The influence of induction therapy for kidney transplantation after a non-renal transplant

Prevention and management of tuberculosis in solid organ transplantation: A consensus statement of the transplantation society of Taiwan

Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB). Due to the use of immunosuppressants, the incidence of TB among solid organ transplant recipients has been consistently reported to be higher than that among the general population. TB frequently develops within the first year after transplantation when a high level of immunosuppression is maintained. Extrapulmonary TB and disseminated TB account for a substantial proportion of TB among solid organ transplant recipients. Treatment of TB among recipients is complicated by the drug-drug interactions between anti-TB drugs and immunosuppressants. TB is associated with an increased risk of graft rejection, graft failure and mortality. Detection and management of latent TB infection among solid organ transplant candidates and recipients have been recommended. However, strategy to mitigate the risk of TB among solid organ transplant recipients has not yet been established in Taiwan. To address the challenges of TB among solid organ transplant recipients, a working group of the Transplantation Society of Taiwan was established. The working group searched literatures on TB among solid organ transplant recipients as well as guidelines and recommendations, and proposed interventions to strengthen TB prevention and care among solid organ transplant recipients.

Kidney Allograft and Recipient Survival After Heart Transplantation by Induction Type in the United States

BACKGROUND

Induction choices for kidney-after-heart transplant recipients are variable. We examined the impact of kidney induction types on kidney graft and patient survival in heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

We analyzed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient database from inception through the end of 2018 to study kidney and patient outcomes in the United States after heart transplantation. We only included recipients who were discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance. We grouped recipients by induction type into 3 groups: depletional (N = 307), nondepletional (n = 253), and no-induction (steroid only) (n = 57). We studied patients and kidney survival using Cox PH regression, with transplant centers included as a random effect. We adjusted the models for heart induction, recipient and donor age, gender, time between heart and kidney transplant, heart transplant indication, HLA mismatches, payor, live-donor kidney, transplant year, dialysis status, and diabetes mellitus at the time of kidney transplant.

RESULTS

The 1-y kidney rejection rates and creatinine levels were similar in all groups. The 1-y rehospitalization rate was higher in the depletional group (51.7%) and nondepletional group (50.7%) than in the no-induction group (39.1%) although this was not statistically significant. There were no differences in recipient or kidney survival by kidney induction type. Live-donor kidney was associated with improved patient (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.0; P = 0.05) and kidney survival (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.84; P = 0.012].

CONCLUSIONS

Type of kidney induction did not influence patient or kidney graft survival in heart transplant recipients. No-induction may be the preferred choice due to the lack of clinical benefits associated with induction use.

Outcomes of Kidney Allograft and Recipient Survival After Liver Transplantation by Induction Type in the United States

There are several choices for induction immunosuppression in kidney-after-liver transplantation. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We assessed all kidney-after-liver transplant recipients in the United States between 1/1/2000 and 7/31/2017 to study kidney graft and patient outcomes by induction type. We only included patients discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate with or without steroids and had a negative crossmatch before kidney engraftment. We grouped recipients by kidney induction type into the following 3 groups: depletional (n = 550), nondepletional (n = 434), and no antibody induction (n = 144). We studied patient and kidney allograft survival using Cox proportional hazard regression, with transplant center included as a random effect. Models were adjusted for liver induction regimen, recipient and donor age, sex, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, payor type, living donor kidney transplantation, dialysis status, time from liver engraftment, hepatitis C virus status, and the presence of diabetes mellitus at time of kidney transplantation and transplantation year. The 6-month and 1-year rejection rates did not differ between groups. Compared with no induction, neither depletional nor nondepletional induction was associated with an improved recipient or graft survival in the multivariable models. Depletional induction at the time of liver transplantation was associated with worse patient survival after kidney transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-2.67; P = 0.02). Living donor kidney transplantation was associated with a 48.1% improved graft survival (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.82; P = 0.00). In conclusion, in the settings of a negative cross-match and maintenance with tacrolimus and mycophenolate, induction use was not associated with a patient or graft survival benefit in kidney-after-liver transplantations.

