1
|
Turkmen Koc SN, Rezaei Benam S, Aral IP, Shahbazi R, Ulubayram K. Gold nanoparticles-mediated photothermal and photodynamic therapies for cancer. Int J Pharm 2024; 655:124057. [PMID: 38552752 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Cancer remains one of the major causes of death globally, with one out of every six deaths attributed to the disease. The impact of cancer is felt on psychological, physical, and financial levels, affecting individuals, communities, and healthcare institutions. Conventional cancer treatments have many challenges and inadequacies. Nanomedicine, however, presents a promising solution by not only overcoming these problems but also offering the advantage of combined therapy for treatment-resistant cancers. Nanoparticles specifically engineered for use in nanomedicine can be efficiently targeted to cancer cells through a combination of active and passive techniques, leading to superior tumor-specific accumulation, enhanced drug availability, and reduced systemic toxicity. Among various nanoparticle formulations designed for cancer treatment, gold nanoparticles have gained prominence in the field of nanomedicine due to their photothermal, photodynamic, and immunologic effects without the need for photosensitizers or immunotherapeutic agents. To date, there is no comprehensive literature review that focuses on the photothermal, photodynamic, and immunologic effects of gold nanoparticles. In this review, significant attention has been devoted to examining the parameters pertaining to the structure of gold nanoparticles and laser characteristics, which play a crucial role in influencing the efficacy of photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Moreover, this article provides insights into the success of PTT and PDT mediated by gold nanoparticles in primary cancer treatment, as well as the immunological effects of PTT and PDT on metastasis and recurrence, providing a promising strategy for cancer therapy. In summary, gold nanoparticles, with their unique properties, have the potential for clinical application in various cancer therapies, including the treatment of primary cancer, recurrence and metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyma Nur Turkmen Koc
- Department of Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Sanam Rezaei Benam
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Ipek Pınar Aral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Reza Shahbazi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA; Tumor Microenvironment & Metastasis, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA; Brown Center for Immunotherapy, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
| | - Kezban Ulubayram
- Department of Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye; Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye; Department of Bioengineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kulkarni-Dwivedi N, Patel PR, Shravage BV, Umrani RD, Paknikar KM, Jadhav SH. Hyperthermia and doxorubicin release by Fol-LSMO nanoparticles induce apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer cells. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2022; 17:1929-1949. [PMID: 36645007 DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2022-0171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Studies on the anticancer effects of lanthanum strontium manganese oxide (LSMO) nanoparticles (NPs)-mediated hyperthermia at cellular and molecular levels are scarce. Materials & methods: LSMO NPs conjugated with folic acid (Fol-LSMO NPs) were synthesized, followed by doxorubicin-loading (DoxFol-LSMO NPs), and their effects on breast cancer cells were investigated. Results: Hyperthermia (45°C) and combination treatments exhibited the highest (∼95%) anticancer activity with increased oxidative stress. The involvement of intrinsic mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway and induction of autophagy was noted. Cellular and molecular evidence confirmed the crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy, involving Beclin1, Bcl2 and Caspase-3 genes with free reactive oxygen species presence. Conclusion: The study confirmed hyperthermia and doxorubicin release by Fol-LSMO NPs induces apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Kulkarni-Dwivedi
- Nanobioscience Group, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, 411004, Maharashtra, India.,Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, 411007, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pratikshkumar R Patel
