Selenium-based digital radiography versus high-resolution storage phosphor radiography in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules without calcification: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis

Missed lung cancer on chest radiography and computed tomography

Missed lung cancer raises an important medicolegal issue and contributes to one of the most common causes for malpractice actions against radiologists. Lung cancer may be missed on either chest radiography or computed tomography. Although most malpractice cases involve lesions overlooked on the former, a small and increasing portion of cases are related to chest computed tomography scan. Factors contributing to overlooked lung cancer can be attributed to observer performance, lesion characteristics, and technical considerations.

Slot-scan digital radiography of the lower extremities: a comparison to computed radiography with respect to image quality and radiation dose

Objective

To compare the slot-scan digital radiography (SSDR) of the lower extremity region and the computed radiography (CR) method with respect to the image quality and radiation exposure.

Materials and Methods

We enrolled 54 patients who underwent both the SSDR and CR of the lower extremities. The study evaluated and statistically compared the image quality of four features (outer cortex, inner cortex, trabeculae and intermuscular fat) at six different levels (pelvis, hip, femur, knee, tibia and ankle) between each method. The image quality was evaluated using a visibility scale, and the entrance skin dose was measured using a dosimeter at three different levels of a phantom (hip, knee, and ankle).

Results

The mean image visibility scale values for the SSDR method were significantly higher than for the CR method. The entrance skin dose for the SSDR method was 278 µGy at each level, compared to the entrance skin doses of the CR method, which were 3,410 µGy for the hip, 1,152 µGy for the knee, and 580 µGy for the ankle.

Conclusion

Both the image quality and patient entrance skin dose data suggest that the SSDR method is superior to the CR method for the lower extremity musculoskeletal examination.

Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics

Solid-state, digital radiography (DR) detectors, designed specifically for standard projection radiography, emerged just before the turn of the millennium. This new generation of digital image detector comprises a thin layer of x-ray absorptive material combined with an electronic active matrix array fabricated in a thin film of hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H). DR detectors can offer both efficient (low-dose) x-ray image acquisition plus on-line readout of the latent image as electronic data. To date, solid-state, flat-panel, DR detectors have come in two principal designs, the indirect-conversion (x-ray scintillator-based) and the direct-conversion (x-ray photoconductor-based) types. This review describes the underlying principles and enabling technologies exploited by these designs of detector, and evaluates their physical imaging characteristics, comparing performance both against each other and computed radiography (CR). In standard projection radiography indirect conversion DR detectors currently offer superior physical image quality and dose efficiency compared with direct conversion DR and modern point-scan CR. These conclusions have been confirmed in the findings of clinical evaluations of DR detectors. Future trends in solid-state DR detector technologies are also briefly considered. Salient innovations include WiFi-enabled, portable DR detectors, improvements in x-ray absorber layers and developments in alternative electronic media to a-Si:H.

Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation dose in chest imaging using an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector system and an amorphous selenium flat-panel detector system. In addition, the low-contrast performance of both systems with standard and low radiation doses was compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In two groups of 100 patients each, digital chest radiographs were acquired with either an amorphous silicon or an amorphous selenium flat-panel system. The effective dose of the examination was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters placed in an anthropomorphic Rando phantom. The image quality of the digital chest radiographs was assessed by five experienced radiologists using the European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images. In addition, a contrast-detail phantom study was set up to assess the low-contrast performance of both systems at different radiation dose levels. Differences between the two groups were tested for significance using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

The amorphous silicon flat-panel system allowed an important and significant reduction in effective dose in comparison with the amorphous selenium flat-panel system (p < 0.0001) for both the posteroanterior and lateral views. In addition, clinical image quality analysis showed that the dose reduction was not detrimental to image quality. Compared with the amorphous selenium flat-panel detector system, the amorphous silicon flat-panel detector system performed significantly better in the low-contrast phantom study, with phantom entrance dose values of up to 135 muGy.

CONCLUSION

Chest radiographs can be acquired with a significantly lower patient radiation dose using an amorphous silicon flat-panel system than using an amorphous selenium flat-panel system, thereby producing images that are equal or even superior in quality to those of the amorphous selenium flat-panel detector system.

Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice

The purpose of this study was to assess contrast-detail performance and effective dose of eight different digital chest radiography systems. Digital chest radiography systems from different manufacturers were included: one storage phosphor system, one selenium-coated drum system, and six direct readout systems including four thin-film transistor (TFT) systems and two charge-coupled device (CCD) systems. For measuring image quality, a contrast-detail test object was used in combination with a phantom that simulates the primary and scatter transmission through lung fields (LucAl). Six observers judged phantom images of each modality by soft-copy reading in a four-alternative-forced-choice experiment. The entrance dose was also measured, and the effective dose was calculated for an average patient. Contrast-detail curves were constructed from the observer data. The blocked two-way ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. Significant difference in contrast-detail performance was found between the systems. Best contrast-detail performance was shown by a CCD system with slot-scan technology, and the selenium-coated drum system was compared to the other six systems (p values <or=0.003). Calculated effective dose varied between 0.010 mSv and 0.032 mSv. Significant differences in contrast-detail performance and effective dose levels were found between different digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.

Comparison of a digital flat-panel versus screen–film, photofluorography and storage-phosphor systems by detection of simulated lung adenocarcinoma lesions using hard copy images

The purpose of this study was to compare hard copy images from a flat-panel detector digital radiography system with conventional radiography, photofluorographic radiography and storage phosphor radiography for the detection of simulated lung adenocarcinoma lesions and also for radiation dose. To test the diagnostic performance of these four systems, the authors used 15 types of lung adenocarcinoma phantom according to Noguchi's classification and an anthropomorphic chest phantom. The visual evaluation of tumour detectability by four radiologists and two general thoracic surgeons was examined with a five-level confidence scale. Lung doses were measured with glass dosemeters for the chest radiology systems under the conditions used by each hospital and centre. Our results indicated that flat-panel detector digital radiography and storage phosphor radiography are not necessarily superior to conventional radiography and photofluorographic radiography for detecting lung adenocarcinomas when only hard copy images are used, and this suggests a need to carefully optimize chest radiography.

Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease

OBJECTIVE

In a short period, a variety of technically different digital radiography chest systems have become available for clinical use. Our purpose was to assess the diagnostic performance of eight different digital radiography chest systems for detection of simulated chest disease under clinical conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Assessed were four different flat-panel detector systems, two different charge-coupled device systems, one selenium-coated drum, and one storage phosphor system. For each system, 10 chest images of an anthropomorphic chest phantom were obtained. Each image contained one to 12 simulated chest lesions. Eight radiologists performed soft-copy interpretations. Entrance dose was measured and effective dose calculated. A semi-parametric logistic regression model was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found in the diagnostic performance of the eight digital chest systems (p = 0.01). Best performance was observed with the charge-coupled device system with slot-scan technology, yielding a sensitivity of 46% (132 of 288) lesions detected. The performance of three flat-panel detectors and the selenium-drum system was not significantly different from the slot-scan charge-coupled device system. Fewer lesions were detected with the storage phosphor system than with all other digital technologies, with a sensitivity of 34% (99 of 288) lesions detected, slot-scan charge-coupled device system versus storage phosphor system, p < 0.001. The effective dose varied among the digital systems.

CONCLUSION

We found differences in diagnostic performance among the eight different digital chest systems. Differences in detection rates are predominantly explained by detector design.

State-of-the-art screening for lung cancer (part 1): the chest radiograph

The chest radiographic methods used in prior studies of lung cancer screening and in current prospective clinical trials of lung cancer screening do not incorporate, as part of their prospective design, the newer methods available for the detection of lung nodules. DR, image processing, ES, and CAD have been shown to enhance lung nodule detection. TS is a promising method but with less supporting data currently available. These techniques, alone or in combination, do not equal the nodule detection capability of lung CT, but they are likely to benefit patients having CXRs for other clinically indicated purposes and when the detection of a nodule is incidental to the clinical indication for the radiographic study.