Quantitative Variable Assessment of Patellar Instability: An MRI-Based Study

Arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with polyethylene suture combined with medial retinaculum plication for the treatment of acute patellar dislocation in young and middle-aged patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to propose a surgical technique for arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with polyethylene suture combined with medial retinaculum plication and to evaluate the efficacy of this surgical technique in the treatment of acute patellar dislocation.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with acute patellar dislocations treated with arthroscopic MPFL reconstruction with polyethylene tape (FiberTape) combined with medial support band compression were analyzed retrospectively from January 2018 to January 2021. The mean age of the patients was 25.15 ± 4.66 years; the mean follow-up time was 27.5 (24-36) months. Clinical evaluation consisted of apprehension test results, patellar extrapolation test results, Lysholm score, Kujala score, and IKDC score, the Patellar lateral shift distance and patellar tilt angle (PTA) measured by CT scan.

RESULTS

All patients had no recurrent patellar dislocation or subluxation after surgery, and the apprehension test was negative. In all patients, the Kujala score (36.0 ± 9.9 vs. 98.2 ± 3.1), the IKDC score (48.6 ± 7.0 vs. 90.6 ± 4.4) and the Lysholm score (32.8 ± 10.4 vs. 96.7 ± 3.1) had improved at the 24-month follow up (P < 0.05). In addition, PTA was significantly lower at the 12-month follow-up and 24-giving-month follow-up compared to the preoperative period (P < 0.05, Table 2). The patellar lateral shift distance decreased from 14.94 ± 6.11 mm preoperatively to 3.00 ± 1.40 mm (12-month follow up) and 3.26 ± 1.37 mm (24-month follow up), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic MPFL reconstruction with polyethylene suture combined with medial retinaculum plication is a safe and reliable surgical technique for the treatment of acute patellar dislocation in young and middle-aged patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Combined ACL and MPFL Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction for ACL Injury With Patellar Instability

BACKGROUND

An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury accompanied by patellar instability (PI) is a topic that has gained orthopaedic surgeons' attention recently. Untreated PI is reportedly associated with worse clinical outcomes after isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in patients after an ACL injury with PI. Nevertheless, the appropriate surgical approach and its long-term therapeutic effects in these patients remain unclear.

PURPOSE

(1) To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between isolated ACLR (iACLR) and combined ACLR and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (cAMR) in patients after an ACL injury with PI and (2) to explore the correlations between these 2 procedures and clinical and radiological outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients diagnosed with an ACL injury accompanied by PI between January 2016 and April 2021 were analyzed in this study. There were 34 patients excluded because of missing postoperative radiological data. Among the remaining 72 patients, 34 patients underwent iACLR, while 38 patients underwent cAMR. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, and patient-reported outcomes (Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, and Tegner activity score) were prospectively collected. Patellar alignment parameters and worsening patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) features (evaluated with the modified Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score) were analyzed longitudinally on magnetic resonance imaging. The Kujala score was used to evaluate the functional recovery of the patellofemoral joint, and redislocations of the patella were prospectively recorded. Finally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the correlations between these 2 procedures and clinical (not achieving the minimal detectable change [MDC] for the Lysholm score) and radiological (worsening PFOA features) outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 28.9 ± 6.2 and 27.1 ± 6.8 months for the iACLR and cAMR groups, respectively (P = .231). Significantly higher Lysholm scores (88.3 ± 9.9 vs 82.1 ± 11.1, respectively; P = .016) and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores (83.6 ± 11.9 vs 78.3 ± 10.2, respectively; P = .046) were detected in the cAMR group compared with the iACLR group postoperatively. The rates of return to preinjury sports were 20.6% and 44.7% in the iACLR and cAMR groups, respectively (difference, 24.1% [95% CI, 3.3%-45.0%]; P = .030). Moreover, the rates of worsening PFOA features were 44.1% and 18.4% in the iACLR and cAMR groups, respectively (difference, 25.7% [95% CI, 4.9%-46.4%]; P = .018). In addition, significantly higher Kujala scores (87.9 ± 11.3 vs 80.1 ± 12.0, respectively; P = .006), lower redislocation rates (0.0% vs 11.8%, respectively; difference, 11.8% [95% CI, 0.9%-22.6%]; P = .045), and significantly better patellar alignment were detected in the cAMR group compared with the iACLR group postoperatively. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that iACLR and partial lateral meniscectomy were significantly correlated with not achieving the MDC for the Lysholm score and worsening PFOA features in our study population.

