Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound after Endovascular Aortic Repair: Supplement and Potential Substitute for CT in Early- and Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Endoleaks are the most common complication after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is presently the golden standard for lifelong surveillance after EVAR. Several studies and meta-analyses have shown contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to be a good alternative. The main goal of our study was to further validate the inclusion of CEUS in follow-up examination protocols for the systematic surveillance after EVAR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who had received CEUS as part of their routine surveillance after EVAR at our center was conducted. Detection rate and classification of endoleak types were compared between available postinterventional CTA/magnetic resonance angiography and follow-up CEUS examinations. Last preinterventional CTAs before EVAR served as baselines with focus on potential cofactors such as age, body mass index, maximum aortic aneurysm diameters, endoleak orientation, and distance-to-surface influencing detection rates and classification.

RESULTS

In total, 101 patients were included in the analysis. Forty-four endoleaks (43.5% of cases) were detected by either initial CEUS or CTA, mostly type II (37.6% of the included patients). Initial CEUS showed an endoleak sensitivity of 91.2%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 84.6%. No covariate with an influence on the correct classification could be identified either for CEUS or CT.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS should be considered a valid complementary method to CTA in the lifelong surveillance after EVAR. As type II endoleaks seem to be a common early-term, sometimes spontaneously resolving complication that can potentially be missed by CTA, we suggest combined follow-up protocols including CEUS in the early on postinterventional assessment.

Bicolor K-edge spectral photon-counting CT imaging for the diagnosis of thoracic endoleaks: A dynamic phantom study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of identifying and characterizing the three most common types of endoleaks within a thoracic aorta aneurysm model using bicolor K-edge imaging with a spectral photon-counting computing tomography (SPCCT) system in combination with a biphasic contrast agent injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three types of thoracic endoleaks (type 1, 2 and 3) were created in a dynamic anthropomorphic thoracic aorta phantom. Protocol consisted in an injection of an iodinated contrast material followed 80 seconds after an injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). The phantom was scanned using a clinical prototype SPCCT during bicolor phase imaging consisting in an early distribution of GBCA and a late distribution of iodine. Conventional and spectral images were reconstructed for differentiating between the contrast agents and measuring their respective attenuation values and concentrations inside and outside the stent graft.

RESULTS

Conventional images failed to provide specific dynamic imaging contrast agents in the aneurysmal sac and outside the stent graft while spectral images differentiated their specific distribution. In type 1 and 3 thoracic endoleaks, GBCA concentration was measured outside the stent graft at 6.1 ± 3.7 (standard deviation [SD]) mg/mL and 6.0 ± 4.0 (SD) mg/mL, respectively, in favor of an early blood flow. In type 2 thoracic endoleak, iodine was measured outside the stent graft at 24.3 ± 5.5 (SD) mg/mL in favor of a late blood flow in the aneurysmal sac.

CONCLUSION

Bicolor K-edge imaging enabled SPCCT allows a bicolor characterization of thoracic aorta endoleaks in a single acquisition in combination with a biphasic contrast agent injection.

Utility of Dual-Energy CT in Abdominal Interventions

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is an emerging CT technique based on data acquisition at two different settings. Various postprocessing techniques generate different sets of images, each with unique advantages. With DECT, it is possible to obtain virtual unenhanced images from monochromatic reconstructions and attenuation maps of different elements, thereby improving the detection and characterization of a variety of lesions. Presently, DECT is widely used to evaluate pulmonary embolism, characterize abdominal masses, determine the composition of urinary calculi, and detect tophi in gout. CT angiography is an essential prerequisite for endovascular intervention. DECT allows a better quality of angiographic images with a lesser dose of contrast. Various postprocessing techniques in DECT also help in a better evaluation of response to locoregional therapy. Virtual noncontrast images and iodine map differentiate residual or recurrent tumors from intrinsically hyperdense materials. Superior metallic artifact reduction allows better evaluation of vascular injuries adjacent to bony fractured fragments or previously deployed embolization coils. In addition to metal artifacts reduction, virtual monochromatic spectral imaging could further mitigate metal artifacts during CT-guided biopsy, providing an improved depiction of lesions and safe and versatile access for long puncture pathways. This article reviews and illustrates the different applications of DECT in various abdominal interventions. Familiarity with the capabilities of DECT may help interventional radiologists to improve their practice and ameliorate patient care.

