Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies

Clinical benefits of tomosynthesis-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy: a comparison with stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy

BACKGROUND

Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy (3D-VAB) has been used increasingly. The aim of our study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of 3D-VAB and stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy (2D-VAB) on the number of tissue cores containing targeted calcifications and on the procedure time.

METHODS

Consecutive 87 women who underwent biopsy at our hospital from April 2020 to March 2022 for calcifications mammographically suspicious of malignancy were included in this study: 57 patients with 3D-VAB and 30 patients with 2D-VAB.

RESULTS

Grouped or clustered calcified lesions were found in 39 and 21 patients among the 3D-VAB group and the 2D-VAB group, respectively. The mean number of tissue cores per biopsy containing targeted calcifications from the grouped or clustered calcified lesions was 3 and 2.3 specimens for the 3D-VAB group and for the 2D-VAB group, respectively. The mean procedure time for grouped or clustered calcifications was significantly shorter in the 3D-VAB group than in the 2D-VAB group (16.5 min vs. 27.4 min, P < 0.01). Comparing the procedure time between 3D-VAB and 2D-VAB based on calcification category, 3D-VAB had significantly shorter procedure time than 2D-VAB for both category 3 and category 4 calcification. For all patients, the mean procedure time was 18.1 min for the 3D-VAB group and 27.7 min for the 2D-VAB, thus being significantly shorter with 3D-VAB than 2D-VAB (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the clinical effectiveness of 3D-VAB is superior to that of 2D-VAB and that the significant reduction in examination time with 3D-VAB is expected to benefit patients.