1
|
di Pietro M, Trudgill NJ, Vasileiou M, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Phillips AW, Gossage J, Kaye PV, Foley KG, Crosby T, Nelson S, Griffiths H, Rahman M, Ritchie G, Crisp A, Deed S, Primrose JN. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on monitoring and management of Barrett's oesophagus and stage I oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut 2024; 73:897-909. [PMID: 38553042 PMCID: PMC11103346 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Barrett's oesophagus is the only known precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with very poor prognosis. The main risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus are a history of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux symptoms and obesity. Men, smokers and those with a family history are also at increased risk. Progression from Barrett's oesophagus to cancer occurs via an intermediate stage, known as dysplasia. However, dysplasia and early cancer usually develop without any clinical signs, often in individuals whose symptoms are well controlled by acid suppressant medications; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is recommended to allow for early diagnosis and timely clinical intervention. Individuals with Barrett's oesophagus need to be fully informed about the implications of this diagnosis and the benefits and risks of monitoring strategies. Pharmacological treatments are recommended for control of symptoms, but not for chemoprevention. Dysplasia and stage 1 oesophageal adenocarcinoma have excellent prognoses, since they can be cured with endoscopic or surgical therapies. Endoscopic resection is the most accurate staging technique for early Barrett's-related oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic ablation is effective and indicated to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus in patients with dysplasia. Future research should focus on improved accuracy for dysplasia detection via new technologies and providing more robust evidence to support pathways for follow-up and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nigel J Trudgill
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, West Bromwich, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
- Department of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Alexander W Phillips
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - James Gossage
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Philip V Kaye
- Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kieran G Foley
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
| | - Tom Crosby
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sophie Nelson
- Kenmore Medical Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Muksitur Rahman
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Gill Ritchie
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Amy Crisp
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Stephen Deed
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - John N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nuijten M, Dainelli L, Rasouli B, Araujo Torres K, Perugini M, Marczewska A. A Meal Replacement Program for the Treatment of Obesity: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the Swiss Payer's Perspective. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2021; 14:3147-3160. [PMID: 34267531 PMCID: PMC8275158 DOI: 10.2147/dmso.s284855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is a disease associated with high direct medical costs and high indirect costs resulting from productivity loss. The high prevalence of obesity generates the need for payers to identify cost-effective weight loss approaches. Among various weight management techniques, the OPTI (Optifast®) program is a clinically recognised total meal replacement diet that can lead to significant weight loss and reduction in complications. This study's objective is to assess OPTI program's cost-effectiveness in Switzerland in comparison to "no intervention" and pharmacotherapy. METHODS An event-driven decision-analytic model was used to estimate the payer's cost savings through the reimbursement of OPTI program over a 1-year period as well as a lifetime in Switzerland. The analysis was performed on a broad population of people with obesity with a body mass index (BMI) higher than 30 kg/m2 following the OPTI program vs two comparators (liraglutide and "no intervention"). The model incorporated a higher risk of complications due to an increased BMI and their related healthcare costs. Data sources included published literature, clinical trials, official Swiss price/tariff lists and national population statistics. The primary perspective was that of a Swiss payer. Scenario analyses - for example, for patients with existing complications (such as myocardial infarction, stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus) or severe obesity - were conducted to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS The OPTI program results in cost savings of CHF 20,886 (€ 18,724) and CHF 15,382 (€ 13,790) per person compared with "no intervention" and liraglutide 3 mg, respectively. In addition, OPTI program led to 1.133 and 0.734 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained respectively against its comparators. Scenario analyses showed similar outcomes with cost savings and QALYs gained. CONCLUSION OPTI program is a dominant strategy compared to "no intervention" and liraglutide 3 mg as it leads to both cost savings and QALY gain. Therefore, reimbursing the OPTI program for patients with obesity would be cost-effective for Swiss payers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Nuijten
- Health Economics and Valuation, A2M, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Livia Dainelli
- Global Market Access & Pricing, Nestlé Health Science, Vevey, Switzerland
| | - Bahareh Rasouli
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Moreno Perugini
- Commercial and Medical Affairs, Pharmaceuticals, Nestlé Health Science, Bridgewater, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
McGoran JJ, Ragunath K. Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: Western perspective of current status and future prospects. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:720-729. [PMID: 32790886 DOI: 10.1111/den.13812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma and current practice is to establish endoscopic surveillance once diagnosed, in order to identify early dysplasia and neoplasia that has the potential to undergo endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Before embarking upon EET the clinical team has a duty to consider all viable options and come to a plan based on recent evidence. The therapeutic approach varies greatly but largely adheres to the mantra of 'Detect-Resect-Ablate', in which high-quality endoscopy identifies BE associated pathology, associated lesions (if present) undergo safe endoscopic resection and remaining intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus is ablated to prevent recurrence of dysplasia. In this review, current practice, pitfalls, complications, and the future perspectives on practice in this field are discussed. The Western perspective is focused on here, with an outline of the differences in clinical practice with Asian nations and attempts to bridge these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J McGoran
- Department of Digestive Diseases, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Krish Ragunath
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,Curtin University Medical School, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rubenstein JH, Inadomi JM. Cost-Effectiveness of Screening, Surveillance, and Endoscopic Eradication Therapies for Managing the Burden of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2021; 31:77-90. [PMID: 33213801 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The authors conducted a review of the literature of cost-effectiveness analyses regarding management of Barrett's esophagus, including screening, surveillance, and treatment strategies. Because of the presence of multiple systematic reviews on this topic, they chose to focus on more recent economic analyses, with an emphasis on comparative modeling because these analyses have been demonstrated to achieve greater validity and impact when there are multiple competing strategies that are clinically reasonable to pursue. The authors identified areas of consensus across studies regarding management strategies and also areas that require additional empirical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel H Rubenstein
