The effect of high-flux hemodialysis on hemoglobin concentrations in patients with CKD: results of the MINOXIS study

Online Hemodiafiltration: A New Perspective for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

Introduction Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is the most effective renal replacement therapy (RRT), which allows the enhanced removal of small and large uremic toxins by combining diffusion and convective transport of solutes. Although the goal of OL-HDF is to provide greater clearance of solutes with a preference for intermediate molecules responsible for many of the complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the studies reported to date and their meta-analyses are conflicting in nature and do not show a significant advantage of convective therapies on patient prognosis. Materials and methods At the Clinic of Nephrology and Dialysis, University Hospital "St. Marina", Varna, Bulgaria, 41 patients were monitored in a retrospective study for a two-year period, randomized into two groups, conducting OL-HDF after dilution and hemodialysis (HD) with the aim of studying the effect of convective therapies on the clinical outcome, the achieved quality of life, and the prognosis of the patient. Results The study found a significantly higher quality of life in patients undergoing OL-HDF with significantly higher values ​​of indicators of dialysis adequacy and nutritional status, better control of the anemic syndrome with the reduction of erythropoietin doses, significantly lower frequency of episodes of intradialytic hypotension with improved recovery, and 3.6-fold lower risk of death compared with conventional dialysis. Discussion Three major randomized controlled trials have compared survival outcomes in patients receiving HD or post-dilution OL-HDF, reporting conflicting results. Meta-analyses of the published studies have also been unable to provide a clear and definitive answer regarding the potential benefits of choosing one treatment over the other. Overall mortality, anemia, phosphate control, and small molecule clearance appear to be insufficiently influenced by the treatment method. On the other hand, cardiovascular mortality, hemodynamic stability, and clearance of middle and protein-bound molecules seem to be better in patients treated with OL-HDF. Conclusions Despite the conflicting data reported so far, OL-HDF is associated with better clinical outcome and prognosis for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient and undoubtedly warrants extensive future study with a view to improved quality of life in the growing dialysis population.

Middle-size molecule clearance as measured by β2-microglobulin in high-flux versus low-flux dialysis and hemodiafiltration: A prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Whereas most studies to date have mainly concentrated on the comparison between high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF), or HFHD and low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD) in relation to the clearance of β2-microglobulin (β2M) in HD patients, there have been few related to combined HFHD and HDF therapy. To compare the clearance of middle-sized molecules as measured by β2M in HFHD versus LFHD and HDF.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center, open-label, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University in China. Patients received either HFHD or LFHD and HDF 3 times a week with follow-ups at one and 3 months. The primary endpoint was the clearance of β2M at 3 months. The secondary endpoints included hemodialysis-related adverse events, changes in anemia, states of nutrition, and inflammatory indices.

RESULTS

After 3 months of treatment, the HFHD+HDF group achieved a higher satisfaction level than the LFHD+HDF group, with decreased serum β2M concentrations (34.493 ± 7.257 vs. 43.593 ± 9.036 mg/L, p < 0.001) and elevated red blood cell counts (3.959 ± 0.742 vs. 3.602 ± 0.578 × 10¹² /L, p = 0.015). Compared with baseline, both kinds of treatment led to increases in serum urea (t = -3.623, p = 0.001 vs. t = -4.240, p < 0.001), cholesterol (t = -2.511, p = 0.016 vs. t = -4.472, p < 0.001), and magnesium (t = -2.648, p = 0.011 vs. t = -3.561, p = 0.001). An elevated level of serum albumin (t = -2.683, p = 0.010) was observed only in the HFHD+HDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined therapy with HFHD and HDF has a beneficial effect on improving β2M clearance, red blood cell management, and nutrition status in HD patients.

Effects of Low-Flux and High-Flux Dialysis Membranes on Erythropoietin Responsiveness in Hemodialysis Patients

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often accompanied by anemia. High-flux membranes contribute to a reasonable removal of uremic toxins which cause anemia in CKD. Inadequate data have described the efficiency of high-flux dialysis in promoting erythropoietin responsiveness in CKD patients in the Middle East. This study was conducted to compare the efficiency of maintaining high-flux hemodialysis versus low-flux dialysis for ≥1 year in promoting erythropoietin responsiveness and to show the factors associated with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness in Arab chronic hemodialysis patients.