Experiência inicial com ultrassom Doppler com contraste por microbolhas em adição ao ultrassom Doppler convencional para seguimento de correção endovascular de aneurisma de aorta abdominal

Background

Microbubble contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an accurate diagnostic method for follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) that has been well-established in international studies. However, there are no Brazilian studies that focus on this follow-up method.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to report initial experience with CEUS at a tertiary hospital, comparing the findings of CEUS with those of conventional Doppler ultrasound (DUS), with the aim of determining whether addition of contrast to the standard ultrasonographic control protocol resulted in different findings.

Methods

From 2015 to 2017, 21 patients in follow-up after EVAR underwent DUS followed by CEUS. The findings of these examinations were analyzed in terms of identification of complications and their capacity to identify the origin of endoleaks.

Results

There was evidence of complications in 10 of the 21 cases examined: seven patients exhibited endoleaks (33.3%); two patients exhibited stenosis of a branch of the endograft (9.52%); and one patient exhibited a dissection involving the external iliac artery (4.76%). In the 21 patients assessed, combined use of both methods identified 10 cases of post-EVAR complications. In six of the seven cases of endoleaks (85.71%), use of the methods in combination was capable of identifying the origin of endoleakage. DUS alone failed to identify endoleaks in two cases (28.5%) and identified doubtful findings in another two cases (28.5%), in which diagnostic definition was achieved after employing CEUS.

Conclusions

CEUS is a technique that is easy to perform and provides additional support for follow-up of infrarenal EVAR.

Best Practice Guidelines: Imaging Surveillance After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE. Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the preferred treatment modality. Surveillance imaging after EVAR detects potential complications. The most common complication is endoleak, which can predispose the aorta to rupture. This article provides a comprehensive and evidence-based review regarding surveillance imaging after EVAR to help readers understand current societal guidelines, guide institutional protocols, and provide a framework to facilitate safe, cost-effective, and clinically relevant imaging of patients after EVAR. CONCLUSION. Lifelong surveillance is necessary for patients who have undergone EVAR. Triple-phase CT angiography (CTA) within 30 days after EVAR is necessary to triage patients appropriately and guide future imaging. Patients without endoleak on initial CTA can be monitored with annual duplex ultrasound. Patients with type I or type III endoleaks should be referred for intervention. Patients with type II and type V endoleaks should be referred for intervention only if the sac diameter grows by more than 1 cm. MR angiography should be used primarily as a problem-solving modality or in patients with contraindications to contrast media or radiation. Strong consideration should be given to more frequent surveillance in patients who have undergone EVAR who have aneurysms with a hostile neck anatomy compared with those patients with favorable neck anatomy.

Vascular CT and MRI: a practical guide to imaging protocols

Non-invasive cross-sectional imaging techniques play a crucial role in the assessment of the varied manifestations of vascular disease. Vascular imaging encompasses a wide variety of pathology. Designing vascular imaging protocols can be challenging owing to the non-uniform velocity of blood in the aorta, differences in cardiac output between patients, and the effect of different disease states on blood flow. In this review, we provide the rationale behind—and a practical guide to—designing and implementing straightforward vascular computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols.

Teaching Points

• There is a wide range of vascular pathologies requiring bespoke imaging protocols.

• Variations in cardiac output and non-uniform blood velocity complicate vascular imaging.

• Contrast media dose, injection rate and duration affect arterial enhancement in CTA.

• Iterative CT reconstruction can improve image quality and reduce radiation dose.

