care Clinic: An Overview

Transgender healthcare is an evolving multispecialty field including medical and social domains catering to the needs of a specific subset of population presenting with gender incongruence, differences in sexual development/orientation, requiring care rather than cure. Delivery of transgender healthcare is done through gender friendly healthcare facilities, which are designated as “gender affirmative care clinics (GACC).” The primary purpose of the gender affirmative care clinic is to be the “one stop solution” for a person seeking affirmative care. The main objective is to facilitate care with compassion and prevent/mitigate dysphoria. The components of the GACC should include reception cum front office; affirmative mental healthcare department; affirmative medical, surgical, and sexual healthcare department; diagnostics, legal, and ethics department, as well as inpatient care. The GACC should be preferably located in a place that is easily accessible to the community members and has an “open plan.”

Health Care Disparities in Radiology-A Review of the Current Literature

INTRODUCTION

Health care disparities exist in all medical specialties, including radiology. Raising awareness of established health care disparities is a critical component of radiology's efforts to mitigate disparities. Our primary objective is to perform a comprehensive review of the last 10 years of literature pertaining to disparities in radiology care. Our secondary objective is to raise awareness of disparities in radiology.

METHODS

We reviewed English-language medicine and health services literature from the past 10 years (2010-2020) for research that described disparities in any aspect of radiologic imaging using radiology search terms and key words for disparities in OVID. Relevant studies were identified with adherence to the guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

RESULTS

The search yielded a total 1,890 articles. We reviewed the citations and abstracts with the initial search yielding 1,890 articles (without duplicates). Of these, 1,776 were excluded based on the criteria set forth in the methods. The remaining unique 114 articles were included for qualitative synthesis.

DISCUSSION

We hope this article increases awareness and inspires action to address disparities and encourages research that further investigates previously identified disparities and explores not-yet-identified disparities.

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control (AEC) systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control (AEC) systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

Implementation of transgender and gender diverse curriculum in medical imaging programs: A review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Sexual and gender minority patients experience significant inequities when accessing health care. Transgender and non-binary patients are at an even greater risk of experiencing health disparities due to their specialized health care needs. In the discipline of medical imaging, limited cultural competence, social stigma, and cis-heteronormative environments are barriers for these patients. There is an urgent need to improve medical imaging care for transgender and non-binary people; inclusion of sexual and gender minority content in medical imaging curriculum is one strategy to begin to address this need.

METHOD

A review of the literature was undertaken to explore implementation of sexual and gender minority content in the curricula of medical imaging programs.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

Three main themes were identified: 1) educators' acknowledgement of the importance and value of adding sexual and gender minority content to healthcare curriculum; 2) educators' lack of a sense of preparedness, experience, and knowledge to adequately teach this content: and 3) lack of resources and institutional support to help develop curriculum.

CONCLUSION

Including content in the curriculum related to the needs of transgender and non-binary patients will help ensure entry-to-practice Medical Radiation Technologists are better prepared to provide inclusive care.

Improving Awareness of LGBTQ Patient Preferences Among Radiology Staff Members

BACKGROUND

Our health system set out to improve services to patients from the LGBTQ community as a step towards decreasing disparities in care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pilot education intervention targeting staff knowledge and skills regarding terminology with regards to gender fluidity and sexual orientation was designed and implemented.

RESULTS

81 staff members participated and we found improvements in knowledge but there remain uncertainties that can be addressed in future training sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

LGBTQ staff education in radiology is feasible and effective. Additional education interventions may be necessary to address persistent knowledge gaps. Effects on patient acre are yet unknown.

Imaging in Gender Affirmation Surgery

Purpose of Review

This review summarizes recent developments in gender affirmation surgery, imaging findings in patients undergoing these surgeries, focusing on common postoperative radiologic appearances, complications, and pitfalls in interpretation.

Recent Findings

The imaging workup of masculinizing and feminizing genitourinary surgeries uses multiple modalities in presurgical planning and within the immediate and long-term postoperative period. CT and MRI can help identify immediate and remote postoperative complications. Fluoroscopic examinations can diagnose postoperative urethral complications after gender affirmation surgeries. Lastly, the patients can undergo imaging for unrelated acute and chronic pathology, and knowledge of these imaging findings can be very helpful.

Summary

Imaging plays a significant role in the care of transgender patients and, particularly, in those pursuing gender affirmation surgery. As insurance coverage expands for these surgical procedures, radiologists should be prepared to encounter, understand, and interpret pre and postoperative findings.

Gentle Touch: Noninvasive Approaches to Improve Patient Comfort and Cooperation for Pediatric Imaging

Pediatric imaging presents unique challenges related to patient anxiety, cooperation, and safety. Techniques to reduce anxiety and patient motion in adults must often be augmented in pediatrics, because it is always mentioned in the field of pediatrics, children are not miniature adults. This article will review methods that can be considered to improve patient experience and cooperation in imaging studies. Such techniques can range from modifications to the scanner suite, different ways of preparing and interacting with children, collaborating with parents for improved patient care, and technical advances such as accelerated acquisition and motion correction to reduce artifact. Special considerations for specific populations including transgender patients, neonates, and pregnant women undergoing fetal imaging will be described. The unique risks of sedation in children will also be briefly reviewed.

