Fracture risk in CKD

Secondary Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a global public health problem, with fractures contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. Although postmenopausal osteoporosis is most common, up to 30% of postmenopausal women, > 50% of premenopausal women, and between 50% and 80% of men have secondary osteoporosis. Exclusion of secondary causes is important, as treatment of such patients often commences by treating the underlying condition. These are varied but often neglected, ranging from endocrine to chronic inflammatory and genetic conditions. General screening is recommended for all patients with osteoporosis, with advanced investigations reserved for premenopausal women and men aged < 50 years, for older patients in whom classical risk factors for osteoporosis are absent, and for all patients with the lowest bone mass (Z-score ≤ -2). The response of secondary osteoporosis to conventional anti-osteoporosis therapy may be inadequate if the underlying condition is unrecognized and untreated. Bone densitometry, using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, may underestimate fracture risk in some chronic diseases, including glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, and obesity, and may overestimate fracture risk in others (eg, Turner syndrome). FRAX and trabecular bone score may provide additional information regarding fracture risk in secondary osteoporosis, but their use is limited to adults aged ≥ 40 years and ≥ 50 years, respectively. In addition, FRAX requires adjustment in some chronic conditions, such as glucocorticoid use, type 2 diabetes, and HIV. In most conditions, evidence for antiresorptive or anabolic therapy is limited to increases in bone mass. Current osteoporosis management guidelines also neglect secondary osteoporosis and these existing evidence gaps are discussed.

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) based on cystatin C was associated with increased risk of hip and proximal humerus fractures in women and decreased risk of hip fracture in men, whereas eGFR based on creatinine was not associated with fracture risk in both sexes: The Tromsø Study

PURPOSE

Patients with end-stage kidney disease have an increased fracture risk. Whether mild to moderate reductions in kidney function is associated with increased fracture risk is uncertain. Results from previous studies may be confounded by muscle mass because of the use of creatinine-based estimates of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcre). We tested the hypothesis that lower eGFR within the normal range of kidney function based on serum cystatin C (eGFRcys) or both cystatin C and creatinine (eGFRcrecys) predict fractures better than eGFR based on creatinine (eGFRcre).

METHODS

In the Tromsø Study 1994-95, a cohort of 3016 women and 2836 men aged 50-84 years had eGFRcre, eGFRcys and eGFRcrecys estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations. Hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals) for fracture were calculated in Cox's proportional hazards models and adjusted for age, height, body mass index, bone mineral density, diastolic blood pressure, smoking, physical activity, previous fracture, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

During a median of 14.6 years follow-up, 232, 135 and 394 women and 118, 35 and 65 men suffered incident hip, proximal humerus and wrist fractures. In women, lower eGFRcre did not predict fracture, but the risk for hip and proximal humerus fracture increased per standard deviation (SD) lower eGFRcys (HRs 1.36 (1.16-1.60) and 1.33 (1.08-1.63)) and per SD lower eGFRcrecys (HRs 1.25 (1.08-1.45) and 1.30 (1.07-1.57)). In men, none of the eGFR estimates were related to increased fracture risk. In contrast, eGFRcys and eGFRcrecys were inversely associated with hip fracture risk (HRs 0.85 (0.73-0.99) and 0.82 (0.68-0.98)).

CONCLUSIONS

In women, each SD lower eGFRcys and eGFRcrecys increased the risk of hip and proximal humerus fracture by 25-36%, whereas eGFRcre did not. In men, none of the estimates of eGFR were related to increased fracture risk, and each SD lower eGFRcys and eGFRcrecys decreased the risk of hip fracture by 15-18%. The findings particularly apply to a cohort of generally healthy individuals with a normal kidney function. In future studies, the association of measured GFR using the gold standard method of iohexol clearance with fractures risk should be examined for causal inference. More clinical research is needed before robust clinical inferences can be made.