• MRA is of particular value when imaging small arteries and venous studies.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms revisited: MDCT with multiplanar reconstructions for identifying indicators of instability in the pre- and postoperative patient

Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is commonly a fatal event. Multidetector computed tomographic (CT) signs of frank aortic rupture are usually readily apparent and widely understood. However, diagnosing an impending aortic rupture on the basis of imaging findings can prove more difficult. CT is the primary modality used for serial imaging in patients with aortic aneurysm and may show findings indicative of aortic instability. Therefore, it is critical that radiologists be familiar with the CT findings of aortic instability to avert the potential complications of hemorrhage, end organ or limb ischemia, and death. Various preoperative CT indicators have been previously described in both research investigations and review articles. A large baseline aneurysm size and a rapid increase in size over time are associated with a higher risk for rupture. The importance of obtaining accurate measurements with multiplanar reconstructions and the role of new semiautomated tools for obtaining accurate, reproducible measurements are discussed. Additional CT findings that reflect aortic aneurysm instability include luminal expansion with lysis of thrombus, intramural hemorrhage (ie, the crescent sign), periaortic hemorrhage, a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and contained rupture (ie, the draped aorta sign). After open or endovascular aneurysm repair, CT is routinely used to monitor for graft complications. In this setting, radiologists should understand that the presence of an endoluminal stent or surgical graft does not preclude aortic rupture. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Systolic Sac Pressure Index for the Prediction of Persistent Type II Endoleak for 12 Months After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between the systolic sac pressure index (SPI) and the presence of endoleaks 12 months after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a single-center prospective trial of consecutively treated patients. SPI (calculated as systolic sac pressure/systolic aortic pressure) was measured by catheterization immediately after EVAR. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was scheduled 12 months after EVAR to detect possible endoleaks.

RESULTS

Data were available for 34 patients who underwent EVAR for an AAA. Persisting type II endoleak was found in 8 patients (endoleak-positive group) but not in the other 26 patients (endoleak-negative group). The mean ± standard deviation SPI was significantly greater in the endoleak-positive group than in the endoleak-negative group (0.692 ± 0.048 vs. 0.505 ± 0.081, respectively; P = .001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that an SPI of 0.638 was the optimum cutoff value for predicting a persistent endoleak at 12 months with high accuracy (0.971; 33/34), sensitivity (1.00), and specificity (0.962) values. The mean change in AAA diameter was -4.28 ± 5.03 mm and 2.22 ± 4.54 mm in patients with SPI of <0.638 or ≥0.638, respectively (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with an SPI of ≥0.638 immediately after EVAR were more likely to have a persistent type II endoleak at 12 months with an accuracy of 0.971, and showed increases in aneurysm sac diameter compared with patients with an SPI of <0.638.

MDCT of endoleaks following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Endovascular aneurysm repair has been used to repair abdominal aortic aneurysms but necessitates surveillance to diagnose the delayed possibility of endoleak formation. Multi-detector computer tomography (MDCT) of the abdomen is one imaging technique used to diagnose enlargement of the aneurysm sac that may be indicative of endoleaks. MDCT has a role in identifying the initial endoleak formation and providing signs suggestive of the specific endoleak subtype; thus it is necessary for radiologists to be familiar with the findings of endoleak seen on MDCT. In this pictorial review, we explore the various types of endoleaks and their appearance on MDCT.

Duplex Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for the Postoperative Follow-Up of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Where Do We Stand Now?

In the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has rapidly developed to be the preferred method for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with suitable anatomy. EVAR offers the advantage of lower perioperative mortality and morbidity but carries the cost of device-related complications such as endoleak, graft migration, graft thrombosis, and structural graft failure. These complications mandate a lifelong surveillance of EVAR patients and their endografts. The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the safety of color-duplex ultrasound (CDU) as compared with computed tomography (CT), based on the current literature, for post-EVAR surveillance. The post-EVAR follow-up modalities, CDU versus CT, are evaluated questioning three parameters: (1) accuracy of aneurysm size, (2) detection and classification of endoleaks, and (3) detection of stent-graft deformation. Studies comparing CDU with CT scan for investigation of post-EVAR complications have produced mixed results. Further and long-term research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of CDU versus CT, before CDU can be recommended as the primary imaging modality for EVAR surveillance, in place of CT for stable aneurysms.