CONCLUSION

In patients after an ACL injury with PI, cAMR yielded better clinical and radiological outcomes compared with iACLR, with better patellar stability and a lower proportion of worsening PFOA features. Furthermore, not achieving the MDC for the Lysholm score and worsening PFOA features were significantly correlated with iACLR and partial lateral meniscectomy. Our study suggests that cAMR may be a more appropriate procedure for patients after an ACL injury with PI, which warrants further high-level clinical evidence.

Inconsistent repeatability of the Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia due to the variability of imaging modalities: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to critically assess the quality of papers that report on the intra- and inter-observer repeatability of the Dejour classification for trochlear dysplasia, and to identify the possible causes for poor repeatability.

METHODS

Two authors independently conducted an electronic search (four databases) on 8 February 2023 for studies (English or French) that assessed trochlear dysplasia classifications on imaging of skeletally mature participants. Exclusion criteria were reviews of clinical studies, conference proceedings, or editorials. After title, abstract, and full-text screening, characteristics of eligible studies were tabulated (author, year, journal, study design, cohort characteristics, and intra- and/or inter-observer agreement coefficients). The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Authors analysed three components of the included studies: (1) classifications based on true lateral radiographs and slice imaging; (2) dysplasia graded into Type A vs B vs C vs D and 3) coefficients of intra- and/or inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

The electronic search returned 3,178 references, and after removal of duplicates and irrelevant studies, ten were eligible for data extraction. A second search (31 July 2023) yielded one additional study. Eight studies did not include lateral radiographs, two studies did not explicitly state if radiographs were true lateral views, and one used true lateral radiographs in isolation. Classification of trochlear dysplasia into A vs B vs C vs D using different imaging modalities resulted in moderate to near-perfect intra-observer agreement, and slight to near-perfect inter-observer agreement. Studies distinguished between moderate and severe dysplasia using a variety of combinations: A vs B/C/D, A/B vs C/D and A/C vs B/D.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review revealed that the Dejour classification remains the most widely used to assess trochlear dysplasia and that the majority of studies that assessed the reliability of the Dejour classification, reported moderate to near-perfect inter-observer agreement; however, pooling of results for comparison among the included studies was inappropriate due to substantial variation in imaging protocols and non-standardised criteria to distinguish severe from moderate dysplasia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

TRIAL REGISTRY

The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023386731.

Patellar Tilt and Patellar Tendon-Trochlear Groove Angle Present the Optimum Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic Reliability for Patients With Patellar Instability

PURPOSE

To describe, in controls and in a population with patellar instability, magnetic resonance imaging values of measurements representing major associated factors for patellar instability (patellar height, trochlear dysplasia, and extensor mechanism alignment), as well as their cutoff values.

METHODS

In total, 323 knee magnetic resonance imaging scans, 142 with patellar instability and 181 controls without patellofemoral complaints (anterior cruciate, medial collateral ligament, meniscus ruptures or normal) were evaluated. Means, normality values in the control population, ideal cutoff values through receiver operating characteristic curves analysis, and interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) were described for a series of measurements.

RESULTS

All measurements were statistically different in control and instability patients, except for the patellotrochlear index and tibial tuberosity to posterior cruciate ligament distance. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient was good or excellent (above 0.75) only for the patellotrochlear index, patellar tendon-trochlear groove (PTTG) angle, and patellar tilt. The optimal cutoff value for each measurement was: PTTG angle ≥25.3o with sensitivity (S) of 70% and specificity (E) of 89%, patellar tilt ≥16o (S: 69% and E: 84%), trochlear sulcus angle ≥153o (S: 75% and E: 76%), Carrillon ≤12.8o (S: 62% and E: 87%), PTTG distance ≥11mm (S: 71% and E: 78%), Caton-Deschamps index ≥1.23 (S: 72% and E: 76%) and trochlear bump ≥3.95 mm (S: 76% and E: 65%).

