Safety and efficacy of GP40061 compared with originator insulin glargine (Lantus®): a randomized open-label clinical trial

Immunogenicity, Efficacy, and Safety of Biosimilar Insulin Glargine (Gan & Lee Glargine) Compared With Originator Insulin Glargine (Lantus) in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes After 26 Weeks Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To compare the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of Gan & Lee insulin glargine (GL Glargine) with that of the originator insulin glargine (Lantus) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label, equivalence study. Five hundred seventy-six subjects with T1DM were randomized 1:1 to receive either GL Glargine or Lantus treatment for 26 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects in each treatment group who developed treatment-induced anti-insulin antibody after baseline and up to visit week 26, which was evaluated using a country-adjusted logistic regression model. The study also compared the changes in glycated hemoglobin, and adverse events including hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

The percentage of subjects positive for treatment-induced anti-insulin antibody by Week 26 was 25.8% in the GL Glargine treatment group and 25.3% in the Lantus treatment group, with a 90% confidence interval (-5.4, 6.5) of the difference in proportions that fell completely between the similarity margins (-11.3, 11.3). The least squares mean difference between treatment groups for changes in glycated hemoglobin was -0.08 (90% confidence interval: -0.23, 0.06), and the other immunogenicity and safety profiles were comparable.

CONCLUSION

GL Glargine demonstrated similar immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety compared to Lantus over 26 weeks in patients with T1DM.

Evolution of insulin therapy in the light of innovative technologies of the 21^st century

The advent of insulin biosimilars has ushered in a new era in the treatment of diabetes mellitus, promising increased accessibility and affordability of this life-saving medication. This comprehensive review explores the evolving landscape of insulin biosimilars, focusing on their therapeutic equivalence, regulatory considerations, and clinical implications. Biosimilars are biological drugs produced using innovative technologies that replicate the structure and action of the reference drug in a very close way and are not inferior in effectiveness and other characteristics to the original, but are more affordable in pricing. Assessing their therapeutic equivalence requires a multifaceted approach including physicochemical and biological characterization, preclinical studies, and performance testing. The introduction of biosimilar drugs into clinical practice is gradually gaining importance for global health, especially in the treatment of oncological, autoimmune, endocrine diseases and, in particular, diabetes. The process of their registration and introduction into patient treatment practice has already been standardized in developed countries, international documents necessary for implementation have been issued, and convincing and clear confirmation of the positive results obtained during preclinical and clinical studies proving the bioequivalence and interchangeability of the biosimilar and the reference drug is required. The clinical implications of insulin biosimilars are of paramount importance, impacting patient outcomes, healthcare costs, and overall diabetes management. This review synthesizes existing evidence on the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilars, providing insights into their potential role in diabetes therapy. Insulin biosimilars represent a promising avenue for expanding access to insulin therapy while addressing the economic burden of diabetes care. This review underscores the importance of continued research, robust regulatory oversight, and informed clinical decision-making to maximize the benefits of insulin biosimilars for patients and healthcare systems worldwide.

Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To ascertain the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity from existing evidence via conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials between biosimilar and originator insulins.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrails.gov were searched to identify head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compare the efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulin and its originator. Efficacy was assessed by change of HbA1C, fasting plasma glucose (laboratory or self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)), and change all mean of 7 points- or 8 points- SMBG. Safety was assessed by change in proportion hypoglycemia and serious hypoglycemia. The occurrence of anti-insulin antibodies (AIAs) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs with 6188 patients from different countries were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and were expressed as the mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). In efficacy, Insulin biosimilar products showed similar in change of HbA1C at weeks 26 and 52, the MD were 0.03 (95% CI - 0.02 to 0.07, p = 0.28), and 0.05 (95% CI - 0.05 to 0.15, p = 0.36), respectively. The proportion of HbA1C less than 7% at endpoint, the OR were 1.04 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.20, p = 0.64). The change of fasting plasma glucose (laboratory or SMBG) mmol/L in 24-52 weeks and change all mean of 7 points-/8 points- SMBG mmol/L in 24-52 weeks, the MD were 0.02 (95% CI - 0.20 to 0.24, p = 0.87) and - 0.34 (95% CI - 1.35 to 0.67, p = 0.51), respectively. In occurrence of hypoglycemia (≥ 1 events) and severe hypoglycemia, the OR were 0.96 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.09, p = 0.52) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.31, p = 0.62). The AIA was 1.02 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.16, p = 0.76). Analysis stratified by type of diabetes and duration of insulin. There was no significant difference between the biosimilar and their reference group in a different type of diabetes and different duration of insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin biosimilar showed comparable characteristics with the reference drug in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, through comprehensive and specific conventional meta-analysis.