CT angiography after 20 years: a transformation in cardiovascular disease characterization continues to advance

Through a marriage of spiral computed tomography (CT) and graphical volumetric image processing, CT angiography was born 20 years ago. Fueled by a series of technical innovations in CT and image processing, over the next 5-15 years, CT angiography toppled conventional angiography, the undisputed diagnostic reference standard for vascular disease for the prior 70 years, as the preferred modality for the diagnosis and characterization of most cardiovascular abnormalities. This review recounts the evolution of CT angiography from its development and early challenges to a maturing modality that has provided unique insights into cardiovascular disease characterization and management. Selected clinical challenges, which include acute aortic syndromes, peripheral vascular disease, aortic stent-graft and transcatheter aortic valve assessment, and coronary artery disease, are presented as contrasting examples of how CT angiography is changing our approach to cardiovascular disease diagnosis and management. Finally, the recently introduced capabilities for multispectral imaging, tissue perfusion imaging, and radiation dose reduction through iterative reconstruction are explored with consideration toward the continued refinement and advancement of CT angiography.

Dual-energy CT: vascular applications

OBJECTIVE

Dual-energy CT permits a variety of image reconstructions for the depiction and characterization of vascular disease. Techniques include visualization of low- and high-peak-kilovoltage spectra image datasets and also material-specific reconstructions combining both low- and high-peak-kilovoltage data.

CONCLUSION

This article focuses on four main vascular areas: the aorta, the major visceral, lower limb, and cervical arteries. For each territory, the current status, potential advantages, and limitations of these techniques are described.

Dual-energy CT: radiation dose aspects

OBJECTIVE

Various applications for dual-energy CT (DECT) have been investigated and have shown substantial clinical benefits. However, only limited data are available regarding the radiation dose associated with DECT imaging. The purpose of this article is to review the available literature regarding the radiation dose associated with DECT imaging applications in comparison with conventional single-energy CT techniques.

CONCLUSION

The rediscovery of DECT and the increasing availability of this technique on clinical CT systems have opened new dimensions for CT. The advanced spectral differentiation of materials within the human body as well as the selective visualization or subtraction of iodinated contrast material or xenon provides both advanced visualization of disease-specific molecular substrates as well as additional functional information within a single scan.

A multidetector tomography protocol for follow-up of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to improve the use of 64-channel multidetector computed tomography using lower doses of ionizing radiation during follow-up procedures in a series of patients with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

Thirty patients receiving 5 to 29 months of follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair were analyzed using a 64-channel multidetector computed tomography device by an exam that included pre-and postcontrast with both arterial and venous phases. Leak presence and type were classified based on the exam phase.

RESULTS

Endoleaks were identified in 8/30 of cases; the endoleaks in 3/8 of these cases were not visible in the arterial phases of the exams.

CONCLUSION

The authors conclude that multidetector computed tomography with pre-contrast and venous phases should be a part of the ongoing follow-up of patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The arterial phase can be excluded when the aneurism is stable or regresses. These findings permit a lower radiation dose without jeopardizing the correct diagnosis of an endoleak.

A importância do diagnóstico por imagem na classificação dos endoleaks como complicação do tratamento endovascular de aneurismas aórticos

OBJETIVO: Relatar uma série de casos de endoleaks, com descrição da classificação vigente. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Realizou-se um estudo retrospectivo dos endoleaks diagnosticados em nossa instituição, entre 2005 e 2009. Foram incluídos 20 casos, utilizados para ilustrar os diferentes tipos de endoleaks. RESULTADOS: Setenta por cento dos pacientes eram do sexo masculino. A idade variou entre 43 e 91 anos, média de 76,3 anos. Treze casos foram observados na aorta abdominal infrarrenal, quatro na aorta torácica, dois nas artérias ilíacas e um no território carotídeo. A ultrassonografia foi o método utilizado para o diagnóstico em 3 casos e a tomografia computadorizada, nos outros 17 casos. Classificação: tipo I, 60%; tipo II, 25%; tipo III, 15%. Não foram observados os demais tipos nesta série. CONCLUSÃO: O diagnóstico precoce e a correta classificação são fundamentais para o manejo adequado dos casos de endoleaks, tornando o conhecimento de seus subtipos conceito fundamental na formação do médico especialista em radiologia e diagnóstico por imagem e para o cirurgião vascular.