CONCLUSIONS

Caton-Deschamps index (≥1.23), trochlear sulcus angle (≥153o), ventral prominence of the trochlea (≥3.95 mm), PTTG distance (≥11 mm), PTTG angle (≥25.3o), Carrillon angle (≤12.8o), and patellar tilt (≥16o) presented better diagnostic performance for patellar instability. Patellotrochlear index and tibial tuberosity to posterior cruciate ligament distance were not related to patellar instability. The interobserver reliability of the factors related to patellar instability was excellent only for the PTTG angle and lateral patellar tilt.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Patellar Dislocation: Workup and Decision-Making

Acute patellar dislocation (PD) is usually a problem of adolescents and young adults. In most cases, it is a sports-related injury. It is the result of an indirect force on the knee joint, which leads to valgus and external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. PD is unlikely to occur on a knee with normal patellofemoral joint (PFJ) anatomy. Acute PD consists of an acute injury of the ligamentous medial patellar stabilizers in the background of factors predisposing to patellar instability. These factors are classified into three groups. The first group refers to the integrity of the ligamentous medial patellar restraints, particularly, the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). The second group refers to an abnormal PFJ anatomy, which renders the patella inherently unstable inside the trochlea. The third group refers to the overall axial and torsional profile of the lower limb and to systemic factors, such as ligament laxity and neuromuscular coordination of movement. PD at a younger age is associated with an increased number and severity of patellar instability predisposing factors and lower stress to dislocate the patella. Acute primary PD is usually treated conservatively, while surgical treatment is reserved for recurrent PD. The aim of treatment is to restore the stability and function of the PFJ and to reduce the risk of patellar redislocation. Surgical procedures to treat patellar instability are classified into non-anatomic and anatomic procedures. Non-anatomic procedures are extensor mechanism realignment techniques that aim to center the patella into the trochlear groove. Anatomic procedures aim to restore the PFJ anatomy (ruptured ligaments, osteochondral fractures), which has been severed after the first incident of PD. Anatomic procedures, especially MPFL reconstruction, are more effective in preventing recurrent PD, compared with non-anatomic techniques. Theoretically, all factors that affect PFJ stability should be evaluated and, if possible, addressed. This is practically impossible. Considering that the MPFL ruptures in almost all PDs, MPFL reconstruction is the primary procedure, which is currently selected by most surgeons as a first-line treatment for patients with recurrent PD. Restoration of the axial and torsional alignment of the lower limbs is also increasingly implemented by surgeons. Non-anatomic surgical techniques, such as tibial-tuberosity osteotomy, are used as an adjunct to anatomic procedures. In the presence of multiple PFJ instability factors, acute MPFL reconstruction may be the treatment of choice for acute primary PD as well. Skeletal immaturity of the patient precludes osseous procedures to avoid premature physis closure and subsequent limb deformity. Unfortunately, restoration of the patient's previous activity level or participation in more strenuous sports is questionable and not easy to predict. In the case of competitive athletes, PD may prevent participation in elite levels of sports.

Trochlea dysplasia, increased TT-TG distance and patella alta are risk factors for developing first-time and recurrent patella dislocation: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and best knowledge synthesis of the present literature concerning biomechanical risk factors for developing first-time and recurrent patella dislocation.

METHODS

The study was performed as a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched. Studies investigating participants with risk factors for first-time as well as recurrent patella dislocation were included. The records were screened, and data extracted independently by two researchers supervised by a third independent assessor. The study was registered in PROSPERO.

RESULTS

A total of 6233 records were screened, and 50 studies met the inclusion criteria. The biomechanical risk factors: trochlear dysplasia, increased tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), and patella alta were found to be statistically significantly associated with patella dislocation in several publications and were thus recognized as risk factors for patella dislocation. The soft-tissue stabilizers: longer and thinner MPFL ligament, increased number of type 2C and decreased number of type 1 muscle fibers, and joint laxity were found to be statistically significantly associated with patella dislocation in a few publications, but due to limited evidence, no conclusion was made on this matter.

CONCLUSION

There is strong evidence in the literature that abnormalities of bony stabilizers, trochlear dysplasia, increased TT-TG distance, and patella alta are risk factors for patella dislocation. There is less evidence that soft-tissue stabilizers are risk factors. The study emphasizes the importance of a thorough investigation of bony stabilizers in clinical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance Has Better Diagnostic Reliability Than Tubercle-Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distance For Predicting Patellar Instability: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is now routinely utilized to help determine whether a realignment procedure is necessary for patients with patellar instability. The tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance has been explored as an alternative measurement. The aim of this study is to compare the reliability of TT-TG and TT-PCL; to explore whether there is a relationship between the TT-PCL and the TT-TG distance; to determine whether there is a relationship between the TT-TG and TT-PCL distances and knee rotation; and to compare the abilities of the TT-PCL distance and the TT-TG distance with predicted patellar instability.

