1
|
Bergan S, Brunet M, Hesselink DA, Johnson-Davis KL, Kunicki PK, Lemaitre F, Marquet P, Molinaro M, Noceti O, Pattanaik S, Pawinski T, Seger C, Shipkova M, Swen JJ, van Gelder T, Venkataramanan R, Wieland E, Woillard JB, Zwart TC, Barten MJ, Budde K, Dieterlen MT, Elens L, Haufroid V, Masuda S, Millan O, Mizuno T, Moes DJAR, Oellerich M, Picard N, Salzmann L, Tönshoff B, van Schaik RHN, Vethe NT, Vinks AA, Wallemacq P, Åsberg A, Langman LJ. Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. Ther Drug Monit 2021; 43:150-200. [PMID: 33711005 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stein Bergan
- Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mercè Brunet
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kamisha L Johnson-Davis
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Paweł K Kunicki
- Department of Drug Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Florian Lemaitre
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail)-UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre Marquet
- INSERM, Université de Limoges, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU de Limoges, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France
| | - Mariadelfina Molinaro
- Clinical and Experimental Pharmacokinetics Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ofelia Noceti
- National Center for Liver Tansplantation and Liver Diseases, Army Forces Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | - Tomasz Pawinski
- Department of Drug Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | | | - Maria Shipkova
- Synlab TDM Competence Center, Synlab MVZ Leinfelden-Echterdingen GmbH, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Teun van Gelder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Raman Venkataramanan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Department of Pathology, Starzl Transplantation Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eberhard Wieland
- Synlab TDM Competence Center, Synlab MVZ Leinfelden-Echterdingen GmbH, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
| | - Jean-Baptiste Woillard
- INSERM, Université de Limoges, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU de Limoges, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France
| | - Tom C Zwart
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Markus J Barten
- Department of Cardiac- and Vascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maja-Theresa Dieterlen
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, HELIOS Clinic, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Laure Elens
- Integrated PharmacoMetrics, PharmacoGenomics and PharmacoKinetics (PMGK) Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haufroid
- Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain and Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Satohiro Masuda
- Department of Pharmacy, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Olga Millan
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Tomoyuki Mizuno
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Dirk J A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Oellerich
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Picard
- INSERM, Université de Limoges, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU de Limoges, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France
| | | | - Burkhard Tönshoff
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ron H N van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nils Tore Vethe
- Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alexander A Vinks
- Department of Pharmacy, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Pierre Wallemacq
- Clinical Chemistry Department, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, LTAP, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anders Åsberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; and
| | - Loralie J Langman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Varnell CD, Fukuda T, Kirby CL, Martin LJ, Warshaw BL, Patel HP, Chand DH, Barletta GM, Van Why SK, VanDeVoorde RG, Weaver DJ, Wilson A, Verghese PS, Vinks AA, Greenbaum LA, Goebel J, Hooper DK. Mycophenolate mofetil-related leukopenia in children and young adults following kidney transplantation: Influence of genes and drugs. Pediatr Transplant 2017; 21:10.1111/petr.13033. [PMID: 28869324 PMCID: PMC5905326 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
MMF is commonly prescribed following kidney transplantation, yet its use is complicated by leukopenia. Understanding the genetics mediating this risk will help clinicians administer MMF safely. We evaluated 284 patients under 21 years of age for incidence and time course of MMF-related leukopenia and performed a candidate gene association study comparing the frequency of 26 SNPs between cases with MMF-related leukopenia and controls. We matched cases by induction, steroid duration, race, center, and age. We also evaluated the impact of induction and SNPs on time to leukopenia in all cases. Sixty-eight (24%) patients had MMF-related leukopenia, of which 59 consented for genotyping and 38 were matched with controls. Among matched pairs, no SNPs were associated with leukopenia. With non-depleting induction, UGT2B7-900A>G (rs7438135) was associated with increased risk of MMF-related leukopenia (P = .038). Time to leukopenia did not differ between patients by induction agent, but 2 SNPs (rs2228075, rs2278294) in IMPDH1 were associated with increased time to leukopenia. MMF-related leukopenia is common after transplantation. UGT2B7 may influence leukopenia risk especially in patients without lymphocyte-depleting induction. IMPDH1 may influence time course of leukopenia after transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles D. Varnell
