Comparison of Visualization Rates of LI-RADS Version 2014 Major Features With IV Gadobenate Dimeglumine or Gadoxetate Disodium in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Best Practice for MRI Diagnostic Accuracy Research With Lessons and Examples from the LI-RADS Individual Participant Data Group

Medical imaging diagnostic test accuracy research is strengthened by adhering to best practices for study design, data collection, data documentation, and study reporting. In this review, key elements of such research are discussed, and specific recommendations provided for optimizing diagnostic accuracy study execution to improve uniformity, minimize common sources of bias and avoid potential pitfalls. Examples are provided regarding study methodology and data collection practices based on insights gained by the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) individual participant data group, who have evaluated raw data from numerous MRI diagnostic accuracy studies for risk of bias and data integrity. The goal of this review is to outline strategies for investigators to improve research practices, and to help reviewers and readers better contextualize a study's findings while understanding its limitations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

LI-RADS CT and MRI Ancillary Feature Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Malignancy: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

Background The independent contribution of each Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT or MRI ancillary feature (AF) has not been established. Purpose To evaluate the association of LI-RADS AFs with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and malignancy while adjusting for LI-RADS major features through an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Materials and Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were searched from January 2014 to January 2022 for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for HCC using LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. Using a one-step approach, IPD across studies were pooled. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were derived from multivariable logistic regression models of each AF combined with major features except threshold growth (excluded because of infrequent reporting). Liver observation clustering was addressed at the study and participant levels through random intercepts. Risk of bias was assessed using a composite reference standard and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Results Twenty studies comprising 3091 observations (2456 adult participants; mean age, 59 years ± 11 [SD]; 1849 [75.3%] men) were included. In total, 89% (eight of nine) of AFs favoring malignancy were associated with malignancy and/or HCC, 80% (four of five) of AFs favoring HCC were associated with HCC, and 57% (four of seven) of AFs favoring benignity were negatively associated with HCC and/or malignancy. Nonenhancing capsule (OR = 3.50 [95% CI: 1.53, 8.01]) had the strongest association with HCC. Diffusion restriction (OR = 14.45 [95% CI: 9.82, 21.27]) and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR = 10.18 [95% CI: 7.17, 14.44]) had the strongest association with malignancy. The strongest negative associations with HCC were parallels blood pool enhancement (OR = 0.07 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.49]) and marked T2 hyperintensity (OR = 0.18 [95% CI: 0.07, 0.45]). Seventeen studies (85%) had a high risk of bias. Conclusion Most LI-RADS AFs were independently associated with HCC, malignancy, or benignity as intended when adjusting for major features. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Crivellaro in this issue.

LI-RADS version 2018 for hepatocellular carcinoma < 1.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop and evaluate a modified Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 using significant ancillary features for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) < 1.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Patients who underwent preoperative gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI for focal solid nodules < 2.0 cm within 1 month of MRI between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Major and ancillary features were compared between HCCs of < 1.0 cm and 1.0-1.9 cm using the chi-square test. Significant ancillary features associated with HCC < 1.0 cm were determined by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 were compared between LI-RADS v2018 and our modified LI-RADS (applying the significant ancillary feature) using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Of 796 included nodules, 248 were < 1.0 cm and 548 were 1.0-1.9 cm. HCC < 1.0 cm less frequently showed an enhancing capsule (7.1% vs. 31.1%, p < .001) and threshold growth (0% vs. 8.3%, p = .007) than HCC of 1.0-1.9 cm. Restricted diffusion was the only ancillary feature significant for diagnosing HCC < 1.0 cm (adjusted odds ratio = 11.50, p < .001). In the diagnosis of HCC, our modified LI-RADS using restricted diffusion had significantly higher sensitivity than LI-RADS v2018 (61.8% vs. 53.5%, p < .001), with similar specificity (97.3% vs. 97.8%, p = .157).

CONCLUSION

Restricted diffusion was the only significant independent ancillary feature for diagnosing HCC < 1.0 cm. Our modified LI-RADS using restricted diffusion can improve the sensitivity for HCC < 1.0 cm.

