MDCT of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinomas: A Prospective Study Using Contrast Materials with Different Iodine Concentrations

LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Accurate detection and characterization of liver observations to enable HCC diagnosis and staging using LI-RADS requires a technically adequate imaging exam. To help achieve this objective, LI-RADS has proposed technical requirements for CT, MR, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver. This article reviews the technical requirements for liver imaging, including the description of minimum acceptable technical standards, such as the scanner hardware requirements, recommended dynamic imaging phases, and common technical challenges of liver imaging.

Comparison of enhancement and image quality: different iodine concentrations for liver on 128-slice multidetector computed tomography in the same chronic liver disease patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The objective of this study was to compare the degree of hepatic enhancement and image quality using contrast media of different iodine concentrations with the same iodine dose.

METHODS

From July 2011 to June 2013, 50 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent baseline and follow-up 128-slice multidetector computed tomography(MDCT) using contrast media with 350 mg I/mL (group A) and 400 mg I/mL (group B) iodine concentrations were included in this prospective study. The patients were randomly allocated to one of two protocols: 350 mg I/mL initially and then 400 mg I/mL; and 400 mg I/mL initially and then 350 mg I/mL. The bolus tracking technique was used to initiate the arterial phase scan. The computed tomography values of hepatic parenchyma, abdominal aorta and portal vein were measured. The degrees of hepatic and vascular enhancement were rated on a 4-point scale for qualitative assessment. The paired Student t test was used to compare outcome variables.

RESULTS

The mean hepatic enhancement was significantly higher in group B than in group A during the portal (p = 0.025) and equilibrium phases (p = 0.021). In all phases, group B had significantly higher mean liver-to-aorta contrast (p < 0.05) and mean visual scores for hepatic and vascular enhancement (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that a higher iodine concentration (400 mg I/mL) in contrast media was more effective at improving hepatic enhancement in portal and equilibrium phase images and overall image quality using 128-slice MDCT in chronic liver disease patients.

Ultrasound fusion imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of current evidence

With advances in technology, imaging techniques that entail fusion of sonography and CT or MRI have been introduced in clinical practice. Ultrasound fusion imaging provides CT or MRI cross-sectional multiplanar images that correspond to the sonographic images, and fusion imaging of B-mode sonography and CT or MRI can be displayed simultaneously and in real time according to the angle of the transducer. Ultrasound fusion imaging helps us understand the three-dimensional relationship between the liver vasculature and tumors, and can detect small liver tumors with poor conspicuity. This fusion imaging is attracting the attention of operators who perform radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of hepatic malignancies because this real-time, multimodality comparison can increase monitoring and targeting confidence during the procedure. When RFA with fusion imaging was performed on small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with poor conspicuity, it was reported that the rates of technical success and local tumor progression were 94.4-100% and 0-8.3%. However, there have been no studies comparing fusion imaging guidance and contrast-enhanced sonography, CT or MRI guidance in ablation. Fusion imaging-guided RFA has proved to be effective for HCCs that are poorly defined on not only conventional B-mode sonography but also contrast-enhanced sonography. In addition, fusion imaging could be useful to assess the treatment response of RFA because of three-dimensional information. Here, we give an overview of the current status of ultrasound fusion imaging for clinical application in the liver.

Radial volumetric imaging breath-hold examination (VIBE) with k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) for dynamic gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI of the liver: advantages over Cartesian VIBE in the arterial phase

OBJECTIVES

To compare radial volumetric imaging breath-hold examination with k-space weighted image contrast reconstruction (r-VIBE-KWIC) to Cartesian VIBE (c-VIBE) in arterial phase dynamic gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the liver.

METHODS

We reviewed 53 consecutive DCE-MRI studies performed on a 3-T unit using c-VIBE and 53 consecutive cases performed using r-VIBE-KWIC with full-frame image subset (r-VIBEfull) and sub-frame image subsets (r-VIBEsub; temporal resolution, 2.5-3 s). All arterial phase images were scored by two readers on: (1) contrast-enhancement ratio (CER) in the abdominal aorta; (2) scan timing; (3) artefacts; (4) visualisation of the common, right, and left hepatic arteries.

