The Effect of Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy on Measures of Kidney Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A systematic review of psychosocial and sex-based contributors to gender disparities in the United States across the steps towards kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Persistent findings suggest women and patients identified as "female" are less likely to receive a kidney transplant. Furthermore, the limited research on transplantation among transgender and gender diverse people suggests this population is susceptible to many of the same psychosocial and systemic barriers.

OBJECTIVE

This review sought to 1) highlight terminology used to elucidate gender disparities, 2) identify barriers present along the steps to transplantation, and 3) summarize contributors to gender disparities across the steps to transplantation.

METHODS

A systematic review of gender and sex disparities in the steps towards kidney transplantation was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across four social science and public health databases from 2005 to 23.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1696 initial results, 33 of which met inclusion criteria. A majority of studies followed a retrospective cohort design (n = 22, 66.7%), inconsistently used gender and sex related terminology (n = 21, 63.6%), and reported significant findings for gender and sex disparities within the steps towards transplantation (n = 28, 84.8%). Gender disparities among the earlier steps were characterized by patient-provider communication and perception of medical suitability whereas disparities in the later steps were characterized by differential outcomes based on older age, an above average BMI, and Black racial identity. Findings for transgender patients pointed to issues computing eGFR and the need for culturally tailored care.

DISCUSSION

Providers should be encouraged to critically examine the diagnostic criteria used to determine transplant eligibility and adopt practices that can be culturally tailored to meet the needs of patients.

Impact of sex used for assignment of reference intervals in a population of patients taking gender-affirming hormones

Background

Gender-affirming hormone therapy with either estradiol or testosterone for transgender persons can significantly impact chemistry and hematology laboratory tests. The sex used for assignment of reference intervals (RIs) in the electronic health record (EHR) will influence normal/abnormal flagging of test results.

Objective

To analyze common non-hormonal laboratory tests with sex-specific RIs ordered in patients with sexual orientation/gender identify (SOGI) field differences (one or more differences between legal sex, sex assigned at birth, and gender identity) in the EHR at an academic medical center in midwestern United States.

Methods

We utilized a previously characterized data set of patients at our institution that included chart review information on gender identity and gender-affirming therapy. We focused on the subset of these patients that had orders for 18 common laboratory tests in calendar year 2021.

Results

A total of 1336 patients with SOGI field differences (1218 or 91.2% identifying as gender-expansive; 892 or 66.8% receiving estradiol or testosterone as gender-affirming therapy) had a total of 9374 orders for 18 laboratory tests with sex-specific RIs. Hemoglobin, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and high-density lipoprotein were the most frequently ordered tests. For patients taking estradiol, 128 of 970 (13.2%) creatinine and 39 of 193 (20.2%) hemoglobin measurements were within the RI for one sex but not the other. For those taking testosterone, 119 of 531 (22.4%) creatinine and 49 of 120 (40.8%) hemoglobin measurements were within the RI for one sex but not the other. Values above the cisgender female RI but within the cisgender male RI were common for hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase in patients taking testosterone.

Conclusions

Clinicians should be aware of the potential impact of gender-affirming therapy on laboratory tests and what sex/gender is being used in the EHR to assign RIs.

A Holistic Framework for the Evaluation of Kidney Function in a Gender-Diverse Landscape

The most commonly used equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate incorporate a binary male-female sex coefficient, which has important implications for the care of transgender, gender-diverse, and nonbinary (TGD) people. Whether "sex assigned at birth" or a binary "gender identity" is most appropriate for the computation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is unknown. Furthermore, the use of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for the development of physical changes to align TGD people with their affirmed gender is increasingly common, and may result in changes in serum creatinine and cystatin C, the biomarkers commonly used to estimate glomerular filtration rate. The paucity of current literature evaluating chronic kidney disease (CKD) prevalence and outcomes in TGD individuals on GAHT makes it difficult to assess any effects of GAHT on kidney function. Whether alterations in serum creatinine reflect changes in glomerular filtration rate or simply changes in muscle mass is unknown. Therefore, we propose a holistic framework to evaluate kidney function in TGD people. The framework focuses on kidney disease prevalence, risk factors, sex hormones, eGFR, other kidney function assessment tools, and the mitigation of health inequities in TGD people.

