Special considerations in the treatment of pregnancy rhinitis

[Features of the sinusitis course in pregnant women]

The purpose of the work was to study the sinusitis diagnostic and clinical features in pregnant women. The pregnant women group (27 human) with sinusitis from 816 pregnant women with nasal congestion and/or nasal discharge was analyzed. The examination included: taking anamnesis, ENT examining, clinical blood test. The frequency of sinusitis in pregnant women with complaints of nasal congestion and/or nasal discharge is 4.7%. The development of sinusitis was associated with inadequate treatment of chronic rhinitis during pregnancy in a third of cases. The course of sinusitis was characterized by the absence of intoxication and fever, in 78% of cases - by the absence of facial pain. In 74% of cases, the onset of the disease was erased. In pregnant women with sinusitis, in comparison with pregnant women with manifestations of chronic rhinitis, had a significant increase in ESR and a tendency to an increase of neutrophils. CONCLUSION: The development of sinusitis in pregnant women in a third of cases is due to the ineffective treatment of chronic rhinitis, and the erased clinical picture of the disease suggests the need for a thorough assessment of the anamnestic and clinical symptoms of the disease.

Pregnancy rhinitis in Turkish women: Do gestational week, BMI and parity affect nasal congestion?

Objective:

To determine the cumulative incidence of pregnancy rhinitis along with prevalence in different trimesters and to find out whether gestational age, BMI and parity have any effect on pregnancy related nasal congestion.

Methods:

In the prospective protocol at the obstetrics outpatient clinic, 167 pregnant women were enrolled consecutively. According to exclusion criteria, 67 of them were excluded. Visual-Analogue-Scale (VAS), Nasal-Obstructive-Symptom-Evaluation (NOSE) scale and Discharge-Inflammation-Polyps/Oedema (DIP) scoring were utilized for diagnosis of pregnancy rhinitis. Besides, weight, length, age, parity and week of pregnancy were recorded.

Results:

Total prevalence of pregnancy rhinitis was 17.17% and cumulative incidence was 38.89%. Our study revealed significant relation of NOSE score with both gestational week (r=0.474, p=0.001) and BMI (r=0.301, p=0.003). VAS score was significantly related with gestational week (r=0.409, p=0.001) and BMI (r=0.270, p=0.007). DIP score was found to be correlated only with gestational week (r=0.375, p=0.001).

Conclusion:

Cumulative incidence of pregnancy rhinitis was 38.89%. Nasal congestion was significantly associated with BMI and gestational week. Patients should be informed about unfavorable fetal and maternal outcomes of pregnancy related nasal congestion which is triggered by obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy.

Rhinitis and pregnancy: literature review

Introduction

There is a controversy concerning the terminology and definition of rhinitis in pregnancy. Gestational rhinitis is a relatively common condition, which has drawn increasing interest in recent years due to a possible association with maternal obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and unfavorable fetal outcomes.

Objective

To review the current knowledge on gestacional rhinitis, and to assess its evidence.

Methods

Structured literature search.

Results

Gestational rhinitis and rhinitis “during pregnancy” are somewhat similar conditions regarding their physiopathology and treatment, but differ regarding definition and prognosis. Hormonal changes have a presumed etiological role, but knowledge about the physiopathology of gestational rhinitis is still lacking. Management of rhinitis during pregnancy focuses on the minimal intervention required for symptom relief.

Conclusion

As it has a great impact on maternal quality of life, both the otorhinolaryngologist and the obstetrician must be careful concerning the early diagnosis and treatment of gestational rhinitis, considering the safety of treatment measures and drugs and their current level of evidence.

Commentary on gender differences in prevalence, treatment, and quality of life of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

Objective:

To examine the existing evidence on gender differences in the prevalence, treatment, and quality of life of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

Methods:

Review of the literature and expert opinion.

Results:

From a sociologic standpoint, women have historically been considered more likely to report symptoms, seek medical care, and give poorer self-evaluation of health, which may bias data toward increased prevalence and a greater effect of CRS on quality of life in women. However, the influence of gender seems to be restricted primarily to the evaluation of general quality of life, whereas the disease-specific health-related quality of life is not different between genders. Furthermore, migraine headaches, which are more common among women, may be misdiagnosed as CRS, which contributes to gender differences in the prevalence of CRS. The degree to which reported differences in prevalence and health utilization represent biologic or physiologic differences between genders is not known; however, differences in anatomic size, tobacco susceptibility, and hormonal factors have been speculated to increase the overall susceptibility to CRS in women compared with men.

Conclusions:

Focused research that examines the effect of gender on the development, treatment, and outcomes of CRS is warranted.

The effects of pregnancy on nasal physiology

BACKGROUND

Nasal congestion that is not present before pregnancy represents a distinct clinical entity called pregnancy rhinitis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics of nasal physiology over the course of pregnancy.

METHODS

The study was conducted with 85 pregnant women and 26 nonpregnant controls. We measured nasal airway patency objectively via acoustic rhinometry (ARM) and anterior rhinomanometry (RMM) and subjectively via the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale in each trimester and compared the results to those of the controls.

RESULTS

The NOSE scores of control and pregnant women showed no difference (p = 0.866). Minimal cross-sectional area (MCA1; minimal cross sectional area at nasal valve and MCA2; minimal cross sectional area at the level where the head of inferior turbinate is placed) decreased significantly between the first and third trimesters: first trimester 0.37 cm(2), third trimester 0.31 cm(2). There was no difference between each trimester with regard to total nasal resistance. The correlation analysis between the NOSE score and both total volume and MCA1 in all patients showed no significance (r = -0.10, p = 0.318; r = -0.04, p = 0.654, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy affects nasal physiology adversely and impairs nasal breathing in some women. However, based on the findings of this study, we concluded that this clinical entity may not be considered as a disease without complementary symptoms despite the presence of objective changes in nasal parameters.