Active arterial contrast extravasation on helical CT of the abdomen, pelvis, and chest

Predictors and pathways of in-hospital mortality in active vascular contrast extravasation detected on abdominopelvic CT

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify factors influencing in-hospital mortality in adult patients with active vascular contrast extravasation (AVCE) on abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

All consecutive patients with AVCE detected on CT between January 2019 and May 2022 were retrospectively included. Their data were compared through uni- and multivariable analyses between patients with and without in-hospital mortality. Path analysis was utilized to clarify the relationships among factors affecting mortality.

RESULTS

There were 272 patients (60.2 ± 19.4 years, 150 men) included, of whom 70 experienced in-hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis revealed nonsurgery, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4-5 or dialysis, prolonged partial thromboplastin time (PTT), minimum AVCE length > 8 mm, and a lower rate of packed red cell (PRC) transfusion were identified as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality (p = 0.005-0.048). Path analysis demonstrated direct influences of CKD4-5 or dialysis, prolonged PTT, and minimum AVCE length on mortality (coefficients 0.525-0.616; p = 0.009 to < 0.001). PRC transfusion impacted mortality through nonsurgery (coefficient 0.798, p = 0.003) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (coefficients 0.025, p = 0.016), leading to subsequent death. Three AVCE spaces (free, loose, and tight) defined on CT were not directly associated with in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

In adults with AVCE on CT, AVCE size had a direct independent influence on mortality, highlighting the critical role of radiologists in detecting and characterizing this finding. Additionally, CKD4-5 or dialysis and prolonged PTT also directly influenced mortality, while the lower rate of PRC transfusion impacted mortality through nonsurgery and ICU admission.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

In patients with active vascular contrast extravasation (AVCE) on abdominopelvic CT, larger AVCE directly increased in-hospital mortality. Radiologists' detection and characterization of this finding is crucial, along with recognizing factors like CKD4-5, dialysis, and prolonged PTT to improve patient outcomes.

KEY POINTS

Several factors independently predicted in-hospital mortality in patients with abdominopelvic AVCE. Extravasation length > 8 mm was the only imaging marker predictive of in-hospital mortality. Non-imaging factors correlated with in-hospital mortality, and PRC transfusion impacted mortality through nonsurgery and ICU admission pathways.

CT of acute abdominopelvic hemorrhage: protocols, pearls, and pitfalls

Abdominal and pelvic hemorrhage may be secondary to a number of causes and is often a medical emergency. Patient presentation ranges from obvious trauma with evidence of hemodynamic instability to vague symptoms. CT has become the imaging modality of choice for identifying abdominopelvic hemorrhage. Recognizing acute hemorrhage as well as identifying its location and severity are key to expediting management. In the Emergency Department, ultrasound often used in the initial evaluation of trauma patients, but is not sensitive for subtle bleeds or injuries. CT is the best first-line imaging tool to identify abdominal hemorrhage and, compared with angiography, has been shown to be superior in detecting intra-abdominal bleeding, especially when the bleeding rate is low. Depending on location and etiology, abdominopelvic hemorrhage may have a characteristic appearance, such as the "sentinel clot" sign associated with blunt trauma to the solid organs or the "triangle sign" of a mesenteric bleed. The following pictorial essay reviews CT technique, study interpretation, and interpretative pearls and pitfalls in the recognition of acute abdominopelvic hemorrhage.

Complications of renal interventions: a pictorial review of CT findings

A number of potential vascular and non-vascular complications can arise from surgical, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, radiotherapy and radiological renal interventions, including percutaneous image-guided biopsy and drainage. Computed tomography scan is usually one of the first and most important diagnostic imaging examinations requested when a potential complication is suspected. There are a wide range of common and uncommon potential complications from renal interventions. An understanding of underlying risk factors is important to reduce potential complications from renal intervention. Radiologists play a crucial role in recognising and diagnosing post-renal intervention complications on computed tomography scans, which could significantly improve the patient’s prognosis.

MRI of Acute Gynecologic Conditions

Although usually not a first-line imaging modality in the setting of acute pelvic pain, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is able to depict and characterize a wide range gynecologic diagnoses with high accuracy. Lack of ionizing radiation renders MRI particularly useful for assessment of pregnant women and children. Furthermore, inherent high soft-tissue resolution of MRI allows accurate diagnosis without intravenous contrast use, which is advantageous for patients with renal insufficiency and pregnant patients. Familiarity with the typical MRI appearance of various acute gynecologic conditions helps establish the correct diagnosis. This article reviews the common MRI findings of acute gynecologic processes, in both pregnant and nonpregnant patients. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1291-1309.