Methods

It was a retrospective cohort study that involved 110 subjects who were categorized into group 1 (50 patients receiving low-flux dialysis) and group 2 (60 patients receiving high-flux dialysis). History taking, examination, and laboratory investigations were conducted for all patients every 3 months from January 2021 to January 2022.

Results

Group 2 had significantly higher weight and body mass index than group 1 but lower cholesterol and intact parathyroid hormone levels than group 1. Erythropoietin resistance index levels did not differ between the two groups upon repeated measures over a 1-year follow-up. Significant risk factors for erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness on multivariate analysis were lower weight (Odds ratio (OR): 0.966; 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.94–0.992; p=0.011), longer hemodialysis vintage (OR: 1.172; 95% CI: 1.036–1.325; p=0.012), lower hemoglobin levels (OR: 0.531; 95% CI: 0.362–0.779; p=0.001), and higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR: 2.436; 95% CI: 1.321–4.493; p=0.004).

Conclusion

High-flux dialysis was not superior to low-flux dialysis in improving erythropoietin responsiveness.

Comparison of the removal of uraemic toxins with medium cut-off and high-flux dialysers: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Accumulation of middle-weight uraemic toxins in haemodialysis (HD) patients results in increased morbidity and mortality. Whether medium cut-off HD (MCO-HD) improves removal of middle-weight uraemic toxins remains to be demonstrated.

METHODS

This cross-over prospective study included 40 patients randomly assigned to receive either 3 months of MCO-HD followed by 3 months of high-flux HD (HF-HD), or vice versa. The primary endpoint was myoglobin reduction ratio (RR) after 3 months of MCO-HD. Secondary endpoints were the effect of MCO-HD on other middle-weight toxins and protein-bound toxins, and on parameters of nutrition, inflammation, anaemia and oxidative stress.

RESULTS

Compared with HF-HD, MCO-HD provided higher mean RR of myoglobin (36 ± 8 versus 57 ± 13%, P < 0.0001), beta2-microglobulin (68 ± 6 versus 73 ± 15%, P = 0.04), prolactin (32 ± 13 versus 59 ± 11%, P < 0.0001), fibroblast growth factor 23 (20 ± 21 versus 41 ± 22%, P = 0.0002), homocysteine (43 ± 7 versus 46 ± 9%, P = 0.03) and higher median RR of kappa [54 (48-58) versus 70 (63-74)%, P < 0.0001] and lambda free light chain (FLC) [15 (9-22) versus 44 (38-49)%, P < 0.0001]. Mean ± SD pre-dialysis levels of beta2-microglobulin (28.4 ± 5.6 versus 26.9 ± 5.1 mg/L, P = 0.01) and oxidized low-density lipoprote (6.9 ± 4.4 versus 5.5 ± 2.5 pg/mL, P = 0.04), and median (interquartile range) kappa FLC [145 (104-203) versus 129 (109-190) mg/L, P < 0.03] and lambda FLC [106 (77-132) versus 89 (62-125) mg/L, P = 0.002] were significantly lower. Mean albumin levels decreased significantly (38.2 ± 4.1 versus 36.9 ± 4.3 g/L, P = 0.004), without an effect on nutritional status as suggested by unchanged normalized protein catabolic rate and transthyretin level.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HF-HD, MCO-HD provides higher myoglobin and other middle molecules RR and is associated with moderate hypoalbuminemia. The potential benefits of this strategy on long-term clinical outcomes deserve further evaluation.

Use of the esa resistance index to guide dosing for anaemia management

BACKGROUND

Identifying erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) resistance is important for treating reversible causes, reaching target haemoglobin levels with minimal dosing, avoiding adverse effects and reducing costs. The resistance index (RI, dose/kg weight/g haemoglobin/dl) is reportedly superior to absolute or weight-based dosing.

OBJECTIVES

With the growing number of ESA classes and medications, our goal was to develop methodology to establish RI ranges in otherwise healthy haemodialysis patients as a structured approach to identify remediable causes of anaemia.

DESIGN

We retrospectively studied anaemia management with darbepoetin in 100 chronic haemodialysis patients and a subgroup of 48 without identifiable conditions that impair erythropoiesis. Data included inflammatory and bone marrow conditions, medications with hematologic effects, catheter use, iron, parathyroid and dialysis measures.