METHOD

This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Three databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from inception to September 2021 to identify clinical studies comparing TT-TG and TT-PCL distances to patellar instability. Data on patient baseline characteristics, TT-TG and TT-PCL distances, inter-observer reliability, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were recorded. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the quality assessment form recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

RESULT

Twenty studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 2330 knees from 2260 patients. The current study showed that TT-TG and TT-PCL have similar observer reliability. The inter- and intra-observer reliability of TT-TG ranged from 0.807 to 0.98 and 0.553 to 0.99, respectively. The inter- and intra-observer reliability of TT-PCL ranged from 0.553 to 0.99 and 0.88 to 0.981, respectively. Six studies compared the AUC for predicting patellar instability and showed that TT-TG had better predictive performance than TT-PCL. Three studies reported a correlation between TT-TG and knee rotation, but no such relationship was found for TT-PCL. Eight studies reported a weak or moderate correlation between TT-TG and TT-PCL.

CONCLUSION

TT-TG and TT-PCL have similar inter- and intra-rater reliability (as measured by ICC), but TT-TG has greater discriminatory power to predict patellar instability than TT-PCL (as measured by AUC values and odds ratio). However, considering trochlear dysplasia and individual variations, future studies need to find more accurate and individualized methods to predict patellar instability.

Tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance versus tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament distance for predicting patellar instability: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To determine the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance versus tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance, and to determine cutoff values of these measurements for pathological diagnosis in the context of patellar instability.

METHODS

Three databases MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to October 5, 2022 for literature outlining comparisons between TT-TG and TT-PCL in patellar instability patients. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve parameters such as area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity, as well as odds ratios, cutoff values for pathological diagnosis and correlations between TT-TG and TT-PCL were recorded. The MINORS score was used for all studies in order to perform a quality assessment of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies comprising 2839 patients (2922 knees) were included in this review. Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.71 to 0.98 and 0.55 to 0.99 for TT-TG and TT-PCL, respectively. Intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.74 to 0.99 and 0.88 to 0.98 for TT-TG and TT-PCL, respectively. AUC measuring diagnostic accuracy of patellar instability for TT-TG ranged from 0.80 to 0.84 and 0.58 to 0.76 for TT-PCL. Five studies found TT-TG to have more discriminatory power than TT-PCL at distinguishing patients with patellar instability from patients who do not. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 21 to 85% and 62 to 100%, respectively, for TT-TG. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 30 to 76% and 46 to 86%, respectively, for TT-PCL. Odds ratio values ranged from 1.06 to 14.02 for TT-TG and 0.98 to 6.47 for TT-PCL. Proposed cutoff TT-TG and TT-PCL values for predicting patellar instability ranged from 15.0 to 21.4 mm and 19.8 to 28.0 mm, respectively. Eight studies reported significant positive correlations between TT-TG and TT-PCL.

CONCLUSION

TT-TG resulted in overall similar reliability, sensitivity and specificity as TT-PCL; however, TT-TG has better diagnostic accuracy than TT-PCL in the context of patellar instability as per AUC and odds ratio values.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

The tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance does not truly reflect the lateralization of the tibial tubercle

PURPOSE

The role of the tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) in recurrent patellar instability (RPI) remains unclear. This study aims to confirm the validity of the TT-TG and TT-PCL in predicting RPI and to verify whether the TT-PCL can truly reflect the lateralization of the tibial tubercle.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients with RPI and 50 controls were recruited and underwent magnetic resonance imaging examinations. The TT-TG, TT-PCL, and tibial tubercle lateralization (TTL) were measured independently by two authors in a blinded and randomized fashion. T-test was used for parametric variances and the Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used for non-parametric variances. Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients were calculated to determine correlations between the defined measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess the reliability of the measurements.

RESULTS

All defined measurements showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. The TT-TG distance, TT-PCL distance, and TTL were significantly greater in the PI group than in the control group. The AUC was highest for the TT-TG distance compared with that for the TT-PCL distance, and TTL were 0.798, 0.764, and 0.769, with the calculated cut-off value of 12.5 mm, 16.5 mm, and 66.1 percentages. There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.595) between the TT-TG distance and TTL, and a weak correlation (r = 0.430) between the TT-PCL distance and TTL.