KEY POINTS

• The imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) < 1.0 cm differed from those of HCC of 1.0-1.9 cm. • Restricted diffusion was the only significant independent ancillary feature for HCC < 1.0 cm. • Modified Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) with the addition of restricted diffusion can improve the sensitivity for HCC < 1.0 cm.

Diagnostic Value of CT Delayed Phase Images Added to Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI for HCC Diagnosis in LR-3/4 Lesions

Objective

To explore the potential value of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in LR-3/4 lesions by adding computed tomography (CT) delayed images based on the Liver Imaging Reporting And Data System (LI-RADS).

Methods

The differences in clinical and imaging characteristics between hepatocellular carcinoma and non-HCC were compared, and logistic regression was used to analyze the imaging risk factors for the diagnosis of HCC. Based on the main and HCC-specific auxiliary features of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI, the HCC diagnostic model 1 was established, and the diagnostic efficacy was analyzed. Based on model 1, delayed phase CT images were added to establish model 2 to find reliable predictors of HCC diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the DeLong test were used to compare the two models.

Results

There was a significant difference in serum AFP between HCC and non-HCC (P = 0.008). Based on main and HCC-specific auxiliary features of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI, enhancing capsule (OR = 0.197, 95% CI = 0.06-0.595, P = 0.005) and washout (OR = 10.345, 95% CI = 3.460-30.930, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors in Model 1. After adding CT delayed-phase images to build model 2, enhancing capsule (OR = 0.132, 95% CI = 0.139-0.449, P = 0.001), MRI and (or) CT washout (OR = 0.052, 95% CI = 0.016-0.172, P < 0.001) were reliable predictors for HCC diagnosis. The AUC of model 1 was 0.808, sensitivity was 63.46%, and specificity was 85.00%. The AUC of model 2 was 0.854, the sensitivity was 71.20%, and the specificity was 85.00%. DeLong test (P = 0.040) demonstrated the diagnostic efficacy of model 2 significantly superior than model 1.

Conclusion

Tumor washout and enhanced capsule are reliable factors for the diagnosis of HCC. Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI with delayed phase CT images can improve the sensitivity and diagnostic efficiency of HCC in LR-3/4 lesions on the premise of maintaining high specificity. Future studies are required to reinforce our finding.

Improved diagnosis of histological capsule in hepatocallular carcinoma by using nonenhancing capsule appearance in addition to enhancing capsule appearance in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

To assess the value of nonenhancing capsule by adding to enhancing capsule in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) for diagnosing histological capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). One-hundred fifty-one patients with HCC who underwent both CE-CT and EOB-MRI were retrospectively reviewed. Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 imaging features, including enhancing and nonenhancing capsule were evaluated by two readers in CE-CT and EOB-MRI. Frequencies of each imaging feature were compared between CE-CT and EOB-MRI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve for the diagnosis of histological capsule was compared across the following three imaging criteria: (1) enhancing capsule in CE-CT, (2) enhancing capsule in EOB-MRI, and (3) enhancing/nonenhancing capsule in EOB-MRI. Enhancing capsule in EOB-MRI was significantly less frequently depicted than that in CE-CT (p < 0.001 and = 0.016 for reader 1 and 2). Enhancing/nonenhancing capsule in EOB-MRI achieved a similar frequency of enhancing in CE-CT (p = 0.590 and 0.465 for reader 1 and 2). Adding nonenhancing capsule to enhancing capsule in EOB-MRI significantly increased AUCs (p < 0.001 for both readers) and achieved similar AUCs compared with enhancing capsule in CE-CT (p = 0.470 and 0.666 for reader 1 and 2). Adding nonenhancing capsule to the definition of capsule appearance can improve the diagnosis of capsule in EOB-MRI for the diagnosis of histological capsule in HCC and decrease discordance of capsule appearance between EOB-MRI and CE-CT.

The value of contrast-enhanced portal vein imaging at the hepatobiliary phase obtained with gadobenate dimeglumine for predicting decompensation and transplant-free survival in chronic liver disease

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of contrast-enhanced portal vein imaging at the hepatobiliary phase obtained with gadobenate dimeglumine for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).