Cystatin C-Based eGFR Changes during Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy in Transgender Individuals

BACKGROUND

Men with CKD tend to experience a faster eGFR decline than women, potentially because of sex hormones. Limited research exists regarding the effect of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) on kidney function. Furthermore, monitoring kidney function during GAHT is challenging because serum creatinine is confounded by body composition. To investigate the relationship between sex hormones and kidney function, we studied the changes of serum creatinine and serum cystatin C, a filtration marker less affected by sex, during 1 year of GAHT.

METHODS

As part of the European Network for the Investigation of Gender Incongruence study, we measured serum creatinine and serum cystatin C in 260 transgender women and 285 transgender men before and 12 months after initiating GAHT. Transgender women received estradiol plus cyproterone acetate, while transgender men received testosterone. Cystatin C-based eGFR was calculated using the full-age-spectrum equation.

RESULTS

In transgender women, cystatin C decreased by 0.069 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.049 to 0.089), corresponding with a 7 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 increase in eGFR. In transgender men, cystatin C increased by 0.052 mg/L (95% CI, 0.031 to 0.072), corresponding with a 6 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 decrease in eGFR. Creatinine concentrations decreased (-0.065 mg/dl; 95% CI, -0.076 to -0.054) in transgender women and increased (+0.131 mg/dl; 95% CI, 0.119 to 0.142) in transgender men. Changes in creatinine-based eGFR varied substantially depending on the sex used in the equation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of transgender individuals, cystatin C-based eGFR increased with estradiol and antiandrogen therapy and decreased with testosterone therapy.

AACC/NKF Guidance Document on Improving Equity in Chronic Kidney Disease Care

BACKGROUND

Kidney disease (KD) is an important health equity issue with Black, Hispanic, and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals experiencing a disproportionate disease burden. Prior to 2021, the commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations incorporated coefficients for Black race that conferred higher GFR estimates for Black individuals compared to non-Black individuals of the same sex, age, and blood creatinine concentration. With a recognition that race does not delineate distinct biological categories, a joint task force of the National Kidney Foundation and the American Society of Nephrology recommended the adoption of the CKD-EPI 2021 race-agnostic equations.

CONTENT

This document provides guidance on implementation of the CKD-EPI 2021 equations. It describes recommendations for KD biomarker testing, and opportunities for collaboration between clinical laboratories and providers to improve KD detection in high-risk populations. Further, the document provides guidance on the use of cystatin C, and eGFR reporting and interpretation in gender-diverse populations.

SUMMARY

Implementation of the CKD-EPI 2021 eGFR equations represents progress toward health equity in the management of KD. Ongoing efforts by multidisciplinary teams, including clinical laboratorians, should focus on improved disease detection in clinically and socially high-risk populations. Routine use of cystatin C is recommended to improve the accuracy of eGFR, particularly in patients whose blood creatinine concentrations are confounded by processes other than glomerular filtration. When managing gender-diverse individuals, eGFR should be calculated and reported with both male and female coefficients. Gender-diverse individuals can benefit from a more holistic management approach, particularly at important clinical decision points.

Role of Sex Hormones in Prevalent Kidney Diseases

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a constantly growing global health burden, with more than 840 million people affected worldwide. CKD presents sex disparities in the pathophysiology of the disease, as well as in the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and disease progression. Overall, while CKD is more frequent in females, males have a higher risk to progress to end-stage kidney disease. In recent years, numerous studies have highlighted the role of sex hormones in the health and diseases of several organs, including the kidney. In this review, we present a clinical overview of the sex-differences in CKD and a selection of prominent kidney diseases causing CKD: lupus nephritis, diabetic kidney disease, IgA nephropathy, and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. We report clinical and experimental findings on the role of sex hormones in the development of the disease and its progression to end-stage kidney disease.

Inclusion of Transgender and Gender Diverse People in Phase III Trials: Examples from HIV Pharmacologic Prevention Studies

Although at least 25 million adults are transgender worldwide, few phase III clinical trials have enrolled transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people. HIV is the only therapeutic area to include TGD people intentionally in phase III randomized clinical trials during the development of certain newer HIV pharmacologic prevention interventions. Pharmacologic assessments for HIV prevention efficacy in TGD populations are important, as there may be specific considerations for product use and potential interactions with hormone therapies. Herein, we summarize ongoing and completed phase III HIV trials that included TGD people as part of the study population, we examine investigators' strategies for recruiting and engaging TGD priority populations in these phase III trials, and we comment on the implications of these studies for prioritizing TGD populations in clinical pharmacology research within the phase III clinical trial landscape.