- Polymer Science & Engineering, CSIR - National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, 411008, Maharashtra, India.,Academy of Scientific & Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, 201002, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Bhupendra V Shravage
- Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, 411007, Maharashtra, India.,Developmental Biology Group, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, 411004, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rinku D Umrani
- LJ Institute of Pharmacy, LJ University, LJ Campus, Ahmedabad, 382210, Gujarat, India
| | - Kishore M Paknikar
- Nanobioscience Group, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, 411004, Maharashtra, India.,Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, Mumbai, 400076, India
| | - Sachin H Jadhav
- Nanobioscience Group, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, 411004, Maharashtra, India.,Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, 411007, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The Effect of Hyperthermia and Radiotherapy Sequence on Cancer Cell Death and the Immune Phenotype of Breast Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092050. [PMID: 35565180 PMCID: PMC9103710 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hyperthermia (HT) is a cancer treatment which locally heats the tumor to supraphysiological temperature, and it is an effective sensitizer for radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. HT is further capable of modulating the immune system. Thus, a better understanding of its effect on the immune phenotype of tumor cells, and particularly when combined with RT, would help to optimize combined anti-cancer treatments. Since in clinics, no standards about the sequence of RT and HT exist, we analyzed whether this differently affects the cell death and immunological phenotype of human breast cancer cells. We revealed that the sequence of HT and RT does not strongly matter from the immunological point of view, however, when HT is combined with RT, it changes the immunophenotype of breast cancer cells and also upregulates immune suppressive immune checkpoint molecules. Thus, the additional application of immune checkpoint inhibitors with RT and HT should be beneficial in clinics. Abstract Hyperthermia (HT) is an accepted treatment for recurrent breast cancer which locally heats the tumor to 39–44 °C, and it is a very potent sensitizer for radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. However, currently little is known about how HT with a distinct temperature, and particularly, how the sequence of HT and RT changes the immune phenotype of breast cancer cells. Therefore, human MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells were treated with HT of different temperatures (39, 41 and 44 °C), alone and in combination with RT (2 × 5 Gy) in different sequences, with either RT or HT first, followed by the other. Tumor cell death forms and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules (ICMs) were analyzed by multicolor flow cytometry. Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) were differentiated and co-cultured with the treated cancer cells. In both cell lines, RT was the main stressor for cell death induction, with apoptosis being the prominent cell death form in MCF-7 cells and both apoptosis and necrosis in MDA-MB-231 cells. Here, the sequence of the combined treatments, either RT or HT, did not have a significant impact on the final outcome. The expression of all of the three examined immune suppressive ICMs, namely PD-L1, PD-L2 and HVEM, was significantly increased on MCF-7 cells 120 h after the treatment of RT with HT of any temperature. Of special interest for MDA-MB-231 cells is that only combinations of RT with HT of both 41 and 44 °C induced a significantly increased expression of PD-L2 at all examined time points (24, 48, 72, and 120 h). Generally, high dynamics of ICM expression can be observed after combined RT and HT treatments. There was no significant difference between the different sequences of treatments (either HT + RT or RT + HT) in case of the upregulation of ICMs. Furthermore, the co-culture of moDCs with tumor cells of any treatment had no impact on the expression of activation markers. We conclude that the sequence of HT and RT does not strongly affect the immune phenotype of breast cancer cells. However, when HT is combined with RT, it results in an increased expression of distinct immune suppressive ICMs that should be considered by including immune checkpoint inhibitors in multimodal tumor treatments with RT and HT. Further, combined RT and HT affects the immune system in the effector phase rather than in the priming phase.
