Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:605-613. [PMID: 30040467 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18909]

MRI for the detection of small malignant renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

We aimed to review the available evidence on the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating malignant from benign small renal masses.

Methods

An electronic literature search of Web of Science, MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed to identify relevant articles up to 31 January 2023. We included studies that reported the diagnostic accuracy of using magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate small (≤4 cm) malignant from benign renal masses. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated using the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. The study quality evaluation was performed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

Results

A total of 10 studies with 860 small renal masses (815 patients) were included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the studies for the detection of malignant masses were 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.90) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.67-0.92), respectively.

Conclusions

MRI had a moderate diagnostic performance in differentiating small malignant renal masses from benign ones. Substantial heterogeneity was observed between studies for both sensitivity and specificity.

Ultrasound Image-Based Deep Features and Radiomics for the Discrimination of Small Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma and Small Renal Cell Carcinoma

We evaluated the performance of ultrasound image-based deep features and radiomics for differentiating small fat-poor angiomyolipoma (sfp-AML) from small renal cell carcinoma (SRCC). This retrospective study included 194 patients with pathologically proven small renal masses (diameter ≤4 cm; 67 in the sfp-AML group and 127 in the SRCC group). We obtained 206 and 364 images from the sfp-AML and SRCC groups with experienced radiologist identification, respectively. We extracted 4024 deep features from the autoencoder neural network and 1497 radiomics features from the Pyradiomics toolbox; the latter included first-order, shape, high-order, Laplacian of Gaussian and Wavelet features. All subjects were allocated to the training and testing sets with a ratio of 3:1 using stratified sampling. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was applied to select the most diagnostic features. Support vector machine (SVM) was adopted as the discriminative classifier. An optimal feature subset including 45 deep and 7 radiomics features was screened by the LASSO model. The SVM classifier achieved good performance in discriminating between sfp-AMLs and SRCCs, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.96 and 0.85 in the training and testing sets, respectively. The classifier built using deep and radiomics features can accurately differentiate sfp-AMLs from SRCCs on ultrasound imaging.

A Non-Invasive Scoring System to Differential Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) From Renal Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat (RAML-wvf) Based on CT Features

Background

Renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat (RAML-wvf) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have many overlapping features on imaging, which poses a challenge to radiologists. This study aimed to create a scoring system to distinguish ccRCC from RAML-wvf using computed tomography imaging.

Methods

A total of 202 patients from 2011 to 2019 that were confirmed by pathology with ccRCC (n=123) or RAML (n=79) were retrospectively analyzed by dividing them randomly into a training cohort (n=142) and a validation cohort (n=60). A model was established using logistic regression and weighted to be a scoring system. ROC, AUC, cut-off point, and calibration analyses were performed. The scoring system was divided into three ranges for convenience in clinical evaluations, and the diagnostic probability of ccRCC was calculated.

Results

Four independent risk factors are included in the system: 1) presence of a pseudocapsule, 2) a heterogeneous tumor parenchyma in pre-enhancement scanning, 3) a non-high CT attenuation in pre-enhancement scanning, and 4) a heterogeneous enhancement in CMP. The prediction accuracy had an ROC of 0.978 (95% CI, 0.956–0.999; P=0.011), similar to the primary model (ROC, 0.977; 95% CI, 0.954–1.000; P=0.012). A sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 93.9% were achieved using 4.5 points as the cutoff value. Validation showed a good result (ROC, 0.922; 95% CI, 0.854–0.991, P=0.035). The number of patients with ccRCC in the three ranges (0 to <2 points; 2–4 points; >4 to ≤11 points) significantly increased with increasing scores.

Conclusion

This scoring system is convenient for distinguishing between ccRCC and RAML-wvf using four computed tomography features.

Magnetic resonance imaging features of minimal-fat angiomyolipoma and causes of preoperative misdiagnosis

BACKGROUND

Minimal-fat angiomyolipoma (mf-AML) is often misdiagnosed as renal cell carcinoma before surgery.

AIM

To analyze the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of mf-AML and the causes of misdiagnosis by MRI before operation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on ten patients with mf-AML confirmed by surgical pathology, all of whom underwent preoperative MRI examination to analyze the morphological characteristics and MRI signals of the tumor.

RESULTS

MRI revealed a circular-like mass in 4/10 (40%) patients, an oval mass in 6/10 patients (60%), a mass with a capsule in 9/10 patients (90%), and a mass with a lipid component in 7/10 patients (70%). The diameter of the masses in all ten patients was from 11 to 47 mm; the diameter was between 11 mm and 40 mm in 8/10 (80%) patients and between 40 mm and 47 mm in 2/10 (20%) patients.

CONCLUSION

An oval morphological characteristic is strong evidence for the diagnosis of mf-AML, while a capsule and lipids are atypical manifestations of mf-AML.