Bone health in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder: a clinical case seminar and update

The metabolic abnormalities affecting bone in the setting of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are complex with overlapping and interacting aetiologies and have challenging diagnostic and management strategies. Disturbances in calcium, phosphate, fibroblast growth factor 23, parathyroid hormone concentrations and vitamin D deficiency are commonly encountered and contribute to the clinical syndromes of bone disorders in CKD, including hyperparathyroidism, osteomalacia, osteoporosis and adynamic bone disease. Mineral and bone abnormalities may also persist or arise de novo post-renal transplantation. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes organisation describes these mineral metabolism derangements and skeletal abnormalities as 'CKD Mineral and Bone Disorder'. Patients with this disorder have an increased risk of fracture, cardiovascular events and overall increased mortality. In light of the recently updated 2017 guidelines from the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes, we present a clinical case-based discussion to highlight the complexities of investigating and managing the bone health of patients with CKD with a focus on these updates.

Gonadal Hormones in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Bone Health in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greatly increased fracture risk compared with the general population. Gonadal hormones have an important influence on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk, and hormone therapies can significantly improve these outcomes. Gonadal dysfunction is a frequent finding in patients with CKD; yet, little is known about the impact of gonadal hormones in the pathogenesis and treatment of bone health in patients with CKD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of gonadal hormones and hormone therapies on bone outcomes in men and women with CKD.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and clinical trial registries were systematically searched from inception to February 14, 2018 for studies that assessed gonadal hormones or hormone treatments with bone outcomes in patients with CKD stage 3-5D. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of search results according to inclusion criteria and assessed study quality and risk of bias using validated assessment tools.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six moderate-to-high quality observational studies showed inconsistent association between any gonadal hormone and bone outcomes, limited by significant study heterogeneity. Five moderate-high risk of bias interventional studies examined treatment with selective oestrogen receptor modulators in post-menopausal women (four using raloxifene and one bazedoxifene) and demonstrated variable effects on BMD and fracture outcomes. Meta-analysis of raloxifene treatment in post-menopausal women demonstrated improvement in lumbar spine (SMD 3.30; 95% CI 3.21-3.38) and femoral neck (SMD 3.29; 95% CI 3.21-3.36) BMD compared with placebo. Transdermal oestradiol/norethisterone in pre-menopausal women receiving dialysis (n = 1 study), demonstrated BMD improvement over 12 months. Testosterone treatment for 6 months in dialysis-dependant men (n = 1 study) did not improve BMD. There is evidence that raloxifene treatment may be beneficial in improving BMD in post-menopausal women with CKD. There is insufficient evidence for other hormone treatments in men or women. Despite high fracture rates and frequent gonadal dysfunction in patients with CKD, significant evidence gaps exist, and well-designed studies are required to specifically assess the impact of gonadal status in the pathogenesis of CKD-related bone fragility and its treatment.

Sex hormone-binding globulin is a biomarker associated with nonvertebral fracture in men on dialysis therapy

Gonadal hormones impact bone health and higher values of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) have been independently associated with fracture risk in men without chronic kidney disease. People with chronic kidney disease have a greatly increased fracture risk, and gonadal dysfunction is common in men receiving dialysis treatment. Nevertheless, in these men the effect of gonadal steroids and SHBG on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk is unknown. Here we investigate relationships between gonadal steroids, SHBG, BMD and fracture in men on long-term dialysis therapy, awaiting kidney or simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation. Results of serum biochemistry, SHBG, gonadal steroids (total testosterone, calculated free testosterone and estradiol), BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and thoracolumbar X-rays were obtained. Multivariable regression models were used to examine associations between SHBG, gonadal steroids, BMD and fracture of 321 men with a mean age of 47 years. Diabetes mellitus was present in 45% and their median dialysis vintage was 24 months. Prior fractures occurred in 42%, 18% had vertebral fracture on lateral spine X-ray, 17% had non-vertebral fragility fracture within 10 years and 7% had both. After adjustment for age, body mass index and dialysis vintage, higher SHBG levels were significantly associated with nonvertebral fractures [odds ratio 1.81 (1.30-2.53)] and remained significant after adjustment for BMD. Calculated free testosterone and estradiol values were not associated with fracture. Prevalent fracture rates were high in relatively young men on dialysis awaiting transplantation. Thus, SHBG is a novel biomarker associated with fracture, which warrants investigation in prospective studies.

The epidemiology of wrist fractures in older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study

There is limited wrist fracture information on men. Our goal was to calculate frequency and identify risk factors for wrist fracture in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study. We confirmed that fracture history and certain medications are predictors, and identified novel predictors including markers of kidney function and physical performance.