[Imaging of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)]

Endoleaks following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are common and present a diagnostic challenge in the follow-up after EVAR. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a promising new method for the diagnosis and follow-up of endoleaks. CEUS with SonoVue allows a rapid and non-invasive diagnosis in the follow-up after EVAR. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional ultrasound compared to the multislice CT angiography is estimated to be 33-63% and 63-93%, respectively. These values can be increased through the use of CEUS in up to 98-100% (sensitivity) and 82-93% (specificity). This article describes the etiology, classification and importance of different types of endoleaks. The value of CEUS in this clinical scenario will be discussed.

[Ultrasound imaging of the abdominal aorta]

Abnormalities of the abdominal aorta and the visceral vessels can represent a diagnostic challenge in patients with both acute and chronic clinical symptoms. In addition to the primary conventional examination using color-coded duplex ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with low mechanical index (low MI) may contribute to achieving a precise diagnosis. CEUS is a new and promising method in the diagnosis and follow-up of aortic and visceral artery lesions. Color-coded duplex ultrasound and CEUS with SonoVue(R) allow a rapid and non-invasive diagnosis especially in critically ill patients as these methods can readily be applied at the bedside. In this article the contribution of color-coded duplex ultrasound and CEUS as compared to multi-slice computed tomography angiography (MS-CTA) in various pathologies of the abdominal aorta and the visceral arteries will be addressed.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomographic angiography for surveillance of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

To compare diagnostic accuracy between contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) and computed tomographic (CT) angiography to detect changes in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size and endoleaks during follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2006 and December 2008, 83 patients were consecutively enrolled for contrast-enhanced US and CT angiography imaging during surveillance after EVAR, yielding 127 paired examinations. Comparative analysis was performed for the anteroposterior and transverse maximal diameters of the aneurysm sac and for the presence or absence of endoleak, as determined by US and CT angiography.

RESULTS

Contrast-enhanced US demonstrated significantly more endoleaks, predominantly of type II, compared with CT angiography (53% vs 22% of cases). The number of observed agreements was 77 of 127 (61%), indicating a low level of agreement (kappa value of 0.237). US was as accurate as CT angiography in the assessment of maximal aneurysm sac diameters, as shown by Bland-Altman analyses and low coefficients of variation (8.0% and 8.6%, respectively). The interobserver variability for AAA size measurement by US was low, given the interclass correlation coefficients of 0.99 and 0.98 for anteroposterior and transverse maximal diameters, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced US may be an alternative to CT angiography in the follow-up of patients after EVAR. As US reduces exposure to the biologic hazards associated with lifelong annual CT angiography, including cumulative radiation dose and nephrotoxic contrast agent load, contrast-enhanced US might be considered as a substitute for CT angiography in the surveillance of patients after EVAR.

Duplex Ultrasound Scanning (DUS) Versus Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) in the Follow-Up After EVAR

Introduction: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the gold standard follow-up modality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A potential alternative noninvasive and less expensive modality is duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS). Methods: We studied 314 follow-up paired scans (DUS and CTA) in 59 patients with EVAR. Results: Endoleak—Endoleak was detected in 23.7% patients. The sensitivity and specificity rates of DUS were 54% and 95.3%, respectively. All 9 endoleaks that needed secondary intervention were detected on DUS. Eight of those were identified within a year after EVAR. Sac size—The mean difference in maximum diameter between the DUS and CTA was ≤5 mm in 84.5% of cases and ≤10 mm in 97.1%. Graft patency—There was 100% agreement between CTA and DUS. Conclusions: Duplex ultrasound scanning was reliable as it detected all the leaks that needed reintervention after EVAR. Duplex ultrasound scanning showed similar results to CTA in detecting sac size and patency.

Type II endoleaks: when is intervention indicated and what is the index of suspicion for types I or III?

