Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and lost cell polarity: a short path to cancer

E-cadherin loss alters cytoskeletal organization and adhesion in non-malignant breast cells but is insufficient to induce an epithelial-mesenchymal transition

BACKGROUND

E-cadherin is an adherens junction protein that forms homophilic intercellular contacts in epithelial cells while also interacting with the intracellular cytoskeletal networks. It has roles including establishment and maintenance of cell polarity, differentiation, migration and signalling in cell proliferation pathways. Its downregulation is commonly observed in epithelial tumours and is a hallmark of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT).

METHODS

To improve our understanding of how E-cadherin loss contributes to tumorigenicity, we investigated the impact of its elimination from the non-tumorigenic breast cell line MCF10A. We performed cell-based assays and whole genome RNAseq to characterize an isogenic MCF10A cell line that is devoid of CDH1 expression due to an engineered homozygous 4 bp deletion in CDH1 exon 11.

RESULTS

The E-cadherin-deficient line, MCF10A CDH1-/- showed subtle morphological changes, weaker cell-substrate adhesion, delayed migration, but retained cell-cell contact, contact growth inhibition and anchorage-dependent growth. Within the cytoskeleton, the apical microtubule network in the CDH1-deficient cells lacked the radial pattern of organization present in the MCF10A cells and F-actin formed thicker, more numerous stress fibres in the basal part of the cell. Whole genome RNAseq identified compensatory changes in the genes involved in cell-cell adhesion while genes involved in cell-substrate adhesion, notably ITGA1, COL8A1, COL4A2 and COL12A1, were significantly downregulated. Key EMT markers including CDH2, FN1, VIM and VTN were not upregulated although increased expression of proteolytic matrix metalloprotease and kallikrein genes was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our results demonstrated that E-cadherin loss alone was insufficient to induce an EMT or enhance transforming potential in the non-tumorigenic MCF10A cells but was associated with broad transcriptional changes associated with tissue remodelling.

E-cadherin loss alters cytoskeletal organization and adhesion in non-malignant breast cells but is insufficient to induce an epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Background

E-cadherin is an adherens junction protein that forms homophilic intercellular contacts in epithelial cells while also interacting with the intracellular cytoskeletal networks. It has roles including establishment and maintenance of cell polarity, differentiation, migration and signalling in cell proliferation pathways. Its downregulation is commonly observed in epithelial tumours and is a hallmark of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT).

Methods

To improve our understanding of how E-cadherin loss contributes to tumorigenicity, we investigated the impact of its elimination from the non-tumorigenic breast cell line MCF10A. We performed cell-based assays and whole genome RNAseq to characterize an isogenic MCF10A cell line that is devoid of CDH1 expression due to an engineered homozygous 4 bp deletion in CDH1 exon 11.

Results

The E-cadherin-deficient line, MCF10A CDH1-/- showed subtle morphological changes, weaker cell-substrate adhesion, delayed migration, but retained cell-cell contact, contact growth inhibition and anchorage-dependent growth. Within the cytoskeleton, the apical microtubule network in the CDH1-deficient cells lacked the radial pattern of organization present in the MCF10A cells and F-actin formed thicker, more numerous stress fibres in the basal part of the cell. Whole genome RNAseq identified compensatory changes in the genes involved in cell-cell adhesion while genes involved in cell-substrate adhesion, notably ITGA1, COL8A1, COL4A2 and COL12A1, were significantly downregulated. Key EMT markers including CDH2, FN1, VIM and VTN were not upregulated although increased expression of proteolytic matrix metalloprotease and kallikrein genes was observed.

Conclusions

Overall, our results demonstrated that E-cadherin loss alone was insufficient to induce an EMT or enhance transforming potential in the non-tumorigenic MCF10A cells but was associated with broad transcriptional changes associated with tissue remodelling.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-552) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

E-cadherin loss alters cytoskeletal organization and adhesion in non-malignant breast cells but is insufficient to induce an epithelial-mesenchymal transition

BACKGROUND

E-cadherin is an adherens junction protein that forms homophilic intercellular contacts in epithelial cells while also interacting with the intracellular cytoskeletal networks. It has roles including establishment and maintenance of cell polarity, differentiation, migration and signalling in cell proliferation pathways. Its downregulation is commonly observed in epithelial tumours and is a hallmark of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT).

METHODS

To improve our understanding of how E-cadherin loss contributes to tumorigenicity, we investigated the impact of its elimination from the non-tumorigenic breast cell line MCF10A. We performed cell-based assays and whole genome RNAseq to characterize an isogenic MCF10A cell line that is devoid of CDH1 expression due to an engineered homozygous 4 bp deletion in CDH1 exon 11.

RESULTS

The E-cadherin-deficient line, MCF10A CDH1-/- showed subtle morphological changes, weaker cell-substrate adhesion, delayed migration, but retained cell-cell contact, contact growth inhibition and anchorage-dependent growth. Within the cytoskeleton, the apical microtubule network in the CDH1-deficient cells lacked the radial pattern of organization present in the MCF10A cells and F-actin formed thicker, more numerous stress fibres in the basal part of the cell. Whole genome RNAseq identified compensatory changes in the genes involved in cell-cell adhesion while genes involved in cell-substrate adhesion, notably ITGA1, COL8A1, COL4A2 and COL12A1, were significantly downregulated. Key EMT markers including CDH2, FN1, VIM and VTN were not upregulated although increased expression of proteolytic matrix metalloprotease and kallikrein genes was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our results demonstrated that E-cadherin loss alone was insufficient to induce an EMT or enhance transforming potential in the non-tumorigenic MCF10A cells but was associated with broad transcriptional changes associated with tissue remodelling.

