Yttrium-90 Hepatic Radioembolization for Advanced Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Survival Outcomes Based on Right- Versus Left-Sided Primary Tumor Location

Are survival outcomes dependent on the tumour dose threshold of 139 Gy in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization using glass particles? A real-world single-centre study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the survival and objective response rate (ORR) of the patients receiving estimated tumour absorbed dose (ETAD) <140 Gy versus ETAD ≥140 Gy in patients with advanced chemorefractory colorectal carcinoma liver metastases (CRCLM) treated with yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE).

METHODS

Between August 2016 and August 2023 adult patients with unresectable, chemorefractory CRCLM treated with 90Y TARE using glass particles, were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and hepatic progression free survival (hPFS). Secondary outcome was ORR.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients with a mean age of 66.2 ± 7.8 years met the inclusion criteria. Mean ETAD for group 1 (ETAD <140 Gy) and group 2 (ETAD ≥140) were 131.2 ± 17.4 Gy versus 195 ± 45.6 Gy, respectively. The mean OS and hPFS for group 1 versus group 2 were 12 ± 10.3 months and 8.1 ± 9.3 months versus 9.3 ± 3 months and 7.1 ± 8.4 months, respectively and there were no significant differences (P = .181 and P = .366, respectively). ORR did not show significant difference between the groups (P = .432).

CONCLUSION

In real-world practice, no significant difference was found in OS, hPFS, and ORR between patients who received ETAD <140 Gy versus ETAD ≥140 Gy in patients with CRCLM, in this series.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study demonstrated that increased tumour absorbed doses in radioembolization may not provide additional significant advantage for OS and hPFS for patients with CRCLM.

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of liver-directed therapies for nonsurgical management of liver metastases: Systematic review and guidelines

The liver is a common site of cancer metastases. Systemic therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for liver metastases (LM), although select patients with liver oligometastases may be candidates for potentially curative liver resection. Recent data support the role of nonsurgical local therapies such as ablation, external beam radiotherapy, embolization, and hepatic artery infusion therapy for management of LM. Additionally, for patients with advanced, symptomatic LM, local therapies may provide palliative benefit. The American Radium Society gastrointestinal expert panel, including members representing radiation oncology, interventional radiology, surgical oncology, and medical oncology, performed a systemic review and developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of nonsurgical local therapies for LM. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the use of nonsurgical local therapies for patients with LM.

Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases

Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.