Cardiac myosin-binding protein C: how a novel biomarker could transform chest pain triage

Differences in Cardiac Troponin T Composition in Myocardial Infarction and End-Stage Renal Disease Patients: A Blood Tube Effect?

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) is key in diagnosing myocardial infarction (MI) but is also elevated in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Specific larger cTnT proteoforms were identified for the acute phase of MI, while in serum of ESRD patients solely small cTnT fragments were found. However, others allocated this to a pre-analytic effect due to abundant thrombin generation in serum. Therefore, we investigated the effect of various anticoagulation methods on cTnT composition and concentration and compared the cTnT composition of MI and ESRD patients.

METHODS

The agreement of cTnT concentrations between simultaneously collected serum, lithium-heparin (LH) plasma, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma was studied using the high-sensitivity (hs-)cTnT immunoassay. cTnT proteoform composition was investigated in a standardized time-dependent manner through spike experiments and in simultaneously collected blood matrixes of MI and ESRD patients.

RESULTS

Excellent hs-cTnT concentration agreements were observed across all blood matrixes (slopes > 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.04). Time-dependent degradation (40 kDa intact:29 kDa fragment:15 to 18 kDa fragments) was found in LH plasma and EDTA plasma, and serum in ratios (%) of 90:10:0, 0:5:95, and 0:0:100, respectively (48 h after blood collection). Moreover, gel filtration chromatography (GFC) profiles illustrated mainly larger cTnT proteoforms in MI patients, while in ESRD patients mainly 15 to 18 kDa fragments were found for all matrices.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of cTnT degradation in vitro is dependent on the (anti)coagulation method, without impacting hs-cTnT concentrations. Furthermore, mainly larger cTnT proteoforms were present in MI patients, while in ESRD patients mainly small 15 to 18 kDa cTnT fragments were found. These insights are essential when developing a novel hs-cTnT assay targeting larger cTnT proteoforms.

Anthracyclines and Biomarkers of Myocardial Injury: The Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning

Background

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has been beneficial in laboratory studies of anthracycline cardiotoxicity, but its effects in patients is not established.

Objectives

The authors studied the effect of RIC on cardiac biomarkers and function during and after anthracycline chemotherapy.

Methods

The ERIC-Onc study (Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in Oncology Patients; NCT02471885) was a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled study of RIC at each chemotherapy cycle. The primary endpoint was troponin T (TnT) during chemotherapy and up to 1 year. Secondary outcomes included cardiac function, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and MACE or cancer death. Cardiac myosin-binding-protein C (cMyC) was investigated in parallel with TnT.

Results

The study was prematurely halted after the evaluation of 55 patients (RIC n = 28, sham n = 27). Biomarkers increased from baseline to cycle 6 of chemotherapy for all patients (median TnT 6 [IQR: 4-9] ng/L to 33 [IQR: 16-36)] ng/L; P ≤ 0.001; cMyC 3 (IQR: 2-5) ng/L to 47 (IQR: 18-49) ng/L; P ≤ 0.001). Mixed-effects regression analysis for repeated measures showed no difference in TnT between the 2 groups (RIC vs sham, mean difference 3.15 ng/L; 95% CI: -0.04 to 6.33; P = 0.053), or cMyC (RIC vs sham, mean difference 4.17 ng/L; 95% CI: -0.12 to 8.45; P = 0.056). There were more MACE and cancer deaths in the RIC group (11 vs 3; HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.07-0.90; P = 0.034), with more cancer deaths (8 vs 1; HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.04-0.95; P = 0.043) at 1 year.

Conclusions

TnT and cMyC significantly increased during anthracycline chemotherapy with 81% having a TnT ≥14 ng/L at cycle 6. RIC did not affect the rise in biomarkers, but there was a small increase in early cancer deaths, possibly related to the greater proportion of patients with metastatic disease randomized to the RIC group (54%vs 37%). (Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in Oncology Patients [ERIC-ONC]; NCT02471885).

Traditional and novel diagnostic biomarkers for acute myocardial infarction

Background

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of death worldwide. The first hours of acute myocardial infarction are correlated with the highest risk of death. Therefore, early diagnosis of the infarction seriously affects the efficacy of the treatment administered to the patient. Misdiagnosing patients with chest pain often leads to inappropriate admission of them as acute myocardial infarction patients. The physical examination of the patient, the electrocardiogram, and the assessment of cardiac biomarkers all play an important role in the early diagnosis of acute ischemia, along with the patient's medical history.

Main body

The present review highlights a number of different biomarkers that are released and elevated in blood during an acute myocardial infarction.

Conclusions

Analysis of cardiac biomarkers has become the first-line diagnostic tool used in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Novel markers of acute myocardial infarction, when added to routinely used markers, can provide added value not only in the earlier detection of acute myocardial infarction but also in monitoring the clinical progress of the disease, predicting its consequences, evaluating its prognosis, detecting recurrence, and managing its treatment. This leads to a lower mortality rate associated with acute myocardial infarction.

cMyC, IMA, S100, and MicroRNAs can serve as markers of early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, whereas myeloperoxidase, sCD40L, PAPPA, and TNF-α can be used to monitor the clinical progress of the disease. In addition, H-FABP, GDF-15, F2 isoprostanes, and ST2 can serve as predictors of AMI complications and mortality. Copeptin, ST2, and SIRT can be useful as prognostic markers of acute myocardial infarction.

Emerging Biomarkers in Acute Coronary Syndromes - A Pathophysiologic Perspective

Diagnosis and prognostication in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is achieved using a combination of clinical factors and biomarkers, notably cardiac troponin and B type natriuretic peptide and its N terminal fragment NT-proBNP. However, there are numerous biomarkers that have been shown to be associated with ACS, with variable incremental utility. This brief review focusses on some promising emerging biomarkers in ACS, discussed according to pathophysiologic mechanism, as well as diagnostic and prognostic utility.

The Biomarkers for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure

The use of a large number of cardiovascular biomarkers, meant to complement the use of the electrocardiogram, echocardiography cardiac imaging, and clinical symptom assessment, has become a routine in clinical diagnosis, differential diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognosis and guides the management of patients with suspected cardiovascular diseases. There is a broad consensus that cardiac troponin and natriuretic peptides are the preferred biomarkers in clinical practice for the diagnosis of the acute coronary syndrome and heart failure, respectively, while the roles and possible clinical applications of several other potential biomarkers are still under study. This review mainly focuses on the recent studies of the roles and clinical applications of troponin and natriuretic peptides, which seem to be the best-validated markers in distinguishing and predicting the future cardiac events of patients with suspected cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, the review briefly discusses some of the large number of potential markers that may play a more prominent role in the future.