METHODS

Three hundred and fourteen CLD patients who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatic magnetic resonance imaging were stratified into three groups: nonadvanced CLD (n = 116), compensated advanced CLD (n = 120), and decompensated advanced CLD (n = 78) groups. The liver-to-portal vein contrast ratio (LPC) and liver-spleen contrast ratio (LSC) at the hepatobiliary phase were measured. The value of LPC for predicting hepatic decompensation and transplant-free survival was assessed using Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of LPC was significantly better than LSC in evaluating the severity of CLD. During a median follow-up period of 53.0 months, the LPC was a significant predictor for hepatic decompensation (p < 0.001) in patients with compensated advanced CLD. The predictive performance of LPC was higher than that of the model for end-stage liver disease score (p = 0.006). With the optimal cut-off value, patients with LPC ≤ 0.98 had a higher cumulative incidence of hepatic decompensation than patients with LPC > 0.98 (p < 0.001). The LPC was also a significant predictive factor for transplant-free survival in patients with compensated advanced CLD (p = 0.007) and those with decompensated advanced CLD (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced portal vein imaging at the hepatobiliary phase obtained with gadobenate dimeglumine is a valuable imaging biomarker for predicting hepatic decompensation and transplant-free survival in CLD patients.

KEY POINTS

• The liver-to-portal vein contrast ratio (LPC) significantly outperformed liver-spleen contrast ratio in evaluating the severity of chronic liver disease. • The LPC was a significant predictor for hepatic decompensation in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease. • The LPC was a significant predictor for transplant-free survival in patients with compensated and those with decompensated advanced chronic liver disease.

HCC or Something Else? Frequency of Various Benign and Malignant Etiologies in Cirrhotic Patients with Newly Detected Focal Liver Lesions in Relation to Different Clinical and Sonographic Parameters

Background and Aims: To investigate the frequency of different benign and malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) in relation to clinical and sonographic features among patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and newly detected FLLs. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 225 cirrhotic patients with newly detected FLLs who underwent hepatic ultrasound (US) examinations at our university hospital from 2011 to 2022. The diagnosis of FLLs was based on histology and/or consensus radiological criteria, in accordance with the current diagnostic guidelines. The FLLs were classified into benign (bFLLs) or malignant (mFLLs) lesions and the latter group was subclassified into HCC and non-HCC mFLLs. The frequency, clinical parameters, and sonographic features of the different groups were examined and compared. Results: Of the 225 FLLs, 154 (68.4%) were mFLLs and 71 (31.6%) bFLLs. HCC was the most frequent subcategory of FLLs (132; 58.7%). There were (22; 9.8%) non-HCC mFLLs with 11 (4.9%) metastases and 11 (4.9%) non-HCC primary liver tumors. Regenerative nodules (RNs) were the most frequent form of bFLLs (25; 11.1%), followed by simple cysts (22; 9.8%) and hemangiomas (14; 6.2%). The other bFLLs (10; 14.1%) were fat deposition/sparing (5), hematomas (2), abscesses (2), and echinococcal cysts (1). The distribution of bFLLs and HCC and non-HCC mFLLs varied significantly according to the clinical scenarios. HCC mFLLs were more frequent in males (p = 0.001), in those with no history of active non-hepatic primary malignant disease (NHPMD) (p < 0.001), in those with a hepatitis B or C etiology of LC (p = 0.002), when located in the right lobe (p = 0.008), and when portal vein thrombosis was present (p = 0.03). Conclusion: In cirrhotic patients with newly detected FLLs, the non-HCC etiology was more frequently diagnosed in lesions that were located in the left lobe, in females, and in patients with a history of active NHPMD. Thus, the lower frequency of HCC in the abovementioned groups demonstrated that a cautious implementation of the current consensus radiological criteria would be required for these groups, particularly in patients with an active NHPMD, given the fact that the consensus criteria were not validated in these populations. A more active diagnostic approach may ultimately be needed for these patients. Large prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Focal Liver Lesion MRI Feature Identification Using Efficientnet and MONAI: A Feasibility Study