INTRODUCTION

To calculate the incidence of wrist fractures and their risk factors in older community-dwelling men from the US Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.

METHODS

Using triannual postcards, we identified incident wrist fractures (centrally confirmed by radiology) in men aged ≥ 65. Potential risk factors included the following: demographics, lifestyle, bone mineral density (BMD), selected medications, biomarkers, and physical function and performance measures. Both baseline and time-varying models were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, MrOS geographic location, and competing mortality risks.

RESULTS

We observed 97 incident wrist fractures among 5875 men followed for an average of 10.8 years. The incidence of wrist fracture was 1.6 per 1000 person-years overall and ranged from 1.0 among men aged 65-69 to 2.4 among men age ≥ 80. Significant predictors included the following: fracture history after age 50 [hazard ratio (95% CI): 2.48 (1.65, 3.73)], high serum phosphate [1.25 (1.02, 1.53)], use of selective serotonin receptor inhibitor (SSRI) [3.60 (1.96, 6.63), decreased right arm BMD [0.49 (0.37, 0.65) per SD increase], and inability to perform the grip strength test [3.38 (1.24, 9.25)]. We did not find associations with factors commonly associated with wrist and other osteoporosis fractures like falls, diabetes, calcium and vitamin D intake, and alcohol intake.

CONCLUSIONS

Among these older, community-dwelling men, we confirmed that fracture history is a strong predictor of wrist fractures in men. Medications such as SSRIs and corticosteroids also play a role in wrist fracture risk. We identified novel risk factors including kidney function and the inability to perform the grip strength test.

Association of Increased Urinary Albumin With Risk of Incident Clinical Fracture and Rate of Hip Bone Loss: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study

Prior studies suggest that increased urine albumin is associated with a heightened fracture risk in women, but results in men are unclear. We used data from Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS), a prospective cohort study of community-dwelling men aged ≥65 years, to evaluate the association of increased urine albumin with subsequent fractures and annualized rate of hip bone loss. We calculated albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) from urine collected at the 2003-2005 visit. Subsequent clinical fractures were ascertained from triannual questionnaires and centrally adjudicated by review of radiographic reports. Total hip BMD was measured by DXA at the 2003-2005 visit and again an average of 3.5 years later. We estimated risk of incident clinical fracture using Cox proportional hazards models, and annualized BMD change using ANCOVA. Of 2982 men with calculable ACR, 9.4% had ACR ≥30 mg/g (albuminuria) and 1.0% had ACR ≥300 mg/g (macroalbuminuria). During a mean of 8.7 years of follow-up, 20.0% of men had an incident clinical fracture. In multivariate-adjusted models, neither higher ACR quintile (p for trend 0.75) nor albuminuria (HR versus no albuminuria, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.20) was associated with increased risk of incident clinical fracture. Increased urine albumin had a borderline significant, multivariate-adjusted, positive association with rate of total hip bone loss when modeled in ACR quintiles (p = 0.06), but not when modeled as albuminuria versus no albuminuria. Macroalbuminuria was associated with a higher rate of annualized hip bone loss compared to no albuminuria (-1.8% more annualized loss than in men with ACR <30 mg/g; p < 0.001), but the limited prevalence of macroalbuminuria precluded reliable estimates of its fracture associations. In these community-dwelling older men, we found no association between urine albumin levels and risk of incident clinical fracture, but found a borderline significant, positive association with rate of hip bone loss. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -2 as markers of mineral bone disease in chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

In the past few years, a distinct and multifactorial clinical entity called chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) that leads to decreased bone density and osteoporosis has been identified. The aim of this study was to assess the levels of the matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -2 (MMP-1 and MMP-2) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients of various disease stages in correlation to other bone turnover markers (BTM). This study is an initial investigative approach to a possible role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the evaluation of bone disease in uremic patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 60 patients at different stages of pre-dialysis CKD, 20 patients on hemodialysis (HD), and 20 age-matched healthy controls. Serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), osteocalcin (OC), N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP), and beta-C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX), were measured by electrochemiluminescence on automatic analyzers. Serum MMP-1 and MMP-2 levels were estimated using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serum levels of urea, creatinine, calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase were estimated. Creatinine clearance (ClCr) was calculated using the traditional clearance formula based on a 24-hour urine collection.

