Nipple Discharge: Current Clinical and Imaging Evaluation

Role of immediate injection of methylene blue after fiberoptic ductoscopy in selective ductectomy for patients with pathological nipple discharge

PURPOSE

Pathological nipple discharge (PND) is associated with malignancy. This study aimed to investigate the value of fiberoptic ductoscopy (FDS) and the feasibility of immediate injection of methylene blue after FDS to identify discharging ducts and intraductal lesions without overflow of methylene blue during surgery.

METHODS

From May 2019 to December 2023, 164 PND patients were enrolled. Methylene blue was injected into the discharging ducts immediately after FDS. Surgery was underwent several hours later. The dyeing effect and the operation time were assessed. The pathological results were analyzed with clinical characteristics and ductoscopic appearances.

RESULTS

The overall detection rate of malignancy was 14.0% (23/164). Both ultrasound (US) and mammography (MG) were negative in 80 (48.8%) patients, while pathology yielded 10 (12.5%) breast cancers. Statistical analysis revealed that patients exhibiting older age, menopause, positive MG, and bloody discharge had a higher propensity for malignancy (P < 0.05). Ductoscopic features such as multiple and distal lesions, irregular morphology and hemorrhage of the lesions, and roughness and stiffness of the ductal walls were associated with malignancy (P < 0.05). Conducting surgery 12-24 h after injection of methylene blue resulted in optimal dyeing without overflow of methylene blue.

CONCLUSION

FDS is an effective and feasible examination for PND patients with negative imaging results. Immediate injection of methylene blue after FDS allows clear identification of discharging ducts and intraductal lesions without overflow of methylene blue. This approach may be useful in guiding selective ductectomy for the detection of early breast cancer.

Anatomical Approach for the Evaluation of the Nipple-Areolar Complex

The nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is an anatomically unique region from which several normal variants and pathologies arise. Understanding its anatomy is crucial for accurate clinical and imaging assessments, aiding with differential diagnosis, and ensuring radiologic-pathologic concordance. Mammography and US are commonly used for NAC evaluation; however, these are susceptible to technical limitations such as tissue superimposition and artifacts, compromising visualization of abnormalities in this area. Although MRI offers higher sensitivity, it is not the initial evaluation modality. A comprehensive clinical inspection is necessary because it may reveal abnormalities not apparent on imaging. This article offers an anatomical approach to the NAC evaluation, simplifying differential diagnoses by reviewing imaging techniques and clinical features of common NAC abnormalities.

The Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in the Evaluation of Bloody Nipple Discharge-A Multicenter Study in the Asian Population

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in Asian patients with bloody nipple discharge (BND).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 58 women with BND (mean age: 51.7 years) who underwent standardized CEM at institutions in Taiwan and Singapore. Lesion characteristics (size, enhancement, conspicuity, shape, margins) were evaluated on CEM by blinded radiologists. Non-enhanced mammography (MMG) and ultrasound (US) within a defined timeframe were compared for diagnostic accuracy. Benign or malignant status was confirmed by biopsy or 2-year imaging follow-up.

RESULTS

Malignancy was found in 29 of 58 lesions (50.0%), with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) being the most common. CEM demonstrated a 100% negative predictive value (NPV) for non-enhancing lesions. Significant predictors of malignancy on multivariate analysis include enhancing lesions of size ≥ 1.5 cm (p-value 0.025) and suspicious morphological features (irregular/spiculated margins, irregular shape, segmental/linear NME distribution) (p-value < 0.001). CEM outperformed MMG (sensitivity: 58.6%) and US (sensitivity: 79.3%), achieving a sensitivity of 100% and the highest diagnostic accuracy at 81.3%. Additionally, a CEM size cut-off of 1.5 cm yielded a sensitivity of 73.5% and a specificity of 84.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

CEM effectively differentiates benign from malignant lesions in patients with BND, improving diagnostic accuracy and potentially reducing unnecessary interventions.

