Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems

Comparison of liquid crystal display monitors calibrated with gray-scale standard display function and with γ 2.2 and iPad: observer performance in detection of cerebral infarction on brain CT

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to compare observer performance in the detection of cerebral infarction on a brain CT using medical-grade liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors calibrated with the gray-scale standard display function and with γ 2.2 and using an iPad with a simulated screen setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We amassed 97 sample sets, from 47 patients with proven cerebral infarction and 50 healthy control subjects. Nine radiologists independently assessed brain CT on a gray-scale standard display function LCD, a γ 2.2 LCD, and an iPad in random order over 4-week intervals. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed by using the continuous scale, and the area under the ROC curve (A(z)) was calculated for each monitor.

RESULTS

The A(z) values for gray-scale standard display function LCD, γ 2.2 LCD, and iPad were 0.875, 0.884, and 0.839, respectively. The difference among the three monitors was very small. There was no significant difference between gray-scale standard display function LCD and γ 2.2 LCD. However, the A(z) value was statistically significantly smaller for the iPad than the γ 2.2 LCD (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Observer performance for detecting cerebral infarction on the LCD with γ 2.2 calibration was found to be similar to the LCD with gray-scale standard display function calibration. Although observer performance using the iPad was poorer than that using the other LCDs, the difference was small. Therefore, the iPad could not substitute for other LCD monitors. However, owing to the promising potential advantages of tablet PCs, such as portability, further examination is needed into the clinical use of tablet PCs.

Effect of greyscale liquid crystal displays of different resolutions on observer performance during detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of monochrome liquid crystal displays (LCDs) with different resolutions on observer performance during detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

Chest images of digital radiography were selected online from the hospital's picture archiving and communication system. Of the 164 images selected, small solitary non-calcified pulmonary nodules were present in 63 images and absent in 101 images. Observer performance was assessed among 3 extremely experienced, 3 very experienced and 3 moderately experienced radiologists, who independently interpreted these images on 2, 3 and 5 megapixel greyscale LCDs. A five-point confidence level rating scale was used to represent the presence of nodules: definite absence, probable absence, indetermination, probable presence and definite presence. The observers were requested to rank each image on the given display according to the presence of the pulmonary nodule. Observer performance was analysed in terms of receiver operating characteristics (ROCs).

RESULTS

The areas under the ROC curves which represented the observer performance for the 2, 3 and 5 megapixel LCDs were found to be 0.705, 0.722 and 0.764, respectively, for the extremely experienced radiologists; 0.687, 0.712 and 0.721, respectively, for the very experienced radiologists; and 0.689, 0.696 and 0.711, respectively, for the moderately experienced radiologists. These differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The observer performances for detection of small solitary non-calcified pulmonary nodules by radiologists with varying degrees of experience were comparable between the 2, 3 and 5 megapixel monochrome LCDs.

Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films

The aim of this study was to determine diagnostic performance of a storage phosphor plate system Digora Optime (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) with two types of LCD monitor in the detection of artificial caries when compared to Ultraspeed (D), Ektaspeed Plus (E), and Insight (F) radiographic films. Seventy extracted human molars-with artificial caries-were radiographed under identical standardized conditions using (1) a storage phosphor plate system Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland), (2) Insight, (3) Ektaspeed Plus, and (4) Ultraspeed (Carestream Health Inc, Rochester, NY). All digital images and radiographs were examined by three observers for the presence or absence of artificial caries using a five-point confidence scale. Digital images were evaluated both on a LCD computer monitor (Philips 170S, Holland) and medical monitor-3 megapixel monochrome display (Me355i2, Totoku, Tokyo)-with brightness and contrast enhancement. Observer responses were evaluated using ROC analysis and other measurements for diagnostic accuracy. Storage phosphor images with medical monitor demonstrated higher mean A (z) values (0.70 +/- 0.08) than digital images with computer monitor and conventional films. Storage phosphor images with medical monitor presented the highest score, 0.97, 0.90, 0.94, for each observer, respectively. Also, true positive observations (0.82) and positive likelihood ratios (2.71) were higher in enhanced storage phosphor images with medical monitor. Caries detection of mechanically created lesions by experienced radiologists is roughly comparable when examining D-speed film images and Digora images on both the computer and medical LCD monitors, and appears to be poorer on E- and F-speed film images.

Influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for detection of diffuse pulmonary disease on chest radiographs

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary diseases depicted on chest radiographs by comparing them with a high-resolution cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A group of 17 radiologists interpreted 87 soft-copy images on LCD monitors with pixel arrays of 1024 x 1280, 1200 x 1600, 1536 x 2048, and 2048 x 2560 and on a CRT monitor with a pixel array of 2048 x 2560. They were asked to indicate their individual confidence levels regarding the presence of diffuse pulmonary diseases. The luminance distributions of all monitors were adjusted to the same distributions, and the ambient illumination was 200 lux. Observer performance was analyzed in terms of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC).