RESULTS

Mean abdominal aortic CERs for c-VIBE, r-VIBEfull, and r-VIBEsub were 3.2, 4.3 and 6.5, respectively. There were significant differences between each group (P < 0.0001). The mean score for c-VIBE was significantly lower than that for r-VIBEfull and r-VIBEsub in all factors except for visualisation of the common hepatic artery (P < 0.05). The mean score of all factors except for scan timing for r-VIBEsub was not significantly different from that for r-VIBEfull.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial VIBE-KWIC provides higher image quality than c-VIBE, and r-VIBEsub features high temporal resolution without image degradation in arterial phase DCE-MRI.

KEY POINTS

Radial VIBE-KWIC minimised artefact and produced high-quality and high-temporal-resolution images. Maximum abdominal aortic enhancement was observed on sub-frame images of r-VIBE-KWIC. Using r-VIBE-KWIC, optimal arterial phase images were obtained in over 90 %. Using r-VIBE-KWIC, visualisation of the hepatic arteries was improved. A two-reader study revealed r-VIBE-KWIC's advantages over Cartesian VIBE.

The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals

Purpose

To investigate four different contrast protocols to detect hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) most adaptable for patients at any body weight (BW) in clinical practice.

Materials and methods

A post-marketing surveillance of liver dynamic CT was prospectively performed by four different protocols in 415 patients: Protocol-A, BW-tailored dose of contrast media (CM: iohexol 300 mgI/mL), fixed injection duration (30s), fixed scan timing at arterial phase (AP); Protocol-B, BW-tailored dose of CM, fixed injection duration (30s), by bolus tracking; Protocol-C, BW-tailored dose of CM, fixed injection flow rate, by bolus tracking; Protocol-D, 100 mL constant of CM at any BW, fixed scan timing. Scan timing and tumor conspicuity at AP was scored qualitatively. The quantitative CT values of aorta and tumor liver contrast (TLC) were obtained.

Results

The qualitative rate assessed “good” as scan timing of AP in Protocol-C was significantly lower than those in Protocols A and D (difference:16.6%, 17.4%, P = 0.0069, P = 0.0140, respectively). Scatter plot of Protocol-D (R² = 0.1283) at AP showed significant inverse relationship between TLC and BW (P =0.0053), although not significant in Protocols A, B, C.

Conclusion

In patients with higher BW, protocols of BW-tailored dose of CM and/or fixed injection duration have no dependence on BW to diagnose hypervascular HCCs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-367) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effect of varying contrast material iodine concentration and injection technique on the conspicuity of hepatocellular carcinoma during 64-section MDCT of patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the intraindividual effects of contrast material with two different iodine concentrations on the conspicuity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and vascular and hepatic contrast enhancement during multiphasic, 64-section multidetector row CT (MDCT) in patients with cirrhosis using two contrast medium injection techniques.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups with an equal iodine dose but different contrast material injection techniques: scheme A, fixed injection duration (25 s), and scheme B, fixed injection flow rate (4 ml s(-1)). For each group, patients were randomised to receive both moderate-concentration contrast medium (MCCM) and high-concentration contrast medium (HCCM) during two CT examinations within 3 months. Enhancement of the aorta, liver and portal vein and the tumour-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between MCCM and HCCM.

RESULTS

30 patients (mean age 59 years; range 45-80 years; 16 patients in scheme A and 14 in scheme B) with a total of 31 confirmed HCC nodules were prospectively enrolled. For scheme B, the mean contrast enhancement of the aorta and tumour-to-liver CNR were significantly higher with HCCM than with MCCM during the hepatic arterial phase (+350.5 HU vs +301.1 HU, p = 0.001, and +7.5 HU vs +5.5 HU, p = 0.004). For both groups, there was no significant difference between MCCM and HCCM for all other comparisons.

CONCLUSION

For a constant injection flow rate, HCCM significantly improves the conspicuity of HCC lesions and aortic enhancement during the hepatic arterial phase on 64-section MDCT in patients with cirrhosis.

Evaluation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver: comparison of different concentrations of contrast material with multi-detector row helical CT--a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

To evaluate two different iodine concentrations of contrast material for detecting hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in cirrhotic liver by multi-detector row helical CT (MDCT) when a fixed contrast material volume and injection rate is used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. In this prospective study, 105 patients were randomly assigned a group A (an iodine concentration of 300 mg I/mL), and a group B (an iodine concentration of 370 mg I/mL). In both groups the volume of contrast material was 100 mL and the injection rate was 4 mL/s. Fifty-two patients had 122 hypervascular HCCs. The diagnosis of HCCs was established histopathologically (n=24) and by imaging findings (n=98). Three readers independently analyzed four image sets: an arterial phase (AP), a portal phase (PP), an equilibrium phase (EP), and combined all three phase images set. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

The mean sensitivity for detecting hypervascular HCCs of the AP set, EP set, and combination set in group B (0.94, 0.81, and 0.93) was significantly higher than in group A (0.84, 0.69, and 0.80). Area under the ROC curve of the AP set and the combination set in group B (0.974 and 0.981) was significantly higher than in group A (0.939 and 0.958).