One of the principal reasons for failure of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the occurrence of endoleaks, which regardless of size or type can transmit systemic pressure to the aneurysm sac. There is little debate that type I endoleaks (poor proximal or distal sealing) are associated with continued risk of aneurysm rupture and require treatment. Similarly, with type III endoleak, there is agreement that the defect in the device needs to be addressed; however, what to do with type II endoleaks and their effect on long-term outcome are not so clear. Aneurysm sac change is a primary parameter for determining the presence of an endoleak and assessing its impact. While diameter measurement has been the most commonly used method for determining sac changes, volume measurement has now been proven superior for monitoring structural changes in the 3-dimensional sac. Determining the source of an endoleak and the direction of flow are necessary for proper classification; however, while computed tomographic angiography has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting endoleaks, it is limited in its ability to show the direction of flow. Contrast-enhanced duplex ultrasound, on the other hand, is better able to quantify flow and characterize endoleaks. Flow is evidence of pressure, and increasing intrasac pressure increases wall tension, thus inducing progressive aneurysm expansion until rupture. Hence, determining intrasac pressure is becoming a vital component of endoleak assessment. All endoleaks can create systemic pressure inside the aneurysm sac, and there are a variety of intrasac pressure transducers being evaluated to assess this effect. A clinical pathway for patients with suspected type II endoleaks is based on a combination of imaging and pressure measurements. Imaging alone requires at least two interval examinations to determine the trend, while pressure measurements give immediate reassurance or an indication to intervene. Although still under development, pressure measurement is destined for general use and will provide a scientific basis for the management of type II endoleaks.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: nonenhanced volumetric CT for follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical usefulness of volumetric analysis at nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) as the sole method with which to follow up endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and to identify endoleaks causing more than 2% volumetric increase from the previous volume determination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study had institutional review board approval. Images were reviewed retrospectively in a HIPAA-compliant manner for 230 CT studies in 70 patients (11 women, 59 men; mean age, 74 years) who underwent EVAR. The scannning protocol consisted of three steps: (a) contrast material-enhanced CT angiography before endovascular stent placement, (b) contrast-enhanced CT angiography 0-3 months after repair to depict immediate complications, and (c) nonenhanced CT at 3, 6, and 12 months after repair. At each follow-up visit, immediate aortic volume analysis was performed. If the interval volumetric change was 2% or less, no further imaging was performed. If the volume increased by more than 2% on the nonenhanced CT image, contrast-enhanced CT angiography was performed immediately to identify the suspected endoleak. Confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by using bootstrapping to account for repeated measurements in the same patients.

RESULTS

Mean volume decrease was -3.2% (95% CI: -4.7%, -1.9%) in intervals without occurrence of a clinically relevant endoleak (n = 183). Types I and III high-pressure endoleaks (n = 10) showed a 10.0% (95% CI: 5.0%, 18.2%) interval volumetric increase. Type II low-pressure endoleaks (n = 37) showed a 5.4% (95% CI: 4.6%, 6.2%) interval volumetric increase. Endoleaks associated with minimal aortic volume increase of less than 2% did not require any intervention. This protocol reduced radiation exposure by approximately 57%-82% in an average-sized patient.

CONCLUSION

Serial volumetric analysis of aortic aneurysm with nonenhanced CT serves as an adequate screening test for endoleak, causing volumetric increase of more than 2% from the volume seen at the previous examination.

Multidetector-row computed tomography angiography in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: evaluation of optimal timing of delayed phase imaging for the detection of low-flow endoleaks

PURPOSE

To evaluate the optimal timing of delayed phase imaging for detecting low-flow endoleaks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair underwent 1- and 6-month follow-up multidetector row computed tomography (CT) performed during unenhanced, arterial, and delayed phase. At 6-month follow-up, delayed phase imaging, focused on stent graft, was performed with a delay of 60 (early delayed enhanced phase) and 300 seconds (late delayed enhanced phase) after intravenous injection of 120 mL of iodinated nonionic contrast medium (iomeprol 300 mgI/mL, Iomeron), at a flow rate of 3 mL/s via an antecubital vein, with a detector-row configuration of 4 x 1-mm, a 1.25-mm slice width, and a pitch of 6. Six-month follow-up CT images were independently evaluated by 2 readers during 2 different reading sessions: sets A (unenhanced, arterial, and early delayed phase images) and B (unenhanced, arterial, and late delayed phase images). Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of both reading sessions were compared. The standard of reference was represented by the combined evaluation of 1- and 6-month CT scans.