RESULTS

The haematologically healthy group was aged 57.1 ± 1.9 SEM years, 33% diabetic, with haemoglobin 10.4 ± 0.2 g/dl. The darbepoetin RI (DRI) values were 0.05 ± 0.01, absolute dose 38.5 ± 3.5 mcg/week and weight-based 0.50 ± 0.05 mcg/kg. Regression analyses included iron saturation, ferritin, parathyroid hormone and urea reduction ratio. DRI was superior to other dosing approaches based on the distribution of results (kurtosis) and discordance between the measures that occurred in 17% of patients at haemoglobin target.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the value of determining the RI for use with expanding ESA choices, using as an example how DRI values can be established for healthy haemodialysis patients so as to guide dosing. When elevated, the RI can trigger evaluation for remediable factors causing hyporesponsiveness even when haemoglobin goals have been reached.

Soluble transferrin receptor as a marker of erythropoiesis in patients undergoing high-flux hemodialysis

Anemia is a common complication in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients receiving hemodialysis. The effect of high-flux dialysis (HFD) on anemia remains unclear. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of HFD on anemia, and the potential of soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) as a marker of iron status and erythropoiesis in CKD patients on hemodialysis. Forty patients, who switched from conventional low-flux dialysis to HFD for 12 months, were enrolled in this study. The levels of sTfR, hemoglobin (Hb), iron, and nutritional markers, as well as the dose of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) and use of chalybeate were determined at 0, 2, 6, and 12 months after starting HFD. HFD significantly increased the hemoglobin level and reduced sTfR level in CKD patients (p < 0.05). In addition, significant decreasing linear trends were observed for rhEPO dosage and chalybeate use (p < 0.05). The level of sTfR was positively correlated with the percentage of reticulocytes (RET%), rhEPO dose, and chalybeate use, while it was negatively correlated with Hb levels and total iron-binding capacity results (all p < 0.05). A univariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) model showed that the Hb level, RET%, rhEPO dose, and chalybeate use were the variables associated with sTfR levels. A multivariate GEE model showed that the time points when hemodialysis was performed were the variables associated significantly with sTfR levels. Overall, our findings suggest that HFD can effectively improve renal anemia in hemodialysis patients, and sTfR could be used as a marker of erythropoiesis in HFD patients.

Short-term effects of hemodiafiltration versus conventional hemodialysis on erythrocyte performance

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a renal replacement therapy that is based on the principles of diffusion and convection for the elimination of uremic toxins. A significant and increasing number of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are treated with HDF, even in the absence of definite and conclusive survival and anemia treatment data. However, its effects on red blood cell (RBC) physiological features have not been examined in depth. In this study, ESRD patients under regular HDF or conventional hemodialysis (cHD) treatment were examined for RBC-related parameters, including anemia, hemolysis, cell shape, redox status, removal signaling, membrane protein composition, and microvesiculation, in repeated paired measurements accomplished before and right after each dialysis session. The HDF group was characterized by better redox potential and suppressed exovesiculation of blood cells compared with the cHD group pre-dialysis. However, HDF was associated with a temporary but acute, oxidative-stress-driven increase in hemolysis, RBC removal signaling, and stomatocytosis, probably associated with the effective clearance of dialyzable natural antioxidant components, including uric acid, from the uremic plasma. The nature of these adverse short-term effects of HDF on post-dialysis plasma and RBCs strongly suggests the use of a parallel antioxidant therapy during the HDF session.

Timing of dialysis initiation, duration and frequency of hemodialysis sessions, and membrane flux: a systematic review for a KDOQI clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

In 2006, NKF-KDOQI (National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) published clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy. Recent studies evaluating hemodialysis adequacy as determined by initiation timing, frequency, duration, and membrane type and prompted an update to the guideline.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and evidence synthesis.

SETTING & POPULATION

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease receiving hemodialysis.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

We screened publications from 2000 to March 2014, systematic reviews, and references and consulted the NKF-KDOQI Hemodialysis Adequacy Work Group members. We included randomized or controlled clinical trials in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis if they reported outcomes of interest.

INTERVENTIONS

Early versus late dialysis therapy initiation; more frequent (>3 times a week) or longer duration (>4.5 hours) compared to conventional hemodialysis; low- versus high-flux dialyzer membranes.

OUTCOMES

All-cause and cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalizations, quality of life, depression or cognitive function scores, blood pressure, number of antihypertensive medications, left ventricular mass, interdialytic weight gain, and harms or complications related to vascular access or the process of dialysis.