CONCLUSION

At the same contrast material volume and injection rate, higher iodine concentration of contrast material was effective for detecting hypervascular HCCs by MDCT.

Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches

The continuing advances in computed tomographic (CT) technology in the past decades have provided ongoing opportunities to improve CT image quality and clinical practice and discover new clinical CT imaging applications. New CT technology, however, has introduced new challenges in clinical radiology practice. One of the challenges is with intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing. In this article, contrast medium pharmacokinetics and patient, contrast medium, and CT scanning factors associated with contrast enhancement and scan timing are presented and discussed. Published data from clinical studies of contrast medium and physiology are reviewed and interpreted. Computer simulation data are analyzed to provide an in-depth analysis of various factors associated with contrast enhancement and scan timing. On the basis of basic principles and analysis of the factors, clinical considerations and modifications to protocol design that are necessary to optimize contrast enhancement for common clinical CT applications are proposed.

Depiction of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma with 64-MDCT: comparison of moderate- and high-concentration contrast material with and without saline flush

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the depiction of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma on 64-MDCT scans obtained with contrast agents of varying iodine concentrations administered with and without saline flush.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study included 149 patients, among whom 36 patients with hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma were identified. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three protocols: A, contrast material of 300 mg I/mL; B, 370 mg I/mL; C, 370 mg I/mL plus saline flush. In all protocols, the same iodine load per kilogram of body weight (516 mg/kg) was administered for the same injection duration (30 seconds). Enhancement values in the aorta, liver, and portal vein and tumor-liver contrast were measured at multiphase CT.

RESULTS

Aortic enhancement was significantly different between protocols A and B (p = 0.04, p < 0.0001) and protocols B and C (p = 0.02, p < 0.001) in the first and second phases. Portal venous enhancement was significantly different between protocols B and C (p = 0.02) in the first phase and between protocols B and C and protocols A and C (p < 0.01, p = 0.02) in the second phase. Tumor-liver contrast was significantly different between protocols A and B (p = 0.03, p = 0.02) and protocols B and C (p = 0.03, p = 0.04) in the first and second phases but not between protocols A and C. There was no significant difference in hepatic enhancement among the three protocols.

CONCLUSION

Use of moderate concentration was more effective than use of a high concentration of contrast material for depiction of hepatocellular carcinoma. Adding a saline flush to the high-concentration protocol eliminated the difference in depiction of hepatocellular carcinoma between the moderate- and high-concentration protocols.

Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging--pilot study

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate a respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequence combined with parallel acquisition to allow the calculation of pure molecular-based (D) and perfusion-related (D*, f) diffusion parameters, on the basis of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory, to determine if these parameters differ between patients with cirrhosis and patients without liver fibrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study; informed consent was waived. IVIM DW imaging was tested on three alkane phantoms, on which the signal-intensity decay curves according to b factors were logarithmically plotted. Ten b factors (0, 10, 20, 30, 50, 80, 100, 200, 400, 800 sec/mm(2)) were used in patients. Patients with documented liver cirrhosis (cirrhotic liver group, n = 12) and patients without chronic liver disease (healthy liver group, n = 25) were included. The mean liver D, D*, and f values were measured and compared with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) computed by using four b values (0, 200, 400, 800 sec/mm(2)). Liver ADC and D, f, and D* parameters were compared between the cirrhotic liver group and healthy liver group. Means were compared by using the Student t test.

RESULTS

Signal-intensity decay curves were monoexponential on phantoms and biexponential in patients. In vivo, mean ADC values were significantly higher than D in the healthy liver group (ADC = 1.39 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.2 [standard deviation] vs D = 1.10 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.7) and in the cirrhotic liver group (ADC = 1.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.4 vs D = 1.19 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.5) (P = .03). ADC and D* were significantly reduced in the cirrhotic liver group compared with those in the healthy liver group (respective P values of .03 and .008).

CONCLUSION

Restricted diffusion observed in patients with cirrhosis may be related to D* variations, which reflect decreased perfusion, as well as alterations in pure molecular water diffusion in cirrhotic livers.