RESULTS

At standard of reference, 24 of 58 patients had an endoleak classified as type 1 in 2 cases, type 2 in 21 cases, and type 3 in the last 1 case. Seven of 21 type 2 endoleaks were classified as low-flow endoleaks. Set A reading session, including early delayed enhanced phase, allowed the detection of 19 of 24 endoleaks (5 false-negative cases represented by low-flow endoleaks), whereas all endoleaks were detected during set B reading session, including late delayed enhanced phase. Differences between sets A and B in terms of sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For optimal multidetector CT detection of low-flow endoleaks in patients who underwent endovascular repair, delayed phase should be acquired 300 seconds after injection of contrast medium.

Endoleak detection and classification after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of CEUS over CTA

This paper focuses on the diagnostic value of CEUS in the detection and characterization of endoleaks in comparison with other imaging modalities, primary CDUS and CTA in the follow-up of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. CEUS is an interesting alternative technique because of its limited costs and lack of exposure to ionizing radiation. However, CTA cannot currently be substituted because it enables a more precise evaluation of aneurysm morphologic changes, aneurysm sac diameter, graft anchorage and integrity. CEUS could be used along with CTA when the latter reveals the presence of endoleak, to provide a better characterization of it taking advantage of the angiodynamic behavior of the contrast agent that permits an easier visualization of the agent flow into the sac. It could also be indicated when aneurysm diameter increases and CTA did not show sac reperfusion or to monitor type II endoleaks reducing the use of CTA with consequent reduction of costs and exposure to radiation.

Surveillance of patients post-endovascular aneurysm repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is increasingly being employed as an alternative to open surgical repair for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. The surveillance of patients post-EVAR has traditionally been carried out with regular computed tomographic scans which have in part been responsible for the high costs associated with this procedure. Duplex has been proposed as an alternative, but researchers have so far been unable to devise a standardised protocol for this surveillance. This review aims to provide a clear understanding of currently employed imaging modalities and discuss future surveillance possibilities for this patient group.

Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair1

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is evolving into a viable alternative to open surgical repair for many patients with abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Endoleak development is a complication of EVAR and represents one of the limitations of this procedure. Endoleaks represent blood flow outside the stent-graft lumen but within the aneurysm sac. Lifelong imaging surveillance of patients after EVAR is critical to detect endoleaks for the patient's benefit and to determine the long-term performance of the stent-graft. Although computed tomographic angiography is the most commonly used examination for imaging surveillance, magnetic resonance angiography, ultrasonography, and digital subtraction angiography all have a role in endoleak detection and management. This review will focus on imaging techniques used for endoleak detection and the role imaging surveillance plays in the overall care of the post-EVAR patient.

Endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic and other thoracic aortic aneurysms

The incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is increasing with the present rate of occurrence at 10.9 cases per 100,000 people per year. The estimated 5-year risk of rupture of a TAA with a diameter between 4 and 5.9 cm is 16%, but it rises to 31% for aneurysms ≥ 6 cm. Despite increasing awareness of the importance of early diagnosis and treatment options, there are no clear guidelines available at the time of writing. Nor is there any clear evidence for specific pharmacological treatment able to resolve or delay the disease progression. Endovascular treatment (EVT), proposed as an alternative to surgery, has been considered a therapeutic innovation, especially because it is minimally invasive, which allows treatment even in high surgical risk patients. Vascular imaging is crucial for patient selection, endoprosthesis choice, and planning of the treatment because not all aneurysms are suitable. Early and midterm results are encouraging, but long-term results are necessary to definitively assess reliability of stent-graft materials and improvement in patient survival. In the choice between surgical or endovascular repair of TAAs, many factors must be considered, including the clinical situation, comorbidities, anatomy, choice of equipment, and last, but not less important, experience of the clinical team.