Liver tumors constitute a major part of the global disease burden, often making regular imaging follow-up necessary. Recently, deep learning (DL) has increasingly been applied in this research area. How these methods could facilitate report writing is still a question, which our study aims to address by assessing multiple DL methods using the Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence (MONAI) framework, which may provide clinicians with preliminary information about a given liver lesion. For this purpose, we collected 2274 three-dimensional images of lesions, which we cropped from gadoxetate disodium enhanced T1w, native T1w, and T2w magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. After we performed training and validation using 202 and 65 lesions, we selected the best performing model to predict features of lesions from our in-house test dataset containing 112 lesions. The model (EfficientNetB0) predicted 10 features in the test set with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (standard deviation), sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value of 0.84 (0.1), 0.78 (0.14), 0.86 (0.08), 0.89 (0.08) and 0.71 (0.17), respectively. These results suggest that AI methods may assist less experienced residents or radiologists in liver MRI reporting of focal liver lesions.

Added value of enhanced CT on LR-3 and LR-4 observation of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI for the diagnosis of HCC: are CT and MR washout features interchangeable?

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the use of portal venous or delayed phase CT as an alternative to estimate washout for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in combination with other features.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 226 observations (n = 162 patients) at high risk for HCC imaged with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and enhanced liver CT between March 2015 and March 2018. Two radiologists independently evaluated two sets of images and assigned the final Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories by consensus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. LR-1, LR-2, LR-5, and LR-M were excluded from the study.The observations were divided using different criteria for washout: hypointensity on the portal venous phase (PVP) at MRI (criteria 1), hypointensity on PVP at MRI and/or hypoattenuation on the PVP/delayed phase at dynamic CT (criteria 2), and hypointensity on the PVP and/or hepatobiliary phase at MRI (criteria 3). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of HCC were analyzed for each criterion.

RESULTS

Using gadoxetic acid-enhanced, 226 lesions were diagnosed as LR-3 or LR-4 by LI-RADS. Among them, 98 and 152 had "washout" at criteria 1 and 2, respectively. For the diagnosis of HCC, criteria 2 and 3 showed significantly higher sensitivities (67.3 and 92.5%, respectively) compared with criteria 1 (35.5%) (p < 0.001). The specificity of criteria 3 (13%) was significantly lower than those of criteria 1 and 2 (40.7% and 38.4%, respectively, p < 0.001). The specificities between criteria 1 and 2 were not statistically different (p = 0.427).

CONCLUSION

Although the LI-RADS lexicon does not permit the interchange of image features among various image modalities, the sensitivity of HCC diagnosis could be improved without any decrease in specificity by adding CT image washout features.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Although the LI-RADS lexicon does not permit the interchange of image features among various image modalities, complementary use of dynamic CT in LR-3 or LR-4 categories on the basis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may contribute to major imaging feature.

CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS Major Features Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) assigns a risk category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to imaging observations. Establishing the contributions of major features can inform the diagnostic algorithm. Purpose To perform a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to establish the probability of HCC for each LI-RADS major feature using CT/MRI and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) LI-RADS in patients at high risk for HCC. Materials and Methods Multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were searched for studies from January 2014 to September 2019 that evaluated the accuracy of CT, MRI, and CEUS for HCC detection using LI-RADS (CT/MRI LI-RADS, versions 2014, 2017, and 2018; CEUS LI-RADS, versions 2016 and 2017). Data were centralized. Clustering was addressed at the study and patient levels using mixed models. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were determined for each major feature using multivariable stepwise logistic regression. Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42020164486). Results A total of 32 studies were included, with 1170 CT observations, 3341 MRI observations, and 853 CEUS observations. At multivariable analysis of CT/MRI LI-RADS, all major features were associated with HCC, except threshold growth (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 0.7, 3.6; P = .07). Nonperipheral washout (OR, 13.2; 95% CI: 9.0, 19.2; P = .01) and nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (OR, 10.3; 95% CI: 6.7, 15.6; P = .01) had stronger associations with HCC than enhancing capsule (OR, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.5; P = .03). On CEUS images, APHE (OR, 7.3; 95% CI: 4.6, 11.5; P = .01), late and mild washout (OR, 4.1; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6; P = .01), and size of at least 20 mm (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.5; P = .04) were associated with HCC. Twenty-five studies (78%) had high risk of bias due to reporting ambiguity or study design flaws. Conclusion Most Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System major features had different independent associations with hepatocellular carcinoma; for CT/MRI, arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout had the strongest associations, whereas threshold growth had no association. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Imaging Diagnosis of HCC: Future directions with special emphasis on hepatobiliary MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a unique cancer entity that can be noninvasively diagnosed using imaging modalities without pathologic confirmation. In 2018, several major guidelines for HCC were updated to include hepatobiliary contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (HBA-MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as major imaging modalities for HCC diagnosis. HBA-MRI enables the achievement of high sensitivity in HCC detection using the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). CEUS is another imaging modality with real-time imaging capability, and it is reported to be useful as a second-line modality to increase sensitivity without losing specificity for HCC diagnosis. However, until now, there is an unsolved discrepancy among guidelines on whether to accept “HBP hypointensity” as a definite diagnostic criterion for HCC or include CEUS in the diagnostic algorithm for HCC diagnosis. Furthermore, there is variability in terminology and inconsistencies in the definition of imaging findings among guidelines; therefore, there is an unmet need for the development of a standardized lexicon. In this article, we review the performance and limitations of HBA-MRI and CEUS after guideline updates in 2018 and briefly introduce some future aspects of imaging-based HCC diagnosis.