Optimal arterial phase imaging for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma determined by continuous image capture on 16-MDCT

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to estimate the optimal time delay before the initiation of arterial phase scanning for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on 16-MDCT when a rapid bolus injection of contrast medium is administered.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 25 patients (19 men and six women; mean age, 63.5 years; age range, 50-81 years) with pathologically confirmed HCC were included. Dynamic 16-MDCT imaging was performed in cine mode using 70 mL of nonionic iodinated contrast medium (300 mg I/mL) at an injection rate of 7 mL/s. Four consecutive 5-mm-thick slices at the maximum diameter of the HCC were selected as the region of interest. Time-attenuation curves were generated by region of interest drawn on the aorta, tumor, and liver. Qualitative assessments of conspicuity for contrast medium wash-in, peak, and wash-out of aorta and tumor were performed.

RESULTS

There were 108 arterial phase enhancing lesions (mean [+/-SD], 4.9 +/- 2.4 cm; range, 0.7-12.9 cm) in the 25 patients. The maximum Hounsfield value of aorta, tumor, and background liver parenchyma were 463.8 +/- 98 HU, 106.5 +/- 19 HU, and 98.3 +/- 14 HU, respectively. At the time of onset of peak tumor enhancement, the difference between tumor density and background liver density was 38.2 +/- 19 HU. The time-attenuation curve showed that the mean times of contrast enhancement start, peak, and end were 9.2 +/- 2.7 seconds, 19.4 +/- 2.1 seconds, and 38 +/- 13.5 seconds, respectively, for the aorta, and 15.5 +/- 2.6 seconds, 26.3 +/- 2.9 seconds, and 57.7 +/- 14.4 seconds, respectively, for 25 pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinomas. Qualitatively, the mean times of contrast enhancement wash-in, peak, and washout were 10.2 +/- 2.8 seconds, 19.9 +/- 3 seconds, and 39.9 +/- 9.2 seconds, respectively for the aorta, and 18 +/- 4.2 seconds, 27 +/- 3 seconds, and 55.7 +/- 21 seconds, respectively, for tumor. There were no differences between quantitative and qualitative measurements of wash-in and peak time for the aorta (p = 0.00017, p = 0.00016) and tumor (p = 0.00163, p = 0.00040).

CONCLUSION

When using 70 mL of 300 mg I/mL of contrast medium with an injection rate of 7 mL/s in 16-MDCT scanning, the optimal time to initiate scanning for HCC is 26.3 +/- 2.9 seconds (range, 24.0-34.5 seconds) after contrast medium administration.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: analysis of the effect of various concentrations of contrast material

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two contrast materials with moderate and high iodine concentrations for the depiction of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 107 patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent helical computed tomography. A fixed dose of 100 ml of iopamidol 300 (mg I/ml) was administered to 50 patients (group A) and iopamidol 370 (mg I/ml) to 57 patients (group B) at the same injection rate (3 ml/s). Unenhanced helical scans and contrast-enhanced scans for three phases (30, 70, and 300 s after starting the infusion of contrast material) were obtained. We evaluated enhancement of the aorta, portal vein, hepatic parenchyma, pancreatic parenchyma, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma during each phase.

RESULTS

During all phases, both aortic and pancreatic enhancement were significantly greater in group B than in group A (P<0.01). Enhancement of the portal vein and hepatic parenchyma was significantly greater at 70 and 300 s in group B than in group A (both P<0.01). Tumor-to-pancreas contrast was significantly greater in group B than in group A at both 30 s (P<0.01) and 70 s (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Administration of contrast material with a high iodine concentration is more effective for depicting pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: value of virtual CT sonography with magnetic navigation

OBJECTIVE

Virtual CT sonography with magnetic navigation yields cross-sectional images of CT volume data that correspond to the angle of the transducer in the magnetic field in real time. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and feasibility of virtual CT sonography for radiofrequency ablation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma poorly defined on B-mode sonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred one patients enrolled in the study were separated into two groups. Fifty-one patients with 65 hepatocellular carcinomas underwent prospective virtual CT sonography as guidance for radiofrequency ablation. Fifty patients with 63 hepatocellular carcinomas managed with B-mode sonographic guidance were retrospectively selected under the same conditions as the virtual CT sonography group to act as a historical control group.