The associations between initial radiographic findings and interventions for renal hemorrhage after high-grade renal trauma: Results from the Multi-Institutional Genitourinary Trauma Study

BACKGROUND

Indications for intervention after high-grade renal trauma (HGRT) remain poorly defined. Certain radiographic findings can be used to guide the management of HGRT. We aimed to assess the associations between initial radiographic findings and interventions for hemorrhage after HGRT and to determine hematoma and laceration sizes predicting interventions.

METHODS

The Genitourinary Trauma Study is a multicenter study including HGRT patients from 14 Level I trauma centers from 2014 to 2017. Admission computed tomography scans were categorized based on multiple variables, including vascular contrast extravasation (VCE), hematoma rim distance (HRD), and size of the deepest laceration. Renal bleeding interventions included angioembolization, surgical packing, renorrhaphy, partial nephrectomy, and nephrectomy. Mixed-effect Poisson regression was used to assess the associations. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to define optimal cutoffs for HRD and laceration size.

RESULTS

In the 326 patients, injury mechanism was blunt in 81%. Forty-seven (14%) patients underwent 51 bleeding interventions, including 19 renal angioembolizations, 16 nephrectomies, and 16 other procedures. In univariable analysis, presence of VCE was associated with a 5.9-fold increase in risk of interventions, and each centimeter increase in HRD was associated with 30% increase in risk of bleeding interventions. An HRD of 3.5 cm or greater and renal laceration depth of 2.5 cm or greater were most predictive of interventions. In multivariable models, VCE and HRD were significantly associated with bleeding interventions.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the importance of certain radiographic findings in prediction of bleeding interventions after HGRT. These factors can be used as adjuncts to renal injury grading to guide clinical decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological Study, Level III and Therapeutic/Care Management, Level IV.

Multidetector CT angiography for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: technique and findings

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a common reason for emergency department admissions and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Factors that complicate its clinical management include patient debility due to comorbidities; intermittence of hemorrhage; and multiple sites of simultaneous bleeding. Its management, therefore, must be multidisciplinary and include emergency physicians, gastroenterologists, and surgeons, as well as radiologists for diagnostic imaging and interventional therapy. Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding is usually managed endoscopically, with radiologic intervention reserved as an alternative to be used if endoscopic therapy fails. Endoscopy is often less successful in the management of acute lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding, where colonoscopy may be more effective. The merits of performing bowel cleansing before colonoscopy in such cases might be offset by the resultant increase in response time and should be weighed carefully against the deficits in visualization and diagnostic accuracy that would result from performing colonoscopy without bowel preparation. In recent years, multidetector computed tomographic (CT) angiography has gained acceptance as a first-line option for the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding. In selected cases of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, CT angiography also provides accurate information about the presence or absence of active bleeding, its source, and its cause. This information helps shorten the total diagnostic time and minimizes or eliminates the need for more expensive and more invasive procedures.

Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant therapy: role of multidetector computed tomography and spectrum of imaging findings from head to toe

Highly effective in preventing and treating thromboembolic conditions in acute and chronic settings, anticoagulant therapy is associated with a non-negligible risk of hemorrhagic complications with a considerable clinical impact. Advanced age and comorbidities further increase the risk of bleeding during heparinization, treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins or long-term oral warfarin anticoagulation. Multidetector computed tomography represents the mainstay diagnostic technique to image-suspected hemorrhages in anticoagulated patients, as it can quickly assess presence, site, and extent of hemorrhage, identify active bleeding, and possible underlying diseases. Cross-sectional imaging appearances of the wide spectrum of anticoagulant therapy-related bleeding complications are hereby presented, including peripheral and thoracic-abdominal wall muscular hematomas, intrathoracic, abdominal, retroperitoneal genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and brain hemorrhages. Prompt recognition and comprehensive diagnostic assessment with multidetector computed tomography allow clinicians to correctly choose treatment modification or withdrawal, surgery, or interventional procedures as needed, with the aim to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality.

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: value of MDCT

Contrast-enhanced multidetector row helical computed tomography (MDCT) scanning is establishing itself as a rapid, noninvasive, and accurate diagnostic method in suspected acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Active bleeding can be depicted as an area of focal high attenuation within the bowel lumen on arterial phase MDCT images. New MDCT technologies facilitate three-dimensional image reconstruction, and higher temporal resolution is available with new MDCT scanner generations. This allows for the acquisition of arterial- and portal-venous phase images of the whole abdomen, revealing potential bleeding sources and simultaneously depict morphological changes in the abdomen, such as intestinal tumors. This article gives an overview of available diagnostic modalities in assessing gastrointestinal (GI) tract hemorrhage, with a special emphasis on new MDCT technology.

