1
|
Kurup AN, Jennings JW, Tutton S, Tam AL, Kelekis A, Wood BJ, Dupuy DE, Napoli A, Park SS, Robinson SI, Rose PS, Soulen MC, White SB, Callstrom MR. Musculoskeletal Oncologic Interventions: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology and Society of Interventional Oncology Research Consensus Panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021; 32:1089.e1-1089.e9. [PMID: 34210477 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Musculoskeletal interventions are increasingly used with palliative and curative intent in the multidisciplinary treatment of oncology patients with bone and soft-tissue tumors. There is an unmet need for high-quality evidence to guide broader application and adoption of minimally invasive interventional technologies to treat these patients. Therefore, the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation and the Society of Interventional Oncology collaborated to convene a research consensus panel to prioritize a research agenda addressing the gaps in the current evidence. This article summarizes the panel's proceedings and recommendations for future basic science and clinical investigation to chart the course for interventional oncology within the musculoskeletal system. Key questions that emerged addressed the effectiveness of ablation within specific patient populations, the effect of combination of ablation with radiotherapy and/or immunotherapy, and the potential of standardization of techniques, including modeling and monitoring, to improve the consistency and predictability of treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Nicholas Kurup
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN.
| | - Jack W Jennings
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sean Tutton
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Alda L Tam
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alexis Kelekis
- Department of Radiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Department of Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Damian E Dupuy
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Cape Cod Hospital, Hyannis, Massachusetts
| | - Alessandro Napoli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sean S Park
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Steven I Robinson
- Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Peter S Rose
- Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Michael C Soulen
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sarah B White
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Matthew R Callstrom
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seager M, Kumar S, Lim E, Munneke G, Bandula S, Walkden M. Renal cryoablation - a practical guide for interventional radiologists. Br J Radiol 2020; 94:20200854. [PMID: 32960674 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Renal cryoablation is a treatment option for early stage renal cell carcinomas with excellent oncological outcomes and low morbidity. This review outlines the technique of renal cryoablation and provides a guide for interventional radiologists on setting up an integrated service within a renal cancer network multidisciplinary setting. Patient selection and preparation, together with the technical aspects which ensure optimal oncological outcomes and avoid collateral damage to adjacent organs are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Seager
- Interventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shankar Kumar
- Interventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom.,Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma Lim
- Interventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom
| | - Graham Munneke
- Interventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Bandula
- Interventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom.,Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Miles Walkden
- Interventional Oncology Service, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, NW1 2BU, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Outcomes of Renal Tumors Treated by Image-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation: Immediate and 3- and 5-Year Outcomes at a Regional Center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215:242-247. [PMID: 32286877 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.22213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate and 3- and 5-year outcomes of patients with clinical stage T1 (cT1) biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated by image-guided percutaneous cryoablation at a regional interventional oncology center. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A prospectively maintained local interventional radiology database identified patients with cT1 RCC lesions that were treated by percutaneous cryoablation. Technical success, procedural complications (graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system), and the residual unablated tumor rate were collated. Local tumor progression-free survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS. A total of 180 patients with 185 separate cT1 RCC lesions were identified. Mean patient age was 68.4 years (range, 34.1-88.9 years) and 52 patients (28.9%) were women. There were 168 (90.8%) and 17 (9.2%) cT1a and cT1b lesions, respectively, with a mean lesion size of 28.5 mm (range, 11-58 mm). Technical success was achieved in 183 of 185 (98.9%) patients. The major complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ grade III) was 2.2% (four out of 185). Residual unablated tumor on the first follow-up scan was identified in four of 183 tumors (2.2%). Estimated local tumor progression-free survival at 3 and 5 years was 98.3% and 94.9%, respectively. No distant metastases or deaths attributable to RCC occurred. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before the procedure was 72.4 ± 18.5 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m2 and this was not statistically significantly different after the procedure (69.7 ± 18.8 mL/min/1.73 m2), at 1 year (70.7 ± 16.4 mL/min/1.73 m2), or at 2 years (69.8 ± 18.9 mL/min/1.73 m2) (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION. These data add to the accumulating evidence that image-guided cryoablation is an efficacious treatment for selected cT1 RCC with a low complication rate and ro bust 3- and 5-year outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Young S, Golzarian J, Anderson JK. Thermal Ablation of T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Clinical Evidence. Semin Intervent Radiol 2019; 36:367-373. [PMID: 31798209 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is most commonly diagnosed at an early (T1a) stage and is typically amenable to several effective treatments. The current gold standard therapy is partial nephrectomy, given its decreased morbidity and similar oncologic outcomes when compared with radical nephrectomy. Thermal ablation is an evolving definitive therapy for T1a RCC which is even less invasive than partial nephrectomy. This article reviews the evidence for thermal ablation in the treatment of T1a RCC and compares outcomes of existing ablation modalities with surgical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamar Young
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- Department of Radiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - J Kyle Anderson
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lum MA, Shah SB, Durack JC, Nikolovski I. Imaging of Small Renal Masses before and after Thermal Ablation. Radiographics 2019; 39:2134-2145. [PMID: 31560613 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019190083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Thermal ablation of small renal masses is increasingly accepted as an alternative to partial nephrectomy, particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities. Many professional societies support this alternate treatment with updated guidelines. Before performing thermal ablation, it is important to stratify risk and assess technical feasibility by evaluating tumor imaging features such as size, location, and centrality. Routine postablation imaging with CT or MRI is necessary for assessment of residual or recurrent tumor, evidence of complications, or new renal masses outside the ablation zone. The normal spectrum and evolution of findings at CT and MRI include a halo appearance of the ablation zone, ablation zone contraction, and ablation zone calcifications. Tumor recurrence frequently manifests at CT or MRI as new nodular enhancement at the periphery of an expanding ablation zone, although it is normal for the ablation zone to enlarge within the first few months. Recognizing early tumor recurrence is important, as small renal masses are often easily treated with repeat ablations. Potential complications of thermal ablation include vascular injury, urine leak, ureteral stricture, nerve injury, and bowel perforation. The risk of these complications may be related to tumor size and location.©RSNA, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Lum
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| | - Shreena B Shah
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| | - Jeremy C Durack
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| | - Ines Nikolovski
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| |
Collapse
|