RESULTS

Serum iPTH, OC, P1NP, β-CTX concentrations were significantly higher (p <0.0001) while ClCr was significantly lower (p <0.0001) in CKD patients, as compared with those of healthy controls. A positive correlation was established between serum MMP-1 and OC levels (r =0.245, p =0.014), as well as with serum β-CTX levels (r =0.197, p =0.048), and a negative correlation between MMP-2 and OC (r =-0.222, p =0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In CKD patients MMP-1 serum levels may reflect increased bone turnover rates. HIPPOKRATIA 2017, 21(1): 25-31.

Comorbidities, bone-sparing agent prescription history and their determinants among postmenopausal women in UK primary care settings: a retrospective database study

SUMMARY

Distinguishing oral bisphosphonates from other bone-sparing therapies, this retrospective observational study, first, characterized treated osteoporosis patients in the UK, and secondly, explored factors associated with the risk of discontinuation or switching between therapies. The latter should be considered when evaluating real-world data.

PURPOSE

This retrospective observational study evaluated the characteristics of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, including comorbidities and determinants of treatment patterns with bone-sparing agents.

METHODS

The UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink was used to identify postmenopausal women (aged ≥50 years) treated with a bone-sparing agent or diagnosed with osteoporosis between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2008. Two non-mutually-exclusive subpopulations were defined: (1) patients active in the database on 31 December 2008; (2) patients treated with a bone-sparing agent since 1 January 1993. Subpopulation 1 was used to describe patient comorbidities and osteoporosis treatment history, and subpopulation 2 was used to explore the characteristics associated with bone-sparing treatment patterns use via multivariable regression for repeated multinomial responses.

RESULTS

A total of 62,657 individuals met the inclusion criteria; subpopulation 1 comprised 38,469 women (61.4%), of whom 21,687 received a bone-sparing agent in 2008 (99.7% oral bisphosphonates and the remainder other agents). Those receiving other agents were more likely to have had previous treatment with bone-sparing agents, to have experienced previous fractures, and to have visited their doctor more frequently. Analyses also identified several comorbidities associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of bone-sparing agents, including heart disease, gastrointestinal disease, and renal failure. Anticonvulsant use was associated with a dramatic increase in the risk of switching.

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient characteristics were associated with discontinuation of, or switching between, bone-sparing treatments. Patients receiving bone-sparing medication other than oral bisphosphonates were more likely to have comorbid conditions and a history of fracture and to have taken an oral bisphosphonate previously.

The uses and abuses of Vitamin D compounds in chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disease (CKD-MBD)

Vitamin D is of paramount importance to skeletal development, integrity and health. Vitamin D homeostatis is typically deranged in a number of chronic conditions, of which chronic kidney disease is one of the most important. The use of vitamin D based therapy to target secondary hyperparathyroidism is now several decades old, and there is a large body of clinical practice, experience, guidelines and research to underpin this. However, there are many unknowns, of significant clinical relevance. Amongst which is what "species" of vitamin D we should be using, in what patient, and, under what conditions. Sadly, there has been a real dearth of randomised controlled trials, and trials with outputs of clinical relevance, which means our clinical practice has not developed and refined adequately ove the last 4 decades. This article will discuss the vexed but critical questions of which vitamin D therapies might suit which kidney patients, and will high-light the many important clinical questions which urgently require answering.

Chronic kidney disease and the skeleton

Fractures across the stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) could be due to osteoporosis, some form of renal osteodystrophy defined by specific quantitative histomorphometry or chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). CKD-MBD is a systemic disease that links disorders of mineral and bone metabolism due to CKD to either one or all of the following: abnormalities of calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone or vitamin D metabolism; abnormalities in bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth or strength; or vascular or other soft-tissue calcification. Osteoporosis, as defined by the National Institutes of Health, may coexist with renal osteodystrophy or CKD-MBD. Differentiation among these disorders is required to manage correctly the correct disorder to reduce the risk of fractures. While the World Health Organization (WHO) bone mineral density (BMD) criteria for osteoporosis can be used in patients with stages 1-3 CKD, the disorders of bone turnover become so aberrant by stages 4 and 5 CKD that neither the WHO criteria nor the occurrence of a fragility fracture can be used for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. The diagnosis of osteoporosis in stages 4 and 5 CKD is one of the exclusion-excluding either renal osteodystrophy or CKD-MBD as the cause of low BMD or fragility fractures. Differentiations among the disorders of renal osteodystrophy, CKD-MBD or osteoporosis are dependent on the measurement of specific biochemical markers, including serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and/or quantitative bone histomorphometry. Management of fractures in stages 1-3 CKD does not differ in persons with or without CKD with osteoporosis assuming that there is no evidence for CKD-MBD, clinically suspected by elevated PTH, hyperphosphatemia or fibroblast growth factor 23 due to CKD. Treatment of fractures in persons with osteoporosis and stages 4 and 5 CKD is not evidence-based, with the exception of post-hoc analysis suggesting efficacy and safety of specific osteoporosis therapies (alendronate, risedronate and denosumab) in stage 4 CKD. This review also discusses how to diagnose and manage fragility fractures across the five stages of CKD.