Evaluating acute nipple inversion, imaging findings and outcomes

PURPOSE

Acute nipple inversion can be unsettling for patients and is sometimes associated with an underlying breast malignancy. It also poses a diagnostic challenge with lack of consensus management guidelines. This study reviewed institutional experience with new nipple inversion, including malignant association, imaging utilization, and outcomes, in an effort to improve management.

METHODS

A multisite institutional retrospective review was conducted of all breast imaging reports from 1/2010 to 6/2022 mentioning nipple inversion as an indication or finding. Patients with new nipple inversion, defined as arising since the time of last breast imaging exam or if reported as new by the patient/provider, were included for analysis. Retroareolar imaging findings, BI-RADS assessments/recommendations, pathology obtained from percutaneous or excisional biopsies, and follow-up imaging and clinical exams were collated. Cases of chronic or stable nipple inversion were excluded. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 414 patients had new nipple inversion, 387/414 (93.5 %) with benign or negative results at initial imaging and 27/414 (6.5 %) with malignant lesions. Diagnostic mammography/ultrasound detected 25/27 (92.6 %) cancers (sensitivity 92.6 %, specificity 75.5 %, PPV 20.8 %, NPV 99.3 %). Of 62 breast MRI exams performed in patients with negative mammogram/ultrasound, no cancers were detected in the retroareolar space with 2 incidental malignant lesions discovered distant from the nipple.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic mammography/ultrasound is reliable in workups of acute nipple inversion, with a high sensitivity and NPV for excluding malignancy. Breast MRI and surgical referral should be reserved for patients with suspicious associated symptoms or clinical findings.

Expression and clinical significance of CA125, CA153 and CEA in nipple discharge of breast cancer patients

Background

It is an important clinical means to identify benign and malignant breast diseases caused by nipple discharge through the detection and analysis of components in nipple discharge. This study was aimed to test the expression and clinical significance of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in nipple discharge of breast cancer patients.

Methods

From January 2017 to December 2018, 86 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with nipple discharge (breast cancer group) and 50 patients with ordinary breast duct hyperplasia with nipple discharge (benign control group) were selected, and the levels of CA125, CA153 and CEA in nipple discharge and serum were detected by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.

Nipple Discharge: When is it Worrisome?

Nipple discharge is the third most common breast related complaint seen in the breast clinics. Although the majority of cases are due to a benign etiology, 5%-12% cases of pathological nipple discharge may be harboring an underlying malignancy. A thorough radiological workup in cases of pathological nipple discharge is thus of utmost importance, with the initial imaging modality depending on the age of the patient. The imaging modalities include mammogram (MG) and ultrasound (US) with addition of breast MRI if the nipple discharge is clinically suspicious and no MG or US correlate is identified. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) also holds promise in demonstrating the exact extent of a pathology detected on US and thus aids in the planning of further management.

The Use of MRI to Detect Malignancy in a Patient Presenting With Unilateral Bloody Nipple Discharge

Nipple discharge presents as either physiological, which is green, white, or yellow, or is considered pathological, which is typically unilateral, spontaneous, and bloody. Bloody nipple discharge (BND) can be due to underlying malignancy or premalignant lesions. Mammogram (MMG), ultrasound (US), MRI, and ductography are all used to evaluate BND, but different modalities offer greater value in the diagnostic process. Here, we present a case that demonstrates the ability of MRI to detect abnormalities not seen on MMG and US in the setting of BND due to underlying malignancy. The use of MRI earlier in the diagnostic process allows for the use of breast-conserving measures and decreases the possibility of metastasis. This would result in less of a need for more aggressive treatments.

Problem-solving Breast MRI

Breast MRI has high sensitivity and negative predictive value, making it well suited to problem solving when other imaging modalities or physical examinations yield results that are inconclusive for the presence of breast cancer. Indications for problem-solving MRI include equivocal or uncertain imaging findings at mammography and/or US; suspicious nipple discharge or skin changes suspected to represent an abnormality when conventional imaging results are negative for cancer; lesions categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4, which are not amenable to biopsy; and discordant radiologic-pathologic findings after biopsy. MRI should not precede or replace careful diagnostic workup with mammography and US and should not be used when a biopsy can be safely performed. The role of MRI in characterizing calcifications is controversial, and management of calcifications should depend on their mammographic appearance because ductal carcinoma in situ may not appear enhancing on MR images. In addition, ductal carcinoma in situ detected solely with MRI is not associated with a higher likelihood of an upgrade to invasive cancer compared with ductal carcinoma in situ detected with other modalities. MRI for triage of high-risk lesions is a subject of ongoing investigation, with a possible future role for MRI in decreasing excisional biopsies. The accuracy of MRI is likely to increase with the use of advanced techniques such as deep learning, which will likely expand the indications for problem-solving MRI. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