Comparison of Gadobenate-Enhanced MRI and Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using LI-RADS Version 2018: A Prospective Intraindividual Randomized Study

Background: Gadobenate and gadoxetate demonstrate different degrees of intracellular accumulation within hepatocytes, potentially impacting these agents' relative performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. Objective: To perform an intraindividual comparison of gadobenate-enhanced MRI and gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for detection of HCC, and to assess the impact of inclusion of hepatobiliary phase images on HCC detection for both agents. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 126 patients (112 men, 14 women; mean age 52.3 years) at high risk for HCC who consented to undergo two 3-T liver MRI examinations [one using gadobenate (0.05 mmol/kg), one using gadoxetate (0.025 mmol/kg)], separated by 7-14 days. The order of the two contrast agents was randomized. All examinations included post-contrast dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images (120 minutes for gadobenate; 20 minutes for gadoxetate). Three radiologists independently reviewed the gadobenate and gadoxetate examinations in separate sessions and recorded the location of detected observations. Observations were classified using LI-RADS version 2018 and using a LI-RADS modification whereby hepatobiliary phase hypointensity may upgrade observations from LR-4 to LR-5. Observations classified as LR-5 were considered positive interpretations for HCC. Diagnostic performance for histologically confirmed HCC (n=96) was assessed. Results: Across readers, sensitivity for HCC using dynamic images alone was 74.0%-80.2% for gadobenate versus 54.2%-67.7% for gadoexetate and using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images was 82.1%-87.4% for gadobenate versus 66.3%-81.1% for gadoxetate. For HCCs measuring 1.0-2.0 cm, sensitivity using dynamic images alone was 61.9% (all readers) for gadobenate versus 38.1%-57.1% for gadoxetate and using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images was 76.2%-85.7% for gadobenate versus 52.4%-61.9% for gadoxetate. PPV for HCC ranged from 88.6%-97.4% across readers, agents, and image sets. Conclusion: Sensitivity for HCC was higher for gadobenate than for gadoxetate, whether using dynamic images alone or dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images; the improved sensitivity using gadobenate was more pronounced for small HCCs. While hepatobiliary phase images improved sensitivity for both agents, sensitivity of gadobenate using dynamic images alone compared favorably with that of gadoxetate using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images. Clinical Impact: The findings support gadobenate as a preferred agent over gadoxetate when performing liver MRI in patients at high risk for HCC.

Enhancing capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma: intra-individual comparison between CT and MRI with extracellular contrast agent

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to that of magnetic resonance imaging obtained with extracellular contrast agent (ECA-MRI) for the diagnosis of a tumor capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using histopathologic findings as the standard of reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with pathologically-proven resected HCCs with available preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and ECA-MRI examinations. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed contrast-enhanced CT and ECA-MRI examinations to assess the presence of an enhancing capsule. The histopathological analysis of resected specimens was used as reference for the diagnosis of a tumor capsule. The sensitivity and specificity of CT and ECA-MRI for the diagnosis of a tumor capsule were determined, and an intra-individual comparison of imaging modalities was performed using McNemar test. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Kappa test.