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Tsuyoshi Fukuda
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Cassie L. Kirby
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Lisa J. Martin
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Barry L. Warshaw
- Division of Nephrology, Emory University School of Medicine and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hiren P. Patel
- Division of Nephrology, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Deepa H. Chand
- Division of Nephrology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, USA,Abbvie, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Scott K. Van Why
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Rene G. VanDeVoorde
- Division of Nephrology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Donald J. Weaver
- Division of Nephrology, Levine Children’s Hospital, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Amy Wilson
- Division of Nephrology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Priya S. Verghese
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University of Minnesota Masonic Children’s Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alexander A. Vinks
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Larry A. Greenbaum
- Division of Nephrology, Emory University School of Medicine and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jens Goebel
- Division of Nephrology, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - David K. Hooper
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA,James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grobman M, Boothe DM, Rindt H, Williamson BG, Katz ML, Coates JR, Reinero CR. Pharmacokinetics and dynamics of mycophenolate mofetil after single-dose oral administration in juvenile dachshunds. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2017. [PMID: 28649788 DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is recommended as an alternative/complementary immunosuppressant. Pharmacokinetic and dynamic effects of MMF are unknown in young-aged dogs. We investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single oral dose MMF metabolite, mycophenolic acid (MPA), in healthy juvenile dogs purpose-bred for the tripeptidyl peptidase 1 gene (TPP1) mutation. The dogs were heterozygous for the mutation (nonaffected carriers). Six dogs received 13 mg/kg oral MMF and two placebo. Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from plasma MPA were evaluated. Whole-blood mitogen-stimulated T-cell proliferation was determined using a flow cytometric assay. Plasma MPA Cmax (mean ± SD, 9.33 ± 7.04 μg/ml) occurred at <1 hr. The AUC0-∞ (mean ± SD, 12.84±6.62 hr*μg/ml), MRTinf (mean ± SD, 11.09 ± 9.63 min), T1/2 (harmonic mean ± PseudoSD 5.50 ± 3.80 min), and k/d (mean ± SD, 0.002 ± 0.001 1/min). Significant differences could not be detected between % inhibition of proliferating CD5+ T lymphocytes at any time point (p = .380). No relationship was observed between MPA concentration and % inhibition of proliferating CD5+ T lymphocytes (R = .148, p = .324). Pharmacodynamics do not support the use of MMF in juvenile dogs at the administered dose based on existing therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Grobman
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - D M Boothe
- Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - H Rindt
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - B G Williamson
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - M L Katz
- Mason Eye Institute, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - J R Coates
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - C R Reinero
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Target Enzyme Activity and Phosphorylation of Pathway Molecules As Specific Biomarkers in Transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 2016; 38 Suppl 1:S43-9. [DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
5
|
T-Cell Surface Antigens and sCD30 as Biomarkers of the Risk of Rejection in Solid Organ Transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 2015; 38 Suppl 1:S29-35. [PMID: 26495982 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