CONCLUSION

Both the TT-TG distance and TT-PCL distance can be measured with excellent reliability on magnetic resonance imaging. The TT-TG distance, rather than the TT-PCL distance, has a better performance in predicting RPI. Most interestingly, the TT-PCL distance cannot reflect the real lateralization of TT. This study provides new information to evaluate TTL in patients with RPI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Tibial Tubercle to Trochlear Groove Distance Measured by Posterior Condylar Reference Line on MRI Can Over-Evaluate Lateralization Deformity of Tibial Tubercle in Patients with Recurrent Patellar Dislocation

Background: The tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is currently considered as an indication for tibial tubercle osteotomy. While the influence of femoral condylar morphology on such measurement remains unclear. Methods: A total of 86 patients with patellar dislocation (PD) and 86 healthy individuals were enrolled. Femoral condylar morphology and the TT-TG distance measured by anatomical transepicondylar axis (TT-TGa), by surgical transepicondylar axis (TT-TGs), and by posterior condylar reference line (TT-TGp) were assessed by MRI. Unpaired t-test, Spearman, and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted. We determined the pathological value of the parameters and established a binary regression model. Results: The interclass correlation coefficients of all the TT-TG distances were greater than 0.75 in all types of trochlear dysplasia. The lateral/posterior femoral condyle was shorter and the medial/posterior condyle was longer in the study group (28.5 ± 3.3 and 35.2 ± 2.8, respectively) than in the control group (30.9 ± 2.7 and 33.5 ± 2.3, respectively). In the study group, the TT-TGp distance was greater than TT-TGs and TT-TGa distance (p < 0.001). The pathological value of the TT-TG distance was 13.0 mm. Each TT-TG distance revealed a significant OR with regard to PD. Conclusion: The TT-TGa, TT-TGs, and TT-TGp distance can be reliably measured by MRI even in patients with trochlear dysplasia. While the TT-TGp distance may overestimate the lateralization deformity of the tibial tubercle. Posterior femoral condylar dysplasia may be a reason for such overestimating. These findings have not been correlated to clinical outcomes and further studies are required.

Reliability of the Tibial Tubercle-Roman Arch Distance for Evaluating Tibial Tubercle Malposition and Predicting Patellar Dislocation via Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background:

The tibial tubercle (TT)–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance has low reproducibility in patients with a dysplastic trochlea, whereas the clinical value of the TT–posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance remains controversial.

Purposes:

To establish a method to assess the position of the TT on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using the TT–Roman arch (TT-RA) distance, compare this method with the TT-TG and TT-PCL distance, and provide the pathological threshold value of the TT-RA distance in patients with patellar dislocation.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The TT-RA distance, TT-TG distance, and TT-PCL distance were measured on MRI scans in 70 patients with a history of patellar dislocation and 70 healthy individuals. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of each measurement parameter were evaluated. The discriminatory capacity and the interrelationship of the 3 measurement parameters were investigated using Pearson correlation and the receiver operating characteristic curve. The pathological threshold values of these measurements were calculated according to the data of healthy individuals. Finally, logistic regression analysis was performed using these values.

Results:

Patients with patellar dislocation had a greater TT-RA distance compared with healthy individuals (18.05 ± 4.16 vs 13.86 ± 2.90 mm; P < .001). The TT-RA distance had a stronger diagnostic capacity, with an area under the curve of 0.802 compared with 0.625 for TT-PCL distance. Excellent reproducibility was seen for TT-RA distance measurement at any degree of trochlear dysplasia (all intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] >0.90). The inter- and intraobserver ICCs of the TT-TG distance measurements were extremely low for Dejour type D dysplasia (ICC, 0.509 and 0.616, respectively). The pathological TT-RA distance threshold was calculated as 19.5 mm. Logistic regression showed that patients with a TT-RA distance >19.5 mm were 11.7 times more likely to sustain patellar dislocation than were those with TT-RA distance less than this value.

Conclusion:

The TT-RA distance was a more reliable parameter with which to evaluate TT position than was TT-TG distance in patients with trochlear dysplasia. The TT-PCL distance was the least reliable among the 3 parameters studied.