RESULTS

The study population included 199 patients (157 men, 42 women; mean age: 61.3 ± 13.0 [SD] years) with 210 HCCs (mean size 56.7 ± 43.7 [SD] mm). A tumor capsule was present in 157/210 (74.8%) HCCs at histopathologic analysis. Capsule enhancement was more frequently visualized on ECA-MRI (R1, 68.6%; R2, 71.9%) than on CT (R1, 44.3%, P < 0.001; R2, 47.6%, P < 0.001). The sensitivity of ECA-MRI was better for the diagnosis of histopathological tumor capsule (R1, 76.4%; R2, 79.6%; P < 0.001), while CT had a greater specificity (R1, 84.9%; R2, 83.0%; P < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was moderate both on CT (kappa = 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.66) and ECA-MRI (kappa = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.45-0.70).

CONCLUSION

Capsule enhancement was more frequently visualized on ECA-MRI than on CT. The sensitivity of ECA-MRI was greater than that of CT, but the specificity of CT was better than that of ECA-MRI.

A Semi-Automatic Step-by-Step Expert-Guided LI-RADS Grading System Based on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI

PURPOSE

Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) classification, especially the identification of LR-3 to 5 lesions with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) probability, is of great significance to treatment strategy determination. We aimed to develop a semi-automatic LI-RADS grading system on multiphase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using deep convolutional neural networks (CNN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An internal data set of 439 patients and external data set of 71 patients with suspected HCC were included and underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. The expert-guided LI-RADS grading system consisted of four deep 3D CNN models including a tumor segmentation model for automatic diameter estimation and three classification models of LI-RADS major features including arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE), washout and enhancing capsule. An end-to-end learning system comprising single deep CNN model that directly classified the LI-RADS grade was developed for comparison.

RESULTS

On internal testing set, the segmentation model reached a mean dice of 0.84, with the accuracy of mapped diameter intervals as 82.7% (95% CI: 74.4%, 91.7%). The area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.941 (95% CI: 0.914, 0.961), 0.859 (95% CI: 0.823, 0.890) and 0.712 (95% CI: 0.668, 0.754) for APHE, washout and capsule, respectively. The expert-guided system significantly outperformed the end-to-end system with a LI-RADS grading accuracy of 68.3% (95% CI: 60.8%, 76.5%) vs 55.6% (95% CI: 48.8%, 63.0%) (P<0.0001). On external testing set, the accuracy of mapped diameter intervals was 91.5% (95% CI: 81.9%, 100.0%). The AUCs were 0.792 (95% CI: 0.745, 0.833), 0.654 (95% CI: 0.602, 0.703) and 0.658 (95% CI: 0.606, 0.707) for APHE, washout and capsule, respectively. The expert-guided system achieved an overall grading accuracy of 66.2% (95% CI: 58.0%, 75.2%), significantly higher than the end-to-end system of 50.1% (95% CI: 43.1%, 58.1%) (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We developed a semi-automatic step-by-step expert-guided LI-RADS grading system (LR-3 to 5), superior to the conventional end-to-end learning system. This deep learning-based system may improve workflow efficiency for HCC diagnosis in clinical practice.

The role of lesion hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI as an additional major imaging feature for HCC classification using LI-RADS v2018 criteria

OBJECTIVES

To determine the value of lesion hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI as an additional major imaging feature for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.

METHODS

Between March 2016 and August 2018, 235 patients with 250 hepatic nodules at high risk of HCC underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the imaging features and classified the nodules based on LI-RADS v2018 criteria, and their consensus data were used to calculate the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS categories. Two modified LI-RADS definitions were as follows: (1) LI-RADS-m1: HBP hypointensity as an additional major feature; (2) LI-RADS-m2: HBP hypointensity as an alternative to "enhancing capsule" as an additional major feature. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 categories was compared using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 classification using original LI-RADS v2018 criteria were 78.1% and 96.3%, respectively. Significantly improved sensitivity (82.7%; p = 0.004) with unchanged specificity (96.3%; p = 1.00) was seen for LR-5 classification using LI-RADS-m1. Similar sensitivity and specificity (82.7% and 96.3%, respectively) were also seen using LI-RADS-m2. Significantly improved sensitivity (79.5% vs. 64.0%; p = 0.031) with unchanged specificity (96.2% vs. 96.2%, p = 1.00) was seen using both LI-RADS-m1 and LI-RADS-m2 compared to the original LI-RADS v2018 for 39 HCC nodules measuring 10-19 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesion hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced HBP MRI may improve sensitivity for LR-5 classification beyond that achievable using conventional LI-RADS v2018 criteria. Lesion hypointensity may prove a suitable alternative imaging feature to enhancing capsule for accurate LR-5 classification.

