Type I collagen matrix plus polyhexamethylene biguanide antimicrobial for the treatment of cutaneous wounds

Insights into the mechanisms of diabetic wounds: pathophysiology, molecular targets, and treatment strategies through conventional and alternative therapies

Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent cause of mortality worldwide and can lead to several secondary issues, including DWs, which are caused by hyperglycemia, diabetic neuropathy, anemia, and ischemia. Roughly 15% of diabetic patient's experience complications related to DWs, with 25% at risk of lower limb amputations. A conventional management protocol is currently used for treating diabetic foot syndrome, which involves therapy using various substances, such as bFGF, pDGF, VEGF, EGF, IGF-I, TGF-β, skin substitutes, cytokine stimulators, cytokine inhibitors, MMPs inhibitors, gene and stem cell therapies, ECM, and angiogenesis stimulators. The protocol also includes wound cleaning, laser therapy, antibiotics, skin substitutes, HOTC therapy, and removing dead tissue. It has been observed that treatment with numerous plants and their active constituents, including Globularia Arabica, Rhus coriaria L., Neolamarckia cadamba, Olea europaea, Salvia kronenburgii, Moringa oleifera, Syzygium aromaticum, Combretum molle, and Myrtus communis, has been found to promote wound healing, reduce inflammation, stimulate angiogenesis, and cytokines production, increase growth factors production, promote keratinocyte production, and encourage fibroblast proliferation. These therapies may also reduce the need for amputations. However, there is still limited information on how to prevent and manage DWs, and further research is needed to fully understand the role of alternative treatments in managing complications of DWs. The conventional management protocol for treating diabetic foot syndrome can be expensive and may cause adverse side effects. Alternative therapies, such as medicinal plants and green synthesis of nano-formulations, may provide efficient and affordable treatments for DWs.

Diabetic Wound: Pathophysiology, Complications and Treatment Strategies

Diabetic wound healing is expected to affect 25% of all diabetics, resulting in less severe external factors, economic costs, and less trauma. Topical formulations have been continually improved to achieve a range of amazing properties and have had a significant impact on the management of diabetic wounds. Topical insulin has become one of the most attractive and convenient wound healing techniques due to its excellent biocompatibility, water retention, and therapeutic properties. Multiple versatile topical insulins have been identified and have shown promise over the past few years as they greatly facilitate the management of diabetic wounds as we understand their etiology. The physiological wound healing process repairs damaged tissue and restores skin integrity. For about a century, insulin, a powerful healing agent, and it has been utilized in several clinical and experimental researches research studies to accelerate the healing of various injuries.

Updates on Recent Clinical Assessment of Commercial Chronic Wound Care Products

Impaired wound healing after trauma, disorders, and surgeries impact millions of people globally every year. Dysregulation in orchestrated healing mechanisms and underlying medical complications make chronic wound management extremely challenging. Besides standard-of-care treatments including broad spectrum antibiotics and wound-debridement, novel adjuvant therapies are clinically tested and commercialized. These include topical agents, skin substitutes, growth factor delivery, and stem cell therapies. With a goal to overcome factors playing pivotal role in delayed wound healing, researchers are exploring novel approaches to elicit desirable healing outcomes in chronic wounds. Although recent innovations in wound care products, therapies, and devices are extensively reviewed in past, a comprehensive review summarizing their clinical outcomes is surprisingly lacking. Herein, this work reviews the commercially available wound care products and their performance in clinical trials to provide a statistically comprehensive understanding of their safety and efficacy. The performance and suitability of various commercial wound care platforms, including xenogeneic and allogenic products, wound care devices, and novel biomaterials, are discussed for chronic wounds. The current clinical evaluation will provide a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of the most-recent approaches and will enable researchers and healthcare providers to develop next-generation technologies for chronic wound management.

Surgical Reconstruction of Stage 3 and 4 Pressure Injuries: A Literature Review and Proposed Algorithm from an Interprofessional Working Group

OBJECTIVE

Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries (PIs) present an enormous societal burden with no clearly defined interventions for surgical reconstruction. The authors sought to assess, via literature review and a reflection/evaluation of their own clinical practice experience (where applicable), the current limitations to the surgical intervention of stage 3 or 4 PIs and propose an algorithm for surgical reconstruction.