RESULTS

We included 32 articles reporting on 19 trials. Moderate-quality evidence indicated that earlier dialysis therapy initiation (at estimated creatinine clearance [eClcr] of 10-14mL/min) did not reduce mortality compared to later initiation (eClcr of 5-7mL/min). More than thrice-weekly hemodialysis and extended-length hemodialysis during a short follow-up did not improve clinical outcomes compared to conventional hemodialysis and resulted in a greater number of vascular access procedures (very low-quality evidence). Hemodialysis using high-flux membranes did not reduce all-cause mortality, but reduced cardiovascular mortality compared to hemodialysis using low-flux membranes (moderate-quality evidence).

LIMITATIONS

Few studies were adequately powered to evaluate mortality. Heterogeneity of study designs and interventions precluded pooling data for most outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited data indicate that earlier dialysis therapy initiation and more frequent and longer hemodialysis did not improve clinical outcomes compared to conventional hemodialysis.

Prognostic effect of high-flux hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease

We investigated the prognostic effects of high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) and low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both an electronic and a manual search were performed based on our rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria to retrieve high-quality, relevant clinical studies from various scientific literature databases. Comprehensive meta-analysis 2.0 (CMA 2.0) was used for the quantitative analysis. We initially retrieved 227 studies from the database search. Following a multi-step screening process, eight high-quality studies were selected for our meta-analysis. These eight studies included 4967 patients with CKD (2416 patients in the HFHD group, 2551 patients in the LFHD group). The results of our meta-analysis showed that the all-cause death rate in the HFHD group was significantly lower than that in the LFHD group (OR=0.704, 95%CI=0.533-0.929, P=0.013). Additionally, the cardiovascular death rate in the HFHD group was significantly lower than that in the LFHD group (OR=0.731, 95%CI=0.616-0.866, P<0.001). The results of this meta-analysis clearly showed that HFHD decreases all-cause death and cardiovascular death rates in patients with CKD and that HFHD can therefore be implemented as one of the first therapy choices for CKD.

Effect of High-Flux Dialysis on Circulating FGF-23 Levels in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients: Results from a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD), increased levels of circulating fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) are independently associated with cardiovascular events and mortality. Interventional strategies aiming to reduce levels of FGF-23 in HD patients are of particular interest. The purpose of the current study was to compare the impact of high-flux versus low-flux HD on circulating FGF-23 levels.

METHODS

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the MINOXIS study, including 127 dialysis patients randomized to low-flux (n = 62) and high-flux (n = 65) HD for 52 weeks. Patients with valid measures for FGF-23 investigated baseline and after 52 weeks were included.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, a significant increase in FGF-23 levels after one year of low-flux HD was observed (Delta plasma FGF-23: +4026 RU/ml; p < 0.001). In contrast, FGF-23 levels remained stable in the high flux group (Delta plasma FGF-23: +373 RU/ml, p = 0.70). The adjusted difference of the absolute change in FGF-23 levels between the two treatment groups was statistically significant (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Over a period of 12 months, high-flux HD was associated with stable FGF-23 levels, whereas the low-flux HD group showed an increase of FGF-23. However, the implications of the different FGF 23 time-trends in patients on high flux dialysis, as compared to the control group, remain to be explored in specifically designed clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00007612.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the erythropoiesis stimulating agent sparing potential of a vitamin E-bonded polysulfone dialysis membrane

Background

Vitamin E (VE) bonded polysulfone dialysis membranes have putative erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA)-sparing and anti-inflammatory properties based on data from a small number of studies. We sought to investigate this in a large, prospective 12-month randomized controlled trial.

Methods

Two-hundred and sixty prevalent haemodialysis (HD) patients were randomized to dialysis with VE-bonded polysulfone membranes or non-VE-bonded equivalents. All ESA-dosing was performed by means of a computer-based anaemia management decision support system. Monthly data were used to calculate the ESA resistance index (ERI) and blood tests were performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months for measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

Results

Of the 260 patients, 123 were randomized to dialysis with the VE-membrane and 12-month data was available for 220 patients. At the study population level, no beneficial effect of the VE membranes on the ERI or CRP levels was observed. Post hoc analyses indicated that there was a significant fall in ERI for patients with the highest baseline ESA resistance dialysed with the VE (9.28 [7.70–12.5] versus 7.70 [5.34–12.7] IU/week/kg/g/dL Hb, P = 0.01) but not the control membranes (9.45 [7.62–12.3] versus 8.14 [4.44–15.6] IU/week/kg/g/dL Hb, P = 0.41); this was not attributable to changes in CRP levels.