T-cell activation is a characteristic of organ rejection. T cells, located in the draining lymph nodes of the transplant recipient, are faced with non-self-molecules presented by antigen presenting cells and become activated. Activated T cells are characterized by up-regulated surface antigens, such as costimulatory molecules, adhesion molecules, chemokine receptors, and major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. Surface antigen expression can be followed by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies in either cell function assays using donor-specific or nonspecific stimulation of isolated cells or whole blood and without stimulation on circulating lymphocytes. Molecules such as CD30 can be proteolytically cleaved off the surface of activated cells in vivo, and the determination of the soluble protein (sCD30) in serum or plasma is performed by immunoassays. As promising biomarkers for rejection and long-term transplant outcome, CD28 (costimulatory receptor for CD80 and CD86), CD154 (CD40 ligand), and sCD30 (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 8) have been identified. Whereas cell function assays are time-consuming laboratory-developed tests which are difficult to standardize, commercial assays are frequently available for soluble proteins. Therefore, more data from clinical trials have been published for sCD30 compared with the surface antigens on activated T cells. This short review summarizes the association between selected surface antigens and immunosuppression, and rejection in solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wieland E, Shipkova M. Lymphocyte surface molecules as immune activation biomarkers. Clin Biochem 2015; 49:347-54. [PMID: 26247177 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.07.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2015] [Revised: 07/23/2015] [Accepted: 07/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Immunosuppression is mandatory after solid organ transplantation between HLA mismatched individuals. It is a lifelong therapy that needs to be closely monitored to avoid under- and over-immunosuppression. For many drugs, pharmacokinetic monitoring has been proven to be beneficial. However, the therapeutic ranges are statistically derived surrogate markers for the effects that cannot predict the individual response of single patients. Better tailored immunosuppression biomarkers are needed that indicate immune activation. T cells are critically involved in organ rejection, and the means to assess their activation state may be promising to individualize immunosuppressive therapies. Activated T cells can be monitored with flow cytometry based on surface molecules that are typically up regulated or with molecules that are cleaved off the cell surface. Among these molecules are the interleukin-2 receptor (CD25); transferrin receptor (CD71); the T cell co-stimulatory molecules CD28, CD69, and CD154 and sCD30, which is a member of the TNF-alpha family. The effect of immunosuppressive drugs on T cell activation can be recorded with indirect cell function assays or by directly monitoring activated T cells in whole blood. Soluble proteins can be measured with immunoassays. This review provides a summary of the experimental and clinical studies investigating the potential of surface molecules as a tool for immune monitoring. It critically discusses the obstacles and shortcomings from an analytical and diagnostic perspective that are currently preventing their use in multicenter trials and clinical routine monitoring of transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eberhard Wieland
- Klinikum Stuttgart, Central Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Germany.
| | - Maria Shipkova
- Klinikum Stuttgart, Central Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in organ transplant recipients: an update. Arch Toxicol 2014; 88:1351-89. [PMID: 24792322 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-014-1247-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Accepted: 04/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
This review aims to provide an update of the literature on the pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients. Mycophenolate is now the antimetabolite of choice in immunosuppressant regimens in transplant recipients. The active drug moiety mycophenolic acid (MPA) is available as an ester pro-drug and an enteric-coated sodium salt. MPA is a competitive, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), an important rate-limiting enzyme in purine synthesis. MPA suppresses T and B lymphocyte proliferation; it also decreases expression of glycoproteins and adhesion molecules responsible for recruiting monocytes and lymphocytes to sites of inflammation and graft rejection; and may destroy activated lymphocytes by induction of a necrotic signal. Improved long-term allograft survival has been demonstrated for MPA and may be due to inhibition of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 or fibroblast proliferation. Recent research also suggested a differential effect of mycophenolate on the regulatory T cell/helper T cell balance which could potentially encourage immune tolerance. Lower exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (renal sparing) appears to be possible with concomitant use of MPA in renal transplant recipients without undue risk of rejection. MPA displays large between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability. At least three studies have now reported that MPA exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with bioavailability decreasing significantly with increasing doses, perhaps due to saturable absorption processes or saturable enterohepatic recirculation. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is still controversial and the ability of routine MPA TDM to improve long-term graft survival and patient outcomes is largely unknown. MPA monitoring may be more important in high-immunological recipients, those on calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens and in whom unexpected rejection or infections have occurred. The majority of pharmacodynamic data on MPA has been obtained in patients receiving MMF therapy in the first year after kidney transplantation. Low MPA area under the concentration time from 0 to 12 h post-dose (AUC0-12) is associated with increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection although AUC0-12 optimal cut-off values vary across study populations. IMPDH monitoring to identify individuals at increased risk of rejection shows some promise but is still in the experimental stage. A relationship between MPA exposure and adverse events was identified in some but not all studies. Genetic variants within genes involved in MPA metabolism (UGT1A9, UGT1A8, UGT2B7), cellular transportation (SLCOB1, SLCO1B3, ABCC2) and targets (IMPDH) have been reported to effect MPA pharmacokinetics and/or response in some studies; however, larger studies across different ethnic groups that take into account genetic linkage and drug interactions that can alter a patient's phenotype are needed before any clinical recommendations based on patient genotype can be formulated. There is little data on the pharmacology and toxicology of MPA in older and paediatric transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Dostalek M, Gohh RY, Akhlaghi F. Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase expression and activity are significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus. Ther Drug Monit 2013; 35:374-83. [PMID: 23666569 PMCID: PMC4109137 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0b013e3182852697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) is a target of the immunosuppressive drug, mycophenolic acid (MPA). A 12-hour clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study was conducted to compare IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 gene expression, IMPDHI and IMPDHII protein levels, and enzyme activity between kidney transplant recipients with respect to diabetes status. METHODS Nondiabetic (ND, n = 11) and diabetic (D, n = 9) kidney transplant recipients and on nontransplant nondiabetic (n = 10) and diabetic (n = 10) volunteers were included in the study. RESULTS Area under the effect curve values for gene expression: IMPDH1 [ND: 22.1 (13.8-31.3) versus D: 4.5 (2.3-6.5), P < 0.001] and IMPDH2 [ND: 15.3 (11.0-21.7) versus D: 6.1 (4.6-8.6), P < 0.001], protein level: IMPDHI [ND: 1.0 (0.5-1.3) versus 0.5 (0.4-0.7), P = 0.002] and IMPDHII [ND: 1.0 (0.6-1.6) versus D: 0.7 (0.6-0.8) P < 0.001] and enzyme activity [ND: 180 (105-245) versus D: 29.9 (15.3-35.6) µmole·s(-1)·mole(-1) adenosine monophosphate, P < 0.001] was significantly lower in transplant recipients with diabetes. Similar results were observed in nontransplanted volunteers. Kinetic studies of MPA-mediated suppression of IMPDH activity in nontransplanted individuals revealed an approximately 2.5-fold lower half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) for diabetic as compared with nondiabetic [ND: 50.2 (49.8-50.7) versus D: 15.8 (15.6-16.3) nmole/L, P = 0.004] volunteers. This difference was not related to several IMPDH gene variants. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates a significantly lower IMPDH gene expression, protein level, and enzyme activity in diabetic patients. Further clinical studies in a larger number of patients are warranted to verify whether MPA dosing must be optimized for kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miroslav Dostalek
- Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Reginald Y. Gohh
- Division of Organ Transplantation, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Fatemeh Akhlaghi
- Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Molinaro M, Chiarelli LR, Biancone L, Castagneto M, Boschiero L, Pisani F, Sabbatini M, Sandrini S, Arbustini E, Tinelli C, Regazzi M, Schena FP, Segoloni GP. Monitoring of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity and expression during the early period of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in de novo renal transplant patients. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2012; 28:109-17. [PMID: 22892445 DOI: 10.2133/dmpk.dmpk-12-rg-048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Measurement of inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity or gene expression was used as a further approach in pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD)-guided mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy. Forty-four de novo kidney transplant patients were enrolled; 35 of these completed the study, and were followed for 24 weeks for clinical status, PK parameters, IMPDH activity and IMPDH1/2 gene expression. IMPDH activity and expression were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before transplant and at week 2,4,12 and 24, drawn before (t0) and 2 h (t2 h) after MMF administration. No significant correlation was found between IMPDH activity/expression and PK parameters. For both genes, significant enhancement in t2 h expression was observed, then decreases towards week 24 with a trend following steroid dosages. Seven patients experienced acute rejection (AR) and exhibited significantly higher pre-transplant expression of both IMPDH1 (median 3.42 vs. 0.84; p=0.0025), and IMPDH2 genes (135 vs. 104; p=0.0218) with respect to non-rejecting patients. A significant association was also found between pre-transplant IMPDH1 mRNA and haematological complications (p=0.032). This study suggests that high steroid dosages may influence IMPDH1/2 expression, hampering their use as a PD biomarker, particularly during the early post-transplant period. The measurement of pre-transplant levels of IMPDH1/2 may contribute to prediction of individual drug responsiveness to improve the clinical management of patients in MMF therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariadelfina Molinaro
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics in Transplantation and Autoimmune Diseases, Foundation IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Biomarkers. Ther Drug Monit 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-385467-4.00016-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
11
|
Laverdière I, Caron P, Couture F, Guillemette C, Lévesque E. Liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometry based assay to evaluate inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from stem cell transplant recipients. Anal Chem 2011; 84:216-23. [PMID: 22092180 DOI: 10.1021/ac202404y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Combinations of immunosuppressive drugs are routinely used post-transplantation to prevent rejection and/or other complications and optimize outcomes. The prodrug ester mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is frequently used in solid-organ and stem cell transplantation settings. A growing body of evidence supports therapeutic monitoring of this immunosuppressant to optimize its efficacy and reduce toxicity. Thus, pharmacodynamic monitoring of MMF is a strategy that could potentially improve patient outcomes. Pharmacodynamic measurements require evaluation of inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity, the target enzyme of the active moiety mycophenolic acid. Various nonradioactive methods using chromatographic separations have been used to quantify xanthosine monophosphate, the catalytic product of the enzyme, to indirectly evaluate IMPDH activity. However, no methods have used mass spectrometry based detection, which provides more specificity and sensitivity. Here, we describe a liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of xanthosine monophosphate and adenosine monophosphate (for normalization) in lysates of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Linearity, precision, and accuracy were validated over a large range of concentrations for each compound. The method could measure analytes with high sensitivity, accuracy (93-116%), and reproducibility (CV < 7.5%). Its clinical application was validated in PBMC lysates obtained from healthy individuals (n = 43) and HSCT recipients (n = 19). This reliable and validated LC-MS/MS method could be a useful tool for pharmacodynamic monitoring of patients treated with MMF.
Collapse
|
12
|
Shipkova M, Wieland E. Surface markers of lymphocyte activation and markers of cell proliferation. Clin Chim Acta 2011; 413:1338-49. [PMID: 22120733 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2011] [Revised: 11/01/2011] [Accepted: 11/04/2011] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The individualization of immunosuppression is an approach for preventing rejection in the early phase after transplantation and for avoiding the long-term side effects of over immunosuppression. Pharmacodynamic markers, either specific or nonspecific, have been proposed as complementary tools to drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs. A key event in graft rejection is the activation and proliferation of the recipient's lymphocytes, particularly T cells. Activated T cells express surface receptors, such as CD25 (the IL-2 receptor) and CD71 (the transferrin receptor), or co-stimulatory molecules (CD26, CD27, CD28, CD30, CD154 or CD40L, and CD134). Both surface marker expression and cell proliferation are predominately assessed by flow cytometry. Protocols have been established and utilized for both in vitro and ex vivo investigations with either isolated lymphocytes or whole blood. This article reviews the current body of research regarding the use of lymphocyte proliferation and surface activation markers with an emphasis on T cells. Experimental and clinical results related to these markers, as well as methodological issues and open questions, are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Shipkova