RESULTS

In the virtual CT sonography group, technically successful ablation was achieved in a single session in 92% (47/51) of the patients and in two sessions in 8% (4/51). In the B-mode sonography group, technical success was achieved in a single session in 72% (36/50) of the patients, in two sessions in 24% (12/50), and in three sessions in 4% (2/50). Treatment analysis showed that the technical success rate after a single treatment session was significantly (p = 0.017) higher for the virtual CT sonography group. The number of treatment sessions was significantly (p = 0.021) lower for the virtual CT sonography group (mean, 1.1 +/- 0.1 vs 1.3 +/- 0.3 sessions).

CONCLUSION

Virtual CT sonographically assisted radiofrequency ablation is an efficient treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that is poorly defined on B-mode sonography.

Comparison between one-route and two-route injection for liver and aortic enhancement using MDCT

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether simultaneous injection into cubital veins bilaterally at one half of the standard injection rate achieves similar hepatic and aortic enhancement on MDCT as the conventional injection rate into a single cubital vein.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients underwent multiphase MDCT because they were suspected of having a hepatic tumor. Patients were assigned to one of the following two groups: group A, 100 mL of 370 mg I/mL of contrast medium injected into a unilateral cubital vein (one-route) via a 20-gauge cannula at a rate of 4 mL/s; or group B, 50 mL of contrast medium injected into the cubital veins bilaterally (two-route) via 24-gauge cannulas at 2 mL/s. Peak contrast enhancement of the liver and abdominal aorta for groups A and B was measured using regions of interest and compared; arrival time of the contrast media was also compared using a bolus-tracking system. Analysis was performed using Wilcoxon's signed rank test.

RESULTS

Peak aortic enhancement of groups A and B was 367 +/- 67 H and 361 +/- 113 H (p = 0.61, not significant), respectively, and peak hepatic enhancement of groups A and B was 56 +/- 11 H and 56 +/- 16 H (p = 0.88, not significant), respectively. Mean arrival time to the aorta of group B (19.4 +/- 3.4 seconds) was significantly later compared with that of group A (15.5 +/- 3.5 seconds) (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The slower two-route injection produced the same aortic and hepatic enhancement as the faster one-route method with faster injection, but the arrival time of the contrast medium was later using the two-route method.

Optimal contrast dose for depiction of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma at dynamic CT using 64-MDCT

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to investigate prospectively the optimal contrast dose for the depiction of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during the hepatic arterial phase (HAP) at dynamic CT using a 64-MDCT scanner.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study included 135 patients with known or suspected HCC who underwent dynamic CT on a 64-detector scanner and 47 were found to have 71 hypervascular HCCs. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three protocols: A contrast dose of 450, 525, or 600 mg I/kg of body weight was delivered over 30 seconds in protocols A, B, and C, respectively. We measured the tumor-liver contrast (TLC) during HAP in the three groups and compared the results. Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated tumor conspicuity during HAP using a 3-point scale; their results were compared.

RESULTS

The TLC in protocols A, B, and C was 26.5, 38.4, and 52.3 H, respectively; the difference was significant between protocols A and B (p = 0.05), A and C (p < 0.01), and B and C (p = 0.02). In our qualitative analysis of tumor conspicuity, the mean score for protocols A, B, and C was 1.6, 2.3, and 2.7, respectively; there was a significant difference between protocols A and B and A and C, but not between protocols B and C.

CONCLUSION

The administration of a total iodine dose of 525 mg or more per kilogram of body weight is desirable for the good or excellent depiction of hypervascular HCC, although the administration of 450 mg I/kg of body weight can depict hypervascular HCC.

Quadruple-phase MDCT of the liver in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of contrast material flow rate

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of contrast material flow rate (3 mL/sec vs 5 mL/sec) on the detection and visualization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with MDCT and the safety profile of iodixanol at different injection rates.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In a prospective, randomized multicenter trial, 97 patients (83 men and 14 women, with a mean age of 64 years) suspected of having HCC underwent quadruple-phase (double arterial, portal venous, delayed phase) 4-16-MDCT. Patients were randomized to receive iodixanol, 320 mg I/mL (1.5 mL/kg body weight), at a flow rate of 3 mL/sec (48 patients) or 5 mL/sec (49 patients). Qualitative (lesion detection, image quality) and quantitative (liver and aortic enhancement, tumor-liver contrast) analyses and safety assessment were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 145 HCCs were detected in the 5 mL/sec group and 100 HCCs in the 3 mL/sec group (p < 0.05). More lesions equal to or less than 1 cm were detected at 5 mL/sec (33 vs 16 lesions). The late arterial phase showed significantly more lesions than the early, arterial phase (133 vs 100 and 96 vs 67 lesions, respectively, p < 0.0001). Hyperattenuating HCCs were better visualized in the late arterial phase at 5 mL/sec (excellent visualization: 54% vs 27%). Using a flow of 5 mL/sec did not increase the rate of patient discomfort or contrast media-related adverse events. Most discomfort in both groups was of mild intensity and there was no severe discomfort.