KEY POINTS

• Including lesion hypointensity in the HBP as an additional major feature improved sensitivity for LR-5 classification on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. • Lesion hypointensity in the HBP can replace "enhancing capsule" as an additional major feature for LR-5 classification without impairing specificity.

Intraindividual Comparison of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Washout between MRIs with Hepatobiliary and Extracellular Contrast Agents

Objective

To intraindividually compare hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) washout between MRIs using hepatobiliary agent (HBA) and extracellular agent (ECA).

Materials and Methods

This study included 114 prospectively enrolled patients with chronic liver disease (mean age, 55 ± 9 years; 94 men) who underwent both HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI before surgical resection for HCC between November 2016 and May 2019. For 114 HCCs, the lesion-to-liver visual signal intensity ratio (SIR) using a 5-point scale (−2 to +2) was evaluated in each phase. Washout was defined as negative visual SIR with temporal reduction of visual SIR from the arterial phase. Illusional washout (IW) was defined as a visual SIR of 0 with an enhancing capsule. The frequency of washout and MRI sensitivity for HCC using LR-5 or its modifications were compared between HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI. Subgroup analysis was performed according to lesion size (< 20 mm or ≥ 20 mm).

Results

The frequency of portal venous phase (PP) washout with HBA-MRI was comparable to that of delayed phase (DP) washout with ECA-MRI (77.2% [88/114] vs. 68.4% [78/114]; p = 0.134). The frequencies were also comparable when IW was allowed (79.8% [91/114] for HBA-MRI vs. 81.6% [93/114] for ECA-MRI; p = 0.845). The sensitivities for HCC of LR-5 (using PP or DP washout) were comparable between HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI (78.1% [89/114] vs. 73.7% [84/114]; p = 0.458). In HCCs < 20 mm, the sensitivity of LR-5 was higher on HBA-MRI than on ECA-MRI (70.8% [34/48] vs. 50.0% [24/48]; p = 0.034). The sensitivity was similar to each other if IW was added to LR-5 (72.9% [35/48] for HBA-MRI vs. 70.8% [34/48] for ECA-MRI; p > 0.999).

Conclusion

Extracellular phase washout for HCC diagnosis was comparable between MRIs with both contrast agents, except for tumors < 20 mm. Adding IW could improve the sensitivity for HCC on ECA-MRI in tumors < 20 mm.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Liver Disease

The liver fibrosis stage is the most important clinical determinate of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic liver diseases. With newer therapies, liver fibrosis can be stabilized and possibly reversed, thus accurate diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis are clinically important. Ultrasound, CT, and conventional MRI can be used to establish the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis but have limited utility for assessing earlier stages of fibrosis. Elastography-based ultrasound and MRI techniques are more useful for assessment of precirrhotic hepatic fibrosis. In patients with advanced fibrosis at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ultrasound is the surveillance modality recommended by international guidelines in nearly all circumstances. However, in patients in whom ultrasound does not assess the liver well, including those with severe steatosis or obesity, multiphase CT or MRI may have a role in surveillance for HCC. Both multiphase CT and MRI can be used for continued surveillance in patients with a history of HCC, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound may have an emerging role in this setting. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categorizes observations from imaging analyses of high-risk patients based on the level of suspicion for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and overall malignancy. The categories range from definitely benign (LR-1) to definitely HCC (LR-5), malignancy (LR-M), or tumor in vein (LR-TIV) based on findings from computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. However, the actual percentage of HCC and overall malignancy within each LI-RADS category is not known. We performed a systematic review to determine the percentage of observations in each LI-RADS category for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging that are HCCs or malignancies.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus databases from 2014 through 2018 for studies that reported the percentage of observations in each LI-RADS v2014 and v2017 category that were confirmed as HCCs or other malignancies based on pathology, follow-up imaging analyses, or response to treatment (reference standard). Data were assessed on a per-observation basis. Random-effects models were used to determine the pooled percentages of HCC and overall malignancy for each LI-RADS category. Differences between categories were compared by analysis of variance of logit-transformed percentage of HCC and overall malignancy. Risk of bias and concerns about applicability were assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool.