The Value of Adding Ductography to Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge in Women with Negative Mammography

Objective

The optimal imaging approach for evaluating pathological nipple discharge remains unclear. We investigated the value of adding ductography to ultrasound (US) for evaluating pathologic nipple discharge in patients with negative mammography findings.

Materials and Methods

From July 2003 to December 2018, 101 women (mean age, 46.3 ± 12.2 years; range, 23–75 years) with pathologic nipple discharge were evaluated using pre-ductography (initial) US, ductography, and post-ductography US. The imaging findings were reviewed retrospectively. The standard reference was surgery (70 patients) or > 2 years of follow-up with US (31 patients). The diagnostic performances of initial US, ductography, and post-ductography US for detecting malignancy were compared using the McNemar’s test or a generalized estimating equation.

Results

In total, 47 papillomas, 30 other benign lesions, seven high-risk lesions, and 17 malignant lesions were identified as underlying causes of pathologic nipple discharge. Only eight of the 17 malignancies were detected on the initial US, while the remaining nine malignancies were detected by ductography. Among the nine malignancies detected by ductography, eight were detected on post-ductography US and could be localized for US-guided intervention. The sensitivities of ductography (94.1% [16/17]) and post-ductography US (94.1% [16/17]) were significantly higher than those of initial US (47.1% [8/17]; p = 0.027 and 0.013, respectively). The negative predictive value of post-ductography US (96.9% [31/32]) was significantly higher than that of the initial US (83.3% [45/54]; p = 0.006). Specificity was significantly higher for initial US than for ductography and post-ductography US (p = 0.001 for all).

Conclusion

The combined use of ductography and US has a high sensitivity for detecting malignancy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge and negative mammography. Ductography findings enable lesion localization on second-look post-ductography US, thus facilitating the selection of optimal treatment plans.

Nipple Discharge Imaging Evaluation with Mammography, Ultrasound, Galactography, and MRI

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic yield of various imaging tests used to evaluate nipple discharge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single institution, IRB-approved, retrospective study was performed of 320 consecutive patients presenting with nipple discharge. Imaging and pathology were reviewed to determine the yield for malignancy, atypical high-risk lesions (HRLs), and intraductal papillomas (IDPs).

RESULTS

Of the 320 patients, pathology or follow up confirmed 40 breast malignancies (40/320, 12.5%),14 atypical HRLs (14/320, 4.4%), 71 IDPs (71/320, 22.2%), 48 other benign pathologies (48/320,15.0%), and 147 unknown but benign cases (147/320, 45.9%). Physiologic discharge characteristics were observed in a minority of malignant cases: nonspontaneous (4/40, 10.0%); neither bloody nor clear (4/40, 10.0%); bilateral (3/40, 7.5%). Malignancy was associated with older age (p < 0.001) and bloody discharge (odds ratio 6.5, p < 0.0001). The combination of digital mammography and ultrasound had a 93% sensitivity and a 98% NPV, while contrast enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) had a 100% sensitivity and a 100% NPV for malignancy. Only three galactography examinations were performed among the malignant cohort, with minimal contribution (1 of 3) to the diagnostic evaluation. In this case, galactography findings helped determine imaging-pathology discordance, prompting a recommendation for surgical excision and subsequently a malignant diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The combination of mammography and ultrasonography detected 93% of breast malignancies associated with nipple discharge and had a 98% NPV for malignancy. The value of CE-MRI is its ability to detect the remaining malignancies, not detected on mammography or ultrasound, and its ability to obviate the need for surgical duct excision.