2
|
Fahrni G, Boccalini S, Lacombe H, de Oliveira F, Houmeau A, Francart F, Villien M, Rotzinger DC, Robert A, Douek P, Si-Mohamed SA. Ultra-high-resolution 40 keV virtual monoenergetic imaging using spectral photon-counting CT in high-risk patients for coronary stenoses. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-11237-x. [PMID: 39661149 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11237-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2024] [Revised: 10/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the image quality of ultra-high-resolution (UHR) virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at 40 keV compared to 70 keV, using spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) and dual-layer dual-energy CT (DECT) for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS AND MATERIALS In this prospective IRB-approved study, 26 high-risk patients were included. CCTA was performed both with an SPCCT in UHR mode and with one of two DECT scanners (iQOn or CT7500) within 3 days. 40 keV and 70 keV VMIs were reconstructed for both modalities. Stenoses, blooming artefacts, and image quality were compared between all four reconstructions. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (4 women [15%]) and 28 coronary stenoses (mean stenosis of 56% ± 16%) were included. 40 keV SPCCT gave an overall higher quality score (5 [5, 5]) than 70 keV SPCCT (5 [4, 5], 40 keV DECT (4 [3, 4]) and 70 keV SPCCT (4 [4, 5]), p < 0.001). Less variability in stenosis measurement was found with SPCCT between 40 keV and 70 keV (bias: -1% ± 3%, LoA: 6%) compared with DECT (-6% ± 8%, LoA 16%). 40 keV SPCCT vs 40 keV DECT showed a -3% ± 6% bias, whereas 40 keV SPCCT vs 70 keV DECT showed a -8% ± 6% bias. From 70 keV to 40 keV, blooming artefacts did not increase with SPCCT (mean +2% ± 5%, p = 0.136) whereas they increased with DECT (mean +7% ± 6%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION UHR 40 keV SPCCT VMIs outperformed 40 keV and 70 keV DECT VMIs for assessing coronary artery stenoses, with no impairment compared to 70 keV SPCCT VMIs. KEY POINTS Question Use of low virtual mono-energetic images at 40 keV using spectral dual-energy and photon-counting CT systems is not yet established for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis. Findings UHR 40 keV SPCCT enhances diagnostic accuracy in coronary artery assessment. Clinical relevance By combining spectral sensitivity with lower virtual mono-energetic imaging and ultra-high spatial resolution, SPCCT enhances coronary artery assessment, potentially leading to more accurate diagnoses and better patient outcomes in cardiovascular imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Fahrni
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Division, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, Villeurbanne, France
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Radiology, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Sara Boccalini
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, Villeurbanne, France
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Radiology, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Hugo Lacombe
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, Villeurbanne, France
- Philips Healthcare, Suresnes, France
| | - Fabien de Oliveira
- Department of Radiology, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Angèle Houmeau
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Florie Francart
- Department of Radiology, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | | | - David C Rotzinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Division, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Antoine Robert
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Philippe Douek
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, Villeurbanne, France
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Radiology, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Salim A Si-Mohamed
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, Villeurbanne, France.
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Radiology, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Soschynski M, Storelli R, Birkemeyer C, Hagar MT, Faby S, Schwemmer C, Nous FMA, Pugliese F, Vliegenthart R, Schlett CL, Nikolaou K, Krumm P, Nieman K, Bamberg F, Artzner CP. CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR versus Invasive FFR for Hemodynamic Relevance of Coronary Artery Disease. Radiology 2024; 312:e233234. [PMID: 39162632 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Background CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging enhance the specificity of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for ruling out coronary artery disease (CAD). However, evidence on comparative diagnostic value remains scarce. Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA plus CT-FFR, CCTA plus CT perfusion, and sequential CCTA plus CT-FFR and CT perfusion for detecting hemodynamically relevant CAD with that of invasive angiography. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of a prospective study included patients with chest pain referred for invasive coronary angiography at nine centers from July 2016 to September 2019. CCTA and CT perfusion were performed with third-generation dual-source CT scanners. CT-FFR was assessed on-site. Independent core laboratories analyzed CCTA alone, CCTA plus CT perfusion, CCTA plus CT-FFR, and a sequential approach involving CCTA plus CT-FFR and CT perfusion for the presence of hemodynamically relevant stenosis. Invasive coronary angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve was the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy metrics and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were compared with the Sign test and DeLong test. Results Of the 105 participants (mean age, 64 years ± 8 [SD]; 68 male), 49 (47%) had hemodynamically relevant stenoses at invasive coronary angiography. CCTA plus CT-FFR and CCTA plus CT perfusion showed no evidence of a difference for participant-based sensitivities (90% vs 90%, P > .99), specificities (77% vs 79%, P > .99) and vessel-based AUCs (0.84 [95% CI: 0.77, 0.91] vs 0.83 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.91], P = .90). Both had higher participant-based specificity than CCTA alone (54%, both P < .001) without evidence of a difference in sensitivity between CCTA (94%) and CCTA plus CT perfusion (P = .50) or CCTA plus CT-FFR (P = .63). The sequential approach combining CCTA plus CT-FFR with CT perfusion achieved higher participant-based specificity than CCTA plus CT-FFR (88% vs 77%, P = .03) without evidence of a difference in participant-based sensitivity (88% vs 90%, P > .99) and vessel-based AUC (0.85 [95% CI: 0.77, 0.93], P = .78). Compared with CCTA plus CT perfusion, the sequential approach showed no evidence of a difference in participant-based sensitivity (P > .99), specificity (P = .06), or vessel-based AUC (P = .54). Conclusion There was no evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between CCTA plus CT-FFR and CCTA plus CT perfusion for detecting hemodynamically relevant CAD. A sequential approach combining CCTA plus CT-FFR with CT perfusion led to improved participant-based specificity with no evidence of a difference in sensitivity compared with CCTA plus CT-FFR. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT02810795 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sinitsyn in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Soschynski
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Roberto Storelli
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Clara Birkemeyer
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Muhammad Taha Hagar
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Sebastian Faby
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Chris Schwemmer
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Fay M A Nous
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Francesca Pugliese
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Christopher L Schlett
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Patrick Krumm
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Koen Nieman
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| | - Christoph P Artzner
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (M.S., R.S., M.T.H., C.L.S., F.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (C.B., K. Nikolaou, P.K., C.P.A.); Department of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (S.F., C.S.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (F.M.A.N., K. Nieman); Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (F.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (R.V.); and Stanford University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, Calif (K. Nieman)
| |
Collapse
|