Clinical and pharmacogenetic studies of iloperidone

Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: Focus on antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialised tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalise drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging.

METHODS

In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 45 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)).

RESULTS

Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings.

CONCLUSION

All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimise treatment effects, minimise side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalised drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.

Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers

Why does the usual dose of medication work for a person while another individual cannot give the expected response to the same drug? On the other hand, how come half of the usual dose of an analgesic relieves an individual’s pain immediately, as another man continue to suffer even after taking double dose? Although a treatment method has been successfully used in majority of the population for many years, why does the same therapy cause serious side effects in another region of the world? Most presently approved therapies are not effective in all patients. For example, 20-40% of patients with depression respond poorly or not at all to antidepressant drug therapy. Many patients are resistant to the effects of antiasthmatics and antiulcer drugs or drug treatment of hyperlipidemia and many other diseases. The reason for all those is basically interindividual differences in genomic structures of people, which are explained in this chapter in terms of the systems and the most frequently used drugs in clinical treatment.

Iloperidone: A new drug for the treatment of schizophrenia

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomics, clinical efficacy, and safety and tolerability profile of iloperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Iloperidone is an atypical antipsychotic that recently received marketing approval from the Food and Drug Administration for the acute treatment of schizophrenia. Iloperidone is a pure antagonist and the first antipsychotic to have pharmacogenomic studies indicate predictive response based on six identified polymorphisms. Pharmacokinetic studies have determined that iloperidone is well absorbed orally, with a bioavailability of 96%. Phase II and III clinical trials have shown iloperidone to improve symptoms of schizophrenia, based on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scores (p < 0.05). Iloperidone has established tolerability at recommended dosages of up to 24 mg daily; however, the dosage must be slowly increased over seven days, and twice-daily administration is required to avoid orthostatic hypotension. The most common adverse effects associated with iloperidone were dizziness, dry mouth, fatigue, nasal congestion, orthostatic hypotension, somnolence, tachycardia, and weight gain. Safety studies have also found that iloperidone increases the risk of Q-Tc interval prolongation, similar to that seen with ziprasidone. Minimal changes in glucose and lipid abnormalities were seen in short-term (4- and 6-week) and long-term (52-week) studies, indicating a low chance of metabolic disturbance with iloperidone.

CONCLUSION

Iloperidone may be a viable and safe option for the treatment of schizophrenia in adult patients, especially for patients who cannot tolerate other antipsychotic agents. However, iloperidone lacks a clear benefit over other antipsychotic agents.

New atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia: iloperidone

The optimal treatment of schizophrenia poses a challenge to develop more effective treatments and safer drugs, to overcome poor compliance, discontinuation and frequent switching with available antipsychotics. Iloperidone is a new dopamine type 2/serotonin type 2A (D(2)/5-HT(2A)) antagonist structurally related to risperidone, expected to give better efficacy with less extrapyramidal symptoms than D(2) receptor antagonist antipsychotics. In double-blind phase III trials iloperidone reduced the symptoms of schizophrenia at oral doses from 12 to 24 mg. It was more effective than placebo in reducing positive and negative syndrome total score and Brief Psychiatric Rating scale scores; it was as effective as haloperidol and risperidone in post-hoc analysis. Its long-term efficacy was equivalent to that of haloperidol. The most common adverse events were dizziness, dry mouth, dyspepsia and somnolence, with few extrapyramidal symptoms and metabolic changes in short- and long-term studies in adults. Akathisia was rare, but prolongation of the corrected QT (QTc) interval was comparable to haloperidol and ziprasidone, which is of particular concern. Further comparative studies are needed to clarify the benefit/risk profile of iloperidone and its role in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Pharmacogenomics: the promise of personalized medicine for CNS disorders

This review focuses first on the concept of pharmacogenomics and its related concepts (biomarkers and personalized prescription). Next, the first generation of five DNA pharmacogenomic tests used in the clinical practice of psychiatry is briefly reviewed. Then the possible involvement of these pharmacogenomic tests in the exploration of early clinical proof of mechanism is described by using two of the tests and one example from the pharmaceutical industry (iloperidone clinical trials). The initial attempts to use other microarray tests (measuring RNA expression) as peripheral biomarkers for CNS disorders are briefly described. Then the challenge of taking pharmacogenomic tests (compared to drugs) into clinical practice is explained by focusing on regulatory oversight, the methodological/scientific issues concerning diagnostic tests, and cost-effectiveness issues. Current information on medicine-based evidence and cost-effectiveness usually focuses on average patients and not the outliers who are most likely to benefit from personalized prescription. Finally, future research directions are suggested. The future of 'personalized prescription' in psychiatry requires consideration of pharmacogenomic testing and environmental and personal variables that influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug response for each individual drug used by each patient.