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John M Inadomi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, Suite 4C104, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Katzka D, Bergman JJGHM. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia and/or Early Cancer: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:760-769. [PMID: 31730766 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
DESCRIPTION The purpose of this best practice advice article is to describe the role of Barrett's endoscopic therapy (BET) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and/or early cancer and appropriate follow-up of these patients. METHODS The best practice advice provided in this document is based on evidence and relevant publications reviewed by the committee. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: In BE patients with confirmed low-grade dysplasia, a repeat examination with high-definition white-light endoscopy should be performed within 3-6 months to rule out the presence of a visible lesion, which should prompt endoscopic resection. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Both BET and continued surveillance are reasonable options for the management of BE patients with confirmed and persistent low-grade dysplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: BET is the preferred treatment for BE patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: BET should be preferred over esophagectomy for BE patients with intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1a). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: BET is a reasonable alternative to esophagectomy in patients with submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1b) with low-risk features (<500-μm invasion in the submucosa [sm1], good to moderate differentiation, and no lymphatic invasion) especially in those who are poor surgical candidates. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: In all patients undergoing BET, mucosal ablation should be applied to 1) all visible esophageal columnar mucosa; 2) 5-10 mm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction and 3) 5-10 mm distal to the gastroesophageal junction, as demarcated by the top of the gastric folds (ie, gastric cardia) using focal ablation in a circumferential fashion. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Mucosal ablation therapy should only be performed in the presence of flat BE without signs of inflammation and in the absence of visible abnormalities. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: BET should be performed by experts in high-volume centers that perform a minimum of 10 new cases annually. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: BET should be continued until there is an absence of columnar epithelium in the tubular esophagus on high-definition white-light endoscopy and preferably optical chromoendoscopy. In case of complete endoscopic eradication, the neosquamous mucosa and the gastric cardia are sampled by 4-quadrant biopsies. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: If random biopsies obtained from the neosquamous epithelium demonstrate intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia or subsquamous intestinal metaplasia, a repeat endoscopy should be performed and visible islands or tongues should undergo targeted focal ablation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia (without residual columnar epithelium in the tubular esophagus) should not warrant additional ablation therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: When consenting patients for BET, the most common complication of therapy to be quoted is post-procedural stricture formation, occurring in about 6% of cases. Bleeding and perforation occur at rates <1%. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: After complete eradication (endoscopic and histologic) of intestinal metaplasia has been achieved with BET, surveillance endoscopy with biopsies should be performed at the following intervals: for baseline diagnosis of HGD/esophageal adenocarcinoma: at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter; and baseline diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia: at 1 and 3 years. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Endoscopic surveillance post therapy should be performed with high-definition white-light endoscopy, including careful inspection of the neosquamous mucosal and retroflexed inspection of the gastric cardia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 15: The approach to recurrent disease is similar to that of the initial therapy; visible recurrent nodular lesions require endoscopic resection, whereas flat areas of columnar mucosa in the tubular esophagus can be treated with mucosal ablation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 16: Patients should be counseled on cancer risk in the absence of BET, as well as after BET, to allow for informed decision-making between the patient and the physician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prateek Sharma
- University of Kansas School of Medicine Center, Kansas City, Kansas; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pollit V, Graham D, Leonard C, Filby A, McMaster J, Mealing SJ, Lovat LB, Haidry RJ. A cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic eradication therapy for management of dysplasia arising in patients with Barrett's oesophagus in the United Kingdom. Curr Med Res Opin 2019; 35:805-815. [PMID: 30479169 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1552407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is the first line approach for treating Barrett's oesophagus (BE) related neoplasia globally. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) recommend EET with combined endoscopic resection (ER) for visible dysplasia followed by endoscopic ablation in patients with both low and high grade dysplasia (LGD and HGD). The aim of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis for EET for treatment of all grades of dysplasia in BE patients. METHODS A Markov cohort model with a lifetime time horizon was used to undertake a cost-effectiveness analysis. A hypothetical cohort of UK patients diagnosed with BE entered the model. Patients in the treatment arm with LGD and HGD received EET and patients with non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) received endoscopic surveillance only. In the comparator arm, patients with LGD, HGD and NDBE received endoscopic surveillance only. A UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective was adopted and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on key input parameters. RESULTS EET for patients with LGD and HGD arising in BE is cost-effective compared to endoscopic surveillance alone (lifetime ICER £3006 per quality adjusted life year [QALY] gained). The results show that, as the time horizon increases, the treatment becomes more cost-effective. The 5 year financial impact to the UK NHS of introducing EET is £7.1m. CONCLUSIONS EET for patients with low and high grade BE dysplasia, following updated guidelines from the BSG, has been shown to be cost-effective for patients with BE in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Pollit
- a York Health Economics Consortium , York , United Kingdom
| | - David Graham
- b Department of Gastroenterology , University College London Hospital , United Kingdom
- c Division of Surgery and Science , University College London Hospital , United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Laurence B Lovat
- b Department of Gastroenterology , University College London Hospital , United Kingdom
- c Division of Surgery and Science , University College London Hospital , United Kingdom
| | - Rehan J Haidry
- b Department of Gastroenterology , University College London Hospital , United Kingdom
- c Division of Surgery and Science , University College London Hospital , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|