Utility of Restriction Spectrum Imaging Among Men Undergoing First-Time Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer

MRI-based virtual pathology of the prostate

Prostate cancer poses significant diagnostic challenges, with conventional methods like prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies often leading to overdiagnosis or miss clinically significant cancers. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has emerged as a more reliable tool. However, it is limited by high inter-observer variability and radiologists missing up to 30% of clinically significant cancers. This article summarizes a few of these recent advancements in quantitative MRI techniques that look at the "Virtual Pathology" of the prostate with an aim to enhance prostate cancer detection and characterization. These techniques include T2 relaxation-based techniques such as luminal water imaging, diffusion based such as vascular, extracellular, and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumors (VERDICT) and restriction spectrum imaging or combined relaxation-diffusion techniques such as hybrid multi-dimensional MRI (HM-MRI), time-dependent diffusion imaging, and diffusion-relaxation correlation spectrum imaging. These methods provide detailed insights into underlying prostate microstructure and tissue composition and have shown improved diagnostic accuracy over conventional MRI. These innovative MRI methods hold potential for augmenting mpMRI, reducing variability in diagnosis, and paving the way for MRI as a 'virtual histology' tool in prostate cancer diagnosis. However, they require further validation in larger multi-center clinical settings and rigorous in-depth radiological-pathology correlation are needed for broader implementation.

Quantitative characterization of breast lesions and normal fibroglandular tissue using compartmentalized diffusion-weighted model: comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion and restriction spectrum imaging

BACKGROUND

To compare the compartmentalized diffusion-weighted models, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and restriction spectrum imaging (RSI), in characterizing breast lesions and normal fibroglandular tissue.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 152 patients with 157 histopathologically verified breast lesions (41 benign and 116 malignant). All patients underwent a full-protocol preoperative breast MRI, including a multi-b-value DWI sequence. The diffusion parameters derived from the mono-exponential model (ADC), IVIM model (Dt, Dp, f), and RSI model (C1, C2, C3, C1C2, F1, F2, F3, F1F2) were quantitatively measured and then compared among malignant lesions, benign lesions and normal fibroglandular tissues using Kruskal-Wallis test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for the pairwise comparisons. Diagnostic models were built by logistic regression analysis. The ROC analysis was performed using five-fold cross-validation and the mean AUC values were calculated and compared to evaluate the discriminative ability of each parameter or model.

RESULTS

Almost all quantitative diffusion parameters showed significant differences in distinguishing malignant breast lesions from both benign lesions (other than C2) and normal fibroglandular tissue (all parameters) (all P < 0.0167). In terms of the comparisons of benign lesions and normal fibroglandular tissues, the parameters derived from IVIM (Dp, f) and RSI (C1, C2, C1C2, F1, F2, F3) showed significant differences (all P < 0.005). When using individual parameters, RSI-derived parameters-F1, C1C2, and C2 values yielded the highest AUCs for the comparisons of malignant vs. benign, malignant vs. normal tissue and benign vs. normal tissue (AUCs = 0.871, 0.982, and 0.863, respectively). Furthermore, the combined diagnostic model (IVIM + RSI) exhibited the highest diagnostic efficacy for the pairwise discriminations (AUCs = 0.893, 0.991, and 0.928, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative parameters derived from the three-compartment RSI model have great promise as imaging indicators for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions compared with the bi-exponential IVIM model. Additionally, the combined model of IVIM and RSI achieves superior diagnostic performance in characterizing breast lesions.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Free-Hand and Fixed-Arm Spatial Tracking Methodologies in Software-Guided MRI-TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy Platforms

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cancer detection rate (CDR) between the 2 dominant spatial tracking methodologies in software-guided MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy (SGF-Bx) platforms: fixed-arm and free-hand.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on published primary analyses of prospective trials and cohort studies that enrolled biopsy-naïve patients for SFG-Bx. Inclusion criteria included the use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) v2.0 or later and the targeting of lesions graded as PI-RADS 3 or higher. Random effects models were used to assess the overall prostate cancer (PCa) CDR and the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) CDR for both platforms. csPCa was standardized to a definition of Gleason Grade Group 2 or higher when possible. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying studies into the average number of cores taken per lesion.