Imaging of aortic abnormalities with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. A pictorial comparison with CT

Aortic abnormalities are commonly encountered and may represent a diagnostic challenge in patients with acute or chronic clinical symptoms. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with low mechanical index (low MI) is a new promising method in the diagnosis and follow-up of pathological aortic lesions. CEUS with SonoVue allows a more rapid and noninvasive diagnosis, especially in critical patients because of its bedside availability. This review compares CEUS findings with those documented on computed tomography angiography (CTA), allowing the reader to appreciate the usefulness of CEUS in this clinical situation.

Multidetector CT in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treated with Endovascular Repair: Are Unenhanced and Delayed Phase Enhanced Images Effective for Endoleak Detection?

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced, delayed enhanced phase (DEP), and arterial enhanced phase (AEP) multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) for depicting endoleaks during follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients (two women, 48 men; mean age, 72 years) underwent follow-up multi-detector row CT 1, 6, and 12 months after endovascular aneurysm repair. Unenhanced CT was performed with 2.5-mm collimation; 1-mm collimation was used with AEP and DEP examinations. Two independent readers assessed the presence of endoleak in three reading sessions: AEP (session A), unenhanced and AEP (session B), and AEP and DEP (session C). At 6- and 12-month follow-up, a fourth set was included: 1-month unenhanced and AEP (session D). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of each session were calculated. Triple-phase multi-detector row CT was the reference standard.

RESULTS

At 1 month, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 79%, 75%, and 55% for session A; 93%, 97%, and 93% for session B; and 93%, 78%, and 62% for session C. At 6 months, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 92%, 68%, and 48% for session A; 92%, 100%, and 100% for session B; and 100%, 84%, and 67% for session C. At 12 months, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 80%, 80%, and 50% for session A; 90%, 98%, and 90% for session B; and 100%, 80%, and 56% for session C. Sensitivity did not significantly differ (P > .05) among reading sessions A, B, and C, whereas specificity and positive predictive values in session B were significantly higher (P < .001). For 6- and 12-month follow-up, no significant differences (P > .05) were found between sessions D and B.

CONCLUSION

The combination of AEP and unenhanced imaging performed at 1-month follow-up offers improved specificity and positive predictive values compared with AEP alone. DEP imaging does not significantly increase sensitivity for detection of endoleaks, but it does depict low-flow endoleaks not seen at AEP.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Can the Arterial Phase at CT Evaluation after Endovascular Repair Be Eliminated to Reduce Radiation Dose?

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine if arterial phase computed tomographic (CT) imaging is necessary for follow-up imaging of patients who have undergone endovascular stent-graft therapy for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant study was exempt from institutional review board approval; informed patient consent was waived. Eighty-five patients (66 men, 19 women; mean age, 66 years; range, 45-81 years) underwent 110 multidetector CT examinations after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nonenhanced CT images were obtained. Intravenous contrast material was then injected at 4 mL/sec, and arterial and venous phase (60 seconds) CT images were obtained. The nonenhanced and venous phase images were evaluated to determine if an endoleak was present. Subsequently, arterial phase images were analyzed. The effective dose was calculated. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals as indicators of how often arterial phase imaging would contribute to the diagnosis of endoleak were determined.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight type II endoleaks were detected by using combined nonenhanced and venous phase acquisitions. Twenty-five of the 28 endoleaks were also visualized during the arterial phase. Three type II endoleaks were seen only during the venous phase. The arterial phase images depicted no additional endoleaks. Seventy-eight CT examinations performed in 67 patients revealed no endoleak during the venous phase. The arterial phase images also depicted no endoleaks at these examinations. Thus, for no more than 3.1% of all examinations, there was 95% confidence that arterial phase imaging would depict an endoleak missed at venous phase imaging. Arterial phase imaging contributed to a mean of 36.5% of the effective dose delivered.

CONCLUSION

Study results indicate that arterial phase imaging may not be necessary for the routine detection of endoleaks. Radiation exposure can be decreased by eliminating this phase.