Detection and localization of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of multi-detector row helical CT (MDCT) for detection and localization of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage or intraperitoneal bleeding. Thirty-six consecutive patients with clinical signs of acute bleeding underwent biphasic (16- or 40-channel) MDCT. MDCT findings were correlated with endoscopy, angiography or surgery. Among the 36 patients evaluated, 26 were examined for GI bleeding and 10 for intraperitoneal hemorrhage. Confirmed sites of GI bleeding were the stomach (n = 5), duodenum (n = 5), small bowel (n = 6), large bowel (n = 8) and rectum (n = 2). The correct site of bleeding was identifiable on MDCT in 24/26 patients with GI bleeding. In 20 of these 24 patients, active CM extravasation was apparent during the exam. Among the ten patients with intraperitoneal hemorrhage, MDCT correctly identified the bleeding source in nine patients. Our findings suggest that fast and accurate localization of acute gastrointestinal and intraperitoneal bleeding is achievable on MDCT.

64 MDCT in multiple trauma patients: imaging manifestations and clinical implications of active extravasation

The finding of active hemorrhage on computed tomography (CT) in trauma patients has been shown to have significant clinical implications and has been incorporated into numerous CT grading schema. As CT technology has advanced, the sensitivity for detection of active hemorrhage in the trauma population has significantly improved. Currently, with the improved spatial and temporal resolution afforded by 64 multidetector computed tomography (64 MDCT) technology, the clinical implications of the CT findings of active extravasation may need to be reconsidered. This article illustrates the various imaging manifestations of active extravasation throughout the body using 64 MDCT. Additionally, protocol issues specific to the findings of active hemorrhage using 64 MDCT are detailed, including novel interpretation techniques, which offer aid in detecting and characterizing hemorrhage. Finally, the clinical implication of active extravasation using this new technology is discussed. Although more sensitive to the detection of small hemorrhagic foci and with clinical implications highly dependent upon location, active bleeding remains as a salient finding that affects subsequent clinical management of trauma patients.

CT Criteria for Differentiating Abdominal Hemorrhage: Anticoagulation or Aortic Aneurysm Rupture?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to test the hypothesis that CT criteria would allow accurate diagnosis of the specific cause of abdominal hemorrhage in patients with coagulopathy or abdominal aortic aneurysm.

CONCLUSION

Attention to specific CT criteria allows accurate diagnosis of the specific cause of spontaneous abdominal hemorrhage even in patients who have both coagulopathy and an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Signal Flare Phenomenon as Active Bleeding in Retroperitoneal Hematoma With Hematocrit Effect on Dynamic CT Scan

The contrast medium was observed as a thin line indicating active bleeding in the cellular component and stayed at the boundary between the plasma and cellular components in liquefied hematomas. We could also reproduce the same phenomenon in an experimental study using human blood. The characteristic dynamic motion of the contrast medium demonstrated in the liquefied hematoma, which we have called the "signal flare" phenomenon, is a significant sign indicating active bleeding.

Imaging of renal trauma

Trauma is a major cause of death and disability and renal injuries occur in up to 10% of patients with significant blunt abdominal trauma. Patients with penetrating trauma and hematuria, blunt trauma with shock and hematuria, or gross hematuria warrant imaging of the urinary tract specifically and CT is the preferred modality. If there is significant perinephric fluid, especially medially, or deep laceration, delayed images should be obtained to evaluate for urinary extravasation. Most renal injuries are minor, including contusions, subcapsular and perinephric hematoma, and superficial lacerations. More significant injuries include deep lacerations, shattered kidney, active hemorrhage, infarctions, and vascular pedicle and UPJ injuries. These injuries are more likely to need surgery or have delayed complications but may still often be managed conservatively. The presence of urinary extravasation and large devitalized areas of renal parenchyma, especially with associated injuries of intraperitoneal organs, is particularly prone to complication and usually requires surgery. Active hemorrhage should be recognized because it often indicates a need for urgent surgery or embolization to prevent exsanguination.

Contrast material extravasation on contrast-enhanced helical computed tomographic scan of blunt abdominal trauma: its significance on the choice, time, and outcome of treatment

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced helical computed tomographic (CT) scan of blunt abdominal trauma is valuable for detecting contrast material extravasation (CME). The aims of this study were to determine its significance and investigate factors associated with the choice, time, and outcome of management.