Conclusions

Wholesale switching of all chronic HD patients to dialysis with VE-bonded polysulfone membranes appears not to be associated with improvements in ESA-responsiveness or CRP. These membranes may have utility in patients with heightened ESA resistance.

Convective therapies versus low-flux hemodialysis for chronic kidney failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Although convective therapies have gained popularity for the optimal removal of uremic solutes, their benefits and potential risks have not been fully elucidated. We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing convective therapies with low-flux hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney failure.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using MEDLINE (inception-December 2012), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, scientific abstracts from meetings and bibliographies of retrieved articles. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of convective therapies including high-flux hemodialysis, hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration versus low-flux hemodialysis were included. Random-effects model meta-analyses were used to examine continuous and binary outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-five (29 crossover and 36 parallel-arm) trials were identified (n = 12 182). Convective therapies resulted in a decrease in all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76, 1.02, P = 0.09], cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71, 0.98, P = 0.03), all-cause hospitalization (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.82, 1.01; P = 0.08) and therapy-related hypotension (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35, 0.87, P = 0.01). Convective therapies also resulted in an increase in the clearance of several low-molecular-weight (urea, creatinine and phosphate), middle-sized (β-2 microglobulin and leptin) and protein-bound (homocysteine, advanced glycation end-products and pentosidine) solutes and a decrease in inflammatory markers (interleukin-6). There was no impact of convective therapies on cardiac morphological and functional parameters, and blood pressure and anemia parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Although convective therapies are associated with improved clearance of uremic solutes, the potential long-term benefits of specific convective modalities require further study.

Dialysis adequacy today: a European perspective

The need to improve haemodialysis (HD) therapies and to reduce cardiovascular and all-cause mortality frequently encountered by dialysis patients has been recognized and addressed for many years. A number of approaches, including increasing the frequency versus duration of treatment, have been proposed and debated in terms of their clinical efficacy and economic feasibility. Future prescription of dialysis to an expanding end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD-5D) population needs a re-evaluation of existing practices while maintaining the emphasis on patient well-being both in the short and in the long term. Efficient cleansing of the blood of all relevant uraemic toxins, including fluid and salt overload, remains the fundamental objective of all dialysis therapies. Simultaneously, metabolic disorders (e.g. anaemia, mineral bone disease, oxidative stress) that accompany renal failure need to be corrected also as part of the delivery of dialysis therapy itself. Usage of high-flux membranes that enable small and large uraemic toxins to be eliminated from the blood is the first prerequisite towards the aforementioned goals. Application of convective therapies [(online-haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF)] further enhances the detoxification effects of high-flux haemodialysis (HF-HD). However, despite an extended clinical experience with both HF-HD and OL-HDF spanning more than two decades, a more widespread prescription of convective treatment modalities awaits more conclusive evidence from large-scale prospective randomized controlled trials. In this review, we present a European perspective on the need to implement optimal dialysis and to improve it by adopting high convective therapies and to discuss whether inertia to implement these practice patterns may deprive patients of significantly improved well-being and survival.

β(2)-microglobulin amyloidosis

Dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA) is a clinical syndrome of pain, loss of function and other symptoms due to the deposition of amyloid consisting of β(2)-microglobulin (β(2)m) in the musculoskeletal system. The condition is seen in patients who suffer from chronic kidney disease and are treated with hemodialysis for a long time. Even though β(2)m easily can be manipulated to form amyloid in laboratory experiments under non-physiological conditions the precise mechanisms involved in the formation of β(2)m-amyloid in patients with DRA have been difficult to unravel. The current knowledge which is reviewed here indicates that conformational fluctuations centered around the D-strand, the DE-loop, and around the cis-configured Pro32 peptide bond are involved in β(2)m amyloidosis. Also required are highly increased concentrations of circulating β(2)m and possibly various post-translational modifications mediated by the pro-inflammatory environment in uremic blood, together with the influence of divalent metal ions (specifically Cu(2 +)), uremic toxins, and dialysis-enhanced redox-processes. It seems plausible that domain-swapped β(2)m dimers act as building blocks of β-spine cross-β -sheet fibrils consisting of otherwise globular, roughly natively folded protein. An activated complement system and cellular activation perpetuate these reactions which due to the affinity of β(2)m-amyloid for the collagen of synovial surfaces result in the DRA syndrome.