RESULTS

The PCa CDR was 0.674 for free-hand systems and 0.681 for fixed-arm systems. The csPCa CDR was 0.492 for free-hand systems and 0.500 for fixed-hand systems. There was no significant difference between free-hand and fixed-arm cancer detection rates for both overall PCa (P = .88) and csPCa (P = .90). Subgroup analyses revealed significant PCa CDR and csPCa CDR differences (P < .001) between free-hand and fixed-arm platforms only when 2 cores per lesion were taken, in favor of fixed-arm platforms.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed-arm platforms performed similarly in cancer detection to free-hand platforms but show a minor benefit on fewer samples. While tracking methodology differences appear subtle, further investigation into the clinical impact of platform-specific features are warranted.

Quantitative Assessment of Restriction Spectrum MR Imaging for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer and Association With Prognostic Factors

BACKGROUND

Restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) is an advanced quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) technique to assess breast cancer.

PURPOSE

To investigate the ability of RSI to differentiate the benign and malignant breast lesions and the association with prognostic factors of breast cancer.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Seventy women (mean age, 49.6 ± 12.3 years) with 56 malignant and 19 benign breast lesions.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3-T; RSI-based DWI sequence with echo-planar imaging technique.

ASSESSMENT

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and RSI parameters (restricted diffusion f₁ , hindered diffusion f₂ , free diffusion f₃ , and signal fractions f₁ f₂ ) were calculated by two readers for the whole lesion volume and compared between the benign and malignant groups and the subgroups with different statuses of prognostic factors in breast cancer.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Mann-Whitney U test or Student's t-test was applied to compare the quantitative parameters between the different groups. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess readers' reproducibility. Binary logistic regression was used to combine parameters. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of parameters to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Malignant breast lesions showed significantly lower ADC and f₃ values, and significantly higher f₁ and f₁ f₂ values than the benign lesions, with AUC of 0.951, 0.877, 0.868, and 0.860, respectively. When RSI-derived parameters and ADC were combined, the diagnostic performance was superior to either single parameter (AUC = 0.973). The f₃ value was significantly differed between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative tumors. The ADC, f₁ , f₃ , and f₁ f₂ values were significantly different progesterone receptor (PR)-positive and PR-negative status.

DATA CONCLUSION

The RSI-derived parameters (f₁ , f₃ , and f₁ f₂ ) may facilitate the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI

Current challenges of using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level-based screening, such as the increased false positive rate, inability to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) with random biopsy, multifocality in PCa, and the molecular heterogeneity of PCa, can be addressed by integrating advanced multiparametric MR imaging (mpMRI) approaches into the diagnostic workup of PCa. The standard method for diagnosing PCa is a transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided systematic prostate biopsy, but it suffers from sampling errors and frequently fails to detect clinically significant PCa. mpMRI not only increases the detection of clinically significant PCa, but it also helps to reduce unnecessary biopsies because of its high negative predictive value. Furthermore, non-Cartesian image acquisition and compressed sensing have resulted in faster MR acquisition with improved signal-to-noise ratio, which can be used in quantitative MRI methods such as dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. With the growing emphasis on the role of pre-biopsy mpMRI in the evaluation of PCa, there is an increased demand for innovative MRI methods that can improve PCa grading, detect clinically significant PCa, and biopsy guidance. To meet these demands, in addition to routine T1-weighted, T2-weighted, DCE-MRI, diffusion MRI, and MR spectroscopy, several new MR methods such as restriction spectrum imaging, vascular, extracellular, and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumors (VERDICT) method, hybrid multi-dimensional MRI, luminal water imaging, and MR fingerprinting have been developed for a better characterization of the disease. Further, with the increasing interest in combining MR data with clinical and genomic data, there is a growing interest in utilizing radiomics and radiogenomics approaches. These big data can also be utilized in the development of computer-aided diagnostic tools, including automatic segmentation and the detection of clinically significant PCa using machine learning methods.

Diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), a key component in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), is useful for tumor detection and localization in clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 2 and 2.1 (PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v2.1) emphasize the role of DWI in determining PIRADS Assessment Category in each of the transition and peripheral zones. In addition, several recent studies have demonstrated comparable performance of abbreviated biparametric MRI (bpMRI), which incorporates only T2-weighted imaging and DWI, compared with mpMRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Therefore, further optimization of DWI is essential to achieve clinical application of bpMRI for efficient detection of csPC in patients with elevated PSA levels. Although DWI acquisition is routinely performed using single-shot echo-planar imaging, this method suffers from such as susceptibility artifact and anatomic distortion, which remain to be solved. In this review article, we will outline existing problems in standard DWI using the single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence; discuss solutions that employ newly developed imaging techniques, state-of-the-art technologies, and sequences in DWI; and evaluate the current status of quantitative DWI for assessment of tumor aggressiveness in PC.

Voxel-level Classification of Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving Accuracy Using Four-Compartment Restriction Spectrum Imaging

BACKGROUND

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is integral to detection of prostate cancer (PCa), but conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cannot capture the complexity of prostate tissues and tends to yield noisy images that do not distinctly highlight cancer. A four-compartment restriction spectrum imaging (RSI₄ ) model was recently found to optimally characterize pelvic diffusion signals, and the model coefficient for the slowest diffusion compartment, RSI₄ -C₁ , yielded greatest tumor conspicuity.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the slowest diffusion compartment of a four-compartment spectrum imaging model (RSI₄ -C₁ ) as a quantitative voxel-level classifier of PCa.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Forty-six men who underwent an extended MRI acquisition protocol for suspected PCa. Twenty-three men had benign prostates, and the other 23 men had PCa.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3 T, multishell diffusion-weighted and axial T2-weighted sequences.

ASSESSMENT

High-confidence cancer voxels were delineated by expert consensus, using imaging data and biopsy results. The entire prostate was considered benign in patients with no detectable cancer. Diffusion images were used to calculate RSI₄ -C₁ and conventional ADC. Classifier images were also generated.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Voxel-level discrimination of PCa from benign prostate tissue was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves generated by bootstrapping with patient-level case resampling. RSI₄ -C₁ was compared to conventional ADC for two metrics: area under the ROC curve (AUC) and false-positive rate for a sensitivity of 90% (FPR₉₀ ). Statistical significance was assessed using bootstrap difference with two-sided α = 0.05.

RESULTS

RSI₄ -C₁ outperformed conventional ADC, with greater AUC (mean 0.977 [95% CI: 0.951-0.991] vs. 0.922 [0.878-0.948]) and lower FPR₉₀ (0.032 [0.009-0.082] vs. 0.201 [0.132-0.290]). These improvements were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

DATA CONCLUSION

RSI₄ -C₁ yielded a quantitative, voxel-level classifier of PCa that was superior to conventional ADC. RSI classifier images with a low false-positive rate might improve PCa detection and facilitate clinical applications like targeted biopsy and treatment planning.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Multiparametric MRI in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Physical Foundations, Limitations, and Prospective Advances of Diffusion-Weighted MRI

BACKGROUND

 Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an essential component of the multiparametric MRI exam for the diagnosis and assessment of prostate cancer (PCa). Over the last two decades, various models have been developed to quantitatively correlate the DWI signal with microstructural characteristics of prostate tissue. The simplest approach (ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient) - currently established as the clinical standard - describes monoexponential decay of the DWI signal. While numerous studies have shown an inverse correlation of ADC values with the Gleason score, the ADC model lacks specificity and is based on water diffusion dynamics that are not true in human tissue. This article aims to explain the biophysical limitations of the standard DWI model and to discuss the potential of more complex, advanced DWI models.

METHODS

 This article is a review based on a selective literature review.

RESULTS

 Four phenomenological DWI models are introduced: diffusion tensor imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, biexponential model, and diffusion kurtosis imaging. Their parameters may potentially improve PCa diagnostics but show varying degrees of statistical significance with respect to the detection and characterization of PCa in current studies. Phenomenological model parameters lack specificity, which has motivated the development of more descriptive tissue models that directly relate microstructural features to the DWI signal. Finally, we present two of such structural models, i. e. the VERDICT (Vascular, Extracellular, and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumors) and RSI (Restriction Spectrum Imaging) model. Both have shown promising results in initial studies regarding the characterization and prognosis of PCa.