Facial Feminization Surgery: Key CT Findings for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Evaluation

Facial feminization surgery is an increasingly performed component of gender affirmation surgery for transgender women. Preoperative facial CT is performed to plan the adjustment of the patient's masculine characteristics to feminine and to plan operative navigation around specific readily identifiable anatomic structures. In the upper face, surgery is performed to reduce the prominence of the brow and increase the nasofrontal angle; the radiology report should indicate the frontal sinus and supraorbital foramen anatomy. In the midface, rhinoplasty is performed to increase the nasofrontal and nasolabial angles; the radiology report should indicate the presence of a dorsal hump and septal deviation or spurring. In the lower face, the prominence of the chin and squareness of the jaw are adjusted via genioplasty and mandible contouring, respectively; the radiology report should describe the location and potential anatomic variations of the inferior alveolar nerve and mental foramina as well as the presence of dental abnormalities that directly inform the surgical approach. CT may also be performed if there is clinical suspicion for postoperative complications such as hardware fracture or osteotomy through the supraorbital or mental foramen. Familiarity with these findings will facilitate improved communication between radiologists and surgeons, thereby contributing to the care of transgender women.

Facial Feminization Surgery: Key CT Findings for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Evaluation

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is an increasingly performed component of gender affirmation surgery for transgender women. Preoperative facial CT is performed to plan the adjustment of the patient's masculine characteristics to feminine, and to plan operative navigation around specific readily identifiable anatomic structures. In the upper face, surgery is performed to reduce the prominence of the brow and increase the nasofrontal angle; the radiology report should indicate the frontal sinus and supraorbital foramen anatomy. In the midface, rhinoplasty is performed to increase the nasofrontal and nasolabial angles; the radiology report should indicate presence of a dorsal hump and septal deviation or spurring. In the lower face, prominence of the chin and squareness of the jaw are adjusted via genioplasty and mandible contouring, respectively; the radiology report should describe the location and potential anatomic variations of the inferior alveolar nerve and mental foramina, as well as presence of dental abnormalities that directly inform the surgical approach. CT may also be performed if there is clinical suspicion for postoperative complications such as hardware fraction or osteotomy through the supraorbital or mental foramen. Familiarity with these findings will facilitate improved communication between radiologists and surgeons, thereby contributing to the care of transgender women.

Systematic Review of Transgender-Related Research in Radiology Over a Decade: There Is Work to Be Done

PURPOSE

The ACR has established that diversity and inclusion are central to its mission of excellence in the radiologic professions; therefore, radiologists have a responsibility to serve the imaging needs of the transgender community. To understand radiologists' current knowledge of transgender topics, the authors performed a systematic review of publications from radiology journals.

METHODS

A lexicon of 14 transgender-related terms was created and expanded through a PubMed keyword search. From the 129 journals from the radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging category of Journal Citation Reports, 106 journals met the inclusion criteria, including English translation and Scopus data for the study period. Using the Scopus advanced search feature, articles with titles, abstracts, Medical Subject Headings terms, or key words including 1 of 14 transgender terms were identified and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the more than 200,000 articles published by the 106 journals from January 2008 to July 2019, 29 relevant articles were identified. Only 14 of the 106 journals published any transgender-related topics. The volume of articles has increased over time. The largest proportion of articles was published under the "general radiology" subsection, with the majority of these being editorials (6 of 10). Most of the original research was published under "neuroradiology" (7 of 13). Use of nonpreferred language, such as "transsexual" and "natal sex" was present through 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

Publication on transgender-related topics was uncommon among radiology journals. It is important to encourage further research and publication on transgender topics, as well as use of respectful, accepted language in radiology journals.

Urethrographic Evaluation of Anatomic Findings and Complications after Perineal Masculinization and Phalloplasty in Transgender Patients

Transgender patients seeking gender-affirming surgery are a growing population with unique health care needs. The radiologist must understand the challenges these patients face to facilitate a positive patient-physician interaction during the series of postoperative fluoroscopic evaluations. The authors present a standard two-stage surgical approach and common postoperative fluoroscopic findings after perineal masculinization and phalloplasty procedures. Perineal masculinization including urethral lengthening is performed first, followed by skin-flap-based phalloplasty. Patients undergo voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) after intravesical administration of contrast media by way of an indwelling suprapubic catheter after each stage. Retrograde urethrography plays a complementary role to supplement the limitations of VCUG after the second stage. The article reviews the expected postoperative anatomy and explains standardized terminology developed at the authors' institution. Imaging features of common and rare complications are discussed, including contained leak, stenosis, occlusion, and fistula. The successful postoperative imaging study in a transmasculine patient relies on open communication among the interdisciplinary team of specialized surgeons, radiologists, and medical providers, as well as special modifications to existing imaging techniques. ^©RSNA, 2020.

Assessing Transgender Patient Care and Gender Inclusivity of Breast Imaging Facilities Across the United States

PURPOSE

To evaluate transgender patient care, gender inclusivity, and transgender health-related policies at breast imaging facilities across the United States.

METHODS

A survey on breast imaging facilities' policies and practices regarding transgender care was distributed to the membership of the Society of Breast Imaging, consisting of approximately 2,500 breast radiologists across the United States. The survey was conducted by e-mail in January 2018.

RESULTS

There were 144 survey respondents. Responses showed that 78.5% of facilities have gender-neutral patient bathrooms, 9.0% have a separate waiting area for transgender patients, and 76.4% do not have dominant pink hues in their facilities, although 54.2% have displays with female gender content. Also, 58.0% of intake forms do not ask patients to provide their gender identity, although 25.9% automatically populate with female phrases. Within the electronic health record, 32.9% lack a distinct place to record patients' preferred names and 54.9% lack a distinct place to record patients' gender pronouns. The majority (73.4%) do not have explicit policies related to the care of transgender patients. Only 14.7% of facilities offer lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender training.

CONCLUSION

Our national survey demonstrates that many breast imaging facilities do not have structures in place to consistently use patients' preferred names and pronouns, nor provide inclusive environments for transgender patients. All breast imaging facilities should recognize the ways in which their practices may intensify discrimination, exclusivity, and stigma for transgender patients and should seek to improve their transgender health competencies and foster more inclusive environments.