Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool to Assess Pain and Discomfort in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Mental Health and Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a genetic disorder marked by the development of cysts in the kidneys and other organs, leading to diverse clinical manifestations, including kidney failure. The psychological burden of ADPKD is substantial, with significant contributors including pain, daily life disruptions, depression, anxiety, and the guilt associated with transmitting ADPKD to offspring. This review details the psychological impacts of ADPKD on patients, addressing how they navigate physical and emotional challenges, including pain management, genetic guilt, mood disorders, and disease acceptance. This review also underscores the need for comprehensive research into the psychological aspects of ADPKD, focusing on the prevalence and contributing factors of emotional distress and identifying effective strategies for managing anxiety and depression. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of understanding the diverse factors that influence patients' quality of life and advocates for holistic interventions to address these psychological challenges.

Pain and Health-Related Quality of Life in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Results from a National Patient-Powered Registry

Rationale & Objective

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL) including pain, discomfort, fatigue, emotional distress, and impaired mobility. Stakeholders prioritized kidney cyst-related pain as an important core outcome domain in clinical trials, leading to the development of disease-specific assessment tools.

Study Design

The ADPKD Registry is hosted online with multiple disease-specific patient-reported outcomes modules to characterize the patient experience in the United States.

Setting & Participants

The ADPKD Registry allows consented participants access to a Core Questionnaire that includes demographics, comorbid conditions, current symptoms, and kidney function. Participants complete subsequent modules on a 3-month schedule, including 2 validated HRQoL tools, the ADPKD-Pain and Discomfort Scale (ADPKD-PDS), the ADPKD Impact Scale (ADPKD-IS) and a Healthcare Access and Utilization module.

Exposures

Patient-reported latest estimated glomerular filtration rate or creatinine used to calculate stage of chronic kidney disease.

Outcomes

Health-related quality of life, measured using validated ADPKD-specific tools; access to polycystic kidney disease-specific health care.

Analytical Approach

For the 2 HRQoL tools, scores were calculated for physical, emotional, and fatigue domains; pain severity; and pain interference (based on the licensed user manuals). Associations to health care access were also assessed.

Results

By July 2022, 1,086 individuals with ADPKD completed at least 1 of the HRQoL modules, and 319 completed 4 over a year. Participants were an average age of 53. In total, 71% were women, and 91% were White, with all chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages represented. In total, 2.5% reported being treated with dialysis, and 23% had a kidney transplant. CKD stage 4/5 participants reported the most dull kidney pain, whereas sharp kidney pain was evenly distributed across early CKD stages. Dull kidney pain had an impact on sleep regardless of CKD stage. There was a strong positive correlation between the ADPKD-PDS and ADPKD-IS. Patients with a neutral or positive HRQoL were less likely to have been denied access to imaging or other care.

Limitations

Currently, all the information collected is patient reported without health record validation of clinical variables.

Conclusions

Use of the HRQoL tools in the ADPKD Registry provided a broad cross-sectional assessment in the United States and provided granular information on the burden of pain across the CKD spectrum in ADPKD. The ADPKD Registry allowed assessment of ADPKD impact in a community that experiences decline in health and kidney function over decades.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures, Polycystic Kidney Disease Burden, and Outcomes in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Rationale & Objective

Using OVERTURE (NCT01430494) study data on patient-perceived health, health care utilization, and productivity in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), this research was conducted to characterize the burden of illness in patients with ADPKD and assess whether patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment scores predict clinical and health-economic outcomes.

Study Design

Data were analyzed from a prospective, observational study.

Setting & Participants

The study cohort comprised 3,409 individuals with ADPKD in 20 countries who were aged 12-78 years and were in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages G1-G5 and Mayo risk subclasses 1A-1E.

Predictors

Scores on PRO instruments, including disease-specific assessments [ADPKD-Impact Scale (ADPKD-IS), and ADPKD-Urinary Impact Scale (ADPKD-UIS)] and generic measures were assessed.

Outcomes

Clinical variables [eg, height-adjusted total kidney volume (htTKV), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and abdominal girth] and health-economic outcomes were assessed.

Analytical Approach

Associations among variables were evaluated using Spearman correlations, logistic regression, and generalized linear mixed effects repeated measures models.

Results

Baseline CKD stage and Mayo risk classification showed little correlation with baseline PRO scores; however, scores on disease-specific instruments and measures of physical functioning were worse at more severe CKD stages. PRO scores predicted hospitalizations and sick days at 6-18 months, with strongest associations noted for the ADPKD-IS. PRO scores were not associated with htTKV and eGFR, but worse PRO scores were associated with greater abdominal girth. Poor baseline ADPKD-IS scores were positively associated with occurrence of ADPKD-related symptoms up to 18 months, including kidney pain (OR, 5.30; 95% CI, 2.75-10.24), hematuria (OR, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.99-10.53), and urinary tract infection (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.93-10.11; P < 0.001 for all).

Limitations

A limitation of the study was the maximum 18 months of follow-up available to assess outcomes.

Conclusions

PRO scores predicted clinical and health-economic outcomes, such as hospitalization and absence from work, underscoring the importance of quality of life assessment of individuals with ADPKD.

Plain-Language Summary

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly recognized as important parameters for assessing the clinical and humanistic burden of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). We analyzed data from the observational OVERTURE study to better characterize disease impact on quality of life and determine whether patient-perceived burden might predict outcomes. Scores on PRO assessment instruments predicted hospitalizations and sick days at 6-18 months, with associations strongest for the disease-specific ADPKD-Impact Scale. Compared to patients who rated their health-related quality of life as good, those with poor baseline scores were significantly more likely to report ADPKD-related signs and symptoms up to 18 months of follow-up. These findings support using disease-specific PRO assessment instruments to assess and predict the impact of ADPKD.

Beyond Loss of Kidney Function: Patient Care in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease benefit from specialized care over their lifetimes, starting with diagnosis of the condition with ongoing discussion of both the renal course and extra-renal issues. Both renal and extra-renal issues may continue to cause major morbidity even after successful kidney transplant or initiation of RRT, and extra-renal disease aspects should always be considered as part of routine management. In this review, we will focus on updates in pain/depression screening, cardiac manifestations, liver and pancreatic cysts, kidney stone management, and genetic counseling. In some instances, we have shared our current clinical practice rather than an evidence-based guideline. We anticipate more standardization of care after the release of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines for management in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease later this year.