Circulating pentraxin-3 levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis

Dysregulated endothelial cell markers in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on endothelial cell (EC) markers that are involved and dysregulated in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in relation to disease activity, as EC dysregulation plays a major role in the development of premature atherosclerosis in SLE.

METHODS

Search terms were entered into Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were 1) studies published after 2000 reporting measurements of EC markers in serum and/or plasma of SLE patients (diagnosed according to ACR/SLICC criteria), 2) English language peer reviewed articles, and 3) disease activity measurement. For meta-analysis calculations, the Meta-Essentials tool by Erasmus Research Institute and of Management (ERIM) was used. Only those EC markers, which were 1) reported in at least two articles and 2) reported a correlation coefficient (i.e. Spearman's rank or Pearson's) between the measured levels of the EC marker and disease activity were included. For meta-analyses, a fixed effect model was used.

RESULTS

From 2133 hits, 123 eligible articles were selected. The identified SLE-related endothelial markers were involved in EC activation, EC apoptosis, disturbed angiogenesis, defective vascular tone control, immune dysregulation and coagulopathy. Meta-analyses of primarily cross-sectional studies showed significant associations between marker levels and disease activity for the following endothelial markers: Pentraxin-3, Thrombomodulin, VEGF, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, IP-10 and MCP-1. Dysregulated EC markers without associations with disease activity were: Angiopoeitin-2, vWF, P-Selectin, TWEAK and E-Selectin.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a complete literature overview for dysregulated EC markers in SLE comprising a wide range of different EC functions. SLE-induced EC marker dysregulation was seen with, but also without, association with disease activity. This study provides some clarity in the eminent complex field of EC markers as biomarkers for SLE. Longitudinal data on EC markers in SLE are now needed to guide us more in unravelling the pathophysiology of premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events in SLE patients.

Pentraxin 3 is more accurate than C-reactive protein for Takayasu arteritis activity assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

Whether the circulating levels of pentraxin 3 (PTX3), an acute phase reactant (APR), are higher in active Takayasu arteritis (TAK), and if so, whether PTX3 is more accurate than C-reactive protein (CRP) in TAK activity assessment has been investigated in this study.

Study design

Research works such as PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and two Chinese literature databases (CNKI and WanFang) were searched for studies conducted till August 30th, 2019. Two investigators searched the studies independently, who evaluated the quality of the study using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) and extracted data. Pooled standard mean difference (SMD) and diagnostic indexes, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated using a random-effect model.

Results

Totally, 8 studies involving 473 TAK (208 active and 265 inactive TAK) patients and 252 healthy controls were eventually included in the meta-analysis. PTX3 level in the blood in active TAK patients were found to be higher than that in dormant TAK with pooled SMD of 0.761 (95% CI = 0.38–1.14, p<0.0001; I² = 68%, p of Q test = 0.003). And there was no publication bias. Among the 8 studies, 5 studies identified active TAK with both PTX3 and CRP. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of PTX3 in active TAK diagnosis were higher than those of CRP (0.78 [95% CI = 0.65–0.87] vs. 0.66 [95% CI = 0.53–0.77], p = 0.012; 0.85 [95% CI = 0.77–0.90] vs. 0.77 [95% CI = 0.56–0.90], p = 0.033; 0.88 [95% CI = 0.85–0.90] vs. 0.75 [95% CI = 0.71–0.79], p < 0.0001). It showed potential publication bias using Egger’s test (p of PTX3 = 0.031 and p of CRP = 0.047).

Conclusions

PTX3 might be better than CRP in the assessment of TAK activity. Yet, it should be cautious before clinical use for moderate heterogeneity and potential publication bias of the meta-analysis.