CONCLUSION

 Recent developments in DWI techniques promise increasing accuracy and more specific statements about microstructural changes of PCa. However, further studies are necessary to establish a standardized DWI protocol for the diagnosis of PCa.

KEY POINTS

  · DWI is paramount to the mpMRI exam for the diagnosis of PCa.. · Though of clinical value, the ADC model lacks specificity and oversimplifies tissue complexities.. · Advanced phenomenological and structural models have been developed to describe the DWI signal.. · Phenomenological models may improve diagnostics but show inconsistent results regarding PCa assessment.. · Structural models have demonstrated promising results in initial studies regarding PCa characterization..

CITATION FORMAT

· Wichtmann BD, Zöllner FG, Attenberger UI et al. Multiparametric MRI in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Physical Foundations, Limitations, and Prospective Advances of Diffusion-Weighted MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 399 - 409.

New prostate MRI techniques and sequences

Prostate MRI has seen increasing interest in recent years and has led to the development of new MRI techniques and sequences to improve prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis which are reviewed in this article. Numerous studies have focused on improving image quality (segmented DWI) and faster acquisition (compressed sensing, k-t-SENSE, PROPELLER). An increasing number of studies have developed new quantitative and computer-aided diagnosis methods including artificial intelligence (PROSTATEx challenge) that mitigate the subjective nature of mpMRI interpretation. MR fingerprinting allows rapid, simultaneous generation of quantitative maps of multiple physical properties (T1, T2), where PCa are characterized by lower T1 and T2 values. New techniques like luminal water imaging (LWI), restriction spectrum imaging (RSI), VERDICT and hybrid multi-dimensional MRI (HM-MRI) have been developed for microstructure imaging, which provide information similar to histology. The distinct MR properties of tissue components and their change with the presence of cancer is used to diagnose prostate cancer. LWI is a T2-based imaging technique where long T2-component corresponding to luminal water is reduced in PCa. RSI and VERDICT are diffusion-based techniques where PCa is characterized by increased signal from intra-cellular restricted water and increased intracellular volume fraction, respectively, due to increased cellularity. VERDICT also reveal loss of extracellular-extravascular space in PCa due to loss of glandular structure. HM-MRI measures volumes of prostate tissue components, where PCa has reduced lumen and stromal and increased epithelium volume similar to results shown in histology. Similarly, molecular imaging using hyperpolarized ¹³C imaging has been utilized.

Quantitative Prostate MRI

Prostate MRI is reported in clinical practice using the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS). PI-RADS aims to standardize, as much as possible, the acquisition, interpretation, reporting, and ultimately the performance of prostate MRI. PI-RADS relies upon mainly subjective analysis of MR imaging findings, with very few incorporated quantitative features. The shortcomings of PI-RADS are mainly: low-to-moderate interobserver agreement and modest accuracy for detection of clinically significant tumors in the transition zone. The use of a more quantitative analysis of prostate MR imaging findings is therefore of interest. Quantitative MR imaging features including: tumor size and volume, tumor length of capsular contact, tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics, tumor T₁ and T₂ relaxation times, tumor shape, and texture analyses have all shown value for improving characterization of observations detected on prostate MRI and for differentiating between tumors by their pathological grade and stage. Quantitative analysis may therefore improve diagnostic accuracy for detection of cancer and could be a noninvasive means to predict patient prognosis and guide management. Since quantitative analysis of prostate MRI is less dependent on an individual users' assessment, it could also improve interobserver agreement. Semi- and fully automated analysis of quantitative (radiomic) MRI features using artificial neural networks represent the next step in quantitative prostate MRI and are now being actively studied. Validation, through high-quality multicenter studies assessing diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection, in the domain of quantitative prostate MRI is needed. This article reviews advances in quantitative prostate MRI, highlighting the strengths and limitations of existing and emerging techniques, as well as discussing opportunities and challenges for evaluation of prostate MRI in clinical practice when using quantitative assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.