METHODS

CT scans of 32 consecutive trauma patients who had CME were reviewed for the sources of CME, types of CME, flat inferior vena cava, and multiple abdominal injuries. The medical records were reviewed for demographics, systolic blood pressure, Injury Severity Score (ISS), choice of management, time interval between CT scan and intervention, and outcome of intervention.

RESULTS

Systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg was the most important factor (p = 0.0064) that failed observational therapy. When proceeding to intervention treatment, patients with a flat inferior vena cava (1.6 +/- 1.1 hours) had a significantly shorter time interval between CT scan examination and intervention when compared with those with a normal cava (10.9 +/- 16.0 hours) ( p= 0.0124). The mortality rate after intervention treatment was 18.8%. High ISS, uncontained CME in the extraperitoneum, and multiple abdominal injuries were important risk factors. After adjusted for ISS and multiple abdominal injuries, the risk of dying from extraperitoneal CME remained significant when compared with intraperitoneal CME (adjusted odds ratio, 82.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-6,363.17).

CONCLUSION

Termination of observational therapy was appropriate for trauma patients who had CME and systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg. The coexistence of a flat inferior vena cava and CME was associated with early intervention treatment. Despite early intervention, the mortality rate was 18.8%. High ISS and multiple abdominal injuries were important factors, but the risk of dying from uncontained extraperitoneal CME was 82 times the risk of dying from intraperitoneal CME.

Multidetector CT: detection of active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the imaging findings and the prevalence of active hemorrhage on contrast-enhanced multidetector CT in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Contrast-enhanced multidetector CT images of 165 patients with blunt abdominal trauma were reviewed for the presence of extravasated contrast agent, a finding that represents active hemorrhage. The site and appearance of the hemorrhage were noted on multidetector CT images. These findings were compared with surgical and angiographic results or with clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

On multidetector CT images, active hemorrhage was detected in 22 (13%) of 165 patients with a total of 24 bleeding sites (14 intraperitoneal sites and 10 extraperitoneal sites). Active hemorrhage was visible most frequently as a jet of extravasated contrast agent (10/24 bleeding sites [42%]). Diffuse or focal extravasation was less frequently seen (nine [37%] and five [21%] bleeding sites, respectively). CT attenuation values measured in the aorta (mean, 199 H) were significantly higher than those measured in extravasated contrast material (mean, 155 H) (p < 0.001). Sixteen (73%) of 22 patients with active bleeding on multidetector CT images underwent immediate surgical or angiographic intervention. One patient received angiographic therapy 10 hr after undergoing multidetector CT, and five patients died between 1 and 3 hr after multidetector CT examination.

CONCLUSION

Active hemorrhage in patients after blunt abdominal trauma is most frequently visible as a jet of extravasated contrast agent on multidetector CT. When extravasation is detected, immediate surgical or angiographic therapy is required.

Tailored helical CT evaluation of acute abdomen

Helical computed tomography (CT) allows rapid, cost-effective evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain. Tailoring the examination to the working clinical diagnosis by optimizing constituent factors (eg, timing of acquisition, contrast material used, means and rate of contrast material administration, collimation, pitch) can markedly improve diagnostic accuracy. Rapid (>/=3 mL/sec) intravenous injection of contrast material is required for optimal assessment of acute pancreatitis, ischemic bowel, aortic aneurysm, and aortic dissection. Narrow collimation and small reconstruction intervals can help detect calculi in the biliary system and genitourinary tract. Tailored helical CT in patients with acute pyelonephritis usually involves several acquisitions through the kidneys during various phases of renal enhancement. In patients with suspected renal infarction, CT protocol must include an acquisition during the corticomedullary phase. Helical CT with 5-mm collimation through the lower abdomen and pelvis is used to evaluate patients with suspected diverticulitis. Use of both oral and intravenous contrast material can help localize small bowel perforation and characterize related complications. Tailored helical CT for assessment of abdominal hemorrhage consists of initial unenhanced CT followed by optional contrast material-enhanced CT. Clear communication between the radiologist, the patient, and the referring physician is essential for narrowing the differential diagnosis into a working diagnosis prior to helical CT.

Unenhanced CT of abdominal and pelvic hemorrhage

CT performed without oral or intravenous contrast is the initial imaging study of choice in many situations for the detection of hemorrhage anywhere in the abdomen and pelvis. The presence or absence of hemorrhage can be determined rapidly, and the amount and precise location of hemorrhage can also be evaluated. This article reviews the appearances and the common and unusual etiologies of abdominal and pelvic hemorrhage on unenhanced CT. The role of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in patients with known or suspected abdominal and pelvic hemorrhage is also examined.