E-cadherin alterations in hereditary disorders with emphasis on hereditary diffuse gastric cancer

The only gastric cancer (GC) syndrome with a proven inherited defect is designated as hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) and is caused by germline E-cadherin/CDH1 alterations. Other E-cadherin-associated hereditary disorders have been identified, encompassing HDGC families with or without cleft-lip/palate involvement, isolated early-onset diffuse GCs, and lobular breast cancer families without GC. To date, 141 probands harboring more than 100 different germline CDH1 alterations, mainly point mutations and large deletions, have been described in these different settings. A third of all HDGC families described so far carry recurrent CDH1 alterations. Full screening of CDH1 is recommended in patients fulfilling the HDGC criteria and total prophylactic gastrectomy is the only reliable intervention for carriers of pathogenic alterations. In this chapter, we discuss CDH1-associated syndromes, frequency and type of CDH1 germline alterations, clinical criteria, and guidelines for genetic counseling, molecular pathology, and available animal/cell line models of the disease.

Cell origin and premalignant lesions of gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma: a histopathologic study

AIM: To investigate the cell origin and premalignant lesions of gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC).

METHODS: A total of 42 cases of early gastric SRCC were included in this study. The histological morphology of gastric SRCC was observed. Differentiation markers MUC5AC and MUC6 were labeled by immunohistochemical double-staining of gastric SRCC tissue. The expression of Ki-67 and gastrointestinal stem/progenitor cell marker musashi-1 in SRCC was detected by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, the immunophenotype of gastric glands adjacent to carcinoma was also detected.

RESULTS: Early gastric SRCC was characterized by a two-layered structure consisting of superficial layer and basal layer. The superficial layer contained typical large signet-ring cells that possessed abundant cytoplasm, whereas the basal layer was composed of small-sized primitive cancer cells with a high nucleus/cytoplasm ratio. Cells in the basal layer shared common morphologic features and a similar anatomic location with those in the proliferative zone of gastric glands. These cells were negative for both MUC5AC and MUC6, or merely exhibited a weak MUC5AC expression. Compared with the superficial layer, the percentages of Ki-67- and musashi-1-positive cells were significantly higher in the basal layer (t = 31.0 and 22.8, respectively, both P < 0.01). Cells in the basal layer could differentiate into typical signet-ring cells, which resembles the differentiation process of proliferitive zone cells into gastric pit cells. Dysplasia of the proliferative zone of gastric glands adjacent to SRCC was noted, and dysplastic cells in the proliferative zone were phenotypically consistent with cancer cells in the basal layer.

CONCLUSION: Gastric SRCC may originate from MUC5AC-/lowMUC6- pre-pit cells in the proliferative zone of gastric glands. Dysplasia of the proliferative zone may represent the premalignant lesions of gastric SRCC.

Nature meets nurture: molecular genetics of gastric cancer

The immensity of genes and molecules implicated in gastric carcinogenesis is overwhelming and the relevant importance of some of these molecules is too often unclear. This review serves to bring us up-to-date with the latest findings as well as to look at the larger picture in terms of how to tackle the problem of solving this multi-piece puzzle. In this review, the environmental nurturing of intestinal cancer is discussed, beginning with epidemiology (known causative factors for inducing molecular change), an update of H. pylori research, including the role of inflammation and stem cells in premalignant lesions. The role of E-cadherin in the nature (genotype) of diffuse gastric cancer is highlighted, and finally the ever growing discipline of SNP analysis (including IL1B) is discussed.

Nature meets nurture: molecular genetics of gastric cancer

The immensity of genes and molecules implicated in gastric carcinogenesis is overwhelming and the relevant importance of some of these molecules is too often unclear. This review serves to bring us up-to-date with the latest findings as well as to look at the larger picture in terms of how to tackle the problem of solving this multi-piece puzzle. In this review, the environmental nurturing of intestinal cancer is discussed, beginning with epidemiology (known causative factors for inducing molecular change), an update of H. pylori research, including the role of inflammation and stem cells in premalignant lesions. The role of E-cadherin in the nature (genotype) of diffuse gastric cancer is highlighted, and finally the ever growing discipline of SNP analysis (including IL1B) is discussed.

Quantification of epigenetic and genetic 2nd hits in CDH1 during hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome progression

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) families carry CDH1 heterozygous germline mutations; their tumors acquire complete CDH1 inactivation through "2nd-hit" mechanisms. Most frequently, this occurs via promoter hypermethylation (epigenetic modification), and less frequently via CDH1 mutations and loss of heterozygosity (LOH). We quantified the different 2nd hits in CDH1 occurring in neoplastic lesions from HDGC patients.

METHODS

Samples were collected from 16 primary tumors and 12 metastases from 17 patients among 15 HDGC families; CDH1 mutations, LOH, and promoter hypermethylation were analyzed. E-cadherin protein expression and localization were determined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Somatic CDH1 epigenetic and genetic alterations were detected in lesions from 80% of HDGC families and in 75% of all lesions analyzed (21/28). Of the 28 neoplastic lesions analyzed, promoter hypermethylation was found in 32.1%, LOH in 25%, both alterations in 17.9%, and no alterations in 25%. Half of the CDH1 2nd hits in primary tumors were epigenetic modifications, whereas a significantly greater percentage of 2nd hits in metastases were LOH (58.3%; P = .0274). Different neoplastic lesions from the same patient frequently displayed distinct 2nd-hit mechanisms. Different 2nd-hit mechanisms were also detected in the same tumor sample.

CONCLUSION

The 2nd hit in CDH1 frequently occurs via epigenetic changes in HDGC primary tumors and LOH in metastases. Because of the concomitance and heterogeneity of these alterations in neoplastic lesions and the plasticity of hypermethylated promoters during tumor initiation and progression, drugs targeting only epigenetic alterations might not be effective, particularly in patients with metastatic HDGC.