Collapse
|
4
|
IJff M, van Bochove GGW, Whitton D, Winiarczyk R, Honhoff C, Rodermond H, Crezee J, Stalpers LJA, Franken NAP, Oei AL. PARP1-Inhibition Sensitizes Cervical Cancer Cell Lines for Chemoradiation and Thermoradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092092. [PMID: 33926008 PMCID: PMC8123631 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Five-year survival rates from patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) are between 40% and 60%. These patients are usually treated with chemoradiation or radiotherapy in combination with hyperthermia (thermoradiation). The aim of our study was to enhance chemoradiation or thermoradiation by adding PARP1-inhibition to these conventional therapies. To study this, different cervical cancer cell lines were used to measure cell reproductive death and analyze DNA double strand breaks and cell death. By looking into the surviving fractions and DNA double strand breaks, our results suggest that PARP1-i sensitizes cervical cancer cells for the conventional therapies. The results of the live cell imaging suggest that effects are solely additive. Abstract Radiotherapy plus cisplatin (chemoradiation) is standard treatment for women with locoregionally advanced cervical cancer. Both radiotherapy and cisplatin induce DNA single and double-strand breaks (SSBs and DSBs). These double-strand breaks can be repaired via two major DNA repair pathways: Classical Non-Homologous End-Joining (cNHEJ) and Homologous Recombination. Besides inducing DNA breaks, cisplatin also disrupts the cNHEJ pathway. Patients contra-indicated for cisplatin are treated with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia (thermoradiation). Hyperthermia inhibits the HR pathway. The aim of our study is to enhance chemoradiation or thermoradiation by adding PARP1-inhibition, which disrupts both the SSB repair and the Alternative NHEJ DSB repair pathway. This was studied in cervical cancer cell lines (SiHa, HeLa, C33A and CaSki) treated with hyperthermia (42 °C) ± ionizing radiation (2–6 Gy) ± cisplatin (0.3–0.5 µM) ± PARP1-inhibitor (olaparib, 4.0–5.0 µM). Clonogenic assays were performed to measure cell reproductive death. DSBs were analyzed by γ-H2AX staining and cell death by live cell imaging. Both chemoradiation and thermoradiation resulted in lower survival fractions and increased unrepaired DSBs when combined with a PARP1-inhibitor. A quadruple modality, including ionizing radiation, hyperthermia, cisplatin and PARP1-i, was not more effective than either triple modality. However, both chemoradiation and thermoradiation benefit significantly from additional treatment with PARP1-i.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes IJff
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.I.); (G.G.W.v.B.); (D.W.); (R.W.); (C.H.); (H.R.); (L.J.A.S.); (N.A.P.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Gregor G. W. van Bochove
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.I.); (G.G.W.v.B.); (D.W.); (R.W.); (C.H.); (H.R.); (L.J.A.S.); (N.A.P.F.)
| | - Denise Whitton
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.I.); (G.G.W.v.B.); (D.W.); (R.W.); (C.H.); (H.R.); (L.J.A.S.); (N.A.P.F.)
| | - Roy Winiarczyk
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.I.); (G.G.W.v.B.); (D.W.); (R.W.); (C.H.); (H.R.); (L.J.A.S.); (N.A.P.F.)
| | - Celina Honhoff
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.I.); (G.G.W.v.B.); (D.W.); (R.W.); (C.H.); (H.R.); (L.J.A.S.); (N.A.P.F.)
| | - Hans Rodermond
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.I.); (G.G.W.v.B.); (D.W.); (R.W.); (C.H.); (H.R.); (L.J.A.S.); (N.A.P.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Johannes Crezee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Lukas J. A. Stalpers
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.I.); (G.G.W.v.B.); (D.W.); (R.W.); (C.H.); (H.R.); (L.J.A.S.); (N.A.P.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Nicolaas A. P. Franken
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.I.); (G.G.W.v.B.); (D.W.); (R.W.); (C.H.); (H.R.); (L.J.A.S.); (N.A.P.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Arlene L. Oei
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.I.); (G.G.W.v.B.); (D.W.); (R.W.); (C.H.); (H.R.); (L.J.A.S.); (N.A.P.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-205-663-641
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moradi S, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Ghassemi F, Sheibani S, Asadi Amoli F. Increasing the efficiency of the retinoblastoma brachytherapy protocol with ultrasonic hyperthermia and gold nanoparticles: a rabbit model. Int J Radiat Biol 2020; 96:1614-1627. [PMID: 33074061 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1838657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study purposed to evaluate the efficacy of brachytherapy with the modality of ultrasonic hyperthermia in the presence of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) on an ocular retinoblastoma tumor in an animal model of the rabbit. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retinoblastoma tumor was induced by the injection of the human cell line of Y79 in rabbit eyes (n = 41). After two weeks, tumor size reached a diameter of about 5-7 mm. Seven groups were involved: control, GNPs injection, hyperthermia, hyperthermia with GNPs injection, brachytherapy with I-125, a combination of hyperthermia and brachytherapy, and a combination of brachytherapy, hyperthermia and, GNPs. The tumor area was measured using B-mode ultrasound images on the zero-day and at the end of the third week. The groups were evaluated for a histopathological study of tumor necrosis. RESULTS There was a significant difference between the relative area changes of tumor in the combination group with the other study groups (p < .05). The results of histopathologic studies confirmed the necrosis of living retinoblastoma cells. CONCLUSION Combination therapy of brachytherapy and hyperthermia with GNPs reduces the relative size of the tumor. This method increases the necrosis percentage of retinoblastoma and significantly reduces the retinoblastoma mass in the rabbit eyes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Somayeh Moradi