RESULTS

The average ROC curves for the five monitor types were similar, and there were no statistically reliable effects of the five monitor types on the readers' diagnostic performances (P = 0.7587).

CONCLUSION

The detectability of diffuse pulmonary disease on the LCD monitors with a spatial resolution equal to or higher than a matrix size of 1024 x 1280 was found to be equivalent to that on the high-resolution CRT monitor.

MRI of meniscal lesions: soft-copy (PACS) and hard-copy evaluation versus reviewer experience

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to compare diagnostic performance, reviewer confidence, and time requirements in the MRI diagnosis of meniscal tears for three types of reviewers and two types of image documentations (PACS vs hard copies).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An experienced musculoskeletal radiologist (reviewer 1), a fellow in musculoskeletal radiology (reviewer 2), and a junior staff member in orthopedic surgery (reviewer 3) evaluated MR images displayed on PACS monitors and hard copies independently and in a blinded fashion with regard to the presence or absence of meniscal tears. Seventy-one patients (mean age, 45.4 years; range, 16-80 years) were consecutively included if they had undergone both MRI of the knee and arthroscopy within 4 months. Arthroscopy was the standard of reference. Evaluation time and the reviewer's confidence in his or her diagnosis (Visual Analogue Scale, possible values of 0-100) were determined.

RESULTS

Accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities in diagnosing meniscal tears were 80-87%, 63-85%, and 87-93% for soft copies and 82-85%, 64-76%, and 87-94.0%, respectively, for hard copies. Intrareviewer differences between PACS and hard copies were not significant for any of the three reviewers (McNemar tests). Reviewer 3 was less sensitive but more specific in the diagnosis of meniscal tears than reviewers 1 and 2. This difference was significant for both the PACS and hard copies. The reviewers' confidence in their diagnoses and evaluation times were not significantly different for PACS and hard copies (analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc analysis).

CONCLUSION

Differences in the diagnostic performance of suspected meniscal tears depend on reviewer experience rather than on the type of documentation.

The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs

PURPOSE

To access the influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on the detectability of nodular lesions depicted on chest radiographs by comparing them with a high-resolution cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten radiologists interpreted 247 soft-copy images on LCD monitors with pixel arrays of 1,024x1,280, 1,200x1,600, 1,536x2,048 and 2,048x2,560, and a CRT monitor with a pixel array of 2,048x2,560, and were asked to indicate their individual confidence levels regarding the presence of a nodule. These images were chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule from the "Standard Digital Image Database" created by the Japanese Society of Radiological Technology. The luminance distributions of all monitors were adjusted to the same, and the ambient illumination was 200 lux. Observer performance was analyzed in terms of the receiver-operating characteristics.

RESULTS

No significant statistical differences in nodule detection performance were found among the four LCD monitors and the CRT monitor.

CONCLUSION

The nodule detection performance on the LCD monitors with a spatial resolution higher than a matrix size of 1,024x1,280 was found to be equivalent to that on the high-resolution CRT monitor.

Comparison of the Detectability of High- and Low-Contrast Details on a TFT Screen and a CRT Screen Designed for Radiologic Diagnosis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the detection rate of fine details of a new thin-film transistor (TFT) grayscale monitor designed for radiologic diagnosis, compared with a type of cathode ray tube (CRT) screen used routinely for diagnostic radiology.

METHODS

Fifteen radiographs of a statistical phantom presenting low- and high-contrast details were obtained and read out with an Agfa ADC compact storage phosphor system. Each radiograph presented 60 high-density (high-contrast) and 60 low-density (low-contrast) test bodies. Approximately half the test bodies contained holes with different diameters. Observers were asked to detect the presence or absence of a hole in the test body on a 5-point confidence range. The total of 1800 test bodies was reviewed by 5 radiologists on the TFT monitor (20.8 inches; 1536 x 2048 pixels; maximum luminance, 650 cd/m2; contrast, 600:1) and the CRT monitor (21 inches; P45 Phosphor; 2048 x 2560 pixels operated at 1728 x 2304 pixels; maximum luminance, 600 cd/m2; contrast, 300:1). The data were analyzed by receiver-operator characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

For high-contrast details, the mean area under the curve rated 0.9336 for the TFT monitor and 0.9312 for the CRT monitor. For low-contrast details, the mean area under the curve rated 0.9189 for the TFT monitor and 0.9224 for the CRT monitor. At P <or= 0.05, no statistically significant difference could be detected between the 2 observational modalities for both (holes in high- and low-contrast disks) types of artifacts.

CONCLUSIONS

The TFT screen performs as well as CRT monitors for the detection of fine details in both high- and low-contrast environments. Further studies with images derived from clinical routine are necessary before safely using TFT monitors in clinical practice.