RESULTS

Of 454 studies identified, 17 (all retrospective studies) were included in the final analysis, consisting of 2760 patients, 3556 observations, and 2482 HCCs. The pooled percentages of observations confirmed as HCC and overall malignancy, respectively, were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92%-96%) and 97% (95% CI 95%-99%) for LR-5, 74% (95% CI 67%-80%) and 80% (95% CI 75%-85%) for LR-4, 38% (95% CI 31%-45%) and 40% (95% CI 31%-50%) for LR-3, 13% (95% CI 8%-22%) and 14% (95% CI 9%-21%) for LR-2, 79% (95% CI 63%-89%) and 92% (95% CI 77%-98%) for LR-TIV, and 36% (95% CI 26%-48%) and 93% (95% CI 87%-97%) for LR-M. No malignancies were found in the LR-1 group. The percentage of HCCs and overall malignancies confirmed differed significantly among LR groups 2-5 (P < .00001). Patient selection was the most frequent factor that affected bias risk, because of verification bias and case-control study design.

CONCLUSIONS

In a systematic review, we found that increasing LI-RADS categories contained increasing percentages of HCCs and overall malignancy based on reference standard confirmation. Of observations categorized as LR-M, 93% were malignancies and 36% were confirmed as HCCs. The percentage of HCCs found in the LR-2 and LR-3 categories indicate the need for a more active management strategy than currently recommended. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings. PROSPERO number CRD42018087441.

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is composed of four individual algorithms intended to standardize the lexicon, as well as reporting and care, in patients with or at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in the context of surveillance with US; diagnosis with CT, MRI, or contrast material-enhanced US; and assessment of treatment response with CT or MRI. This report provides a broad overview of LI-RADS, including its historic development, relationship to other imaging guidelines, composition, aims, and future directions. In addition, readers will understand the motivation for and key components of the 2018 update.

Retrospective validation of a new diagnostic criterion for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: can hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase be used as an alternative to washout with the aid of ancillary features?

OBJECTIVES

To validate new diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) using hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) as an alternative to washout in combination with ancillary features.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 288 patients at high risk for HCC with 387 nodules (HCCs, n=292; non-HCCs, n=95) showing arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) ≥1 cm on Gd-EOB-MRI. Imaging diagnoses of HCCs were made using different criteria: APHE plus hypointensity on the portal venous phase (PVP) (criterion 1), APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or transitional phase (TP) (criterion 2), APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or TP and/or HBP (criterion 3), and criterion 3 plus non-LR-1/2/M according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 considering ancillary features (criterion 4). Sensitivities and specificities of those criteria were compared using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Among diagnostic criteria for HCCs, criteria 3 and 4 showed significantly higher sensitivities (93.8% and 92.5%, respectively) than criteria 1 and 2 (70.9% and 86.6%, respectively) (p values <0.001). The specificity of criterion 4 (87.4%) was shown to be significantly higher than that of criterion 3 (48.4%, p<0.001), albeit comparable to criterion 2 (86.3%, p>0.999) and significantly lower than criterion 1 (97.9%, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In the non-invasive diagnosis of HCCs on Gd-EOB-MRI, HBP hypointensity may be used as an alternative to washout enabling a highly sensitive diagnosis with little loss in specificity if it is used after excluding nodules considered to be benignities or non-HCC malignancies based on characteristic imaging features.

KEY POINTS

• Gd-EOB-MRI enhancement and ancillary features can be used to diagnose HCC. • Exclusion of LR-1/2/M improves specificity when HBP hypointensity is used.