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Medical Physics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Manijhe Mokhtari-Dizaji
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Medical Physics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fariba Ghassemi
- Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahab Sheibani
- Radiation Application Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Asadi Amoli
- Department of Pathology, Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spałek MJ, Kozak K, Czarnecka AM, Bartnik E, Borkowska A, Rutkowski P. Neoadjuvant Treatment Options in Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082061. [PMID: 32722580 PMCID: PMC7464514 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the heterogeneity of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), the choice of the proper perioperative treatment regimen is challenging. Neoadjuvant therapy has attracted increasing attention due to several advantages, particularly in patients with locally advanced disease. The number of available neoadjuvant modalities is growing continuously. We may consider radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiosensitizers, hyperthermia, and their combinations. This review discusses possible neoadjuvant treatment options in STS with an emphasis on available evidence, indications for each treatment type, and related risks. Finally, we summarize current recommendations of the STS neoadjuvant therapy response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Jacek Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.M.C.); (A.B.); (P.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-22-546-24-55
| | - Katarzyna Kozak
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.M.C.); (A.B.); (P.R.)
| | - Anna Małgorzata Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.M.C.); (A.B.); (P.R.)
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ewa Bartnik
- Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland;
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aneta Borkowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.M.C.); (A.B.); (P.R.)
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (K.K.); (A.M.C.); (A.B.); (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Notter M, Thomsen AR, Nitsche M, Hermann RM, Wolff HA, Habl G, Münch K, Grosu AL, Vaupel P. Combined wIRA-Hyperthermia and Hypofractionated Re-Irradiation in the Treatment of Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Therapeutic Outcome Based on a Novel Size Classification. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12030606. [PMID: 32155740 PMCID: PMC7139693 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Effective tumor control in patients suffering from unresectable locally recurrent breast cancer (LRBC) in pre-irradiated areas can be achieved by re-irradiation combined with superficial hyperthermia. Using this combined modality, total re-irradiation dose and toxicity can be significantly reduced compared to conventionally fractionated treatment schedules with total doses of 60–66 Gy. Applying contact-free, thermography-controlled water-filtered infrared-A superficial hyperthermia, immediately followed by hypofractionated re-irradiation, consisting of 4 Gy once per week up to a total dose of 20 Gy, resulted in high overall response rates even in large-sized tumors. Comparability of clinical data between different combined Hyperthermia (HT)/Radiotherapy (RT) treatment schedules is impeded by the highly individual characteristics of this disease. Tumor size, ranging from microscopic disease and small lesions to large-sized cancer en cuirasse, is described as one of the most important prognostic factors. However, in clinical studies and analyses of LRBC, tumor size has so far been reported in a very heterogeneous way. Therefore, we suggest a novel, simple and feasible size classification (rClasses 0–IV). Applying this classification for the evaluation of 201 patients with pre-irradiated LRBC allowed for a stratification into distinct prognostic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Notter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lindenhofspital Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (M.N.); (K.M.)
| | - Andreas R. Thomsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (A.R.T.); (A.-L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mirko Nitsche
- Center for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology Bremen and Westerstede, 28239 Bremen, Germany; (M.N.); (R.M.H.)
| | - Robert M. Hermann
- Center for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology Bremen and Westerstede, 28239 Bremen, Germany; (M.N.); (R.M.H.)
| | - Hendrik A. Wolff
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Radiology Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (H.A.W.); (G.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Gregor Habl
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Radiology Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (H.A.W.); (G.H.)
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Karin Münch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lindenhofspital Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (M.N.); (K.M.)
| | - Anca-L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (A.R.T.); (A.-L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Vaupel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (A.R.T.); (A.-L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-171-124-0073
| |
Collapse
|