Induction type and outcomes for kidney graft and patient survival in recipients with prior lung transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Induction immunosuppression regimens for kidney transplants in lung transplant recipients vary widely. We studied the impact of induction types for kidney after lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database between 1994 and 2015, we studied outcomes of patients and kidney grafts for 330 kidney after lung transplant recipients for whom induction before kidney transplant included depletional (n = 115), non-depletional (n = 170), or no induction (steroids only; n = 45). We studied risk factors for recipient and graft survival using Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for kidney and lung induction, kidney donor type, dialysis status, recipient and donor ages, time from lung to kidney transplant, cause of lung disease, bilateral vs single lung transplant, diabetes, and human leukocyte antigen mismatches before kidney transplant, with transplant center as a random effect.

RESULTS

There was no difference between groups in patient survival or death-censored kidney allograft survival. The 1-year kidney acute rejection rates were 15.5%, 7.14%, and 0% in depletional, non-depletional, and no induction groups, respectively. In the Cox model for patient survival, living kidney donor recipients and bilateral lung transplant recipients were favorable predictors. For death-censored graft survival, kidney induction type did not predict graft survival. Results did not change when models only included recipients on tacrolimus and mycophenolate based maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of kidney induction did not influence patient or kidney graft survival following kidney transplants for those with previous lung transplants. No induction may be the preferred choice for kidney after lung transplant because of the lack of benefits from biologic induction in this large cohort.

Kidney Transplantation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease After a Previous Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The development of chronic kidney disease is a common complication after a lung transplantation, especially since the introduction of immunosuppressive treatments based on calcineurin inhibitors. Many of these patients reach end-stage renal disease and even need renal replacement therapy. Among the different options of renal replacement therapy, we consider kidney transplantation as a feasible option for these patients.

METHODS

A single center, observational retrospective study including 8 lung transplanted patients who have received a kidney transplant in the period between 2013 and 2017 with at least 1 year of follow-up was used.

RESULTS

Seven patients maintained an adequate function of the graft 1 year after kidney transplantation, and 1 patient died because of a pulmonary condition in spite of a previous kidney transplant. Two patients presented delayed graft function in the first days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The kidney transplantation is a technique of renal replacement therapy that should be considered in patients with previous lung transplantation. Experienced centers in double sequential lung and kidney transplantation should be established to assess and treat these types of patients.

Poor Patient and Graft Outcome After Induction Treatment by Antithymocyte Globulin in Recipients of a Kidney Graft After Nonrenal Organ Transplantation

Background

End-stage renal failure occurs in a substantial number of patients having received a nonrenal transplantation (NRT), for whom a kidney transplantation is needed. The medical strategy regarding the use of immunosuppression (IS) for a kidney graft in patients after an NRT is not well established. The prekidney grafts long-term IS advocates for a mild induction, such as using anti-IL-2R antibodies, whereas addition of new incompatibilities and anti-HLA preimmunization may suggest using stronger IS such as induction by polyclonal antithymocyte globulins (ATG).

Methods

We performed Cox multivariate and propensity score analysis of our validated transplant database to study the impact of the type of induction therapy on kidney graft survival of recipients of a kidney graft after NRT.

Results

We report here that kidney transplantation after NRT treated with an ATG induction has a poorer outcome (kidney and recipient survival) than that with an anti-IL-2R induction. After accounting for potential baseline differences with a multivariate Cox model, or by adjusting on a propensity score, we found that despite patients having received ATG cumulate more risk factors, ATG appears independently involved. As animal-derived biotherapeutics induce antiglycan antibodies and particularly anti-N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) IgGs which may activate endothelial cells in patients and grafts, we also investigated the magnitude and the nature of the anti-Neu5Gc elicited by the induction and showed that induction was associated with a shift in anti-Neu5Gc IgG repertoire. Possible reasons and mechanisms of a deleterious ATG usage in these patients are discussed.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that ATG induction after a kidney transplantation in recipients already under maintenance IS for a NRT should be used cautiously.