- Zentralinstitut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratorioumsmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Glander P, Hambach P, Liefeldt L, Budde K. Inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity as a biomarker in the field of transplantation. Clin Chim Acta 2011; 413:1391-7. [PMID: 21889500 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2011] [Revised: 07/09/2011] [Accepted: 08/16/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Inosine 5'monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) is the rate limiting enzyme in the de novo synthesis of guanine nucleotides. The direct determination of target enzyme activity as a biomarker of mycophenolic acid (MPA) may help to estimate better the individual response to the immunosuppressant. However, the assessment of the clinical utility of this approach is limited by the diversity of the assay systems, which has not yet allowed the prospective assessment of this enzyme in larger patient cohorts. A recently validated and standardized assay allows the investigation of IMPDH activity in larger clinical studies. Although descriptive results from observational studies hold promise for a more individualized therapy in transplant medicine, more studies are needed to prospectively validate this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Glander
- Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Nephrology, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prémaud A, Rousseau A, Johnson G, Canivet C, Gandia P, Muscari F, Peron JM, Rostaing L, Marquet P, Kamar N. Inhibition of T-cell activation and proliferation by mycophenolic acid in patients awaiting liver transplantation: PK/PD relationships. Pharmacol Res 2011; 63:432-8. [PMID: 21241803 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2011.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2010] [Revised: 01/07/2011] [Accepted: 01/09/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Mycophenolic acid (MPA) plasma concentrations were reported to be associated with a decrease in T-cell proliferation, and in both IL-2 α-chain (CD25) and transferin receptor (CD71) expression. The aim of this study was to confirm, quantify and model these PK/PD relationships. Full profiles of MPA plasma concentrations, T-cell proliferation, intracytoplasmic IL-2 and TNF-α expression, and both CD71 and CD25 expression were collected over the 12h after dosing in 10 patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. Data were analyzed using NONMEM(®). Both CD25 and CD71 expression and T cell proliferation clearly decreased (median of decrease from baseline 62%, 68% and 94%, respectively) with increasing MPA concentrations, in contrast to IL-2 and TNF-α expression. The CD25 and CD71 baseline expression (E(0)) and maximum effect (E(max)) were correlated with the E(0) and E(max) values of T-cell proliferation (r(2)=0.509 and r(2)=0.622, respectively). The CD25, CD71 expression and T-cell proliferation profiles were adequately fitted using a sigmoid inhibitory E(max) model. Low estimated values (≤2 mg/L) for 50% inhibitory MPA concentrations were obtained. This study confirmed a transient MPA concentration-dependent decrease in T-cells expressing CD25 and CD71 and a strong reduction of T-cell proliferation and showed that CD25 and CD71 expression was correlated with T-cell proliferation.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring is a well-established approach in transplantation medicine to guide immunosuppressive therapy. However, it cannot always predict the effects of immunosuppressive drugs on immune cells, because it does not reflect any aspect of an individual patient's immune system. Pharmacodynamic monitoring is a more recent strategy to provide information about the biologic effect of a specific drug or drug combination on the individual transplant patient. Currently, there is a large number of different biomarkers that either directly (specific markers) or indirectly (global markers) relate to the pharmacodynamic effects of immunosuppressive drugs and are under investigation as potential candidates to be introduced in clinical practice. Such biomarkers may be useful to identify patients at risk of developing acute rejection, infection, or cancer as well as patients who are suitable for minimization of immunosuppressant therapy and may be helpful to manage the timing and rate of immunosuppressant weaning. Serial longitudinal monitoring may allow maintenance of an individualized immunosuppressive regimen. Thus, biomarker monitoring is a potential complementary tool to therapeutic drug monitoring. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge about the use of a number of global or drug-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers. It is not a comprehensive overview of the literature available, but rather an evidence-based reflection by experts who are intensively involved in scientific work in this field.