CONCLUSION

For detection of HCC with MDCT, a higher flow rate of 5 mL/sec is recommended. Visualization of hyperattenuating HCC is improved with no greater discomfort or adverse events.

Detection and characterization of benign focal liver lesions with multislice CT

MDCT is a rapidly evolving technique that significantly improves CT imaging for several indications including depiction of focal benign lesions. Imaging mainly profits from improved longitudinal spatial resolution allowing high-quality non-axial reformations and 3D reconstructions and CT angiography as well as rapid accurate multiphase imaging with short breath-holding periods. This review provides an overview of the current status of MDCT with respect to liver imaging and the implications for characterizing benign focal liver lesions. MDCT currently allows the acquisition of thin slices in daily routine diagnostics providing an improved detection rate of small liver lesions. Whereas large benign focal liver lesions exhibit typical patterns of morphology, attenuation and perfusion, which also may be assessed with single-slice scanners, small lesions remain challenging even with MDCT, since the specific criteria for confident diagnosis become more ambiguous. Here, MR imaging provides more detailed information about tissue components and the availability of liver-specific contrast agents, adding further impact to this technique. With respect to dose considerations, the number of necessary multiphase scans as well as the application of very thin collimation should be strictly checked for each patient undergoing MDCT based on the individual clinical situation and question.

Optimal Delay Time for the Hepatic Parenchymal Enhancement at the Multidetector CT Examination

The objective of this study was to determine the optimal scan delay time after hepatic parenchymal enhancement using a 16-channel multidetector row helical CT (MDCT) scanner. Two hundred fifty-five consecutive patients underwent biphasic CT scans using a 16-channel MDCT. In group A (n = 125), two hepatic venous phase scans (HVP1 and HVP2) were obtained at 40 and 60 seconds, after 100-HU threshold time (T100HU) in the abdominal aorta. In group B (n = 130), HVP1 and HVP2 scans were obtained 50 and 70 seconds after T100HU. Both groups were divided into subgroups that were given different contrast media. Groups A1 and B1 received a contrast medium of 300 mgI/mL; groups A2 and B2 received a contrast medium of 370 mgI/mL. Each patient was injected with contrast medium at a dose of 2 mL/kg at a rate adjusted to the patient's body weight with a constant injection duration of 47 seconds. The attenuation values (HU) for the liver, portal vein, hepatic vein, and aorta were measured. The average HU was compared between the groups. Hepatic enhancement in the images obtained at 50 and 60 seconds after T100HU was greater (P < 0.05) than in images obtained at 40 and 70 seconds. These results were obtained with both contrast media. A few patients showed greater enhancement at a 40 seconds or 70 seconds. Hepatic enhancement was significantly greater in all scans using a contrast medium dose of 370 mgI/mL compared with the 300-mgI/mL dose (P < 0.05). Independent of the concentration of contrast medium, scan delays of 50 to 60 seconds after T100HU may provide optimal hepatic enhancement.

Detection and characterization of liver metastases: 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 16--slice multidetector computed tomography with that of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of small hepatic metastases and in the differentiation of hepatic metastases from cysts. Twenty-three patients with 55 liver metastases and 14 liver cysts underwent SPIO-enhanced MR imaging and multiphasic CT using 16-MDCT. Two observers independently analyzed each image, in random order. Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for lesion detection and differentiation as metastases or cysts for MDCT and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. For all observers, the Az values of SPIO-enhanced MR imaging for lesion detection and differentiation of liver metastases from cysts (mean 0.955, 0.999) were higher than those of MDCT (mean 0.925, 0.982), but not statistically significantly so (P > 0.05). Sensitivity of SPIO-enhanced MR imaging with regard to the detection of liver metastases (mean 94.5%) was significantly higher than that of MDCT (mean 80.0%) (P < 0.05). SPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 16-MDCT showed similar diagnostic accuracies for detection and differentiation of liver metastases from cysts, but sensitivity of SPIO-enhanced imaging in the detection of liver metastases was superior to that of 16-MDCT.