Hysterosonographically guided endometrial biopsy: technical feasibility

Comparison of saline infusion sonography (SIS) versus SIS-guided endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of endometrial pathology

PURPOSE

To compare saline infusion sonography (SIS) to tissue obtained from SIS-guided endometrial sampling (SISES) to determine sensitivity and specificity for benign and malignant conditions of the endometrium.

METHODS

Added value of SISES after SIS was evaluated over 5 years. SIS and SISES techniques have been previously described. Women with abnormal uterine bleeding and endometrial findings underwent SIS. Criteria for SISES included atypical polypoid mass, focal irregularity or global endometrial thickening, nondiagnostic SIS, discordance between SIS and endometrial biopsy, or request from the primary team. Final surgical pathology was compared with SIS and SISES.

RESULTS

One-hundred twenty-three SIS patients had SISES. SIS alone had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 42%, positive predictive value of 16%, and negative predictive value of 100%. A total of 120 patients had final clinical or surgical outcomes. Specificity was greatly improved with addition of SISES (95.5%, p < 0.001). Combination of SIS with SISES detected all 12 premalignant and malignant endometrial lesions. Three cases had small foci of hyperplasia (n = 2) or atypia (n = 1) in polyps on final surgical pathology, which were not prospectively identified on SISES.

CONCLUSIONS

SISES significantly improves the specificity in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions. False-negative findings of SISES in polyps in postmenopausal women with bleeding suggest the need for surgical removal in this setting. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 44:416-422, 2016.

Simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography for the evaluation of endometrial pathology in women aged 50 years and older

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of simultaneous endometrial aspiration at the time of sonohysterography for screening postmenopausal women at risk for endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of women older than 50 years who underwent saline-infusion sonohysterography for the evaluation of their endometrium. On completion of imaging, the remaining intracavitary saline and endometrial tissue were aspirated through the saline-infusion sonohysterography catheter and submitted for pathologic evaluation. Based on the clinical, pathologic, and ultrasonographic results, the patients underwent surgical treatment with hysteroscopy, hysterectomy, or clinical observation. Follow-up results and outcomes were collected using electronic medical records. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of saline-infusion sonohysterography, endometrial aspiration, and combined approaches for endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography were assessed.

RESULTS

Six hundred three patients underwent endometrial aspiration at the time of sonohysterography. Endometrial tissue was present in 567 (94.0%) and outcome data were available for 540 (89.5%). In 194 (35.9%) patients, final pathology was obtained by surgical intervention. The remaining 346 (64.1%) patients were monitored for at least 6 months. Thirty patients (5.6%) had cancer or endometrial hyperplasia. A sequential model, in which endometrial aspiration was done only for positive saline-infusion sonohysterography findings, yielded sensitivity of 86.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69-96%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 99-100%) for detecting endometrial hyperplasia or cancer (area under the curve 0.93). Considering proliferative endometrium as abnormal endometrial aspiration reduced specificity to 88.3% (95% CI 85-91%, P<.01) without significant increase in sensitivity (100%, 95% CI 88-100%, P=.13).

CONCLUSION

The high sensitivity and specificity of the sequential endometrial aspiration at the time of sonohysterography make this approach a useful and reliable screening algorithm for detecting endometrial cancer or hyperplasia in postmenopausal women at risk. Endometrial aspiration at the time of sonohysterography should be considered as an initial one-stop endometrial evaluation in this population.

Evaluation of endometrium in peri-menopausal abnormal uterine bleeding

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB) is one of the most common health problems encountered by women. It affects about 20% women of reproductive age, and accounts for almost two thirds of all hysterectomies. Gynaecologists are often unable to identify the cause of abnormal bleeding even after a thorough history and physical examination. Diagnostic evaluations and treatment modalities have been evolving over time. The onus in AUB management is to exclude complex endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. From D and C + EUA under general anesthesia the shift to more accurate procedures like hysteroscopy and vision directed biopsy was welcome. But the current minimally invasive procedures like sonohysterography, office vacuum aspiration (Pipelle) and the use of office hysteroscopy have revolutionized the management of AUB. We have tried to review the current literature and guidelines for evaluation of endometrium with the twin goals of finding an accurate reason causing the AUB and to rule out endometrial cancer or a potential for the cancer in future. We have also attempted to compare the current procedures and their present perspective vis-à-vis each other. Histological assessment is the final word, but obtaining a sample for histology makes it more accurate, and we have reviewed these techniques to enhance accuracy in diagnosis. Hysteroscopy and directed biopsy is the 'gold standard' approach for most accurate evaluation of endometrium to rule out focal endometrial Ca. Blind endometrial biopsies should no longer be performed as the sole diagnostic strategy in perimenopausal as well as in postmenopausal women with AUB. A single-stop approach, especially in high risk women (Obesity, diabetes, family history of endometrial, ovarian or breast cancer) as well as in women with endometrial hyperplasia of combining the office hysteroscopy, directed biopsy in presence of a focal lesion, and vacuum sampling of endometrium in normal looking endometrium, all without anesthesia is the most minimally invasive and yet accurate approach in current practice.