METHODS

An interprofessional working group convened to review and assess the scientific literature and propose an algorithm for clinical practice. Data compiled from the literature and a comparison of institutional management were used to develop an algorithm for the surgical reconstruction of stage 3 and 4 PIs with adjunctive use of negative-pressure wound therapy and bioscaffolds.

RESULTS

Surgical reconstruction of PI has relatively high complication rates. The use of negative-pressure wound therapy as adjunctive therapy is beneficial and widespread, leading to reduced dressing change frequency. The evidence for the use of bioscaffolds both in standard wound care and as an adjunct to surgical reconstruction of PI is limited. The proposed algorithm aims to reduce complications typically seen with this patient cohort and improve patient outcomes from surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The working group has proposed a surgical algorithm for stage 3 and 4 PI reconstruction. The algorithm will be validated and refined through additional clinical research.

The Promising Hydrogel Candidates for Preclinically Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Significance: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) causes high amputation rates owing to its aberrant wound healing. Traditional dressings cannot effectively contribute to DFU healing. Functional hydrogels have been proposed as a promising novel dressing to treat DFU in future, but the evidence for various hydrogels to heal DFU is still ambiguous. Recent Advances: In accordance with PRISMA and CONSORT guidelines, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of functional hydrogels. Four electronic databases and one website were used for data searching. Twenty-four animal studies and six clinical trials met the inclusion criteria with a total of 399 diabetic murine models and 278 patients with DFU. Critical Issues: Functional hydrogels accelerated the healing progress for DFU and relieved symptoms in patients. According to their characteristics, the functional hydrogels were divided into antioxidant hydrogel (AOH), antibacterial hydrogel (ABH), multifunctional hydrogel (MFH), proangiogenic hydrogel, and hydrogel promoting proliferation (PPH). By network meta-analysis, AOH and MFH were considered the premium options for treating wounds of diabetic patients at whole stage. Future Direction: Functional hydrogels effectively accelerate healing rates in wounds of diabetic animals. Hydrogels of AOH and MFH might become the ideal candidates for clinical trials on DFU treatment, based on the meta-analyses from the reported work. Early treatment with AOH followed a week later with ABH, which might become an advanced strategy for DFU in future. This information is very important for researchers or/and physicians in taking consideration for alternate application of hydrogel dressings. Scope and Significance: The treatment of DFU imposes a huge burden on medical workers. If DFU is not treated properly, patients will have to suffer from amputation and from spiritual agony. Although various topical dressings have been designated for DFU, the healing ability of those dressings is still unknown well. In this review and meta-analysis, we quantitatively evaluated the reported outcomes of functional hydrogels, pure scaffolds, and controls in 2-week interval. Healing ability of various kinds of functional hydrogels was also assessed in different stages of wound, aiming to screen promising candidates for DFU treatment. This information is valuable in designing smart dressings for researchers or/and physicians in future. Translational Relevance: Considering many external factors like formation of bacterial film and internal factors like hyperglycemia, the progress during DFU healing could involve many biochemical aspects. Persistent inflammation, oxidation stress, and impaired angiogenesis lead to prolonged wound healing and even lethal outcomes. Thus, improvement of topical conditions and inhibition of adverse factors will lead to the alleviated morbidity and even mortality. Clinical Relevance: DFU brings about great burden on patients and medical staffs because of high morbidity and poor prognosis. Improper and powerless treatment might induce high rates of amputation and mortality. Functional hydrogels, mimicking extracellular matrices, would provide the tissue with suitable media and functions to promote DFU healing. The application of various types of hydrogels could be a promising solution to heal DFU and reduce adverse events and costs.

Diabetic Wound-Healing Science

Diabetes mellitus is an increasingly prevalent chronic metabolic disease characterized by prolonged hyperglycemia that leads to long-term health consequences. It is estimated that impaired healing of diabetic wounds affects approximately 25% of all patients with diabetes mellitus, often resulting in lower limb amputation, with subsequent high economic and psychosocial costs. The hyperglycemic environment promotes the formation of biofilms and makes diabetic wounds difficult to treat. In this review, we present updates regarding recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of diabetic wounds focusing on impaired angiogenesis, neuropathy, sub-optimal chronic inflammatory response, barrier disruption, and subsequent polymicrobial infection, followed by current and future treatment strategies designed to tackle the various pathologies associated with diabetic wounds. Given the alarming increase in the prevalence of diabetes, and subsequently diabetic wounds, it is imperative that future treatment strategies target multiple causes of impaired healing in diabetic wounds.