Inflammatory markers and risk of hip fracture in older white women: the study of osteoporotic fractures

Hip fractures are the most devastating consequence of osteoporosis and impact 1 in 6 white women leading to a two- to threefold increased mortality risk in the first year. Despite evidence of inflammatory markers in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, few studies have examined their effect on hip fracture. To determine if high levels of inflammation increase hip fracture risk and to explore mediation pathways, a case-cohort design nested in a cohort of 4709 white women from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures was used. A random sample of 1171 women was selected as the subcohort (mean age 80.1 ± 4.2 years) plus the first 300 women with incident hip fracture. Inflammatory markers interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble receptors (SR) for IL-6 (IL-6 SR) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF SR1 and TNF SR2) were measured, and participants were followed for a median (interquartile range) of 6.3 (3.7, 6.9) years. In multivariable models, the hazard ratio (HR) of hip fracture for women in the highest inflammatory marker level (quartile 4) was 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-2.48, p trend = 0.03) for IL-6 and 2.05 (95% CI, 1.35-3.12, p trend <0.01) for TNF SR1 when compared with women in the lowest level (quartile 1). Among women with 2 and 3-4 inflammatory markers in the highest quartile, the HR of hip fracture was 1.51 (95% CI, 1.07-2.14) and 1.42 (95% CI, 0.87-2.31) compared with women with zero to one marker(s) in the highest quartile (p trend = 0.03). After individually adjusting for seven potential mediators, cystatin-C (a biomarker of renal function) and bone mineral density (BMD) attenuated HRs among women with the highest inflammatory burden by 64% and 50%, respectively, suggesting a potential mediating role. Older white women with high inflammatory burden are at increased risk of hip fracture in part due to poor renal function and low BMD.

Osteoporosis update: proceedings of the 2013 Santa Fe Bone Symposium

The 2013 Santa Fe Bone Symposium included plenary sessions on new developments in the fields of osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease, oral presentations of abstracts, and faculty panel discussions of common clinical conundrums: scenarios of perplexing circumstances where treatment decisions are not clearly defined by current medical evidence and clinical practice guidelines. Controversial issues in the care of osteoporosis were reviewed and discussed by faculty and participants. This is a review of the proceedings of the Santa Fe Bone Symposium, constituting in its entirety an update of advances in the understanding of selected bone disease topics of interest and the implications for managing patients in clinical practice. Topics included the associations of diabetes and obesity with skeletal fragility, the complexities and pitfalls in assessing the benefits and potential adverse effects of nutrients for treatment of osteoporosis, uses of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry beyond measurement of bone mineral density, challenges in the care of osteoporosis in the very elderly, new findings on the role of osteocytes in regulating bone remodeling, and current concepts on the use of bone turnover markers in managing patients with chronic kidney disease who are at high risk for fracture.

Vitamin D and chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disease (CKD-MBD)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a modern day epidemic and has significant morbidity and mortality implications. Mineral and bone disorders are common in CKD and are now collectively referred to as CKD- mineral and bone disorder (MBD). These abnormalities begin to appear even in early stages of CKD and contribute to the pathogenesis of renal osteodystrophy. Alteration in vitamin D metabolism is one of the key features of CKD-MBD that has major clinical and research implications. This review focuses on biology, epidemiology and management aspects of these alterations in vitamin D metabolism as they relate to skeletal aspects of CKD-MBD in adult humans.