Saline contrast sonohysterography and directed extraction, resection and biopsy of intrauterine pathology using a Uterine Explora Curette

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of an endometrial sampling device, the Uterine Explora Curette, with concomitant saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) for ultrasound-directed extraction, resection and biopsy of endometrial pathology.

METHODS

Use of the Uterine Explora Curette was prospectively evaluated in 20 women with either infertility (n = 14), recurrent miscarriage (n = 2) or peri-/postmenopausal bleeding (n = 4). Findings on SCSH were compared with those on pathological analysis.

RESULTS

In all 20 cases the Uterine Explora Curette was used successfully during SCSH to treat endometrial filling defects. The procedure was well tolerated, with an average time from start to finish of 10 (range, 2-23) min. It was without complications, and appeared to remove or biopsy adequately endometrial filling defects in most patients, obviating the need for hysteroscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

In properly selected patients, directed extraction, resection and biopsy using the Uterine Explora Curette during SCSH appears to be an effective and easy method for treating intrauterine pathology and provides a cost-effective alternative to operative hysteroscopy.

A new method of transvaginal ultrasound-guided polypectomy: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

A new device has been manufactured (Safe T Choice), which allows attachment of a transvaginal ultrasound probe to a specially adapted cervical tenaculum. This affords the capacity to monitor intrauterine surgical procedures without the need for hysteroscopy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of endometrial polypectomy using this device combined with saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) to monitor the procedure.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with an endometrial polyp on routine B-mode two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) were invited to join the study. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided polypectomies were carried out by a single operator. The procedure was timed from application until removal of the tenaculum. The ultrasound views were rated as satisfactory or poor. Success of the procedure was gauged by complete removal of the polyp without recourse to hysteroscopy. Women also attended for postoperative follow-up ultrasound scans to check for residual disease.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven women were recruited to the study. The mean operating time was 8 min (95% CI, 5.9-10.4). The procedure was successful in 32/37 (86.5%) cases (95% CI, 75.5-97.5). In three cases (8.1%) the procedure failed because of an inability to obtain satisfactory images of the uterine cavity, and in two further cases (5.4%) the operator was unable to grasp and remove the polyp. Two patients (5.4%) bled from the tenaculum insertion site, necessitating suture for hemostasis. There were no other complications and none of the patients had evidence of residual polyp tissue at the follow-up visit.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that transvaginal ultrasound-guided polypectomy is a feasible technique for the removal of endometrial polyps. Further work is required to compare outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this technique with hysteroscopic polypectomy.

Saline infusion sonohysterography: technique, indications, and imaging findings

OBJECTIVE

To review the technique, indications, and common imaging findings regarding saline infusion sonohysterography.

METHODS

The literature on saline infusion sonohysterography was reviewed. Pertinent images from our institution are presented to illustrate common imaging findings.

RESULTS

From the literature review, we summarize the various clinical scenarios in which saline infusion sonohysterography is useful and give examples from our clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Saline infusion sonohysterography is a useful procedure for evaluation of endometrial and subendometrial abnormalities.

Use of ultrasound to improve the safety of postgraduate training in obstetrics and gynaecology

Supervised clinical work is perhaps the most valuable component of postgraduate training and has a long-term impact. Senior clinicians not only take the responsibility of teaching and supervising junior doctors but also most of them take the consequences of any clinical failures or mistakes associated with the training. Despite the introduction of simulators and computer-assisted learning, practice on real patients is still required to learn many skills in obstetrics and gynaecology. Training must be safe, because trainees or trainers must not put our patients at risk as part of the process of learning to heal others. Ultrasound can be used to demonstrate and guide several procedures that have been performed 'blindly' in the past. This technology can reduce the risks associated with training and supervision of junior doctors.