Collapse
|
16
|
Dieterlen MT, Eberhardt K, Tarnok A, Bittner HB, Barten MJ. Flow Cytometry-Based Pharmacodynamic Monitoring After Organ Transplantation. Methods Cell Biol 2011; 103:267-84. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-385493-3.00011-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
|
17
|
Barraclough KA, Staatz CE, Isbel NM, McTaggart SJ. Review: Pharmacodynamic monitoring of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Nephrology (Carlton) 2010; 15:522-32. [PMID: 20649871 DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01349.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Advances in immunosuppressive therapies have improved kidney transplant outcomes. However, immunosuppressant drug-induced toxicities continue to reduce tolerability and impact patient and graft survival. A major ongoing challenge in kidney transplantation is to establish ways of tailoring immunosuppressant therapy so as to maintain efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Pharmacodynamic monitoring by direct measurement of immune cell function has the potential to personalize immunosuppression. The purpose of this review is to provide the clinician with an overview of the methodology and use of immune function monitoring in the field of kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Barraclough
- Department of Renal Medicine, University of Queensland at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic drug monitoring has been used for many years to relate immunosuppressant dose to drug exposure in vivo. However, this conventional therapeutic drug monitoring of blood immunosuppressant levels may not necessarily predict the pharmacologic effects on immune cells. The direct determination of target enzyme activity (eg, calcineurin activity, inosine-5'-monophospahte dehydrogenase [IMPDH] activity, p70S6 kinase) may help to better assess the individual response to the immunosuppressant. However, its use is limited by the difficulties of the assay systems, which did not allow yet the prospective assessment of these enzymes in larger patient cohorts with the establishment of validated pharmacodynamic drug monitoring. The most progress regarding a robust and reproducible test system has been achieved with the determination of IMPDH activity as a specific pharmacodynamic parameter of mycophenolic acid activity. This recently validated and standardized assay allows the investigation of IMPDH activity in larger clinical studies. Although the determination of target enzyme activity, eg, by the determination of IMPDH activity, holds promise for a more individualized therapy in transplant medicine, more studies are needed to prospectively validate this approach.
Collapse
|
19
|
Budde K, Dürr M, Liefeldt L, Neumayer HH, Glander P. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2010; 9:981-94. [DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2010.513379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
20
|
Fukuda T, Goebel J, Thøgersen H, Maseck D, Cox S, Logan B, Sherbotie J, Seikaly M, Vinks AA. Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of mycophenolic acid effects in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 51:309-20. [PMID: 20418509 DOI: 10.1177/0091270010368542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Monitoring inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity as a biomarker of mycophenolic acid (MPA)-induced immunosuppression may serve as a novel approach in pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD)-guided therapy. The authors prospectively studied MPA pharmacokinetics and IMPDH inhibition in 28 pediatric de novo kidney transplant recipients. Pretransplant IMPDH activity and full PK/PD profiles were obtained at 3 different occasions: 1 to 3 days, 4 to 9 days, and approximately 6 months after transplant. Large intra- and interpatient variability was noted in MPA pharmacokinetics and exposure and IMPDH inhibition. MPA exposure (AUC(0-12 h)) was low early posttransplant and increased over time and stabilized at months 3 to 6. Mean pretransplant IMPDH activity (6.4 ± 4.6 nmol/h/mg protein) was lower than previously reported in adults. In most of the patients, IMPDH enzyme activity decreased with increasing MPA plasma concentration, with maximum inhibition coinciding with maximum MPA concentration. The overall relationship between MPA concentration and IMPDH activity was described by a direct inhibitory E(max) model (EC(50) = 0.97 mg/L). This study suggests the importance of early PK/PD monitoring to improve drug exposure. Because IMPDH inhibition is well correlated to MPA concentration, pretransplant IMPDH activity may serve as an early marker to guide the initial level of MPA exposure required in a pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Fukuda
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Polyoma BK virus-associated nephropathy in kidney-transplant patients: Effects of leflunomide on T-cell functions and disease outcome. Int Immunopharmacol 2009; 9:1131-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2009] [Revised: 04/26/2009] [Accepted: 05/07/2009] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|