Detection of Moderate Hepatic Steatosis on Portal Venous Phase Contrast-Enhanced CT: Evaluation Using an Automated Artificial Intelligence Tool

Correlation of HbA1c levels with CT-based body composition biomarkers in diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome

Diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome are closely linked with visceral body composition, but clinical assessment is limited to external measurements and laboratory values including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Modern deep learning and AI algorithms allow automated extraction of biomarkers for organ size, density, and body composition from routine computed tomography (CT) exams. Comparing visceral CT biomarkers across groups with differing glycemic control revealed significant, progressive CT biomarker changes with increasing HbA1c. For example, in the unenhanced female cohort, mean changes between normal and poorly-controlled diabetes showed: 53% increase in visceral adipose tissue area, 22% increase in kidney volume, 24% increase in liver volume, 6% decrease in liver density (hepatic steatosis), 16% increase in skeletal muscle area, and 21% decrease in skeletal muscle density (myosteatosis) (all p < 0.001). The multisystem changes of metabolic syndrome can be objectively and retrospectively measured using automated CT biomarkers, with implications for diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and GLP-1 agonists.

Adjusting for the effect of IV contrast on automated CT body composition measures during the portal venous phase

OBJECTIVE

Fully-automated CT-based algorithms for quantifying numerous biomarkers have been validated for unenhanced abdominal scans. There is great interest in optimizing the documentation and reporting of biophysical measures present on all CT scans for the purposes of opportunistic screening and risk profiling. The purpose of this study was to determine and adjust the effect of intravenous (IV) contrast on these automated body composition measures at routine portal venous phase post-contrast imaging.

METHODS

Final study cohort consisted of 1,612 older adults (mean age, 68.0 years; 594 women) all imaged utilizing a uniform CT urothelial protocol consisting of pre-contrast, portal venous, and delayed excretory phases. Fully-automated CT-based algorithms for quantifying numerous biomarkers, including muscle and fat area and density, bone mineral density, and solid organ volume were applied to pre-contrast and portal venous phases. The effect of IV contrast upon these body composition measures was analyzed. Regression analyses, including square of the Pearson correlation coefficient (r2), were performed for each comparison.

RESULTS

We found that simple, linear relationships can be derived to determine non-contrast equivalent values from the post-contrast CT biomeasures. Excellent positive linear correlation (r2 = 0.91-0.99) between pre- and post-contrast values was observed for all automated soft tissue measures, whereas moderate positive linear correlation was observed for bone attenuation (r2 = 0.58-0.76). In general, the area- and volume-based measurement require less adjustment than attenuation-based measures, as expected.

CONCLUSION

Fully-automated quantitative CT-biomarker measures at portal venous phase abdominal CT can be adjusted to a non-contrast equivalent using simple, linear relationships.

Post-contrast CT liver attenuation alone is superior to the liver-spleen difference for identifying moderate hepatic steatosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic performance of post-contrast CT for predicting moderate hepatic steatosis in an older adult cohort undergoing a uniform CT protocol, utilizing hepatic and splenic attenuation values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1676 adults (mean age, 68.4 ± 10.2 years; 1045M/631F) underwent a CT urothelial protocol that included unenhanced, portal venous, and 10-min delayed phases through the liver and spleen. Automated hepatosplenic segmentation for attenuation values (in HU) was performed using a validated deep-learning tool. Unenhanced liver attenuation < 40.0 HU, corresponding to > 15% MRI-based proton density fat, served as the reference standard for moderate steatosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of moderate or severe steatosis was 12.9% (216/1676). The diagnostic performance of portal venous liver HU in predicting moderate hepatic steatosis (AUROC = 0.943) was significantly better than the liver-spleen HU difference (AUROC = 0.814) (p < 0.001). Portal venous phase liver thresholds of 80 and 90 HU had a sensitivity/specificity for moderate steatosis of 85.6%/89.6%, and 94.9%/74.7%, respectively, whereas a liver-spleen difference of -40 HU and -10 HU had a sensitivity/specificity of 43.5%/90.0% and 92.1%/52.5%, respectively. Furthermore, livers with moderate-severe steatosis demonstrated significantly less post-contrast enhancement (mean, 35.7 HU vs 47.3 HU; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Moderate steatosis can be reliably diagnosed on standard portal venous phase CT using liver attenuation values alone. Consideration of splenic attenuation appears to add little value. Moderate steatosis not only has intrinsically lower pre-contrast liver attenuation values (< 40 HU), but also enhances less, typically resulting in post-contrast liver attenuation values of 80 HU or less.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Moderate steatosis can be reliably diagnosed on post-contrast CT using liver attenuation values alone. Livers with at least moderate steatosis enhance less than those with mild or no steatosis, which combines with the lower intrinsic attenuation to improve detection.

KEY POINTS

The liver-spleen attenuation difference is frequently utilized in routine practice but appears to have performance limitations. The liver-spleen attenuation difference is less effective than liver attenuation for moderate steatosis. Moderate and severe steatosis can be identified on standard portal venous phase CT using liver attenuation alone.

Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon

Pancreatic surgery is nowadays considered one of the most complex surgical approaches and not unscathed from complications. After the surgical procedure, cross-sectional imaging is considered the non-invasive reference standard to detect early and late compilations, and consequently to address patients to the best management possible. Contras-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) should be considered the most important and useful imaging technique to evaluate the surgical site. Thanks to its speed, contrast, and spatial resolution, it can help reach the final diagnosis with high accuracy. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered as a second-line imaging approach, especially for the evaluation of biliary findings and late complications. In both cases, the radiologist should be aware of protocols and what to look at, to create a robust dialogue with the surgeon and outline a fitted treatment for each patient.